Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:49:47.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fragility and resilience in the European Union's security strategy: comparing policy paradigms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2020

Edoardo Baldaro*
Affiliation:
Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Naples ‘L'Orientale’, Largo San Giovanni Maggiore 30 – 80134, Naples, Italy
Irene Costantini
Affiliation:
Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Naples ‘L'Orientale’, Largo San Giovanni Maggiore 30 – 80134, Naples, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The article takes fragility and resilience as distinct policy paradigms, and proposes a structured, focused comparison of how they informed and changed the EU approach to conflict and crisis management in time. The first section provides a cumulative synthesis of the debate on fragility and resilience in the international and European security discourse and practice on the background of which their comparison is built. By analysing the founding documents respectively endorsing fragility and resilience in the European context, namely the 2003 European Security Strategy and the 2016 European Union Global Strategy in addition to the existing literature on these topics, the two paradigms are examined in terms of (1) what understanding of the international system they advance; (2) where they identify the locus of the threat; (3) which role they attribute to the international community (4) and the type of solutions they proposed. In accordance with our results, we conclude that the two paradigms are not in competition, since they emerged from and reflected a contingent shift in global and local environments. Moreover, rather than providing a novel lens to better look at conflict and crisis situation, resilience is found to offer more insights into the EU's perception of its role in these contexts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrinha, A (2016) Cybersecurity in the European Union. Resilience and adaptability in governance policy. European Security 25, 387389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, AJ and Williams, PD (2011) The new politics of protection? Co^te d'Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs 87, 825850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belloni, R and Costantini, I (2019) From liberal statebuilding to counterinsurgency and stabilization: the international intervention in Iraq. Ethnopolitics 18, 509525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belloni, R and Moro, FN (2019) Stability and stability operations: definitions, drivers and approaches. Ethnopolitics 18, 445461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgin, P and Morton, AD (2002) Historicising representations of ‘failed states’: beyond the cold-war annexation of the social sciences? Third World Quarterly 23, 5580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøås, M (2017) Fragile states as the new development agenda? Forum for Development Studies 44, 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boege, V, Brown, A, Clemens, K and Nolan, A (2009) On hybrid political orders and emerging states: what is failing – states in the global south or research and politics in the West? Berlin: Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourbeau, P (2015) Resilience and international politics: premises, debates, agenda. International Studies Review 17, 374395.Google Scholar
Bueger, C and Bethke, F (2014) Actor-networking the ‘failed state’ – an enquiry into the life of concepts. Journal of International Relations and Development 17, 3060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Call, CT (2008) The fallacy of the ‘failed state’. Third World Quarterly 29, 14911507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Call, CT (2015) The evolution of peacebuilding: improved ideas and institutions? Tokyo: United Nations University – Centre for Policy Research.Google Scholar
Campbell, JL (2002) Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology 28, 2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carment, D (2003) Assessing state failure: implications for theory and policy. Third World Quarterly 24, 407427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carment, D, Prest, S and Samy, Y (2009) Security, Development, and the Fragile State: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Policy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D (2010) International Statebuilding: The Rise of Post-Liberal Governance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D (2012) Resilience and human security: the post-interventionist paradigm. Security Dialogue 43, 213229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D (2013) International statebuilding and the ideology of resilience. Politics 33, 276286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D (2014) Beyond neoliberalism: resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience 2, 4763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D (2015) Rethinking the conflict-poverty nexus: from securitising intervention to resilience. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development 4, Art. 13, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, D (2016) The Neoliberal Subject. London; New York: Rli.Google Scholar
Chandler, D and Richmond, O (2015) Contesting postliberalism: governmentality or emancipation? Journal of International Relations and Development 18, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charbonneau, B (2009) What is so special about the European Union? EU–UN cooperation in crisis management in Africa. International Peacekeeping 16, 546561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costantini, I (2019) A solution in Libya: elections, mediation and a victor's peace. Middle East Policy XXVI, 149159.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union (2003) A secure Europe in a better world: European Security Strategy. Brussel.Google Scholar
De Coning, C, Aoi, C and Karlsrud, J (eds) (2017) UN Peacekeeping Doctrine in a New Era: Adapting to Stabilisation, Protection and New Threats. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M and Wildavsky, A (1983) Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Barkley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, M (2012) Challenging environments: danger, resilience and the aid industry. Security Dialogue 43, 475492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EEAS (2016 a) Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy. Brussels: European External Action Service.Google Scholar
EEAS (2016 b) Annual Report on the Sahel Regional Action Plan. Brussels, 23 December.Google Scholar
EEAS (2019) From Vision to Action: The EU Global Strategy in Practice – Three Years on, Looking Forward. Brussels: European External Action Service.Google Scholar
Eriksen, SS (2011) ‘State failure’ in theory and practice: the idea of the state and the contradictions of state formation. Review of International Studies 37, 229247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2007) Towards an EU response to situations of fragility – engaging in difficult environments for sustainable development, stability and peace. Communication form the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Region. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013) Action plan for resilience in crisis prone countries, 2013–2020. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2015) The EU's Comprehensive Approach to External Conflict and Crises. Brussels: Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council.Google Scholar
European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2017) A Strategic Approach to Resilience in the EU's External Action. Brussels: Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F (2004) State Building: Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century. London: Profile Book.Google Scholar
Global Health Advocates (2017) Misplaced trust: diverging EU aid to stop migration. The EUEmergency Trust Fund for Africa. Brussels.Google Scholar
Grimm, S (2014) The European Union's ambiguous concept of ‘state fragility’. Third World Quarterly 35, 252267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, S, Lemay-Hébert, N and Nay, O (2014) ‘Fragile states’: introducing a political concept. Third World Quarterly 35, 197209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, PA (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25, 275296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hameiri, S (2007) Failed states or a failed paradigm? State capacity and the limits of institutionalism. Journal of International Relations and Development 10, 122149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hameiri, S (2010) Regulating Statehood, State Building and the Transformation of the Global Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harris, J, Hunter, J and Lewis, CM (1995) The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathershaw, J (2012) Conclusion: neither built nor formed – the transformation of states under international intervention. In de Guevara, BB (ed). Statebuilding and State-Formation. The Political Sociology of Intervention. London: Routledge, pp. 246259.Google Scholar
Helman, GB and Ratner, SR (1992) Saving failed states. Foreign Policy 89, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J (2005) Beyond the other? A postcolonial critique of the failed state thesis. African Identities 3, 139154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hout, W (2010) Between development and security: the European Union, governance and fragile states. Third World Quarterly 31, 141157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, GJ (2018) The end of liberal international order? International Affairs 94, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, RH (1987) Quasi-states, dual regimes, and neoclassical theory: international jurisprudence and the third world. International Organization 41, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegen, M and Mérand, F (2014) Constructive ambiguity: comparing the EU's energy and defence policies. West European Politics 37, 182203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, BG (2008) The global political economy of social crisis: towards a critique of the ‘failed state’ ideology. Review of International Political Economy 15, 180205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J (2013) Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: a governmentality approach. Resilience 1, 3852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J (2014) The EU in the horn of Africa: building resilience as a distant form of governance. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52, 285301.Google Scholar
Joseph, J (2016) Governing through failure and denial: the new resilience agenda. Millennium 44, 370390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juncos, AE (2017) Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn? European Security 26, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, RD (1994) The coming anarchy. The Atlantic, February 1. Available at https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1994/02/the-coming-anarchy/304670/.Google Scholar
Krasner, SD and Pascual, C (2005) Addressing state failure. Foreign Affairs 84, 153163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krastev, I (2018) 3 Versions of Europe are collapsing at the same time. Foreign Policy, July 10.Google Scholar
Lake, DA (2016) The Statebuilder's Dilemma: On the Limits of Foreign Intervention. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemay-Hébert, N (2013) Rethinking Weberian approaches to statebuilding. In Chandler, D and Sisk, TD (eds). Routledge Handbook of International Statebuilding. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 314.Google Scholar
Lopez Lucia, E (2017) Performing EU agency by experimenting the ‘ComprehensiveApproach’: the European Union Sahel Strategy. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 35, 451468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mälksoo, M (2016) From the ESS to the EU Global Strategy: external policy, internal purpose. Contemporary Security Policy 37, 374388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazarr, MJ (2013) The rise and fall of the failed-state paradigm. Foreign Affairs, December 6.Google Scholar
Menkhaus, K (2013) Making sense of resilience in peacebuilding contexts: approaches, applications, implications. Geneva: Geneva Peacebuilding Platform.Google Scholar
Migdal, JS (1988) Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Milliken, J and Krause, K (2002) State failure, state collapse, and state reconstruction: concepts, lessons and strategies. Development and Change 33, 753774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muggah, R (ed.) (2014) Stabilization Operations, Security and Development: States of Fragility. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nay, O (2013) Fragile and failed states: critical perspectives on conceptual hybrids. International Political Science Review 34, 326341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, DC (1995) The new institutional economics and third world development. In Harris, J, Hunter, J and Lewis, CM (eds). The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1726.Google Scholar
Olsen, GR (2009) The EU and military conflict management in Africa: for the good of Africa or Europe? International Peacekeeping 16, 245260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OXFAM (2020) The EU Trust Fund for Africa. Trapped between aid Policy and Migration Politics. Oxford: Oxfam Briefing Paper.Google Scholar
Paris, R (2004) At War's End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, R (2010) Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies 36, 337365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, R (2011) Ordering the world: academic research and policymaking on fragile states1: academic research and policymaking on fragile states. International Studies Review 13, 5871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, S (2006) Weak states and global threats: fact or fiction? The Washington Quarterly 29, 2753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, S (2011) Weak Links: Fragile States, Global Threats, and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, R and Roos, C (2019) Towards a new ontology of crisis? Resilience in EU migration governance. European Security 28(4), 393412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pospisil, J and Kühn, FP (2016) The resilient state: new regulatory modes in international approaches to state building? Third World Quarterly 37, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raineri, L and Baldaro, E (2019) Resilience to what? EU capacity-building missions in the Sahel. In Cusumano, E and Hofmaier, S (eds), Projecting Resilience Across the Mediterranean. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 169187.Google Scholar
Raineri, L and Strazzari, F (2019) (B)ordering hybrid security? EU stabilisation practices in the Sahara Sahel region. Ethnopolitics 18, 544559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, T (ed.) (2011) Governance without a State? Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, VA (2008) Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Sciences 11, 303326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, VA and Radaelli, CM (2004) Policy change and discourse in Europe: conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics 27, 183210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Smith, T (2018) Paradoxes of resilience: a review of the World Disasters Report 2016. Development and Change 49, 662677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selchow, S (2017) Resilience and resilient in Obama's National Security Strategy 2010: enter two ‘political keywords’. Politics 37, 3651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, KE (2013) European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sørensen, G (2001) War and state-making: why doesn't it work in the third world?. Security Dialogue 32, 341354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocci, N (2017 a) Framing the EU Global Strategy. A Stronger Europe in a Fragile World. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocci, N (2017 b) From the European Security Strategy to the EU Global Strategy: explaining the journey. International Politics 54, 487502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocci, N (2019) Resilience and the role of the European Union in the world. Contemporary Security Policy 41, 176194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonra, B (2020) Resilience and the EU's Global Strategy: the potential promise of justice. GLOBUS Research Paper 4. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies. 20 February 2020.Google Scholar
Tschirgi, NY, Lund, MS and Mancini, F (2010) Security and Development: Searching for Critical Connections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
UN (2004) A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. New York: UN.Google Scholar
Wagner, W and Anholt, R (2016) Resilience as the EU Global Strategy's new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic or promising? Contemporary Security Policy 37, 414430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White House (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington: The White House.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A (1988) Searching for Safety. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. Washington, DC: IBRD/World Bank.Google Scholar