Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T18:49:29.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The size and shape of the Italian interest system between the 1980s and the present day

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

Renata Lizzi  and
Andrea Pritoni
Renata Lizzi*
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Forlì, Italy
Andrea Pritoni
Affiliation:
Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Within interest group research, scholars following the population ecology perspective mainly look at the demographic features of populations and systems under scrutiny: density and diversity represent the main dimensions investigated. Even though, in recent years, an impressive amount of literature on this topic has been produced, there has been neither systematic analysis of, nor empirical research into, the Italian interest system so far. This article aims to address this lacuna. Following a diachronic perspective, we count how many politically active groups have populated the Italian interest system with regard to two different periods: 1984–88 and 2010–14. From 1984 to 2014 the number of interest groups almost doubled and the density of the system greatly increased; diversity, however, has remained relatively more stable.

Keywords

interest groupspopulation ecologyItalian politicsdensitydiversity
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 291 - 312
Copyright
© Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baroni, L., Carroll, B.J., Chalmers, A., Muñoz Marquez, L.M. and Rasmussen, A. (2014), ‘Defining and classifying interest groups’, Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 141–159.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C. and Leech, B.L. (2009), Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berkhout, J. (2014), ‘Interest organization demography research in Europe’. Unpublished Paper. Retrieved 2014 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2434079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2010), ‘The changing demography of the EU interest system since 1990’, European Union Politics 11(3): 447–461.Google Scholar
Berkhout, J., Carroll, B.J., Braun, C., Chalmers, A.W., Destrooper, T., Lowery, D., Otjes, S. and Rasmussen, A. (2015), ‘Interest organizations across economic sectors: explaining interest group density in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 462–480.Google Scholar
Berry, J.M. (1999), The New Liberalism, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Beyers, J. and Braun, C. (2014), ‘Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers’, Journal of Public Policy 34(1): 93–121.Google Scholar
Binderkrantz, A.S. (2012), ‘Interest groups in the media: bias and diversity over time’, European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 117–139.Google Scholar
Binderkrantz, A.S., Christiansen, P.M. and Pedersen, H.H. (2015), ‘Interest group access to the bureaucracy parliament and the media.’ Governance 28(1): 95–112.Google Scholar
Binderkrantz, A.S., Bonafont, L.C. and Halpin, D. (2016), ‘Diversity in the news? A study of interest groups in the media in the UK, Spain and Denmark’. British Journal of Political Science 47(2): 313–328.Google Scholar
Borghetto, E. and Visconti, F. (2014), ‘Governing by revising: a study on post-enactment policy change in Italy’, in N. Conti and F. Marangoni (eds), The Challenge of Coalition Government: The Italian Case, London: Routledge, pp. 106–127.Google Scholar
Bunea, A. and Baumgartner, F.R. (2014), ‘The state of the discipline: authorship, research designs, and citation patters in studies of EU interest groups and lobbying’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(10): 1412–1434.Google Scholar
Capano, G., Lizzi, R. and Pritoni, A. (2014), ‘Gruppi di interesse e politiche pubbliche nell’Italia della transizione: oltre il clientelismo e il collateralismo’, Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 9(3): 323–344.Google Scholar
Carrieri, M. (2009), ‘Le organizzazioni di interesse nel sistema politico bipolare’. Astrid Working Paper, Roma. Retrieved 2009 from http://www.astrid-online.it/static/upload/protected/Carr/Carrieri_15_3_09.pdf.Google Scholar
Christiansen, P.M. (2012), ‘The usual suspects: interest group dynamics and representation in Denmark’, in D. Halpin and G. Jordan (eds), The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotta, M. and Verzichelli, L. (2007), Political Institutions in Italy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotta, M. and Verzichelli, L. (2016), Il sistema politico italiano, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
De Micheli, C. and Verzichelli, L. (eds) (2004), Il parlamento, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Denzau, A.T. and Munger, M.C. (1986), ‘Legislators and interest groups: how unorganized interests get represented’, American Political Science Review 80(1): 89–106.Google Scholar
Danielian, L.H. and Page, B.I. (1994), ‘The heavenly chorus: interest group voices on TV news’, American Journal of Political Science 38(4): 1056–1078.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. (1975), ‘Case studies and theory in political science’, in F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds), Handbook of Political Science, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 79–138.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2003), L’europeizzazione dell’Italia: l’impatto dell’Unione Europea sulle istituzioni e le politiche italiane, Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2009), ‘The transformation of Italian democracy’, Bullettin of Italian Politics 1(19): 29–47.Google Scholar
Farinelli, U. (2004), ‘Renewable energy policies in Italy’, Energy for Sustainable Development 8(1): 58–66.Google Scholar
Fasano, L.M. and Pasini, N. (2014), ‘Tra frammentazione e polarizzazione del sistema politico italiano: interpretazioni e casi empirici’, in M. Almagisti, L. Lanzalaco and L. Verzichelli (eds), La transizione politica italiana, Roma: Carocci, pp. 109–142.Google Scholar
Ferrante, M. (1998), ‘Transizione di regime e interessi imprenditoriali in Italia’, Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 28(1): 81–118.Google Scholar
