Article contents
Historiographical Reflections on the Period 1750–1870 in Southeast Asia and Korea1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2011
Extract
The historiography with which most of us interact outside our own country or area of expertise is predominantly western and primarily in English. Although increasingly diverse in authorship, this historiography continued to build on traditions and sources which were developed in a less universalist age. It is not surprising the find that the period (roughly mid-seventeenth to mid-eighteenth centuries) in which most independent countries of eastern Asia sought to disengage from the European-dominated world economy is poorly understood or appreciated. I am conscious of the danger that my own recent work on the Southeast Asian ‘Age of Commerce’ may unintentionally reinforce negative images of those states which reacted to the traumas of the seventeenth century by decreasing their interaction with European traders.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1994
References
Notes
2 Reid, Anthony, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680 (2 vols., New Haven 1988–1993).Google Scholar
3 I am indebted for much of this section to two unpublished papers by Dr. Morris-Suzuki, ‘Re-writing History: Civilization Theory in Contemporary Japan’, and ‘Edo Boom’.
4 Smith, Thomas, Native Sources of Japanese Industrialization 1750–1920 (Berkeley 1988)Google Scholar. Akira, Hayami, ‘Introduction’, in: Hayami, Akari and Tsubouchi, Yoshihiro eds., Economic Development in Rice Producing Societies. Some Aspects of East Asian Economic History 1500–1900 (Tokyo 1989).Google Scholar
5 Tsuji Tatsuya, Edo jidai o kangaeru (1988). Heita, Kawakatsu, Nihon bumei to indai Seiyo: ‘Sokoku’ Saito [Japanese civilization and the modern West] (Tokyo 1991)Google Scholar. Bito Masahide, Edo jidai to wan nani ka [What is the Edo age] (1992).
6 Heita, Kawakatsu, ‘Shakai no bussan fukugo’ toshite no bunmei’, Mugendai 91 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Adas, Michael, Machines as the Measure of Men. Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance (Ithaca 1989).Google Scholar
8 Mantegazza, G.M., La Birmanie (Rome 1784) 103.Google Scholar
9 Reid, Southeast Asia.
10 Raffles, Thomas Stamford, The History of Java (London 1817Google Scholar. Reprinted Kuala Lumpur 1965) II, 6.
11 Raffles, Thomas Stamford, Memoir of the Life and Public Services of Sir Thomas Stamford Raffles, by his widow (2 vols., London 1835) I, 90–100.Google Scholar
12 Mouhot, Henri, Travels in the Central Parts of Indo-China (Siam), Cambodia, and Laos during the years 1858, 1859, and 1860 (2 vols., London 1864. Reprinted Bangkok 1986).Google Scholar
13 Kawai Hirotami, ‘Chôsen ni okeru tôsô no gen'in to so tôji no jôkyô’ [Cause of political factional strife in Choson dynasty and socio-political conditions of the period], Shigaku zasshi 27/3 (1916). Itani Zen'ichi, Chôsen keizai-shi [An economic history of Korea] (Tokyo 1928).
14 Coedès, G., ‘Etudes indochinoises’, BSEI 26 (1951) 437–462.Google Scholar
15 Schreiner, A., Les institutions annamites en Basse-Cochinchine avant la conquête française (2 vols., Saigon 1900–1902) I, 53–54Google Scholar. Luro, E., Le Pays d'Annam; Etudes sur l'organisation politique et sociale des annamites (Paris 1878)Google Scholar. Silvestre, J., L'Empire d'Annam et le peuple annamiie (Paris 1889).Google Scholar
16 Hutchinson, E.W., Adventurers in Siam in the Seventeenth Century (London 1940) 192.Google Scholar
17 Hall, D.G.E., A History of Southeast Asia (London 1955) 378.Google Scholar
18 Ibidem, 647, 531–532, 577, 581.
19 Sukarno, , Indonesia Menggugat (Jakarta 1956) 118.Google Scholar
20 Luro, Pays d'Annam, 100. Tran Van Giau, Su Khung Hoang cua che do phong kien nha Nguyen truoc 1858 [The Crisis of the Vietnamese feudal system before 1858] (Hanoi 1958) 33. Phan Huy Le et al., Lich Su che Do Phon Kien Viet-Nam [History of the Vietnamese Feudal System] (3 vols., Hanoi 1961) III, 430.
