Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:16:13.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research Statement: Portuguese–Dutch Conflicts and the Macao–Nagasaki Trade in the Early Seventeenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2014

Extract

The Macao–Nagasaki connection in the early seventeenth century involved a complex set of interrelationships with regard to trade, mission, cultural intercourse, and other important topics between China, Japan, Portugal, Spain, and the Netherlands. The rise to importance of Macao and Nagasaki was the result of the interruption of Sino–Japanese trade relations and the policy adjustments by the governments of China and Japan to bring the Portuguese under their control and administration. One of the main differences between Macao and Nagasaki was that the former remained a Portuguese settlement for centuries, while the latter was an enclave first of the Portuguese and later of the Dutch. This short article, mainly based on secondary sources by C. R. Boxer, Leonard Blussé, and others, is a tentative study of the international relations in East Asia and their changes after the appearance of the Portuguese and the Dutch in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.

Two important facts make the sixteen-century international relations in East Asia different from the situation before: the appearance of the Portuguese in this area and the deterioration of Sino–Japanese relations.

For the first thirty years after the Portuguese arrived on the coast of Guangdong in 1514, encounters between them and the Chinese were rife with misunderstandings and conflicts, because Portugal was not a tributary country of China; the Portuguese were totally new to the Chinese. As the Portuguese could not establish formal commercial relations with China, in order to acquire Chinese goods they sought close relations with Chinese and later Japanese smugglers and pirates. They even engaged in the slave trade, which gave them a very bad name in China.

Type
Managing Trade Flows
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Boxer, C. R.The Portuguese Seaborne Empire, 1415–1825. London: Hutchinson, 1969.Google Scholar
Boxer, C. R.Portuguese Merchants and Missionaries in Feudal Japan, 1543–1640. London: Variorum Reprints, 1986.Google Scholar
Boxer, C. R.The Great Ship from Amacon; Annals of Macao and the Old Japan Trade, 1555–1640. Macao: Instituto Cultural de Macau, Centro de Estudos Marítimos de Macau, 1988.Google Scholar
Kazui, T.Foreign Relations During the Edo Period: Sakoku Reexamined,” translated by Videen, S. Downing. Journal of Japanese Studies 8:2 (1982): 283306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar