Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:04:33.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Italian foreign policy: challenges and continuities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2017

Pierangelo Isernia Open the ORCID record for Pierangelo Isernia [Opens in a new window]  and
Francesca Longo Open the ORCID record for Francesca Longo [Opens in a new window]
Pierangelo Isernia*
Affiliation:
Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences (DISPOC), University of Siena, Siena, Italy
Francesca Longo
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Studies, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Italian foreign politics is facing tough challenges in the near future. For more than 60 years, the Italian foreign policy compass was set on two poles, the European Union and the United States. Sometimes alternatively, much more often conjointly, these two polar stars oriented each and every Italian government’s choice since the end of Second World War. All this has been changing over the last few years. In this context, the article intends to introduce the special issue on Italian foreign policy drawing a stylized map of theoretical approaches that knits together the dispersed theoretical and empirical studies of Italian foreign policy, using a couple of theoretical perspectives as light posts in orienting the articles in this special issue. This introduction is organized in four sections. First, it discusses the approaches that explicitly combine together domestic and international factors in explaining foreign policy. Next, it maps studies on the Italian foreign policy within these frameworks. Then the main characteristics of Italian foreign policy, using these theoretical perspectives, are discussed. The article concludes summarizing how the contributions in this special issue fits into these theoretical frameworks and help shed light on present Italian foreign policy.

Keywords

international relationsItalyforeign policy
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 47 , Special Issue 2: Special issue: Italian Foreign Policy: To Take Arms against a Sea of Troubles? , July 2017 , pp. 107 - 124
Copyright
© Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G.A. (1989), ‘The international-national connection’, British Journal of Political Science 19(2): 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, J. E. and Eichengreen, B. (1989), ‘Parallel and overlapping games: Theory and an application to the European gas trade’, Economics & Politics 1(2): 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammendola, T. and Isernia, P. (2000), ‘Continuità e mutamento nella politica estera italiana’, in G. Di Palma, S. Fabbrini and G. Freddi (eds), Condannata al successo. L’Italia nell’Europa integrata, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 365–400.Google Scholar
Andreatta, F., Clementi, M., Colombo, A., Koenig Archibugi, M. and Parsi, V.E. (2007), Relazioni internazionali, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Auerswald, D.P. (2000), Disarmed Democracies. Domestic Institutions and the Use of Force, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Auerswald, D.P. (2004), ‘Explaining wars of choice: an integrated decision model of NATO policy in Kosovo’, International Studies Quarterly 48(3): 631–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerswald, D.P. and Saideman, S.M. (2014), NATO in Afghanistan. Fighting Together, Fighting Alone, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bellucci, P. (2005), ‘La reazione dell'élite politica italiana di fronte all’integrazione europea alla fine degli anni ‘90’, in M. Cotta, P. Isernia and L. Verzichelli (eds), L’Europa in Italia. Elite, opinione pubblica e decisioni, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 171–222.Google Scholar
Brighi, E. (2013), Foreign Policy, Domestic Politics and International Relations, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnales, W. (2002), ‘Foreign policy’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, pp. 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cladi, L. and Webber, M. (2011), ‘Italian foreign policy in the post-cold war period: a neoclassical realist approach’, European Security 20(2): 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, B.C. and Harris, S.A. (1975), ‘Foreign policy’, in F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 6: Policies and Policymaking, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 381–438.Google Scholar
Cotta, M. and Isernia, P. (1996), ‘Bandiera e Risorse: la politica estera italiana negli anni ’80’, in M. Cotta and P. Isernia (eds) Il Gigante dai Piedi di Argilla, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp 137–186.Google Scholar
Croci, O. (2013), ‘The second Berlusconi government and Italian foreign policy’, The International Spectator 2: 90–101.Google Scholar
Davidson, J.W. (2009), ‘Italy-US relations since the end of the Cold War: prestige, peace, and the transatlantic balance’, Bulletin of Italian Politics 1(2): 289–308.Google Scholar
Elman, C. (1996), ‘Horses for courses: why nor neorealist theories of foreign policy?’, Security Studies 6(1): 7–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P.B., Jacobson, H.K. and Putnam, R.D. (1993), Double-Edged Diplomacy. International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J.D. (1998), ‘Domestic politics, foreign policy, and theories of international relations’, Annual Review Political Science 1: 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, J. (1999), ‘Actors and Preferences in International Relations’, in D. A. Lake and R. Powell (eds.) Strategic Choice and International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 39–76.Google Scholar
Frieden, J. and Martin, L. (2003), ‘International political economy: global and domestic interactions’, in I. Katznelson and H.V. Milner (eds), Political Science: The State of the Discipline, New York: W.W. Norton, pp. 118–146.Google Scholar
Garrison, J.A. (2003), ‘Foreign policy analysis in 20/20: a symposium’, International Studies Review 5(2): 155–202.Google Scholar
Gerner, D. J. (1991), ‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Renaissance, Routine, or Rubbish’, in W. Crotty (editor) Political Science: Looking to the Future vol. 2, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 123–185.Google Scholar
Giacomello, B. and Verbeek, E. eds. (2011), Italy’s foreign policy in the 21st century. The new assertiveness of an aspiring middle power?, Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. (1978), ‘The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics’, International Organization 32(4): 881–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, P. (2002), ‘Domestic politics and international relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, pp. 407–429.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. A. (1986), ‘Politics in Hard Times’, Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises, Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (1999), ‘What Place for Ideas in the Agency- Structure Debate? Globalisation as a Process without a Subject’, paper presented at BISA Annual Conference, Manchester, December, available at: http://www.criticalrealism.com/archive/cshay_wpisad.html.Google Scholar
Harnisch, S., Frank, C. and Maull, H.W. (2011), Role Theory in International Relations. Approaches and Analyses, New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hermann, C.F. (1978), ‘Foreign policy behavior: that which is to be explained’, in M.A. East, S.A. Salmore and C.F. Hermann (eds), Why Nations Act. Theoretical Perspectives for Comparative Foreign Policy Studies, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Hermann, C. F., Kegley, C. W. and Rosenau, J.N. editors (1987), New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Holsti, K.J. (1970), ‘National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy’, International Studies Quarterly 14(3): 233–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, D.P. (2007), ‘Reinvigorating the study of foreign policy decision-making: toward a constructivist approach’, Foreign Policy Analysis 3(1): 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, V.M. (2005), ‘Foreign policy analysis: actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations’, Foreign Policy Analysis 1(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, V.M. (2007), Foreign Policy Analysis. Classic and Contemporary Theory, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hudson, V.M. (2010), ‘Foreign policy analysis: origins (1954–93) and contestations’, in R.A. Denemark (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved 9 July 2014 from http://www.isacompendium.com/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9781444336597_yr2013_chunk_g97814443365978_ss1-20.Google Scholar
Hudson, V.M. and Vore, C.S. (1995), ‘Foreign policy analysis yesterday, today, and tomorrow’, Mershon International Studies Review 39(2): 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignazi, P., G. Giacomello and F.Coticchia (2012), Italian Military Operations Abroad ’, Just Don’t Call it War, Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, J.K. (1996), ‘Are all politics domestic? Perspectives on the integration of comparative politics and international relations theories’, Comparative Politics 29(1): 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaarbo, J. (2003), ‘Foreign policy analysis in the twenty-first century: back to comparison, forward to identity and ideas’, International Studies Review 5(2): 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, Norman (1963), The politics of Italian foreign policy, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuzma, L.M. (1998), ‘The Crusade to resurrect the national role concept’, Mershon International Studies Review 42(1): 167–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, D.A. and Powell, R. (1999), Strategic Choice and International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Prestre, P.G. (ed.) (1997), Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transition, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastanduno, M., Lake, D.A. and Ikenberry, G.J. (1989), ‘Toward a realist theory of state action’, International Studies Quarterly 33(4): 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H.V. (1997), Interests, Institutions and Information. Domestic Politics and International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (1993), ‘Introduction: integrating international and domestic theories of international bargaining’, in P.B. Evans, H.K. Jacobson and R.D. Putnam (eds), Double-Edged Diplomacy. International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 3–41.Google Scholar
Müller, H. and Risse-Kappen, T. (1993), ‘From the outside in and from the inside out: international relations, domestic politics and foreign policy’, in D. Skidmore and V.M. Hudson (eds), The Limits of State Autonomy. Societal Groups and Foreign Policy Formulation, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 25–48.Google Scholar
Neack, L. J., Hey, A. K. and Haney, P. J. editors (1995), Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Panebianco, A. (1977), ‘La Politica Estera Italiana: Un Modello Interpretativo’, Il Mulino XXVI: 845–879.Google Scholar
Pasquino, G. (1974), ‘Pesi Internazionali e Contrappesi Nazionali’, in F.L. Cavazza and S.R. Graubard (eds), Il Caso Italiano, Milano: Garzanti, pp. 163–182.Google Scholar
Posner, A.R. (1978), ‘Italy: dependence and political fragmentation’, in P J. Katzenstein (ed.), Between Power and Plenty. Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 225–254.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (1988), ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level game’, International Organization 42(3): 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, B. (1993), ‘Psychology, foreign policy, and international relations theory’, Political Psychology 14(3): 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, R. (1990), Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (1998), ‘Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy’, World Politics 51(1): 144–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, J.N. (1966), ‘Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy’, in R.B. Farrell (ed.), Approaches to Comparative and International Politics, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 27–92.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J.N. (ed.) (1969a), Linkage Politics. Essays on the Convergence of National and International Systems, New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J.N. (1969b), ‘Toward the study of national-international linkages’, in J.N. Rosenau (ed.), Linkage Politics. Essays on the Convergence of National and International Systems, New York, NY: The Free Press, pp. 44–65.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J.N. (1970), ‘Foreign policy as adaptive behavior: some preliminary notes for a theoretical model’, Comparative Politics 2(3): 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, J.N. (1981), The Study of Political Adaptation, London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Sampson, M. W. III and Walker, S. G. (1987), ‘Cultural Norms and National Roles: A Comparison of Japan and France’, in S.G. Walker editor Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 105–122.Google Scholar
Santoro, C.M. (1990), ‘La Politica Estera’, in B. Dente (ed.), Le Politiche Pubbliche in Italia, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
Santoro, C. M. (1991), La Politica Estera di una Media Potenza, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (1986), ‘Theories of foreign policy: an historical overview’, Review of International Studies 12(1): 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, D.S. (2008), ‘Foreign-policy decision making’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), Oxford Handbook International Relations, Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 576–594.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, J.W., Lobell, S.E. and Ripsman, N.M. (2009), ‘Introduction: neoclassical realism, the state and foreign policy’, in S.E. Lobell, N.M. Ripsman and J.W. Taliaferro (eds), Neoclassical Realism, the State and Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Thies, C.G. (2010), ‘Role theory and foreign policy’, in R.A. Denemark (ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved 17 July 2014 from http://www.isacompendium.com/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9781444336597_yr2013_chunk_g978144433659717_ss1-17.Google Scholar
Thies, C.G. and Breuning, M. (2012), ‘Integrating foreign policy analysis and international relations through role theory’, Foreign Policy Analysis 8: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, S.G. (1979), ‘National role conceptions and systemic outcomes’, in L.S. Falkowski (ed.), Psychological Models in International Relations, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 169–210.Google Scholar
Walker, S.G. (1987a), Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, S.G. (1987b), ‘Role theory and the origins of foreign policy’, in C.F. Hermann, C.W. Kegley Jr and J.N. Rosenau (eds), New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, pp. 269–284.Google Scholar
Wish, N.B. (1980), ‘Foreign policy makers and their national role conceptions’, International Studies Quarterly 24(4): 532–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, F. (1992), ‘Realism and domestic politics: a review essay’, International Security 17(1): 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar