No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
What difference does it make? Explaining the voting behaviour of Partito Democratico’s electorate and selectorate in 2013
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2016
Abstract
This article analyses the differences in voting behaviour of the selectorate and electorate of the Italian Partito Democratico (PD) in 2013, particularly focussing on the role played by leadership, ideology, and media in affecting voting decisions. We study the different motivations underlying the decision to vote for the PD in the 2013 Italian general election or for each one of the three candidates to party leadership in the 2013 PD leadership selection race. The empirical analysis uses 2013 Italian National Election Study and 2013 Candidate & Leader Selection data. Results of the analysis show that leadership evaluation has a stronger influence on the selectorate than on the electorate and that the perceived distance between voters and the party on the left-right continuum has a stronger impact on the electorate than on the selectorate. Moreover, the analysis underlines that media are substantially not a relevant factor explaining voting behaviour of PD’s electorate and selectorate. These findings confirm the relevancy of leadership evaluation in intra-party competitions and open a new perspective to study leader selection races.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 1 - 20
- Copyright
- © Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2016
References
Albert, A. and Anderson, J.A. (1984), ‘On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models’, Biometrika
71(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, M., Gill, J. and McDonald, M.P. (2004), Numerical Issues in Statistical Computing for the Social Scientist, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Barisione, M. (2009), ‘So, what difference do leaders make? Candidates’ image and the “conditionality” of leader effects on voting’,
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties
19(4): 473–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellucci, P. and Segatti, P. (eds) (2011), Votare in Italia: 1968-2008. Dall’Appartenenza alla Scelta, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bellucci, P., Garzia, D. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2015), ‘Issues and leaders as vote determinants: the case of Italy’, Party Politics
21(2): 272–283.Google Scholar
Bennett, L.W. and Iyengar, S. (2008), ‘A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication’, Journal of Communication
58(4): 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentivegna, S. and Ceccarini, L. (2013), ‘Web, giovani e voto’, in ITANES (ed.), Voto Amaro, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 193–205.Google Scholar
Bille, L. (1997), ‘Leadership change and party change -- the case of the Danish Social Democratic Party, 1960–95’, Party Politics
3(3): 379–390.Google Scholar
Caprara, V.G. and Zimbardo, P. (2004), ‘Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference’, American Psychologist
59(7): 581–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, J.M. and Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2006), ‘Primary elections and candidate strength in Latin America’, The Journal of Politics
68(3): 530–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catellani, P. and Alberici, A.I. (2012), ‘Does the candidate matter? Comparing the voting choice of early and late deciders’, Political Psychology
20(20): 1–16.Google Scholar
Cavataio, M. and Fasano, L.M. (2014), ‘Leali, incerti o defezionisti? Atteggiamenti di voto post-primarie nei selettori tra il 2007 e il 2013’, Quaderni di Scienza Politica
21(3): 329–349.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. (2013), The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaramonte, A. and Emanuele, V. (2013), ‘Volatile and tripolar: the new Italian party system’, in L. De Sio, V. Emanuele, N. Maggini and A. Paparo (eds), The Italian General Election of 2013, Roma: CISE, pp. 63–68.Google Scholar
Chiaramonte, A. and De Sio, L. (2014),
Terremoto Elettorale. Le Elezioni Politiche del 2013
, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
DiNitto, A.J. and Smithers, W. (1972), ‘The representatives of the direct primary: a further test of V. O. Key’s thesis’, Polity
5(2): 209–224.Google Scholar
Fiorini, A. and Porcellato, N. (2014), ‘Il voto dei gazebo: i cittadini e la selezione del leader’, in G. Pasquino and F. Venturino (eds), Il Partito Democratico Secondo Matteo, Bologna: Bononia University Press, pp. 47–65.Google Scholar
Franchino, F. and Zucchini, F. (2015), ‘Voting in a multi-dimensional space: a conjoint analysis employing valence and ideology attributes of candidates’, Political Science Research and Methods
3(2): 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garzia, D. (2013), ‘The 2013 Italian parliamentary election: changing things so everything stays the same’, West European Politics
36(5): 1095–1105.Google Scholar
Garzia, D. (2014), Personalization of Politics and Electoral Change, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garzia, D. and Viotti, F. (2012), ‘Party identification, leader effects and vote choice in Italy, 1990-2008’, Word Political Science Review
8(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Geer, J.G. (1988), ‘Assessing the representativeness of electorates in presidential primaries’, American Journal of Political Science
32(4): 929–945.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. (2012), Econometric Analysis, 7th edn., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hallin, D.C. and Mancini, P. (2004), Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, J. and McFadden, D. (1984), ‘A specification test for the multinomial logit model’, Econometrica
