Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:26:09.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NASCITA ED ISTITUZIONALIZZAZIONE DI UNA NUOVA DISCIPLINA. IL CASO DELL'INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY (IPE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Questo articolo si propone tre finalità. La prima e la più importante è presentare l'«evoluzione teorica» dell'Ipe, per usare un'espressione di Crane e Amawi (1997) che non implica un processo lineare e continuo. Inizialmente ispirato a Realismo, Liberalismo e Marxismo nelle Relazioni Internazionali, il dibattito ha via via acquistato caratteristiche proprie e si è collegato alle discussioni contemporanee sulle scienze sociali.

Summary

Summary

This article traces the formation of a new discipline – International Political Economy (Ipe) – both in terms of concepts and theoretical debates, and of the social process of its institutionalisation, as shown by journals, textbooks, course offerings, and Internet websites. The article is divided into three parts. In the first, some well- known definitions of Ipe are presented, and different types of theory are illustrated. Special attention is given to the definition of Robert Gilpin because of the importance of his work and the evolution of his thinking about Ipe. In the second, the thirty-year life of IPE is analysed to identify the most important events leading to the creation of a new field of social research: the organization of conferences in the early seventies; the publication of important books written by unorthodox economists like Kindleberger and Hirschman, and theoretical debates. The work of R.W. Cox, which is related to the «Gramscian turn» in International Relations, is a particular focus of attention. Finally, the consequences of the «Fourth Debate» on Positivism in International Relations are considered in terms of the connection of Ipe with Constructivism, historical sociology and the «cultural turn» in the social sciences. The third part shows how the debate on Ipe has moved from being fully internal to (American) Political Science, to include general concerns about the social sciences at the beginning of the XXI century. An extensive bibliography follows.

Type
Rassegne
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Società editrice il Mulino, Bologna 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Amin, S. (1985), La Déconnexion, Paris, La Découverte.Google Scholar
Art, R.J. e Jervis, R. (a cura di) (2000), International Politics, V ed., New York, Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Balaam, D.N. e Veseth, M. (2001), Introduction to International Political Economy, II ed., Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (a cura di) (1993), Key Concepts in International Political Economy, Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Baylis, J. e Smith, S. (a cura di) (2001), The Globalization of World Politics, II ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, S. e Dore, R. (a cura di) (1996), National Diversity and Global Capitalism, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, trad. it. Differenze Nazionali e Capitalismo Globale, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1998.Google Scholar
Bergsten, C.F., Keohane, R.O. e Nye, J.S. (1975), International Economics and International Politics: a Framework for Analysis, in «International Organization», n. 1, pp. 336.Google Scholar
Birchfield, V. (1999), Contesting the Hegemony of Market Ideology: Gramsci's «Good Sense» and Polany's «Double Movement», in «Review of International Political Economy», n. 1, pp. 2754.Google Scholar
Biersteker, T.J. (1993), Evolving Perspectives on International Political Economy: Twentieth-Century Context and Discontinuities, in «International Political Science Review», n. 1, pp. 734.Google Scholar
Blake, D.H. e Walters, R.S. (1976), The Politics of Global Economic Relations, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. e Drache, D. (a cura di) (1996), States Against Markets, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. e Saillard, Y. (a cura di) (2002), Régulation Theory, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Burchill, S. e Linklater, A. (a cura di) (1996), Theories of International Relations, New York, St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Caporaso, J.A. e Levine, D.P. (1998), Theories of Political Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chase-Dunn, C. (a cura di) (1995), The Historical Evolution of the International Political Economy, Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Checkel, J.T. (1998), The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory, in «World Politics», n. 1, pp. 324–48.Google Scholar
Clark, B. (1998), Political Economy. A Comparative Approach, Westport, Praeger.Google Scholar
Cobalti, A. (1969), La «Peace Research»: ricercatori sociali a servizio della pace, in «Prospettive di efficienza», n. 12, pp. 4170.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.J. (1990), The Political Economy of International Trade, in «International Organization», n. 2, pp. 261–81.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.J. (a cura di) (1993), The International Political Economy of Monetary Relations, Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.J. e Lipson, C. (a cura di) (1999a), Issues and Agents in International Political Economy, Cambridge, The Mit Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, B.J. (a cura di) (1999b), Theory and Structure in International Political Economy, Cambridge, The Mit Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, T.H. (2000), Global Political Economy. Theory and Practice, New York, Adison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Conybeare, J.A.C. (1987), Trade Wars: The Theory and Practice of International Commercial Rivalry, New York, Columbia University Press Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (1968), The Economics of Interdependence, New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1971), Labor and Transnational Relations, in «International Organization», n. 3, pp. 554–64.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1979), Ideologies and the New International Economic Order: Reflections on Some Recent Literature, in «International Organization», n. 2, pp. 257303.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1981), Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, in «Millennium», n. 2, pp. 126–55.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1983), Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method, in «Millennium», n. 1, pp. 162–75.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1987), Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1991), The Global Political Economy and Social Choice, in R.W. Cox e T.J Sinclair, Approaches to World Order, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 191207.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1992), Global Perestroika, in Miliband, R. e Panitch, L. (a cura di), Social Register: 1992, London, Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1995), Critical Political Economy, in Hettne, B. (a cura di), International Political Economy. Understanding Global Disorder, London, Zed Books, pp. 3145.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1996), A Perspective on Globalization, in Mittelman, J.H. (a cura di), Globalization: Critical Reflections, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Mittelman.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (a cura di) (1997), The New Realism. Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, New York, United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. (1999), Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative Global Order, in «Review of International Studies», n. 1, pp. 1011.Google Scholar
Cox, R.W. e Sinclair, T.J. (1996), Approaches to World Order, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crane, G.T. e Amawi, A. (a cura di) (1997), The Theoretical Evolution of International Political Economy. A Reader, Oxford, Oxford University Press (II ed.).Google Scholar
Deibert, R. (1998), Virtual Resources: International Relations Research Resources in the Web, in «International Organization», n. 1, pp. 211–21.Google Scholar
Denemark, R.A. e O'Brien, R. (1997), Contesting the Canon: International Political Economy at UK and US Universities, in «Review of International Political Economy», n. 1, pp. 214238.Google Scholar
Duménil, G. e Lévy, D. (2001), Costs and Benefits of Neoliberalism. A Class Analysis, in «Review of International Political Economy», n. 4, pp. 578607.Google Scholar
Economides, S. e Wilson, P. (2001), The Economic Factor in International Relations. A Brief Introduction, London, LB. Tauris.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B. (1989), The Political Economy of the Smooth-Hawley Tariff, in Research in Economic History, pp. 143.Google Scholar
Evans, P. e Stephens, J.D. (1988a), Studying Development since the Sixties. The Emergence of the New Comparative Political Economy, in «Theory and Society», n. 3, pp. 713–45.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1988b), Development and the World Economy, in Smelser, N. (a cura di), Handbook of Sociology, Newbury Park, Sage, pp. 739–73.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1995), Embedded Autonomy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fiala, R. (1992), Varieties of Expression in the New International Comparative Political Economy, in «Sociological Perspectives», n. 2, pp. 205–16.Google Scholar
Finnemore, M. (1996), Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism, in «International Organization», n. 2, pp. 325–47.Google Scholar
Finnemore, M. e Sikkink, K. (2001), Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics, in «Annual Review of Political Science», n. 4, pp. 391416.Google Scholar
Frey, B.S. (1984a), International Political Economics, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frey, B.S. (1984b), The Public Choice View of International Political Economy, in «International Organization», n. 1, pp. 199223.Google Scholar
Frieden, J.A. e Lake, D.A. (a cura di) (2000), International Political Economy. Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth, IV ed., New York, Bedford/St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Germain, R.D. e Kenny, M. (1998), Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians, in «Review of International Studies», n. 1, pp. 321.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1985), The Nation State and Violence, Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar
Gill, S. (1990), Two Concepts of International Political Economy, in «Review of International Studies», n. 3, pp. 369–81.Google Scholar
Gill, S. (1991), Historical Materialism, Gramsci, and International Political Economy, in Murphy, C.N. e Tooze, R. (a cura di), The New International Political Economy, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, pp. 5175.Google Scholar
Gill, S. e Law, D. (1988), The Global Political Economy. Perspectives, Problems and Policies, Baltimore, The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, S. e Mittelman, J.H. (a cura di) (1997), Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gills, B.K. (2001), Re-orienting the New (International) Political Economy, in «New Political Economy», n. 2, pp. 233–45.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1971), The Politics of Transnational Economic Relations, in «International Organization», n. 3, pp. 398418.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1975a), Three Models of the Future, in «International Organization», n. 1, pp. 3761.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1975b), U.S. Power and The Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of the Foreign Direct Investment, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1981), War and Change in World Politics, New York, Cambridge University Press, trad. it. Guerra e mutamento nella politica internazionale, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1989.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1986), The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism, in Keohane, R.O., (a cura di), Neo-realism and Its Critics, New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 301–21.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1987), The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton, Princeton University Press, trad. it. Politica ed economia delle relazioni internazionali, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1990.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1996), No One Loves a Political Realist, in «Security Studies», n. 3, pp. 526.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (2000a), The Retreat-of the State?, in Lawton, T.C., Rosenau, J.N. e Verdun, A.C., (a cura di), Strange Power. Shaping the Parameters of International Relations and International Political Economy, Aldeshot, Ashgate, pp. 197214.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (2000b), The Challenge of the Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21th Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press, trad. it. Le insidie del capitalismo globale , Milano, Università Bocconi Editore, 2001.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (2001), Global Political Economy. Understanding the International Economic Order, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J.H. (1984), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford Oxford University Press, trad. it. Ordine e Conflitto nel Capitalismo Contemporaneo, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1989.Google Scholar
Gomes-Casseres, B. e Yoffie, D.B. (1993), The International Political Economy of Direct Foreign Investments (Volumes I–II), Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. (1978), The Second Image Reversed: the International Sources of Domestic Politics, in «International Organization», n. 4, pp. 881911.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. (1996), Squaring the Circle: the Domestic Sources of International Cooperation, in «International Organization», n. 2, pp. 349–73.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. e Swedberg, R. (a cura di) (2001), The Sociology of Economic Life, II ed., Boulder, Westview.Google Scholar
Grieco, J. (1993), The International System and the International Political Economy (Volumes I–II), Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Guillén, M.F. (2001), Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble ? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature, in «Annual Review of Sociology», 27, pp. 235–60.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. (1995), The International Political Economy and Developing Countries (Volumes I–II), Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Hall, M. (1999), International Relations and Historical Sociology: Taking Stock of Convergence, in «Review of International Political Economy», n. 1, pp. 101–19.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. (1989), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. (1997), The Role of Interests, Institutions, and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of the Industrialized Nations, in Lichbach, M.I. e Zuckerman, A.S., (a cura di), Comparative Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 175207.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. e Soskice, D. (a cura di) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. e Taylor, R. (1996), Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, in «Political Studies», n. 5, pp. 936–57.Google Scholar
Hall, P.A. (1998), The Potential of Historical Institutionalism: a Response to Hay e Wincott, in «Political Studies», n. 5, pp. 958–62.Google Scholar
Halsey, A.H., Lauder, H., Brown, P. e Wells, A.S. (a cura di) (1996), Education. Culture, Economy, and Society, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, C. e Marsh, D. (1999), Introduction: Towards a New (International) Political Economy, in «New Political Economy», n. 1, pp. 522.Google Scholar
Hay, C. e Wincott, D. (1998), Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism, in «Political Studies», n. 5, pp. 951–7.Google Scholar
Held, D. e McGrew, A. (a cura di) (2000), The Global Transformation Reader, Cambridge (UK), Polity Press.Google Scholar
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. e Perraton, J. (1999), Global Transformations. Politics, Economic and Culture, Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hettne, B. (a cura di) (1995), International Political Economy. Understanding Global Disorder, London, Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hettne, B. (1997), The Double Movement: Global Market versus Regionalism, in Cox, R.W., (a cura di), The New Realism. Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, New York, United Nations University Press, pp. 223–41.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. (1977), Social Limits to Growth, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, trad. it. I limiti sociali allo sviluppo, Milano, Bompiani, 1981.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. e Goldthorpe, J.H. (a cura di) (1978), The Political Economy of Inflation, Oxford, Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.O. (1945), National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Berkeley, University of California P., trad. it. Potenza nazionale e commercio estero, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1987.