Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2010
The study of Islam and Muslims in relation to local non-Muslim population and their religious beliefs and social practices in medieval India has often tended to be conducted eventually along two lines, seemingly opposed to each other. On the one hand, there are communal historians who have reduced the history of medieval India into the conflict between Hindus and Muslims, which they have projected as having resulted from their divergent religious outlooks. The period was Islamic in their view, and the state a conversion machinery and an organ to bring Hindus under the hegemony of Islam. This was a mission in which the state could not succeed fully, largely because of ‘Hindu’ resistance. On the other hand, there are a large number of ‘liberal’ historians to whom the hallmark of medieval Indian society has been an amity between the two communities, the various tensions and encounters over economic and political matters notwithstanding. The medieval period, in the opinion of such historians, saw the evolution and efflorescence of a composite culture to which medieval rulers, nobles, sufis and Persian and Urdu poets contributed significantly. The later animosity between Hindus and Muslims and clashes over religious matters, they argued, were the handiwork of the British.
1 Sijizi, Amir Hasan, Fawaid-ul-Fuad (Nawal Kishore) 13–14, 68 and 147Google Scholar; Kwurd, Amir, Siyar-ul-Auliya (Delhi 1302 AH/1884–1885) 38–39Google Scholar and 46.
2 The statement is attributed to Shaikh Sharf-ud-Din Yahya Maneri, an eminent fourteenth-century sufi of Bihar. Compare Nimatullah, Maulana, Ganj-i Layakhfa (Patna MS) 34–35Google Scholar.
3 Fawaid-ul-Fuad, 137, 158–159; Nizami, K.A. ed., Khair-ul-Majalis (Aligarh 1959) 65, 66 and 150; cf. alsoGoogle ScholarNizami, K.A., Some Aspects of Religion and Politics in India during the Thirteenth Century (reprint; Delhi 1974) 178–179Google Scholar in particular for the significance and meanings of circulation of zanbil and chilla-i makus (inverted chilla).
4 Kizvi, S. A. A., History of Sufism in India I (Delhi 1978)335Google Scholar.
5 Rizvi, S.A.A. and Zaidi, Sailesh eds., Alakhbani or Rushd-Nama (Aligarh 1971)Google Scholar.
6 Surur-us-Sudur (Habibganj Collection, Aligarh) 69, 74, 302; Baba Farid's compositions are also believed to have been incorporated by the fifth Sikh Guru Arjan in 1604 in the Guru Granth Saheb. For some other dohas cf. Maktubat-i Muzaffar Shams Balkhi (Patna MS) f. 141b, 193a; cf. also Patna University Journal 12 (1958)Google Scholar for their English translations.
7 Badaoni, Abd-ul Qadir, Muntakhab-ut-Tawarikh I, 230Google Scholar; for an analysis of Chandayan cf. Chandra, S., Social Life and Concepts in Medieval Hindi Bhakti Poetry (Delhi 1983) 21–32Google Scholar.
8 Gupta, Mataprasad, Prakasham, Pramanik eds., Chandayan (Agra 1967) Nos. 164Google Scholar and 320; Chandra, , Social Life and Concepts, 30–31;Google Scholar cf. also Chandayan, Nos. 7, 9 and 14 where Mulla Daud calls the first four caliphs as ‘Pandits’ who spread (to the Muslims) their Vedas and Puranas, thus equating the brahmanical scriptures with the holy Quran and hadis. Again, he says that after being initiated by his Shaikh into the path of dharma, he washed his sins by bathing in the Ganga.
9 For some comments on these sufi poets of Hindavi cf. Rashid, A., Society and Culture in Medieval India 1206–1556 (Calcutta 1969)Google Scholar.
10 Bilgrami, Mir Abd-ul-Wahid, Haqaiq-i Hindi (Aligarh MS); Hindi tr. by S.A.A. Rizvi (Banaras 1957)Google Scholar.
11 Sharif, Jafar, Qanun-i-Islam. English tr. by Herklots, G.A. (reprint; London 1972) 195–196,Google Scholar 289–292, 295–296; Ahmad, Aziz, An Intellectual History of Islam in India (Edinburgh 1969) 44–45Google Scholar.
12 Cf. Rizvi, , History of Sufism I, 322–396Google Scholar for abundance of details in this respect. Rizvi discusses Sankara's advaita, Ramanuja's visishtadvaita, Nimbarkar's dvaitadvaita and Chaitanya's achinta-bhedabheda and shows similarities between these and Wahdat-ul-wujud.
