Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:31:49.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LE VECCHIE NOVITÀ DELLA GLOBALIZZAZIONE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Marcq Cesa

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Quando la diffusione di un termine si fa tanto ampia da permetterne un uso indiscriminato, sia nel linguaggio comune che, e soprattutto, in quello scientifico, è lecito sospettare che essa rifletta una vera e propria moda intellettuale, o poco più. Questo è certamente il caso della «globalizzazione». Nell'ultimo decennio, economisti, storici, sociologi e politologi hanno fatto a gara, a più riprese, e con grande dovizia di argomenti, a offrire una lettura «globalizzata» dei fenomeni di loro rispettiva competenza, spesso sottolineando un insieme di elementi di drastica rottura con un passato relativamente recente e insistendo, di conseguenza, su tutta una serie di novità epocali che la globalizzazione comporterebbe. Secondo molti, infatti, la globalizzazione ha stravolto i tradizionali punti di riferimento e reso obsoleti gli strumenti analitici in nostro possesso; è necessario dunque elaborarne di nuovi, pena l'impossibilità di rendere conto delle più importanti dinamiche politiche, economiche e sociali odierne. A queste opinioni si contrappongono quelle di coloro che, pur riconoscendo l'importanza di molte tendenze «globalizzanti» in atto, ne limitano più o meno decisamente la portata, sia da una prospettiva storica (abbiamo già assistito a processi simili) che da una analitica (concetti e teorie di cui già disponiamo possono essere di grande utilità anche nell'esame dei fenomeni detti «globali»).

Summary

Summary

Current debates on globalization and the alleged transformation of the nature of international relations are strongly reminiscent of much of what had been argued some three decades ago, as scholars discussed interdependence theory in terms of growing commercial and financial integration, the emergence of new transnational and transgovernmental actors, the technical complexities of the international agenda, the eclipse of the state, the decline of security goals and the rise of welfare goals as the highest priorities of societies, the importance of international institutions, the ambiguities of power and the irrelevance of force. All this pointed at the obsolescence of the realist paradigm, and in turn triggered a set of realist replies. Even the lively exchange on the impact of globalization on developing countries is old news, indebted as it is to a strikingly similar discussion on dependency theory involving liberal, marxist, and eventually realist scholars.

A realist-informed assessment of several factual claims made by the globalists suggests that the repercussions of globalization on international relations have been grossly exaggerated. The state's economic sovereignty may well be challenged; yet states are far from impotent in dealing with markets and still perform a number of functions that can hardly be ignored; multinational corporations and other transnational actors may well play a key role in international affairs; yet they must come to terms with states in many important ways; globalization may well put a premium on devising common strategies for common problems; yet no issue seems so global as to prevent states from looking at it from a national perspective. Above all, globalization may well pull and haul all states; yet some states - the more powerful in general, the United States in particular - are less constrained than others. As a result, those who present globalization as the beginning of a new era for international relations are neither theoretically original nor empirically convincing.