Fisker, H.M. (2015), ‘Dead or alive? Explaining the long-term survival chances of interest groups’, West European Politics 38(3): 709–729.Google Scholar
Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1997), ‘Reconceptualizing PAC formation: it’s not a collective action problem, and it may be an arms race’, American Politics Quarterly 25(3): 319–346.Google Scholar
Gray, V. and Lowery, D. (1998), ‘To lobby alone or in a flock: foraging behaviour among organized interests’, American Politics Quarterly 26(1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, D. and Jordan, G. (eds) (2012), The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Halpin, D., Baxter, G. and MacLeod, I. (2012), ‘Multiple arenas, multiple populations: counting organized interests in Scottish public policy’, in D. Halpin and G. Jordan (eds), The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 118–140.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D.C., Baumgartner, F.R., Berry, J.M. and Leech, B.L. (2012), ‘Studying organizational advocacy and influence: re-examining interest group research’, Annual Review of Political Science 15: 379–399.Google Scholar
Koff, S.Z. and Koff, S.P. (2000), Italy. From the First to the Second Republic, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kohler-Koch, B. (2007), ‘The organization of interests and democracy in the European Union’, in B. Kohler-Koch and B. Rittberger (eds), Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 255–327.Google Scholar
Jordan, G. and Greenan, J. (2012), ‘The changing contours of British representation’, in D. Halpin and G. Jordan (eds), The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–98.Google Scholar
Jordan, G., Baumgartner, F.R., McCarthy, J.D., Bevan, S. and Greenan, J. (2012), ‘Tracking interest group populations in the US and the UK’, in D. Halpin and G. Jordan (eds), The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 141–160.Google Scholar
Lange, P. and Regini, M. (eds) (1986), Stato e regolazione sociale. Nuove prospettive sul caso italiano, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lanza, O. and Lavdas, K. (2000), ‘The disentanglement of interest politics: business associability, the parties and policy in Italy and Greece’, European Journal of Political Research 37(2): 203–235.Google Scholar
Lanzalaco, L. (1990), Dall’impresa all’associazione, Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Lanzalaco, L. (1993), ‘Interest groups in Italy: from pressure activity to policy networks’, in J.J. Richardson (ed.), Pressure Groups, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
LaPalombara, J. (1964), Interest Groups in Italian Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lizzi, R. (2011), ‘I gruppi d’interesse in Italia tra continuità e cambiamento. Fattori istituzionali e dinamiche di policy’, Rivista Italiana di politiche pubbliche 6(2): 179–210.Google Scholar
Lowery, D. (2012), ‘Interest organization populations: the demands of the scale of analysis and the theoretical purposes of counting’, in D. Halpin and G. Jordan (eds), The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 44–66.Google Scholar
Lowery, D. and Gray, V. (1995), ‘The population ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the natural regulation of interest group numbers in the American States’, American Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, D., Gray, V. and Fellowes, M. (2005), ‘Sisyphus meets the borg: economic scale and inequalities in interest representation’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 17(1): 41–74.Google Scholar
Lowery, D., Poppelaars, C. and Berkhout, J. (2008), ‘The European Union interest system in comparative perspective: a bridge too far?’, West European Politics 31(6): 1231–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattina, L. (1991), Gli industriali e la democrazia. La Confindustria nella formazione dell’Italia repubblicana, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Mattina, L. (2011), ‘Note a margine delle più recenti ricerche sui gruppi’, Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche 6(2): 387–396.Google Scholar
Messer, A., Berkhout, J. and Lowery, D. (2011), ‘The density of the EU interest system: a test of the ESA model’, British Journal of Political Science 41(1): 161–190.Google Scholar
Morlino, L. (ed.) (1991), Costruire la democrazia: gruppi e partiti in Italia, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Nownes, A.J. (2012), ‘Numbers in a niche: a practitioner’s guide to mapping gay and lesbian groups in the US’, in D. Halpin and G. Jordan (eds), The Scale of Interest Organization in Democratic Politics: Data and Research Methods, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternotte, D. and Kollman, K. (2013), ‘Regulating intimate relationships in the European polity: same-sex unions and policy convergence’, Social Politics 20(4): 510–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppelaars, C. (2009), ‘Corporatism or lobbyism behind Dutch dikes? Interest representation in the Netherlands’, in C. McGrath (ed.), Interest Groups and Lobbying, Volume Two: Europe , Lewistone, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, pp. 207–231.Google Scholar
Pritoni, A. (2015a), ‘Decision-making potential and “detailed” legislation of Western European parliamentary governments (1990–2013)’. Comparative European Politics, https://doi.org/ 10.1057/cep.2014.55 (online publication first).Google Scholar
Pritoni, A. (2015b), Poteri forti? Banche e assicurazioni nel sistema politico italiano, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1976), Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. (1960), The Semi-Sovereign People. A Realist View of Democracy in America, New York: Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K.L. (2010), ‘Who sings in the heavenly chorus? The shape of organized interest system’, in L.S. Maisel, J.M. Berry and G.C. Edwards III (eds), The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 425–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wonka, A., Baumgartner, F.R., Mahoney, C. and Berkhout, J. (2010), ‘Measuring the size and scope of the EU group interest population’, European Union Politics 11(3): 463–476.Google Scholar