Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:38:05.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SUL CONCETTO DI «IMPRENDITORE DI POLICY»

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Marco Giuliani

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

La diffusione di alcuni concetti nelle scienze sociali segue a volte percorsi imperscrutabili. Anche quando la sua origine non si perde in tempi lontani al punto da rendere necessaria una complessa ricostruzione etimologica, o quando il suo impiego non appare così strettamente improntato ad un contesto linguistico specifico, ripercorrere passo dopo passo la propagazione di un dato termine e il suo lento permeare il discorso scientifico può costituire un interessante percorso di ricerca.

Summary

Summary

The growing concern in the public policy literature with policy entrepreneurs is probably the consequence of their increasing role in the formulation and implementation of public decisions. The technical and social complexity of democratic governance probably calls for the innovative potential which this kind of actors can bring into the policy-making process. This article firstly explores the concept of policy entrepreneur, identifying its defining properties and suggesting a typology of entrepreneurship based upon a strategic and a cognitive dimension, and secondly presents some hypothesis regarding the resources these actors activate, and the conditions which favour their emergence.

Type
Note
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , August 1998 , pp. 357 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Capano, G. e Giuliani, M. (a cura di) (1996), Dizionario di politiche pubbliche, Roma, La Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar
Dente, B. (1996), Tempo, in Capano e Giuliani (1996), pp. 404–409.Google Scholar
Dyson, K. e Featherstone, K. (1997), Jacques Delors and the Re-launch of Economic and Monetary Union, relazione presentata al convegno Ecsa, Seattle, 29 maggio-1° giugno.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R.M. e Gould, R.V. (1994), A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain, in «American Journal of Sociology», n. 6, pp. 1455–1491.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1998), Le trappole del welfare, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. e Weingast, B.R. (1993), Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market, in Goldstein, J. e Keohane, R.O. (a cura di), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, pp. 173–206.Google Scholar
Giuliani, M., Rinkevicius, L. e Sverrisson, A. (1998), Green Policy Entrepreneurship and Science and Technology Policy, in Jamison, A., (titolo da definirsi), Aarlborg, Aarlborg University Press, in corso di pubblicazione.Google Scholar
Gould, R.V. e Fernandez, R.M. (1989), Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks, in «Sociological Methodology», vol. 19, pp. 89–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajer, M.A. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1974), Issue Network and the Executive Establishment, in King, A., (a cura di), The New American Political System, Washington, American Entreprise Institute, pp. 87–124.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. e Wildavsky, A. (1981), The Private Government of Public Money, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
King, P.J. e Roberts, N.C. (1987), Policy Entrepreneurs: Catalysts for Policy Innovation, in «Journal of State Government», n. 1, pp. 172–179.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J.W. (1984), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston, Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Laffan, B. (1997), From Policy Entrepreneur to Policy Manager: the Challenge Facing the European Commission, in «Journal of European Public Policy», n. 3, pp. 422–438.Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. (1991), The European Commission, in Keohane, R.O. e Hoffmann, S. (a cura di), The New European Community. Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, Boulder, Westview Press, pp. 85–132.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1989), Evidence, Argument and Persuasion, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maraffi, M. (1996), Imprenditore di policy, in Capano e Giuliani (1996), pp. 188–192.Google Scholar
March, J.G. e Olsen, J.P. (1997), Governare la democrazia, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Marsden, P.V. (1982), Brokerage Behavior in Restricted Exchange Networks, in Marsden, P.V. e Lin, N. (a cura di), Social Structure and Network Analysis, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Milward, H.B. (1980), Policy Entrepreneurship and Bureaucratic Demand Creation, in Ingram, H.M. e Mann, D.E. (a cura di), Why Policies Succeed or Fail, London, Sage, pp. 255–277.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. (1997), Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation, in «American Journal of Political Science», n. 3, pp. 738–770.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. e Vergari, S. (1996), Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change, n. 3, pp. 420–434.Google Scholar
Nugent, N. (1995), The Leadership Capacity of the European Commission, in «Journal of European Public Policy», n. 4, pp. 603–623.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. (1998), Where Does Power Come From? The Narrative of Tax Competition in the European Union, relazione presentata al convegno Ecpr, Warwick, 23-28 marzo.Google Scholar
Regonini, G. (1995), Politiche pubbliche e potere, in Regonini, G. (a cura di), Politiche pubbliche e democrazia, Napoli, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, pp. 21–102.Google Scholar
Regonini, G. e Giuliani, M. (1994), Italie: au-delà d'une démocratie consensuelle?, in Jobert, B. (a cura di), Le tournant néo-libéral en Europe, Paris, L'Harmattan, pp. 123–199.Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. (1983), Political Theory and the Art of Heresthetics, in Finifter, A.W. (a cura di), Political Science: The State of the Discipline, Washington, The American Political Science Association, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
Roberts, N.C. (1992), Public Entrepreneurship and Innovation, in «Policy Studies Review», n. 1, pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
Roe, E. (1994), Narrative Policy Analysis. Theory and Practice, Durham, Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. (1960), The Semisovereign People, New York, Rinehart Winston.Google Scholar
Schneider, M. e Teske, P. (1992), Toward a Theory of the Political Entrepreneur. Evidence from Local Government, in «American Political Science Review», n. 3, pp. 737–747.Google Scholar
Schön, D.A. (1971), Beyond the Stable State, New York, Random House.Google Scholar
Schön, D.A. e Rein, M. (1994), Frame Reflection. Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (1988), Policy Paradox and Political Reason, Glenview, Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (1998), Think Tanks in the World, Manchester, Manchester University Press, in corso di pubblicazione.Google Scholar
Thurow, L.C. (1981), La società a somma zero, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Wallis, J. e Dollery, B. (1997), Autonomous Policy Leadership: Steering a Policy Process in the Direction of a Policy Quest, in «Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration», n. 1, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Weissert, C.S. (1991), Policy Entrepreneurs, Policy Opportunists, and Legislative Effectiveness, in «American Politics Quarterly», n. 2, pp. 262–274.Google Scholar
White, L.G. (1994), Policy Analysis as Discourse, in «Journal of Policy Analysis and Management», n. 3, pp. 506–525.Google Scholar
Wilson, J.Q. (a cura di) (1980), The Politics of Regulation, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar