Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:24:29.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LA PRESIDENZA DELLA COMMISSIONE EUROPEA. VINCOLI E RISORSE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Ken Endo

Introduzione

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

La carica di Presidente della Commissione Europea è malleabile. I suoi poteri e le sue possibilità di incidenza politica mutano con l'avvicendarsi dei presidenti, e anche nel corso di una stessa presidenza, come mostra il caso di Jacques Delors, il cui ufficio è passato in un decennio (1985–1995) attraverso fasi espansive e restrittive.

Summary

Summary

This article highlights the underlying institutional structure of the Commission presidency which clearly exists, despite the contested and malleable nature of the office.

There are at least three important aspects of the Commission President's leadership. The first is to build an administration, or improve it, thereby founding an effective power base to exercise other aspects of leadership. Second, to build coalitions or effect compromises throught which the President attempts to make the Community function, whilst upgrading the common interests among the member states. The third is to set and expand agendas in order to deepen integration.

For these leadership roles, the Commission presidency is given important resources. Internally, the position as the chairman of the College, the possession of the largest cabinet, cooperation with the Secretary General, and other in-house organs and channels under presidential control, help the President to mobilise the College and the Commission apparatus. This mobilisation in turn allows him to exert influence outside the Commission.

Externally, the President's membership of the European Council is a key to understanding his potential to exercise agenda-setting and mediative leadership. The Council presidency, the Council Secretariat and the Franco-German axis may also be turned into his resources when he manages to ally himself with them. Lastly, the international standing of the Commission President helps (or hinders) him in exercising leadership, since prestige in the international arena can be a resource for the constantly contested office of the President. Success in mobilising these external resources can facilitate enhanced utilisation of his internal resources.

However, the Commission presidency is circumscribed by constraints. The office of the Commission President is not intended to be, nor is it, equipped with democratic legitimacy, lacks the important resource of a political party, and is characterised by meagre links with peoples. Moreover, the internal standing of the Commission President within the Commission is also partly designed and partly obliged to be modest, given the rule of collegiality, the lack of power to hire and fire the Commissioners as well as other key in-house posts, and the fragmentation and heterogeneity of the Commission apparatus.

Type
Saggi
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 441 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Societ Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Blondel, J. (1987), Political Leadership: Towards a general analysis, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Blondel, J. (1991), Commission de la Communauté et Gouvernements d'Europe Occidentale, in Blondel, J. e Bardi, L. (in collaborazione con G. Pasquino), cit.Google Scholar
Blondel, J e Bardi, L. (in collaborazione con G. Pasquino) (1991), La Commission européenne: Processus de décision et le role des commissaires (Florence, novembre).Google Scholar
Blondel, J. e Müller-Rommel, F. (a cura di) (1993), Governing Together: The Extent and Limits of Joint Decision Making in Western European Cabinets, Basingstoke, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, D. (1991), Man in the News: Jacques Delors, «Financial Times», 23–24 novembre, p. 8.Google Scholar
Bulletin of the European Communities (Bull EC) (1967), n. 4.Google Scholar
Bulletin of the European Communities (1970), n. 1.Google Scholar
Bulletin of the European Communities (1972), n. 8.Google Scholar
Burgess, M. (1989), Federalism and European Union: Political Ideas, Influences and Strategies in the European Community. 1972–1986, London-New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Cloos, J. et al. (1993), Le Traité de Maastricht: Génese, analyse, commentaires, Bruxelles, Établissements Émile Bruylant.Google Scholar
Commission des Communautés européennes (1993a), Secretariat général, SEC (93) 49/6, 4 febbraio.Google Scholar
Commission des Communautés européennes (1993b), SEC (93) 829, 25 maggio.Google Scholar
Conrad, Y. (1989), Jean Monnet et les Débats de la Fonction Publique Européenne: La Haute Autorità de la CECA (1952–1953), Louvainla-neuve, CIACO.Google Scholar
Coombes, D. (1970), Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community: A Portrait of the Commission of the E.E.C., London, George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1971a), Wieland Europa, in «Die Zeit», n. 28, 9 luglio, S. 3.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1971b), Ein neues Ziel für Europa, in «Die Zeit», n. 29, 16 luglio, S. 3.Google Scholar
Donnelly, M. e Ritchie, E. (1994), The College of Commissioners and their Cabinets, in Edwards, G. e Spense, D. (a cura di), The European Commission, Harlow, Longman, pp. 31–61.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. e Spence, D. (a cura di) (1994), The European Commission, Harlow, Longman.Google Scholar
Forsyth, M. (1981), Unions of States: The Theory and Practice of Confederation, Leicester, Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, C. (1994), Delors: Inside the House that Jacques Built, London, Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
Haas, E. (1958), The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950–1957, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992), Citoyenneté et identità nationale: Réflexions sur l'avenir de l'Europe, in Lenoble, J. e Dewandre, N. (a cura di), L'Europe au soir du siède: Identité et démocratic, Paris, Editions Esprit.Google Scholar
Hallstein, W. (1979), Die Europäische Gemeinschaft, Dusseldorf, Econ Verlag.Google Scholar
Hayward, J. (a cura di) (1993), De Gaulle to Mitterrand: Presidential Power in France, London, Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Hill, A. (1993), Summiteers at odds over Ecofin council's role, in «Financial Times», 13 dicembre, p. 2.Google Scholar
Howe, G. (1994), Conflict of Loyalty, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. (1962), The Parliament of Switzerland, London, Cassel & Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Jacobs, F., Corbett, R. e Shackleton, M. (1992), The European Parliament, 2. ed., Harlow, Longman.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1989), European Diary 1977–1981, London, Colins.Google Scholar
Jones, G.W. (a cura di) (1991a), West European Prime Ministers, in «West European Politics», XIV, 2.Google Scholar
Jones, G.W. (a cura di) (1991b), West European Prime Ministers in Perspective, in «West European Politics», XIV, 2, pp. 163–178.Google Scholar
King, A. (1975), Executives, in Greenstein, F.I. e Polsby, N.W. (a cura di), The Handbook of Political Science, Reading, MA, Addison Wesley, pp. 173–256.Google Scholar
Krenzler, H.G. (1974), Die Rolle der Kabinette in der Kommission des Europäischen Gemeinschaften, in «Europarecht», 2, pp. 59–67.Google Scholar
Le Monde (1972), 20 ottobre, p. 1.Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. (1982), The Making of the European Monetary System: A Case Study of the Politics of the European Community, London, Butterworth.Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. (1991), The European Commission, in Keohane, R.O. e Hoffmann, S. (a cura di), The New European Community: Decision Making and Institutional Change, Boulder, Westview Press, pp. 85–132.Google Scholar
Marjolin, R. (1989), Architect of European Unity: Memoirs 1911–1986, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Milèsi, G. (1985), Jacques Delors, Paris, Pierre Belfond.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. (1992), Jean Monnet and the ECSC Administration: Challenges, Functions and the Inheritance of Ideas, in Heyek, E.V. et al. (a cura di), Early European Community Administration, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Newhouse, J. (1968), Collision in Brussels, London, Faber.Google Scholar
Nöel, E. (1992), Témoignage: l'administration de la Communauté européenne dans la rétrospective d'un ancien haut fonctionnaire (interview par Roger Morgan), in Heyek, E.V. et al. (a cura di), Early European Community Administration, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 145–158.Google Scholar
Nuallain, C.O. (a cura di) (1985), The Presidency of the Council of Ministers: Impact and Implications for National Governments, London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
«Official Journal of the European Communities (OJ)» (1980), Vol. L, 261/16, 4 ottobre.Google Scholar
Règlement intérieure de la Commission (1963), in «Journal officiel des Communautés européennes», n. 17, 31 gennaio.Google Scholar
Ross, G. (1993), Sidling into Industrial Policy: Inside the European Commission, in «French Politics and Society», XI, 1, pp. 20–44.Google Scholar
Ross, G. (1995), Jacques Delors and European Integration, Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, M. (1990), Technology and the Dynamics of Integration, in Wallace, W. (a cura di), The Dynamics of European Integration, London, Pinter, pp. 50–68.Google Scholar
Simonian, H. (1985), The Privileged Partnership: Franco-German Relations in the European Community 1969–1984, Oxford, The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. e Smyrl, M. (1995), A la recherche d'interlocuteurs: La Commission européenne et le developpement territorial en France, in «Sciences et Société. Les cahiers du LERASS» (febbraio).Google Scholar
Spence, D. (1993), The European Community and German Unification, in Jeffery, C. e Strum, R. (a cura di), Federalism, Unification and European Integration, London, Frank Cass, pp. 136–163.Google Scholar
Spence, D. (1994), Structure, Functions and Procedures in the Commission, in Edwards, G. e Spense, D. (a cura di) (1994), pp. 101–103.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (1993), International Organization in the Modern World: The Regional and Global Process, London, Pinter.Google Scholar
Wallace, H. (1983), Negotiation, Conflict, and Compromise: The Elusive Pursuit of Common Policies, in Wallace, H., Wallace, W. e Webb, C. (a cura di), Policy Making in the European Community, 2. ed., Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 43–80.Google Scholar
Wallace, H. e Edwards, G. (1976), European Community: The Evolving Role of the Presidency of the Council, in «International Affairs», LII, 4, pp. 535–550.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. (1983), Less than a Federation, More than a Regime: the Community as a Political System, in Wallace, H., Wallace, W. e Webb, C. (a cura di), Policy Making in the European Community, 2. ed., Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 403–436.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. (1993), Walter Hallstein from the British Perspective, paper presentato all'Institut fur Europaische Politik, Bonn (settembre).Google Scholar
Weiler, J.H.H. (1992), After Maastricht: Community Legitimacy in Post-1992 Europe, in Adams, W.J. (a cura di), Singular Europe: Economy and Polity of the European Community after 1992, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, pp. 11–41.Google Scholar
Werts, J. (1992), The European Council, Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Wright, V. (1989), The Government and Politics of France, London, Unwin-Heyman, 3a ed.Google Scholar