52(5): 1219–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISTAT (2015), ‘Persone che utilizzano Internet’, in Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Noi Italia – cento statistiche per capire il paese in cui viviamo. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. Retrieved 9 November 2016 from http://noi--italia.istat.it
Google Scholar
Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1955), Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Communication, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. (1956), American State Politics: An Introduction, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
King, A. (2002), Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legnante, G. (2002), ‘Tra influenza e incapsulamento: cittadini, comunicazione e campagna elettorale’, in M. Caciagli and P. Corbetta (eds), Le Ragioni Dell’elettore. Perchè ha Vinto il Centrodestra nelle Elezioni Italiane Del 2001, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 233–273.Google Scholar
Legnante, G. and Baldassarri, D. (2010), ‘Campagne elettorali e mediazione sociale: esposizione ai media e relazioni interpersonali’, in P. Bellucci and P. Segatti (eds), Votare in Italia: 1968-2008, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 249–288.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967), ‘Cleavage structure, party system and voter alignments: an introduction’, in S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds), Party System and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997), The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maricchiolo, F. and Bonaiuto, M. (2011), ‘Il corpo nella comunicazione politica contemporanea’, in P. Catellani and G. Sensales (eds), Psicologia Della Politica, Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore, pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
Mauerer, I., Thurner, P.D. and Debus, M. (2015), ‘Under which condition do parties attract voter issue reactions? Party varying issue voting in German elections 1987-2009’, West European Politics
38(6): 1251–1273.Google Scholar
Mazzoni, M. and Vicentini, G. (2014), ‘Le fonti di informazioni’, in G. Pasquino and F. Venturino (eds), Il Partito Democratico Secondo Matteo, Bologna: Bononia University Press, pp. 103–117.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. (1974), ‘Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour’, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press, pp. 105–142.Google Scholar
Merrill, S. III and Grofman, B. (1999), A Unified Theory of Voting – Directional and Proximity Spatial Models, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyrowitz, J. (1985), No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosca, L. and Vaccari, C. (2011), Nuovi Media, Nuova Politica? Partecipazione e Mobilitazione Online da MoveOn al Movimento 5 Stelle, Milano: Franco Angeli Editore.Google Scholar
Mosca, L., Vaccari, C. and Valeriani, A. (2015), ‘An internet-fuelled party? The Five Star Movement and the web’, in F. Tronconi (ed.), Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement. Organisation, Communication and Ideology, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 127–151.Google Scholar
Neuman, W.R., Just, M.R. and Crigler, A.N. (1992), Common Knowledge, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Norrander, B. (1989), ‘Ideological representativeness of presidential primary voters’, American Journal of Political Science
33(3): 570–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilet, J.-B. and W.P., Cross (2014), The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poguntke, T. and Webb, P.D. (2005), The Presidentialization of Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, G. and Macdonald, S.E. (1989), ‘A directional theory of issue voting’, The American Political Science Review
83(1): 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftery, A.E. (1995), ‘Bayesian model selection in social research’, Sociological Methodology
25: 111–163.Google Scholar
Ranney, A. (1968), ‘The representativeness of primary electorates’, Midwest Journal of Political Science
12(2): 224–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranney, A. and Epstein, L.D. (1966), ‘The two electorates: voters and non-voters in a Wisconsin primary’, The Journal of Politics
28: 598–616.Google Scholar
Sandri, G. and Seddone, A. (2015), ‘Sense or sensibility? Political attitudes and voting behaviour of party members, voters and supporters of the Italian centre-left’, Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
45(1): 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandri, G., Seddone, A. and Venturino, F. (2014), ‘The selection of party leaders in Italy, 1989-2012’, in J.-B. Pilet and W.P. Cross (eds), The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 93–107.Google Scholar
Seddone, A. and Venturino, F. (2013), ‘Bringing voters back in leader selection: the open primaries of the Italian Democratic Party’, Modern Italy
18(3): 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, D.E. (1963), ‘Spatial models of party competition’, The American Political Science Review
57(2): 368–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J.B. (2004), ‘The media and politics’, in E. Amenta, K. Nash and A. Scott (eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 263–272.Google Scholar
Venturino, F. (2014), ‘Il Partito Democratico e la Selezione del Leader: Le Regole della Competizione’, in G. Pasquino and F. Venturino (eds), Il Partito Democratico Secondo Matteo, Bologna: Bononia University Press, pp. 13–29.Google Scholar
Martocchia Diodati and Marino supplementary material
Online Appendix
File
122.8 KB