Type
Saggi
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , December 2002 , pp. 389 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by Società editrice il Mulino, Bologna 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Adler, E. (1986), Ideological «Guerrillas» and the Quest for Technological Autonomy: Brazil's Domestic Computer Industry, in «International Organization», XL, n. 3, pp. 673–705.Google Scholar
Are, G. (1998), Luci e ombre della globalizzazione, in «Nuova storia contemporanea», 1, pp. 35–47.Google Scholar
Art, R.J. (1996), American Foreign Policy and the Fungibility of Force, in «Security Studies», V, n. 4, pp. 7–42.Google Scholar
Attinà, F. (1999), Il sistema politico globale, Roma-Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (1979), Power Analysis and World Politics. New Trends versus Old Tendencies, in «World Politics», XXXI, n. 1, pp. 161–194.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (1980), Interdependence and Power: A Conceptual Analysis, in «International Organization», XXXIV, n. 4, pp. 471–506.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (1985), Economic Statecraft, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D.A. (1999–2000), The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice, in «International Security», XXIV, n. 3, pp. 80–107.Google Scholar
Baran, P. (1967), The Political Economy of Growth, New York, Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Barbieri, K. (1996), Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?, in «Journal of Peace Research», XXXIII, n. 1, pp. 29–49.Google Scholar
Baylis, J. e Smith, S. (a cura di) (1997), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blanchard, J.-M., Mansfield, E.D. e Ripsman, N.M. (a cura di) (2000), Power and the Purse. Economic Statecraft, Interdependence, and National Security, London, Cass.Google Scholar
Block, F. (1996), The Vampire State and Other Stories, New York, New Press.Google Scholar
Bryan, L. e Farrell, D. (1996), Market Unbound: Unleashing Global Capitalism, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Burbach, R., Núñez, O. e Kagarlitsky, B. (1997), Globalization and its Discontents, London, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1978), The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis, in «American Political Science Review», LXXII, n. 4, pp. 1243–1261.Google Scholar
Carr, E.H. (1946 2), The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cesa, M. (1996), Politica e economia internazionale. Introduzione alle teorie di International Political Economy, Milano, Jaca Book.Google Scholar
Clark, I. (1999), Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.N. (1968), The Economics of Interdependence: Economic Policy in the Atlantic Community, New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.N. (1972), Economic Interdependence and Foreign Policy in the Seventies, in «World Politics», XXIV, n. 2, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar
Cortright, D. e Lopez, G. (1997), Economic Sanctions. Panacea of Peacebuilding in a Post-Cold War World?, Boulder, Westview.Google Scholar
Crawford, B. (1993), Economic Vulnerability in International Relations, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dos Santos, T. (1970), The Structure of Dependence, in «American Economic Review», LX, n. 2, pp. 231–236.Google Scholar
Drezner, D.W. (1999), The Sanctions Paradox. Economic Statecraft and International Relations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1986), State, Capital, and the Transformation of Dependence: the Brazilian Computer Case, in «World Development», XIV, n. 7, pp. 791–808.Google Scholar
Evans, P. (1997), The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization, in «World Politics», L, 1, pp. 62–87.Google Scholar
Frank, A.G. (1969), Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil, New York, Monthly Review Press, ed. riv.Google Scholar
Friedman, T.L. (1999), The Lexus and the Olive Tree, New York, Farrar, Strauss & Giroux, trad. it. Le radici del futuro, Milano, Mondadori, 2000.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. (1995), Capital Mobility, Trade and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy, in «International Organization», IL, n. 4, pp. 657–687.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1975), U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1977), Economic Interdependence and National Security in Historical Perspective, in Knorr, K. e Trager, F.N. (a cura di), Economic Issues and National Security, Lawrence, University of Kansas Press, pp. 19–66.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1981), War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; trad. it. Guerra e mutamento nella politica internazionale, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1989.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1996), No One Loves a Political Realist, in Frankel, B. (a cura di), Realism: Restatements and Renewal, London, Cass, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (2000a), The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century, Princeton, Princeton University Press; trad. it. Le insidie del capitalismo globale, Milano, Egea, 2001.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (2000b), The Retreat of the State?, in Lawton, T.C., Rosenau, J.N. e Verdun, A.C. (a cura di), Strange Power: Shaping the Parameters of International Relations and International Political Economy, Aldershot, Ashgate, pp. 197–213.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (2001), Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order, Princeton, Princeton University Press; trad. it. in corso di stampa presso Egea, Milano.Google Scholar
Grieco, J.M. (1982), Between Dependency and Autonomy: India's Experience with the International Computer Industry, in «International Organization», XXXVI, n. 3, pp. 609–632.Google Scholar
Grieco, J.M. (2002), Economic Globalization and Political Backlash, in Grieco, J.M. e Ikenberry, G.J. (a cura di), State Power and World Markets, New York, Norton, pp. 204–243.Google Scholar
Held, D. e McGrew, A. (2000), The Great Globalization Debate: An Introduction, in The Global Transformations Reader, Cambridge, Polity Press; trad. it. Globalismo e antiglobalismo, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2001.Google Scholar
Held, D. (a cura di) (2000), The Global Transformations Reader, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.O. (1945), National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Berkeley, The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, M. (1978), Integration Theory, in Taylor, T. (a cura di), Approaches and Theory in International Relations, London, Longman, pp. 237–256.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S.H. (2002), Le 21ème siècle a commencé, ou: l'état des lieux, in «Vingtième Siècle», 76, octobre-décembre (in corso di pubblicazione).Google Scholar
Hook, S.W. (1995), National Interest and Foreign Aid, Boulder, Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P. (1999), The Lonely Superpower, in «Foreign Affairs», LXXVIII, n. 2, pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G.J. (200la), After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G.J. (2001b), L'età della globalizzazione, in G.J. Ikenberry e V.E. Parsi (a cura di), Manuale di Relazioni Internazionali, Roma-Bari, Laterza, pp. 43–63.Google Scholar
Kapstein, E.B. (1992), Between Power and Purpose: Central Bankers and the Politics of Regulatory Convergence, in «International Organization», XLVI, n. 1, pp. 265–288.Google Scholar
Kapstein, E.B. (2000), Winners and Losers in the Global Economy, in «International Organization», LIV, n. 2, pp. 359–384.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1984), After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. e Milner, H. (a cura di) (1996), Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. e Nye, J.S. (a cura di) (1972), Transnational Relations and World Politics, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1974), Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations, in «World Politics», XXVII, n. 1, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston, Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (2000), Globalization: What's New? What's Not? (And So What?), in «Foreign Policy», 118, pp. 104–119.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1920), The Economic Consequences of the Peace, New York, Harcourt, Brace and Howe; trad. it. Le conseguenze economiche della pace, Torino, Rosenberg & Sellier, 1983.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C.P. (1970), Power and Money. The Economics of International Politics and the Politics of International Economics, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C.P. (1973), The World in Depression, 1929–1939, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirshner, J. (1995), Currency and Coercion. The Political Economy of International Monetary Power, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr, K. (1973), Power and Wealth. The Political Economy of International Power, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Krasner, S.D. (1976), State Power and the Structure of International Trade, in «World Politics», XXVIII, n. 3, pp. 317–347.Google Scholar
Labbé, M.-H. (1994), L'arme économique dans les relations Internationales, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Luttwak, E.N. (1990), From Geo-Politics to Geo-Economics. Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce, in «The National Interest», n. 20, pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E.D. (1994), Power, Trade, and War, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, M. (1997), Preserving the Unipolar Moment. Realist Theories and US Grand Strategy after the Cold War, in «International Security», XXI, n. 4, pp. 49–88.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, M. (1998), Economics and Security in Statecraft and Scholarship, in «International Organization», LII, n. 4, pp. 825–854.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1994), Regime Design Matters. International Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance, in «International Organization», XLVIII, n. 3, pp. 435–458.Google Scholar
Morse, E.L. (1970), The Transformation of Foreign Policies. Modernization, Interdependence, and Externalization, in «World Politics», XXII, n. 3, pp. 371–392.Google Scholar
Morse, E.L. (1974), Modernization and the Transformation of International Relations, New York, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Nester, W. (1995), International Relations. Geopolitical Relations and Geoeconomic Conflict and Cooperation, New York, Harper and Collins.Google Scholar
Ohmae, K. (1990), The Borderless World, London, Collins; trad. it. Il mondo senza confini, Milano, Il Sole-24 Ore Libri, 1991.Google Scholar
Ohmae, K. (1995), The End of the Nation State, New York, The Free Press; trad. it. La fine dello stato-nazione, Milano, Baldini & Castoldi, 1996.Google Scholar
Ornaghi, L. (2001), Il ruolo internazionale dello Stato, in G.J. Ikenberry e V.E. Parsi (a cura di), Manuale di Relazioni Internazionali, Roma-Bari, Laterza, pp. 69–87.Google Scholar
Papayoanou, P.A. (1997), Economic Interdependence and the Balance of Power, in «International Studies Quarterly», XLI, n. 1, pp. 113–140.Google Scholar
Pape, R.A. (1997), Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work, in «International Security», XXII, n. 2, pp. 90–136.Google Scholar
Parker, G. (1985), Western Geopolitical Thought in the Twentieth Century, London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Pearson, L.B. (1969), Partners in Development. Report of the Commission on International Development, New York, Praeger.Google Scholar
Pieper, U. e Taylor, L. (1998), The Revival of the Liberal Creed: the IMF, the World Bank and Inequality in the Globalized Economy, in Baker, D., Epstein, G. e Podin, R. (a cura di), Globalization and Progressive Economic Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–63.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. (1998), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
Reich, R.B. (1992), The Work of Nations, New York, Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Rodrick, D. (1997), Has Globalization Gone Too Far?, Washington, Institute of International Economics.Google Scholar
Rodrick, D. (2001), Trading in Illusions, in «Foreign Policy», 123, March-April, pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, R. (1999), The Rise of the Virtual State. Wealth and Power in the Coming Century, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, R. e Stein, A. (1973), Interdependence: Myth or Reality?, in «World Politics», XXVI, n. 1, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Scott, B.R. (2001), The Great Divide in the Global Village, in «Foreign Affairs», LXXX, n. 1, pp. 160–177.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1996), The Retreat of the State. The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; trad. it. Chi governa l'economia mondiale?, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1998.Google Scholar
Thacker, S. (1999), The High Politics of IMF Lending, in «World Politics», LII, n. 1, pp. 38–75.Google Scholar
«The Economist» (2001), Globalisation and Its Critics. A Survey, September 29.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1974, 1980, 1989), The Modern World-System, New York, Academic Press, 3 voll.; trad it. dei primi due volumi, Il sistema mondiale dell'economia, voll. 1 e 2, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1978 e 1982, rispettivamente.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. (1970), The Myth of National Interdependence, in Kindleberger, C.P. (a cura di), The International Corporation, Cambridge, Mit Press, pp. 205–223.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, Reading, Addison-Wesley; trad. it. Teoria della politica internazionale, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1987.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. (2000a), Globalization and American Power, in «The National Interest», 59, pp. 46–56.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. (2000b), Structural Realism after the Cold War, in «International Security», XXV, n. 1, pp. 5–41.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (2001), Will the Nation-State Survive Globalization?, in «Foreign Affairs», LXXX, n. 1, pp. 178–190.Google Scholar