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.O. (1971), The Political Economy of Import Substituting Industrialization in Latin America, in Hirschman, A.O., A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America, New Haven, Yale University Press Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.O. (1981), The Rise and Decline of Development Economics, in A.O. Hirschman, Essays in Trespassing. Economics to Politics and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobden, S. (1998), International Relations and Historical Sociology: Breaking Down Bounderies, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Hobden, S. (1999), Theorising the International System: Perspectives from Historical Sociology, in «Review of International Studies», n. 25, pp. 257271.Google Scholar
Hobson, J.M. (1997), The Wealth of States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J.M. (1998a), Debate: The «Second Wave of Weberian Historical Sociology. The Historical Sociology of the State and the State of Historical Sociology in International Relations, in «Review of International Political Economy», n. 2, pp. 284320.Google Scholar
Hobson, J.M. (1998b), For a «Second Wave» Weberian Historical Sociology in International Relations: a Reply to Halperin and Shaw, in «Review of International Political Economy», n. 2, pp. 354–61.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S. (1977), An American Social Science: International Relations, in Daedalus, n. 106, pp. 4160.Google Scholar
Hoogvelt, A. (2001), Globalization and the Postcolonial World: The New Political Economy of Development, Basingstoke, Palgrave, II ed.Google Scholar
Hurrell, A. e Woods, N. (1995), Globalisation and Inequality, in «Millennium», n. 3, pp. 447–70.Google Scholar
Hurrell, A. (1999), (a cura di), Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1994), Post-Fordism and the State, in Amin, A. (a cura di), Post-Fordism. A Reader, Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 251–79.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1997), Twenty Years of the (Parisian) Regulation Approach: the Paradox of Success and Failure at Home and Abroad, in «New Political Economy», n. 3, pp. 503–26.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. e Sum, N.-L. (2001), Pre-disciplinary and Post-disciplinary Perspectives, in «New Political Economy», n. 1, pp. 89101.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P.J. (1978), Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, Madison, University of Winsconsin Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P.J. (1985), Small States in World Markets, New York, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P.J., Keohane, R.O. e Krasner, S.D. (1998), International Organization and the Study of World Politics, in «International Organization», n. 4, pp. 645–85.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1986) (a cura di), Neo-realism and Its Critics, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. e Milner, H. (1996) (a cura di), Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. e Nye, J. (1972) (a cura di), Transnational Relations and World Politics, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston, Little.Google Scholar
Kiely, R. (2000), Globalization: From Domination to Resistance, in «Thirld World Quarterly», n. 6, pp. 1059–70.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C.P. (1973), The World in Depression, Berkeley, University of California Press, trad. it. La grande depressione del mondo: 1929–1939, Milano, Etas, 1982.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C.P. (2000), Comparative Political Economy. A Retrospective, Cambridge, The Mit Press.Google Scholar
Knorr, K. (1975), The Power of Nations. The Political Economy of International Relations, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (1976), State Power and the Structure of International Trade, in «World Politics», n. 3, pp. 317–47.Google Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (1982), Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables, in «International Organization», n. 2, pp. 185205.Google Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (a cura di) (1983), International Regimes, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (1996), The Accomplishments of International Political Economy, in Smith, S., Booth, K. e Zalewski, M. (a cura di), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–27.Google Scholar
Lake, D.A. (a cura di) (1993), The International Political Economy of Trade (Volumes I–II), Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Langley, P. (2000), Confronting Globalisation: International Political Economy and Its Critics, in «Millennium», n. 2, pp. 461–69.Google Scholar
Lawler, P. (1986), Peace Research and International Relations: From Divergence to Convergence, in «Millennium», n. 3, pp. 367–90.Google Scholar
Lawton, T.C., Rosenau, J.N. e Verdun, A.C. (2000) (a cura di), Strange Power. Shaping the Parameters of International Relations and International Political Economy, Aldeshot, Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lechner, F.J. e Boli, J. (a cura di) (2000), The Globalization Reader, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lentini, O. (1988), Portrait. Immanuel Wallerstein, in «International Sociology», n. 1, pp. 135–39.Google Scholar
Leys, C. (2001), Market-driven Politics. Neoliberal Democracy and the Public Interest, London, Verso.Google Scholar
Linklater, A. (2000), International Relations. Critical Concepts in Political Science (Voll. 1–5), London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Lucarelli, S. e Menotti, R. (2002), Le Relazioni internazionali nella terra del Principe, in «Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica», 1, pp. 3179.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1993), The Sources of Social Power (Vol. 2). The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, M. (1996), Authoritarian and Liberal Militarism: a Contribution from Comparative and Historical Sociology, in Smith, S., Booth, K. e Zalewski, M. (a cura di), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 221–39.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, M., Lake, D.A. e Ikenberry, G.J. (1989), Toward a Realist Theory of State Action, in «International Studies Quarterly», n. 33–34, pp. 457–74.Google Scholar
Maxwell, R. (a cura di) (2001), Culture Works. The Political Economy of Culture, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mayall, J. (1998), Globalization and International Relations, in «Review of International Studies», n. 24, 239–250.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.W., Boli, J., Thomas, G.M. e Ramirez, F.O. (1997), World Society and the Nation State, in «American Journal of Sociology», 103, pp. 144–81.Google Scholar
Miliband, R. e Panitch, L. (1992) (a cura di), Socialist Register: 1992, London, Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Milner, H. (1988), Resisting Protectionism, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mittelman, J.H. (a cura di) (1996), Globalization: Critical Reflections, Boulder, Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Mittelman, J.H. (2000), The Globalization Syndrome. Transformation and Resistance, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, R., Lorentzen, J., Leander, A. e Guzzini, S. (1993), New Diplomacy in the Post-Cold War World, New York, St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Morse, E.L. (1976), Modernization and the Transformation of International Relations, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. (1984), The Emergence of Nieo Ideology, Boueder, Westview.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. (1999), Inequality, Turmoil and Democracy: Global Political-economic Visions at the End of the Century, in «New Political Economy», n. 2, pp. 289304.Google Scholar
Murphy, C.N. e Tooze, R. (a cura di) (1991), The New International Political Economy, Boulder, Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Neufeld, B. (1993), The Marginalisation of Peace Research in International Relations, in «Millennium», n. 2, pp. 165–84.Google Scholar
New Political Economy (1999), The Millennium Symposium. Conversations with Manuel Castells, Robert Cox and Immanuel Wallerstein, in «New Political Economy», n. 3, pp. 379408.Google Scholar
North, D.C. (1989), Institutions and Economic Growth, in «World Development», n. 17, pp. 1319–32.Google Scholar
O'Brien, R. (2000a), The Difficult Birth of a Global Labour Movement, in «Review of International Political Economy», n. 3, pp. 514–23.Google Scholar
O'Brien, R. (2000b), The Agency of Labour in a Changing Global Order, in Stubbs, R. e Underhill, G.R.D. (a cura di), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, London, MacMillan (II ed.), pp. 3947.Google Scholar
Palan, R. (1999), Susan Strange 1923–1998: a Great International Relations Theorist, in «Review of International Political Economy», n. 2, pp. 121–32.Google Scholar
Palan, R. (a cura di) (2000), Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Panitch, L. e Leys, C. (a cura di) (2000), Working Class Global Realities, Socialist Register: 2001, London, Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, F.S. e Payaslian, S. (1999), International Political Economy: Conflict & Cooperation in the Global System, New York, McGraw-Hill College.Google Scholar
Polychroniou, C. (a cura di) (1992), Perspectives and Issues in International Political Economy, Westport, Praeger.Google Scholar
Prakash, A. e Hart, J.H. (1999), Globalization and Governance, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Prakash, A. (2000a), Coping with Globalization, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Prakash, A. (2000b), Responding to Globalization, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Radice, H. (2000), Taking Globalization Seriously. Socialist Register: 1999, London, Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Review of International Studies (2000), Ris Interview with Jim Rosenau, in «Review of International Studies», n. 26, pp. 465–75.Google Scholar
Robinson, W.I. e Harris, J. (2000), Towards a Global Ruling Class: Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class, in «Science & Society», n. 1, pp. 1154.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. (1995), Comparative Politics and International Political Economy (Volumes I–II), Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Rojek, C. e Turner, B. (2000), Decorative Sociology: Towards a Critique of the Cultural Turn, in «The Sociological Review», n. 4, pp. 629–48.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, R. e Stein, A. (1973), Interdependence: Myth or Reality, in «World Politics», 1, pp. 125.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, R. (1986), The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. (2001), International Relations, in Krieger, J. e Crahan, M.E., The Oxford Companion to Politics of the World, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 424–27.Google Scholar
Sandler, T. (2001), Economic Concepts for the Social Sciences, New York, Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Scartezzini, R. e Rosa, P. (1994), Le relazioni internazionali. Lineamenti di indagine sociologica, Roma, NIS.Google Scholar
Sharma, A. e Woodward, R. (2001), Political Economy Website: A Researcher's Guide, in «New Political Economy», n. 1, pp. 119–30.Google Scholar
Scholte, J.A. (2000), Globalization. A Critical Introduction, New York, St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Sklair, L. (2001), The Transnational Capitalist Class, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1979), States and Social Revolutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Smith, S., Booth, K. e Zalewski, M. (a cura di) (1996), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spero, J.E. (1977), The Politics of International Economic Relations, New York, St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Spero, J.E. e Hart, J.A. (1997), The Politics of International Economic Relations, New York, St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Steans, J. (1999), The Private is Global. Feminist Politics in Global Political Economy, in «New Political Economy», n. 1, pp. 113128.Google Scholar
Stiles, K.W. e Akaha, T. (a cura di) (1991), International Political Economy. A Reader, New York, Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1970), International Economics and International Relations. A Case of Mutual Neglect, in «International Affairs», n. 2, pp. 304–14.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1986), Casino Capitalism, Oxford, Blackwell, trad. it. Capitalismo d'azzardo, Bari, Laterza, 1988.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1988), States and Markets, London, Pinter.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1992), States, Firms and Diplomacy, in «International Affairs», n. 1. pp. 115.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1998), Mad Money, Manchester: Manchester University Press, trad. it. Denaro Impazzito. I mercati finanziari: presente e futuro , Milano, Comunità, 1999.Google Scholar
Stubbs, R. e Underhill, G.R.D. (1994), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, London, MacMillan (II ed. 2000).Google Scholar
Tickner, J.A. (1988), Hans Morgenthaus Principles of Political Realism. A Feminist Reformulation, in «Millennium», n. 3, pp. 429–40.Google Scholar
Tooze, R. (1984a), Perspectives and Theory: a Consumer Guide, in Strange, S. (a cura di), Path to International Political Economy, London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Tooze, R. (1984b), In Search of «International Political Economy», in «Political Studies», 32, pp. 637–46.Google Scholar
Tooze, R. (1990), Understanding the Global Political Economy: Applying Gramsci, in «Millennium», n. 2, pp. 273–80.Google Scholar
Tooze, R. (2000), Susan Strange, Academic International Relations and the Study of International Political Economy, in «New Political Economy», n. 1, pp. 280–90.Google Scholar
Trigilia, C. (1998), Sociologia economica, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Underhill, G.R.D. (2000a), State, Market, and Global Political Economy: Genealogy of an (Inter-?) Discipline, in «International Affairs», n. 4, pp. 803–24.Google Scholar
Underhill, G.R.D. (2000b), Global Money and the Decline of State Power, in T.C. Lawton, J.N Rosenau e A.C. Verdun, (a cura di) (2000), Strange Power. Shaping the Parameters of International Relations and International Political Economy, Aldeshot, Ashgate, pp. 115–35.Google Scholar
Underhill, G.R.D. (2000c), Conceptualizing the Changing Global Order, in R. Stubbs e G.R.D. Underhill (1994), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, London, MacMillan (II ed. 2000).Google Scholar
Vaubel, R. e Willett, T.D. (a cura di) (1991), The Political Economy of International Organizations, Boulder, Westview Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. (1971), Sovereignty at Bay, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Viner, J. (1948), Power versus Plenty as Objectives of Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, in «World Politics», n. 1, pp. 129.Google Scholar
Waever, O. (1996), The Rise and Fall of Inter-Paradigm Debate, in Smith, S., Booth, K. e Zalewski, M. (a cura di), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waever, O. (1998), The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline : American and European Developments in International Relations, in «International Organization», n. 4, pp. 687727.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1974), The Modern World-System, San Diego Academic Press, trad. it. Il sistema mondiale dell'economia moderna, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1990.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1979), The Capitalist World-Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (2000a), The Essential Wallerstein, New York, New Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (2000b), Globalization or the Age of Transition? A Long-Term View of the World-System, in «International Sociology», n. 2, 249–65.Google Scholar
Waltz, K. (1979), Theory of International Politics, Reading, Addison-Wesley, trad. it. L'uomo, lo stato e la guerra. Un'analisi teorica, Roma, Giuffrè, 1998.Google Scholar
Weck-Hannemann, A. (1992), The Contribution of Public Choice Theory to International Political Economy, in Polychroniou, C. (a cura di), Perspectives and Issues in International Political Economy, Westport, Praeger, pp. 3857.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1992), Anarchy is What States Make of it: the Social Construction of Power Politics, in «International Organization», n. 2, pp. 395421.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1994), Collective Identity Formation and the International State, in «American Political Science Review», n. 2, pp. 384396.Google Scholar
Woods, N. (a cura di) (2000), The Political Economy of Globalization, London, MacMillan.Google Scholar
Young, O.R. (1996), The International Political Economy and International Institutions (Volumes I–II), Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar
Zacher, M.W. (1993), The International Political Economy of Natural Resources (Volumes I–II), Aldershot, Elgar Reference Collection.Google Scholar