No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2010
Senegal's relationship with France from the very beginning was marked by dependency. Economic, political and cultural life in Senegal revolved around the metropole — the highly centralized administrative and political institutions of France located in Paris dominated the Senegalese periphery. But Senegal's dependency was not merely economic or political. French policies towards Senegal primarily aimed at intellectual and cultural goals and were in some cases economic and political liabilities to the metropole. In this respect, the Senegalese case did not correspond to traditional theories of dependency which stress the overall importance of economic interests. Furthermore, the nature of this dependency does not appear to have significantly altered, although the political orientation of the French government has changed greatly since the colonization of Senegal. The character and development of this phenomenon, along with its implications for current French policy, will be considered here in light of the French world view, with particular reference to the Cartesian ideal.
1 Cohen, William B., The French Encounter with Africans. White Response to Blacks, 1530–1880 (Bloomingion, Indiana 1980).Google Scholar
2 Belts, Raymond, Assimilation and Association in French Colonial Theory, 1890–1914 (New York 1961) (‘mission civilisatrice’).Google Scholar
3 Cohen, William B., Rulers of Empire. The French Colonial Service in Africa (Stanford 1974).Google Scholar
4 Belts, Raymond, Tricouleur. The French Overseas Empire (New York and London 1978).Google Scholar
5 Davis, Michael, European-African Interaction in the Precolonial Period. Saint-Louis: Senegal, 1758–1854 (Ann Arbor, Mich. 1979).Google Scholar
6 Kulski, Wladyslaw W., De Gaulle and the World. The Foreign Policy of the Fifth Republic (New York 1960).Google Scholar
7 Adamolekun, Ladipo, ‘The French Tradition of Administrative Training in Africa: The Senegalese Experience’, Administration 1969, 93–102; andGoogle ScholarO'Brien, Rita Cruise, ‘Some Problems s in the Consolidation of National Independence in Africa. The Case of the French Expatriates in Senegal’, African Affairs 73 (1974) 85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 See, for instance, Semir, Amin, New Colonialism in West Africa (Penguin African Library)Google Scholar.
9 Webster, James Berlin and Bohanen, A. A., History of West Africa (New York 1970).Google Scholar
10 Belts, Assimilation and Association in French Colonial Theory.
11 Cellar, Sheldon, Structural Change and Colonial Dependency. Senegal 1885–1915 (Beverly Hills, Cal. 1976).Google Scholar
12 See, for instance, Hodgkins, Thomas, Nationalism in Colonial Africa (New York 1957) 33–40Google Scholar.
13 Cellar, Sheldon, ‘The Colonial Era’ in:Phyllis Martin, M. and O'meara, Patrick eds., Africa (Bloomington 1977) 140.Google Scholar
14 Ward, A.W., Prothero, G.W. and Leathes, S. eds., The Cambridge Modern History IV, The Thirty Years' War (New York and Cambridge 1934) 792.Google Scholar
15 Ibidem, 790.
16 Balz, Albert G.A., Descartes and the Modern Mind (New Haven 1952) 242.Google Scholar
17 Chilcote, Ronald H., ‘Dependency. A Critical Synthesis of the Literature’, Latin American Perspectives 1 (1974) 1,4–17;CrossRefGoogle ScholarChilcote, Ronald H., Theories of Comparative Politics. The Search for a Paradigm (Boulder, Colorado 1981);Google ScholarGereffi, Gary A., The Pharmaceutical Industry and Dependencies in the Third World (see introduction) (Princeton, New Jersey 1983);CrossRefGoogle ScholarMahler, Vincent A., Dependency Approaches to International Political Economy. A Cross-National Study (New York 1980); andGoogle ScholarPalma, G., ‘Dependency and Development. A Critical Overview’ in: Seers, Dudley ed., Dependency Theory. A Critical Reassessment (London 1981) 20–78Google Scholar.
18 Cohen, The French Encounter with Africans.
19 Duignan, Peter and Gann, L.H., ‘Economic Achievements of the Colonizer. An Assessment’ in: , Idem eds., Colonialism in Africa 1870–1960 IV, The Economics of Colonialism (Cambridge 1975)673–696.Google Scholar
20 The Cambridge Modern History IV, The Thirty Years'War.
21 ‘Supposedly, it was […] [the] Latin-Christian tradition which originally gave France her universal outlook and her emphasis on equality. Certain elements of Stoic philosophy incorporated into Roman thought and Roman law provided the basis for universal law while the Christian emphasis on the equality of man before God provided the basis for secular equality. Here are found the ' roots of French love of order, the desire to cloudily all laws natural and human in a logical fashion, and the tendency to express everything in universal terms. See Betts, Assimilation and Association in French Colonial Theory, 26–27.
22 Ministère Des Relations Extérieures, La Politique Etrangère de la France. Textes et Documents (La Documentation Françhises, juillet-aout 981) 13–14.