13 Ek Niranjan Alha mera, Hindu Turak duhu nahin nera, Kahai Kabir chetahu re bhaundu, Belan Hara Turakna Hindu.
14 For a different view cf. Aziz Ahmad, Studies in Islamic Culture in the Indian Environment (reprint; Karachi 1970) 144–145.
15 Nizami, K.A., ‘Some Religious and Cultural Trends of the Tughluq Period’ and also ‘A Medieval Indian Madrasah’, in: Nizami, K.A., Studies in Medieval Indian History and Culture (Allahabad 1966) 54–64Google Scholar and 73–79.
16 Mujeeb, M., Indian Muslims (London 1966) 272–276,Google Scholar for such an attempt by Shaikh Abd-ul-Wahhab Muttaqi, Ali Muttaqi and Shaikh Husam-ud-Din.
17 While Shaikh Abd-ul-Wahhab and other ulama discouraged the teaching of the ‘heresy’ of Ibn-al-Arabi (d. 1248), the famous Hispanic propounder of the doctrine of wahdat-ul-wujud Shaikh Nizam-ud-Din of Amethi (d. 1517), a Chishti saint, snatched Ibn al-Arabi's well-known book on the theme, Eusus-ul-Hikam from the hand of the son of a sufi and gave him another book. The Shaikh wanted his disciples to limit their readings only to the orthodox sufic treatises, compare Mujeeb, , Indian Muslims, 274–275 and 306–307Google Scholar.
18 For an assessment of some of these stories cf. Habib, Muhammad, ‘Chishti Mystic Records of the Sultanate Period’ in: Nizami, K.A. ed., Politics and Society during the Early Medieval Period (Delhi 1974) 385–433.Google Scholar It is not unlikely that these legend gained wider currency in the fifteenth-sixteenth centuries in the face of increasingly effective resistance to the authority of the Sultans by the local landed chiefs. The central Muslim authorities may have aimed at reinforcing their positions by popularising these legends. Eaton, Richard M. also notes such legends in his Sufis of Bijapur, 1300–1700 (Princeton 1978) 110–113 and 166.Google Scholar Susan Bayly makes some perceptive observations on the political significance of some such similar legends in eighteenth-century South Indian context; cf. ‘Islam and State Power in Pre-Colonial Southlndia’, Itinerario 12, 1 (1988) 143–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19 Shaikh, Ali Asghar binMaudud, Jawahir-iFaridi (Lahore 1301 AH/1883–1884) 155–160Google Scholar.
20 Khwurd, , Siyar-ul-Auliya, 45–47Google Scholar.
21 Dihlawi, Abd-ul-Haq Muhaddis, Akhbar-ul-Akhyar (reprint; Deoband n.d.) 28–29Google Scholar.
22 Compare Khan, M. Ishaq, ‘The Impact of Islam on Kashmir in the Sultanate Period (1320–1586)’, Indian Economic and Social History Review 23, 2 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Kashmiri, Baba Nasib, Nur-Nama (Research and Publication Department, Srinagar, ACC, No. 795)Google Scholar.
24 Magray, Saiyid Ali, Tarikh-i Kashmir (Research and Publication Department, Srinagar, ACC,Google Scholar No. 739). For this reference and for the one to Nur Nama I am indebted to Mr. A. Hamid Rather of Kashmir University.
25 Sharif, , Qanun-ilslam, 201–202Google Scholar.
26 Rashid, , Society and Culture in Medieval India, 233Google Scholar; Reports of the Archaeological Survey of India 16, 90 off.
27 Gwaliari, Muhammad Ghaus, Culzar-i Abarar f. 75Google Scholar; for some Ghazi and Shahid legends from Bengal, cf. Sen, Dineshchandra, The Folk Literature of Bengal (reprint; Delhi 1982) 123–152. See alsoGoogle ScholarEaton, Richard, Sufis of Bijapur, 19–44 for a useful account of ‘Sufis as Warriors’Google Scholar.
28 Askari, S.H. and Ahmad, Q. eds., A Comprehensive History of Bihar II (Patna 1984) 407Google Scholar.
29 Rashid, , Society and Culture in Medieval India, 192–193Google Scholar.
30 Rizvi, , History ofSufism I, 14.Google Scholar The attempt was like some modern efforts, notably the Egyptian scholar Ali Tantawi's in his Fi Zilal-al-Quran, to explain modern'science in the light of the Quran. For a concise account of medieval Indian Persian translations of Hindu classics, cf. Mujtabai, F., Aspects ofHindu Muslim Cultural Relation (Delhi 1978) 61–91Google Scholar.
31 RazaAnsari, M., Tazkira-iHazratSaiyidSahebBansawi (Urdu) (Lucknow 1986) 289–292Google Scholar.
32 Maqamat-i Mazhari, 23–24.
33 Rizvi, S.A.A., History of Sufism in India II (Delhi 1983) 305Google Scholar.
34 Kashkul-i Kalimi (Delhi 1308/1890–1891) 10.Google Scholar In his letters to his disciples, Shah Kalim Allah and following him, his khalifas, Shaikh Nizam-ud-Din and Shaikh Fakhru-ud-Din laid special emphasis on the lives of the Prophet and his companions as models for Muslims and on spreading, preaching and glorifying the ‘word of Allah’. Cf. Nizami, K.A., Tarikh-i Mashaikh-iChist (Urdu) V (Delhi 1984) 105–106,Google Scholar 161–162, 215–216.
35 Maqamat-i Mazhari, 99–101; Anjum, Khaliq, Mirza Mazbar fan-i Janan ke Khutut (Urdu translations of Mirza's letters) (Delhi 1962) 94Google Scholar.
36 Basharat-i Mazhariya (Aligarh MS). For this reference I am thankful to my friend Dr. Fozail Ahmad Qadri of Manipur University, Imphal.
37 Maqamat-i Mazhari, 99–100; Anjum, , Mirza Mazhar, 93Google Scholar.
38 MSS of these works are available in Salar Jan Museum, Hyderabad and Raza Library Rampur.
39 Zakhirat-ul-Muluk (Amritsar 1321/1903–1904) 117–118Google Scholar.
40 Askari, S.H., Proceeding ofIndian History Congress (Agra 1956)Google Scholar.
41 Maktubal-iQuddusiya (AhmadiMatba', Delhi) letter 169, 336–337Google Scholar.
42 For one such demand by an eighteenth-century Qazi, cf. Alam, M., The Crisis of Empire in Mughal North India (Delhi 1986)Google Scholar.
43 For a discussion cf. Khan, I.A., ‘Shaikh Abd-ul-Quddus Gangohi's Relations with Political Authorities: a Reappraisal’, Medieval India: A Miscellany IV (Delhi 1977) 73–90;Google Scholar cf. also Nizami, K.A., Tarikh-i-Mashaikh-i Chisht (Urdu) (Delhi 1957 219–221;Google ScholarIbidem, Salatin-i Dihli Ke MazhabiRujhanat (Urdu) (Delhi 1958) 449–450Google Scholar.
44 Nizami, , Studies in Medieval Indian History and Culture, 23Google Scholar.
45 Yadav, B.N.S., Society and Culture in Northern India in the Twelfth Century (Allahabad 1973) Chapters 1 and 8Google Scholar; Sharma, R.S., Social Change in Early Medieval India (Delhi 1969)Google Scholar; Mazumdar, B.P., Socio-Economic History of Northern India, 1030–1194 (Calcutta 1960)Google Scholar Chapters III and XIV; Ibidem, ‘Epigraphic Records on Migrant Brahmans in North India (1030–1225)’, Indian Historical Review 5, 1–2 (1978–1979) 64–86;Google ScholarChattopadhyaya, B.D., ‘Origins of Rajputs: The Political, Economic and Social Processes in Early Medieval Rajasthan’, Indian Historical Review 3, 1 (1976) 59–82;Google ScholarNandi, R.N., ‘Client, Ritual and Conflict in Early Brahmanical Order’, Indian Historical Review 6, 1–2 (1979–1980) 64–118Google Scholar.
46 Fawaid-ul-Fuad, 65.
47 Ibidem, 195–197.
48 Ibidem, 150.
49 Jamali, , Siyar-ul Afrin (Delhi 1311/1893–1894) 159–160Google Scholar.
50 Rihla. Urdu tr. by Jafari, R.A. (Karachi 1977) 68Google Scholar.
51 Akhbar-ul-Akhyar, 53–54.
52 Dadu 13/48; 16/53, 54and 55; 16/44 and 28; 14/32–34.
53 Akhbar-ul-Akhyar, 306. Kashmir, however, presents a different case. The Rishis there claimed the Shaivite poetess, Lai Ded, as ‘Rabia, the Second’, incorporating her message in their compositions in the local language. Compare Khan, M. Ishaq, Indian Economic and Social History Review 23, 2 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
54 Dabislan-i Maiahib (Kanpur 1903) 179–180. The printed text, however, reads ‘wa rah-ijog ai Nabi…fara girazta’Google Scholar.
