Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:04:27.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II. Some Remarks on the Development of Colonial Bureaucracies in India and Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

C. Fasseur  and
D.H.A. Kolff
C. Fasseur
Affiliation:
University of Leiden
D.H.A. Kolff
Affiliation:
University of Leiden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A systematic comparison of the development of modern bureaucracies in India and Indonesia during the colonial era has never been made. No equivalent of the excellent work done by J.S. Furnivall on the colonial administration in Burma and Java is available. Yet, much of what he said is useful for the subject of this paper and we shall therefore lean heavily on him. It would be an overstatementto say that Indians before the Second World War felt interested in the events and developments in Indonesia. In the other direction that interest surely existed. We need only to recall the deep impact the Indian nationalist movement made upon such Indonesian nationalists as Sukarno.‘The example of Asian nationalism to which Indonesians referred most often was the Indian one.’ This applies for instance to the Congress non-cooperation campaign in the early 1920s. Indonesian nationalists could since then be classified as cooperators and non-cooperators, although for them the principal criterion was not the wish to boycott Dutch schools, goods and government officials(such a boycott actually never occurred in colonial Indonesia)but the refusal to participate in representative councils such as the Volksraad(i.e. People's Council).

Type
Articles
Information
Itinerario , Volume 10 , Issue 1: India and Indonesia from the 1920 to the 1950s: The Origins of Planning , March 1986 , pp. 31 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Abeyasekere, Susan, One hand clapping Indonesian nationalists and the Dutch 1939-1942 (Monash University 1976)8Google Scholar.

2 Kolff, Cf. D H A., ‘De kontroleur G K. van Hogendorp (1844-1879) een enthousiast statisticus’, in Anrooy, F. van a o. ed., Between People and Statistics. Essays on modern Indonesian History presented to P Creutzberg (The Hague 1979) 192Google Scholar.

3 Cf. Fasseur, C., ‘Nederland en het Indonesische nationalisme De balans nog eens opgemaakt’, Bijdragen en Mededelingen van het Hislorisch Genootschap 99 (1984) 38–39Google Scholar.

4 In 1930 there were only 12 Indonesian towns with more than 50, 000 inhabitants, Jakarta heading this list with 553, 000. Cf Statistic Pochetbooh of Indonesia 1941 (Batavia 1948)Table 19Google Scholar.

5 Fasseur, ‘Nederland en het Indonesische nationalisme’, 39.

6 Ibidem.

7 The first exception was a note by an Indian civil servant, who had been deputed to Java, on the working of the currencysystem there. His research seems to have convinced Lord Kimberly in 1892 that a gold currency could be safely introduced in India. Ambirajan, See S., Political Economy and Monetary Management India 1766-1914 (Madras 1984) 142.Google Scholar Another example was the cultivation system in Java that also aroused Money's enthusiasm. It was discussed at length by Ranade, M G. in Essays on Indian Economics (Bombay 1898) 65–97Google Scholar.

8 Misra, B B., The Bureaucracy in India, a Historical Analysis of Development up to 1947 (Delhi 1977)81Google Scholar.

9 Blunt, Edward, The I C S, the Indian CivilService (London 1937) 49Google Scholar.

10 Misra, The Bureaucracy in India, 49, 59.

11 The term ‘regent’ was adopted from the Dutch vocabulary the members of the Dutch patriciate who participated in the government of the more important cities in Holland were called regenten.

12 Blunt, The I C S., 50.

13 See for an enumeration of these native states and other particularities Indisch Verslag [Indian Report] 1938 (Batavia 1939) 473–497.

14 Coupland, Reginald, The Indian Problem, 1833-1935 (Oxford 1942 repr 1968) 13Google Scholar.

15 See for a summary of the importance of the cultivation system for the Dutch finances Fasseur, C., ‘Some Remarks on the Cultivation System in Java’, Ada Historiae Neerlandkae X (1978) 155Google Scholar.

16 Cohn, Bernard S., ‘Representing Authority in Victorian India’, in Eric Hobsbawm and Ranger, Terence eds., The Invention of Tradition(Cambridge 1983) 166, 173, 190. The quotation from the Queen's proclamation is given on p. 165Google Scholar.

17 Ibidem, 166, 181

18 Note of the General Secretarie (Algemene Secretarie) of October 30, 1902 in Verbaaljune, 8, 1905, N 14, Archives of the Ministry for the Colonies (secret)

19 Sutherland, Heather, The making of a bureaucratic elite. The colonial transformation of the Javanese priyayi (Singapore 1979) 106ffGoogle Scholar

20 Dionne, R. and Macleod, R., ‘Science and policy in British India, 1858-1914 perspectives on a persisting belief’, in Asie du Sud, Traditions et changements (Collogues International du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, no 582) (Paris 1979) 55–68Google Scholar.

21 Blunt, The I C S, 75, 76

22 O'MaWey, L.S.S., The Indiancivihervice 1601-1930(London 1931) 113Google Scholar.

23 Misra, The Bureaucracy in India, 157.

24 Blunt, The I C S, 76

25 O'MaWey, The Indian civih ervice, 115–116

26 Blunt, The I C S, 97, 98

27 J B. van der Houven van Oordt, Aanteekeningen betreffende het Britsch Indisch Bestuursstelsel, bijeengebracht op last van Z E den Minister van Kolonien (n.p 1901)

28 Sutherland, The making of a bureaucratic elite, 130 It is not very clear to us how she can on the basis of this survey conclude that ‘the core of hereditary succession had beenlost’ Article 69 of the Government Regulation of 1854 states that insofar as it was reconcilable with the need for a candidate of‘ability, diligence, honesty and loyalty’ a son or close relative ol the last regent in office would be chosen as his successor. Cf. Indisch Verslag 1939, 498-517, esp 498, 512

29 Dobbin, Christine, Urban Leadership in Western India, Politics and Communities m Bombay city 1840-1885 (London 1972) 172–185Google Scholar

30 Van der Houven van Oordt, Aanteekeningen, 74. These figures include Burma (16 municipali-ties, 195 members of committee), but exclude Calcutta, Madras, Bombayand Rangoon

31 Visman, F H., Verslag van de Commissie tot Bestudeering van staatsrechtelijke Hervormingen (Batavia 1941) 152–153Google Scholar

32 Van der Houven van Oordt, Aanteekeningen,73, 90

33 Potter, David C., ‘Manpower Shortage and the End of Colonialism The Case of the Indian Civil Service’, Modem Asian Studies VII (1973) 47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar See for the biblical image Daniel, 2

34 Potter, , ‘Manpower Shortage’, 62Google Scholar

35 Misra, The Bureaucracy in India, 217, 219, 240, 245

36 Ibidem, 220-222

37 Potter, ‘Manpower Shortage’, 68, 69, 72

38 Indisch Genootschap, vergadering van 7 december 1934, 341-355 Emerson, Rupert, Malaysia a Study in Direct and Indirect Rule (New York 1937) 410Google Scholar

39 Benda, Harry J, Continuity and Change in Southeast Asia, 236–252Google Scholar (repr from The Journal of Asian Studies XXV (1966) 589-605)