Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:05:57.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DEMOCRAZIA E REFERENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2018

Precisazioni concettuali

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Gli strumenti referendari rappresentano un tentativo di conciliare i limiti posti dalle grandi dimensioni del corpo elettorale – che rendono impossibili vere e proprie assemblee popolari del tipo Landsgemeinde – e l'esigenza di una partecipazione diretta dei cittadini ai processi decisionali. Di questi strumenti analizzerò in questa sede i più «democratici», quelli cioè che sono il prodotto di spinte «dal basso», frutto di richieste promosse da un certo numero di elettori al di fuori di qualsiasi controllo da parte del potere politico. Non terrò conto, pertanto, né dei referendum obbligatori, imposti dalla costituzione (in generale nei casi in cui si tratta di modificarla o di consentire un parziale abbandono di sovranità), né di quelli organizzati a scopi tattici o di legittimazione, né, a fortiori, dei plebisciti a carattere personale.

Summary

Summary

This article is devoted to the analysis of functions and disfunctions which can be recognized in two different forms of direct consultations: referendum, to be considered a veto on some acts of the legislative or the government, and initiative, which tries to transfer the production of laws from elected representatives to the voters. Generally speaking, referendum instruments are considered functional for the demos, since they grant the power to decide directly the issues and increase occasions for participation and socialisation, and disfunctional for the political élites, who usally consider direct consultations an interference in decision making.

The author tries to offer a more articulate discussion of the subject. For instance, empirical analysis shows that referendums may work as instruments of integration of oppositions and as ways to strengthen the legitimacy of the élites, thus becoming functional for them. But disfunctions and risks showed by direct consultations (which are zero-sum mechanisms) often appear to be neglected. First of all, they need a higher level of knowledge and competence than in normal elections, since voters are issue deciders and not simply electors; moreover, the overload on governments may be a consequence either of a proliferation of inputs (intiative) or of an excessive contestation of the governments’ outputs (referendum); the fact that referendum and initiative may become an instrument of pressure and a «blackmail potential» in the hands of minority groups opposing and obstructing innovations suggests that popular consultations may also produce conservative effects.

Type
SAGGI
Copyright
Copyright © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 

References

Riferimenti bibliografici

Andreani, T. (1990), Démocratie représentative, démocratie délégative, démocratie directe, in «Critique Communiste», XCVIII, pp. 3343.Google Scholar
App, R. (1987), Initiativen und ihre Wirkungen auf Bundesebene seit 1974, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», pp. 189206.Google Scholar
Ashby, W.R. (1956), An Introduction to Cybernetics, London, Chapmann and Hall.Google Scholar
Auer, A. (1989), Le référendum et l'initiative populaire aux Etats-Unis, Bâle-Paris, Helbing & Lichtenhahn - Economica.Google Scholar
Bachrach, P. e Baratz, M. (1962), Two Faces of Power, in «American Political Science Review», LVI, pp. 947952.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bendor, J.B. (1985), Parallel Systems: Redundancy in Government, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1984), Il futuro della democrazia, Torino, Einaudi.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. e Tullock, J. (1962), The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bütschi, D. e Cattacin, S. (1994), Le modèle suisse du bien-ětre, Lausanne, Réalités Sociales.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. e Rogers, J. (1992), Secondary Associations and Democratic Governance, in «Politics and Society», XX, pp. 393472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, T.E. (1989), Direct Democracy. The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crozier, M. et al. (1975), The Crisis of Democracy, New York, New York University Press, trad. it. La crisi della democrazia, Milano, Angeli, 1977.Google Scholar
Crozier, M. e Friedberg, E. (1981), L'acteur et le système, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1985), A Preface to Economic Democracy, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Danzinger, J.N. (1980), California's Proposition 13 and the Fiscal Limitation Movement in the US, in «Political Studies», XXVIII.Google Scholar
Delley, J.D. (1978), L'initiative populaire en Suisse, Lausanne, L'Age d'Homme.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K.W.D. (1976), Die Schweiz als ein paradigmatischer Fall politischer Integration, Berne, P. Haupt.Google Scholar
Dobry, M. (1986), Sociologie des crises politiques, Paris, Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
Epple-Gass, R. (1991), Neue Formen politischer Mobilisierung: (k)eine Herausforderung der schweizerischen Demokratie?, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», pp. 151171.Google Scholar
Gaxie, D. (1978), Le cens caché, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
Germann, R.E. et al. (1985), Experts et commissions de la Confédération, Lausanne, Presses polytechniques romandes.Google Scholar
Giugni, M. (1991), Les impacts de la démocratic directe sur les nouveaux mouvements sociaux, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», pp. 173185.Google Scholar
Giugni, M. e Kriesi, H. (1990), Nouveaux mouvements sociaux dans les années 80: evolution et perspectives, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», pp. 79100.Google Scholar
Goodenough, R. (1982), Proposition 13 and its Impact on Local Government Programmes in California, in «Policy and Politics», X, pp. 439458.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1973), ha technique et la science comme «idéologie», Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989), Ist der Herzschlag der Revolution zum Stillstand gekommen? Volkssouveränitat als Verfahren. Ein mormativer Begriff der Oeffentlichkeit?, in Forum fur Philosophic Bad Homburg (Herausgeber), Die Ideen von 1789 in der deutschen Rezeption, Francoforte, Suhrkamp, pp. 736.Google Scholar
Hermet, G. (1975), Dictature bourgeoise et modernisation conservatrice: problèmes méthodologiques de l'analyse des situations autoritaires, in «Revue Française de Science Politique», XXV, pp. 10291061.Google Scholar
Hertig, H.P. (1982), Sind Abstimmungserfolge käuflich? Elemente der Meinungsbildung bei eidgenössischen Abstimmungen, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», pp. 3557.Google Scholar
Immergut, E.M. (1992), Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe, Cambridge (Mass.), Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P.J. (1985), Small States in World Markets, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (1994a), Le défi à la démocratic directe posé par les transformations de l'éspace public, in Papadopoulos, Y. (a cura di), Present et avenir de la démocratic directe, Genève, Georg, pp. 3172.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (1994b), Social Movements and Direct Democracy, paper presentato al Congresso mondiale dell'IPSA, Berlino, agosto.Google Scholar
Kübler, D. (1994), L'Etat face à la toxicomanie. Action publique et contrat social, Lausanne, Travaux de l'Institut de Science Politique.Google Scholar
Landowski, E. (1989), La société réfléchie, Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
Lavau, G. (1969), Le parti communiste dans le systèrne politique français, in Bon, F. (a cura di), Le communisme en France, Paris, A. Colin, Cahiers de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques, pp. 781.Google Scholar
Lavau, G. (1986), L'électeur devient-il individualiste?, in Birnbaum, P. e Lecat, J. (a cura di), Sur l'individualisme, Paris, Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, pp. 301329.Google Scholar
Lenoir, R. (1989), La genèse sociale d'un problème social, in Champagne, P. et al., Initiation à la pratique sociologique, Paris, Dunod, pp. 7898.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1977), Democracy in Plural Societies, New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. (1985), Principes et limites de la démocratic libérale, Paris-Montreal, La Découverte-Boréal Express.Google Scholar
Magleby, D.B. (1994), I problematici sviluppi della recente esperienza statunitense, in Caciagli, M. e Uleri, P.V. (a cura di), Democrazie e referendum, Roma-Bari, Laterza, pp. 7999.Google Scholar
Mény, Y. (1978), Initiative populaire, referendum et «recall» dans les Etats américains, in «Pouvoirs», VII, pp. 107113.Google Scholar
Neidhart, L. (1983), Regierbarkeitsfragen in der direkten Demokratie, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», pp. 1343.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1984), Contradictions of the Welfare State, London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1987), Democracy Against the Welfare State? Structural foundations of Neoconservative Political Opportunities, in «Political Theory», XV, pp. 501537.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1989), Bindung, Vessel, Bremse. Die Unübersichtlichkeit von Selhstheschränkungsformeln, in A. Honneth et al, Zwischenbetrachtungen im Prozess der Aufklärung, Francfort, Suhrkamp, pp. 739774.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven e London, Yale University Press, trad. it. (1984), Ascesa e declino delle nazioni, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ossipow, W. (1988), Les groupes d'intérět dans le processus de décision et la communication politique. Une interpretation systémique du cas suisse, in Jean Meynaud ou l'utopie revisitée, Lausanne, Université de Lausanne, pp. 109125.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (1991), Quel role pour les petits partis dans le démocratic directe?, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», 1991 pp. 131150.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (a cura di) (1994), Elites politiques et peuple en Suisse. Analyse des votations fédérales 1970–1987, Lausanne, Réalités sociales.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (1994), Les tensions de la démocratic locale, in Bassand, M. e Leresche, J.P. (a cura di), Les faces cachées de l'urbain, Berne, P. Lang pp. 139153.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. (1978), L'Etat, le pouvoir, le socialisme, Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
Ranney, A. (1994), Nuove pratiche e vecchia teoria, in Caciagli, M. e Uleri, P.V. (a cura di), Democrazie e referendum, Roma-Bari, Laterza, pp. 2948.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1980), Challenge to Governance, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Saris, W. (1991), New Possibilities for Political Participation: Tele-Democracy, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», pp. 327336.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1976), Parties and Party Systems, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1987), The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Chatham, Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1990), La social-démocratie face à la crise, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1991), Political Institutions, Decision Styles and Policy Choices, in Czada, R. e Windhoff-Héritier, A. (a cura di), Political Choice, Francfort-Boulder, Campus-Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.G. (1982), The Role of the Parties in Shaping Macro-economic Policy, in Castles, F.G. (a cura di), The Impact of Parties, London, Sage, pp. 97176.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1964), Capitalismo, socialismo, democrazia, Milano, Etas Kompass.Google Scholar
Sciarini, P. (1992), La Suisse dans la négociation sur l'Espace économique européen: de la rupture à l'apprentissage, in «Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique», pp. 297322.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1986), The Functional Properties of the Referendum, in «European Journal of Political Research», IV, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Suksi, M. (1993), Bringing in the People. A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1988), Struggle, Politics, and Reform, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Uleri, P.V. (1994), The Referendum Phenomenon in Italy: from the Beginning to the Crisis of a Democratic System, paper ECPR, Madrid.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968), Economia e società, Milano, Comunità, 2 voll.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A.B. (1979), Speaking Truth to Power. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, Boston, Little Brown.Google Scholar
Willke, H. (1992), Ironie des Staates, Francfort, Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Zolo, D. (1992), Il principato democratico, Milano, Feltrinelli.Google Scholar