55 Compare Digby, Simon, ‘Abd-ul-Quddus Gangohi (1456–1537): The Personality and Attitudes of a Medieval Indian Sufi’, Medieval India: A Miscellany III (Bombay 1975) 28Google Scholar.
56 Ibidem, 30; Makhtubat-i Quddusiya, letter to Sikandar Lodi.
57 Ibidem, 33–34; Makhtubat-i Quddusiya, letter to Babur.
58 Allah, Shah Muhibb was, however, an exception. Compare Digby, ‘Abd-ul-Quddus Gangohi’, 12–14Google Scholar.
59 Makhtubat-i Imam Rabbani.
60 Ibidem.
61 Ibidem.
62 Alaud-Daula Simnani (1261–1336) was the first to challenge the concept of Wahdat-ul-wujud in Iran. Simnani had a large number of disciples, some of whom visited India and influenced Saiyd Muhammad Gesu Daraz (d. 1422).
63 Compare Rizvi, , History of Sufism 11Google Scholar.
64 Compare Faruqi, Burhan Ahmad, The Mujaddid's Conception of Tauhid (Lahore 1940)Google Scholar.
65 Zia-Ud-Din Barani, Sahifa-i Nat-i Muhammadi and Nizami, , Studies in Medieval Indian History and Culture, 23Google Scholar for Iltutmish, ; Tarikh-i Firoz Shahi, 289–292Google Scholar and Habib, Muhammad and Nizami, K.A. eds., A Comprehensive History of India V (Delhi 1970) 362–366Google Scholar for Ala-ud-Din's conversation with Qazi Mughis.
66 Barani, , Tarikh-i Firoz Shahi, 216Google Scholar.
67 Hasan, Agha Mahdi, Tughlaq Dynasty (reprint; Delhi 1976)Google Scholar and Nigam, S.B.P., Nobility under the Sultans of Delhi (Delhi 1968) 74–92Google Scholar for Hindu officials under the Tughlaqs; Tarikh-i Farishta for Sikandar's introduction of Persian for Hindus.
68 Compare Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate, an English translation of Barani's Fatawa-i Jahandari by Habib, Muhammad and Begam, Afsar Jahan. See also the text edited by Ms. Khan, A. Salim (Lahore 1972) 217–231Google Scholar.
69 Badaoni, , Munlakhab-ul-tawarikh II.Google Scholar English tr. by W.H. Low, 253.
70 Francois Bernier, Travels in the Mogul Empire, 1656–1668. English tr. by A. Constable (reprint; New Delhi 1972) 303.
71 Ibidem, 306.
72 Ibidem, 313–314.
73 Compare Baini Prasad, History of Jahangir (reprint; Allahabad 1962) 202–231Google Scholar.
74 Compare Sarkar, J.N., Fall of the Mughul Empire II (reprint; Delhi 1971) 395–396Google Scholar; Ibidem III (reprint; Delhi 1975) 20–22, 196–222.Wink, Andre, Land and Sovereignty in India: Agrarian Society and Politics under the Eighteenth-Century Svarajya (Cambridge 1986) 41Google Scholar.
75 Bernier, , Travels in the Mogul Empire, 336Google Scholar.
76 Ibidem, 334.
77 Ibidem, 321.
78 Even though Tahirid established the first Persian dynasty in Khorasan, the SafTarids (867–892), the Samanids (874–999) and the Buyids (934–1055) were the first consciously Persian principalities. The Samanids claimed to be the descendants of the pre-Islamic Sassanid nobleman, Saman, while the Buyids mentioned Yezdger, a Sassanid king, as their ancestor. Rudaki and Daqiqi, the first Persian poets were patronised by the Samanids. Later, the Turks, the Ghaznavidss, the Seljuqs and the Khwarizmshahis became enthusiastic patrons of Persian language and culture. Compare Brown, E.J., A Literary History of Persia II (Cambridge 1964)Google Scholar.
79 Compare Shahnama: The Epic of the Kings. English tr. by Levy, Reaben; rev. by Banani, Amin (London 1967)Google Scholar particularly the last sections. The poet's support to the Ajam is illustrated in the letter he mentions to have been written by Rustam to Sa'd bin Wiqas.
80 Compare Sircar, D.C., Selected Inscriptions II (Delhi 1983) 650–664;Google ScholarGupta, P.L., Coins (Delhi 1969) 204–205,Google Scholar Nos. 215–218. I owe to my colleague, B.D. Chattopadhyaya for these references.