Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:07:14.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RIFLESSIONI SULLA METODOLOGIA DEGLI STUDI COMPARATI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sono passati vent'anni da quando pubblicai Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences (Smelser 1976). Il libro riscosse un certo interesse da parte della sociologia e della scienza politica. Tuttavia, dovrei mettere in chiaro che la sua pubblicazione fu in qualche modo singolare. Nella mia carriera non mi sono mai considerato un metodologo, malgrado in alcuni periodi abbia insegnato metodologia. E benché ritenga che il messaggio di quel volume sia congruente con gran parte della mia ricerca sostantiva, avevo scritto ben poco sui metodi di comparazione prima dell'uscita del libro, e niente ho scritto sul tema in seguito. L'invito a tenere una lezione presso l'Istituto Universitario Europeo mi ha offerto una gradita opportunità di passare in rassegna alcuni sviluppi occorsi dopo la seconda metà degli anni Settanta e di elaborare nuove riflessioni su alcune tematiche metodologiche nelle scienze sociali comparatistiche. Queste mie riflessioni si svilupperanno in quattro parti: a) alcune informazioni sui precedenti della stesura del libro e un'analisi retrospettiva dei suoi contenuti e dei suoi scopi intellettuali; b) una rassegna dei contributi alla letteratura sulla metodologia comparatista che sono apparsi in seguito; c) un tentativo di mettere ordine in questa letteratura confusa; d) una breve riconsiderazione finale di un paio di problemi centrali che verranno allo scoperto in questa presentazione.

Summary

Summary

This article revisits the methodological status of comparative social studies as it was originally presented in the author's Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences (1976), in the light of the criticism and proposals of the last two decades. In the first part, background, contents and aims of the book are recapitulated. The search for a middle ground between the opposite viewpoints of extreme positivism and relativism is emphasized as characterizing the author's approach. Alternative and subsequent approaches to comparative sociology and politics include those offered by Skocpol, Ragin, Wallerstein, Tilly, and most recently King, Keohane and Verba. An overview of this literature shows that the issue of the logics of inference stands out as the hard core of the debate. The point is whether there is and should be a unity or diversity of methods in comparative studies. Although firmly supporting the idea that there is a unique logic of inference underlying social science methods, the author acknowledges that world-system theories call for new strategies of comparative research in which interdependence among nation-states and relation phenomena are reckoned with.

Type
Saggi
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Armer, M. e Grimshaw, A.D. (a cura di) (1973), Comparative Social Research: Methodological Problems and Strategies, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Bach, R. (1977), Methods of Analysis in the Study of the World-Economy: A Comment on Rubinson, in <American Sociological Review>, 42, 5, pp. 811842.Google Scholar
Brady, H.E. (1995), Symposium on <Designing Social Inquiry>, Part 2, in <Political Methodologist>, 6, 2, pp. 1119.,+Part+2,+in+,+6,+2,+pp.+11–19.>Google Scholar
Caporaso, J.A. (1995), Research Design, Falsification, and the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide, in <American Political Science Review>, 89, 1, pp. 36.Google Scholar
Frank, A.G. (1971), The Sociology of Underdevelopment and the Underdevelopment of Sociology, London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
King, G., Kehoane, R.O. e Verba, S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1971), Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method, in <American Political Science Review>, 65, 3, pp. 682693.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. e Smelser, N. (a cura di) (1961), Sociology: The Progress of a Decade, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
McMichael, P. (1990), Incorporating Comparison within a World Historical Perspective: An Alternative Comparative Method, in <American Sociological Review>, 55, 3, pp. 385397.,+55,+3,+pp.+385–397.>Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. e Teune, H. (1970), The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. (1981), Comparative Sociology and the Comparative Method, in <International Journal of Comparative Sociology>, 22, 12, pp. 102120.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. (1987), The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. (1995), The Role of Theory and Anomaly in Social-scientific Inference, in <American Political Science Review>, 89, 1, pp. 710.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1970), Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics, in <American Political Science Review>, 64, 4, pp. 10331053.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. e Somers, M. (1980), The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry, in <Comparative Studies in Society and History> 22, pp. 174197.+22,+pp.+174–197.>Google Scholar
Smelser, N.J. (1967), Notes on the Methodology of the Comparative Analysis of Economic Activity, in Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, The Hague, Nauwelarts, vol. II, pp. 721.Google Scholar
Smelser, N.J. (1971), Alexis de Tocqueville as Comparative Analyst, in Vallier, I. (a cura di), Comparative Methods in Sociology: Essays on Trends and Applications, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, N.J. (1973), The Methodology of Comparative Analysis, in Warwick, D.P. e Osherson, S. (a cura di), Comparative Research Methods, Englewood Cliffs, prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Smelser, N.J. (1976), Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1984), Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Vallier, I. (a cura di) (1971), Comparative Methods in Sociology: Essays on Trends and Applications, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1974), The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixthteen Century, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1978), The Capitalist World Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1984), The Politics of the World Economy: The States, the Movements and the Civilizations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar