Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T14:27:17.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ronald Inden, Text and Practice: Essays on South Asian History. With an introduction by Daud Ali. SOAS Studies on South Asia. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006. vi + 372 pp. ISBN: 0-19-566895-2 (hbk.).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2010

Jahnavi Phalkey
Affiliation:
Georgia institute of Technology

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 See Bauer, Jerome and Cohen, Richard, ‘Historical Notes: Insight into the Origin of “South Asia Regional Studies” at the University of Pennsylvania’, South Asia News (Autumn 1991), 14Google Scholar. Quoted in Dirks, Nicholas B., ‘South Asian Studies: Futures Past’, UCIAS, ‘The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines’, Vol. 3, Article 9, (2003), 2Google Scholar. I have drawn extensively upon this article, and therefore necessarily Dirk's perspective, for an overview of the historiography of South Asia in North America. There most certainly exist other takes on this history. For an overview see Elder, Joseph W., Dimock, Edward C. Jr., and Embree, Ainslee, eds, India's Worlds and US Scholars. 1947–1997 (New Delhi: Manohar, 1998).Google Scholar

2 See Dirks, , ‘South Asian Studies’, 23.Google Scholar

3 See Inden, Ronald, Imagining India (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar

4 See Quigley, Declan, ‘Review of R. Inden (1990) Imagining India’, Modern Asian Studies 25/2 (1991), 403406Google Scholar; and Kopf, David, ‘Review of R. Inden (1990) Imagining India’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 112/4 (1992), 674677.Google Scholar