21 Phan, Lich Su che. III, 446.
22 Vien, Nguyen Khac, Vietnam: une longue histoire (Hanoi 1987) 100.Google Scholar
23 Man-gil, Kang, ‘How History is Viewed in the North and in the South: Convergence and Divergence’, Korea Journal 30/2 (1990) 9.Google Scholar
24 E.g. Khoi, Le Thanh, Histoire du Vietnam des origines a. 1858 (Paris 1981) 345.Google Scholar
25 Cited in: Kang, ‘How history is viewed’, 7.
26 Cho Kijun, Han'guk chabonjuui songnip saron [Discourses on the formative history of Korean capitalism] (Seoul 1973). Kang, ‘How history is viewed’, 7. Ki-bail Lee, Ki-baik, A New History of Korea, (Cambridge 1967; revised ed. 1984) 226–263.
27 Kang, ‘How history is viewed’, 8.
28 Myo Myint, ‘The Politics of Survival in Burma: Diplomacy and Statecraft in the Reign of King Mindon, 1853–1878’ (Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1987). Lieberman, Victor, ‘Secular Trends in Burmese Economic History, c. 1350–1830, and their implications for State Formation’, Modern Asian Studies 25/1 (1991) 1–31Google Scholar. Lieberman, Victor, ‘Was the Seventeenth Century a Watershed in Burmese History?’ in: Reid, Anthony ed., Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era (Ithaca 1993) 214–249Google Scholar. Koenig, William, The Burmese Polity, 1752–1819 (Ann Arbor 1990).Google Scholar
29 Wyatt, David, ‘The “Subtle Revolution” of King Rama I of Siam’, in: Wyatt, David and Woodside, Alexander eds., Moral Order and the Question of Change; Essays on Southeast Asian Thought (New Haven 1982) 17Google Scholar. Lorraine Gesinck, ‘Kingship and Political Integration in Traditional Siam,. 1767–1827’ (Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1976). Reynolds, Craig, ‘Buddhist Cosmography in Thai History, with special reference to Nineteenth Century Culture Change’, Journal of Asian Studies 35/2 (1976) 203–220.Google Scholar
30 Nidhi Aeusrivongse, Prawaisat Raitanakosin nai phraratchaphongsawadan Ayutthaya [Bangkok History in Auydhya Chronicles] (Bangkok 1978). Aeusrivongase, Nidhi, Pak Kai Lae Bai Rua: Ruam Khwam Riang Wa Duai Wannakam Lae Prawatisat Ton Ralanakosin [Pen and Sail: Collected essays on early Bangkok literature and history] (Bangkok 1984).Google Scholar
31 Woodside, Alexander, Vietnam and the Chinese Model A Comparative Study of Nguyen and Chʼing Civil Government in the First Halfof the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, Mass., 1971)Google Scholar. Nguyen Dinh Dau 1991, ‘Remarques préliminaires sur les registres cadastraux (dia ba) des six provinces de la Cochinchine (Nam Ky Luc Tinh)’, Bulletin de l'Ecole Française d'Extrême Orient (1991) 78. Nguyen Due Nghinh 1974, ‘Tinh hinh phan phoi ruong dat o xa Mac Xa giua hai thoi diem (1789–1805)’, Nghien Cuu Lick Su (1974) 161. This was translated as ‘La préponderance des propriétaires moyens à Mac Xa entre 1789 et 1805’, in: Propriété privée et propriété collective dans l'ancien Vietnam (Paris 1987) 111–208. Nguyen Due Nghinh, ‘Land Distribution in Tu Liem District according to the Land Registers’, Vietnamese Studies (Hanoi) 61 (1980) 164–187. Sakurai Yumio, ‘A Study of Landownership in some early Nineteenth Century Vietnamese villages’, Southeast Asia, History and Culture (1976) 6. Yumio, Sakurai, Beronamu Sonraku no Keisei [Formation of the Vietnamese village] (Tokyo 1987).Google Scholar
32 Yi T'ae-jin, ‘Choson hugi yangban sahoe ui pyonhwa’ [Transformation of yangban society in Late Choson], Hanʼ;guk saoe palchon saron [Discourse on the development of Korean society] (Seoul 1992).
33 Warren, James, The Sulu Zone 1768–1898 (Singapore 1981)Google Scholar. van der Kraan, Alfons, Lombok; Conquest, Colonization and Underdevelopment, 1870–1940 (Singapore 1980)Google Scholar. Alfons van der Kraan, ‘Bali and Lombok in the World Economy’, Paper presented at a conference ‘Island Southeast Asia and the World Economy’, ECHOSEA Project, ANU, November 1992. Trocki, Carl, Prince of Pirates; the Temenggongs and the Development of johor and Singapore, 1784–1885 (Singapore 1979)Google Scholar. Talib, Shaharil, ‘The Port and Polity of Terengganu during the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries’, in: Kathiritham by-Wells, J. and Villiers, J. eds., The Southeast Asian Port and Polity; Rise and Demise (Singapore 1990) 213–230.Google Scholar
34 RicklefS, M.C.Jogjakarta under Sultan Mangkubumi 1749–1792 (London 1974)Google Scholar. Kumar, Anne, ‘Javanese Court Society and Politics in the Late Eighteenth Century: the record of a lady soldier’, Indonesia 29 (1980) 1–46Google Scholar and 30 (1980) 67–111. Carey, Peter, ‘Waiting for the “Just King”: the Agrarian World of South-Central Java from Giyanti (1755) to the Java War (1825–30)’, Modem Asian Studies 20/1 (1986) 59–138.Google Scholar
35 Carey, Peter, ‘Changing Javanese Perceptions of the Chinese Communities in Central Java’, Indonesia (1984) 37Google Scholar. Wickberg, Edgar, The Chinese in Philippine Life 1850–1898 (New Haven 1965) 20–35.Google Scholar
36 Keong, Ng Chin, ‘The Case of Chʼ;en Mao: Maritime Trade and Overseas Chinese in Chʼing Policies, 1717–1754’, in: Ptak, Roderick and Rothermund, Dietmar eds., Emporia, Commodities and Entrepreneurs in Asian Maritime Trade, c. 1400–1750, ed. (Stuttgart 1991) 373–400.Google Scholar
37 Trocki, Prince of Pirates.
38 Crawfurd, JohnJournal of an Embassy to the Courts of Siam and Cochin-China (London 1828) 414–416.Google Scholar
39 Fairbank, John K. ed., The Chinese World Order. Traditional China's Foreign Relations (Cambridge, Mass. 1968) 11, 99–101, 265–266Google Scholar. Promboon, Suebsang 1971. ‘Sino-Siamese Tributary Relations 1282–1835’ (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan 1971) 121–122Google Scholar. Majul, Cesar A., Muslims in the Philippines (Quezon City 1973) 347–352.Google Scholar
40 Drewes, G.W.J., Directions for Travellers on the Mystic Path (The Hague 1977)Google Scholar. Andaya, Barbara and Matheson, Virginia, ‘Islamic Thought and Malay Tradition: The Writing of Raja Ali Haji of Riau (ca. 1809-ca. 1870)’ in: Reid, Anthony and Marr, David eds., Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia (Singapore 1979) 108–128.Google Scholar
41 Creese, Helen, ‘Sri Surawiria, Dewa Agung of Klungkung (1722–1736)’, BKI 147: 414–415.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by