Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:19:46.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successful student activism in contemporary Italian universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2017

Lorenzo Cini
Lorenzo Cini*
Affiliation:
Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of Florence, Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa, Italy
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article assesses the strategies that the Italian student activists adopted in order to influence the revision process of the governance structure of their universities in 2011. Which kind of strategy has enabled these activists to influence more successfully this process? I argue that the joint pressure of insiders and outsiders allows student activists to get their voice more effectively heard from the university leaders than when one of the two forms of pressure is absent. The ‘power of the streets’ exerted by the ‘outsiders’, combined with the institutional power of the ‘insiders’, produces a significant amplifying effect in the governing bodies. University leaders fear this kind of alliance, as they perceive that insiders with a strong tie with other actors are the expression of a collective voice that is difficult to neutralize. On the other hand, the outsiders are also aware that their collective strength is more likely to be translated into institutional power and action from their allies and/or representatives. To empirically probe this proposition, I have singled out three Italian universities (University of Turin, Sapienza of Rome, and Federico II of Naples), which witnessed high levels of student mobilization in the past years (2008–13), and where student activists and their organizations adopted the most different array of strategies. More specifically, while at the University of Turin the student activists were able to deploy simultaneously both forms of pressure, at the Federico II of Naples and Sapienza of Rome one of the two forms was lacking.

Keywords

Italysocial movementseducation
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 337 - 358
Copyright
© Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amenta, E., Carruthers, B. and Zylan, Y. (1992), ‘A hero for the aged? The Townsend movement, the political mediation model, and U.S. old-age policy, 1934–1950’, American Journal of Sociology 98: 308–339.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. (2011), Student Activism and Curricular Change in Higher Education, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Balsiger, P. (2014), ‘Managing protest: the political action repertoires of corporations’, in D. della Porta and D. Mario (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 653–666.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. and George, A.L. (2001), ‘Case studies and process tracing in history and political science: similar strokes for different foci’, in C. Elman and M. F. Elman (eds), Bridges and Boundaries, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 137–166.Google Scholar
Bosi, L., Giugni, M. and Uba, K. (2016), ‘The consequences of social movements. Taking stock and looking forward’, in L. Bosi, M. Giugni and K. Uba (eds), The Consequences of Social Movements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–38.Google Scholar
Capano, G. (2008), ‘Looking for serendipity – the problematical reform within Italy’s universities’, Higher Education 55: 481–504.Google Scholar
Cini, L. (2016a), ‘Student struggles and power relations in contemporary universities. The cases of Italy and England’, in R. Brooks (ed.), Student Politics and Protest: International Perspectives, London: Routledge, pp. 49–71.Google Scholar
Cini, L. (2016b), The contentious politics of higher education. Struggles and power relations within the English and Italian universities. Unpublished PhD dissertation. European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
Cini, L. (2017), ‘From student to general struggle. The protests against the neoliberal reforms in higher education in contemporary Italy’, in A. Mark and H.-M. Ratiba (eds), Generations and Protests: Legacies, Emergences in the MENA Region and the Mediterranean, Leiden: Brill, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
Cini, L. and Guzman-Concha, C. (2017), ‘Student movements in the age of austerity. The cases of Chile and England’, Social Movement Studies 3(16): 1–6.Google Scholar
Cress, D. and Snow, D. (2000), ‘The Outcomes of Homeless Mobilization: The Influence of Organization, Disruption, Political Mediation, and Framing’, American Journal of Sociology 105: 1063–1104.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. (2003), ‘From reproduction to transformation: social movement fields and the radical habitus’, Theory, Culture & Society 20(6): 43–68.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P. (2011), Quiet Politics and Business Power. Corporate Control in Europe and Japan, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, G., McAdam, D., Scott, R. and Zald, M. (2005), Social Movements and Organization Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. and Rucht, D. (1995), ‘Left-libertarian Movements in Context: Comparing Italy and West Germany, 1965–1990’, in J. C. Jenkins and B. Klandermans (eds), The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 229–272.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. (2008), ‘Comparative analysis: case-oriented versus variable-oriented research’, in M. Keating and D. della Porta (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–222.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. (2013), Clandestine Political Violence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. (2015), Social Movements in Times of Austerity. Bringing Capitalism Back in Protest Analysis, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (2006), Social Movements. An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. (1990 [1975]), The Strategy of Social Protest, Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Giugni, M. (1998), ‘Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements’, Annual Review of Sociology 98: 371–393.Google Scholar
Giugni, M. (2004), Social Protest and Policy Change. Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Giugni, M., McAdam, D. and Tilly, C. (1999), How Social Movements Matter, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. and Jasper, J. (2012), Contention in Context. Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, J. (2006), Getting Your Way: Strategic Dilemmas in the Real World, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, J. (2015), ‘Introduction. Playing the game’, in J. Jasper and W. Duyvendak (eds), Players and Arenas. The Interactive Dynamics of Protest, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 9–32.Google Scholar
Jasper, J., Moran, K. and Tramontano, M. (2015), ‘Strategy’, in D. della Porta and M. Diani (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 399–409.Google Scholar
King, G. (2008), ‘A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism’, Administrative Science Quarterly 53: 395–421.Google Scholar
King, G. (2016), ‘Reputation, risk, and anti-corporate activism: how social movements influence corporate outcomes’, in L. Bosi, M. Giugni and K. Uba (eds), The Consequences of Social Movements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215–236.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1986), ‘Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies’, British Journal of Political Science 16: 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, F. (2007), Protest and Opportunities. The Political Outcomes of Social Movements, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (2004), ‘Political context and opportunity’, in D. Snow, S. Soule and H. Kriesi (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1975), ‘The comparable-case strategy in comparative research’, Comparative Political Studies 8: 158–177.Google Scholar
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. (2001), Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mccammon, H. and Moon, M. (2015), ‘Social movement coalition’, in D. della Porta and M. Diani (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 326–339.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. and Zald, M.N. (1977), ‘Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory’, American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 1212–1241.Google Scholar
Meyerson, D. and Tompkins, M. (2007), ‘Tempered radicals as institutional change agents: the case of advancing gender equality at the University of Michigan’, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 303(30): 1–21.Google Scholar
Moore, K. (1999), ‘Political protest and institutional change: the anti-Vietnam war movement and American science’, in M. Giugni, D. McAdam and C. Tilly (eds), How Social Movements Matter, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Pettinicchio, D. (2012), ‘Institutional activism: reconsidering the insider/outsider dichotomy’, Sociology Compass 6(6): 499–510.Google Scholar
Pettinicchio, D. (2017), ‘Elites, policy, and social movements’, in B. Wejnert and P. Parigi (eds), Research in Political Sociology, Vol. 24 Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group Limited, pp. 155–190.Google Scholar
Piazza, G. (2014), ‘Non solo studenti: le ondate di protesta nelle scuole e nelle università’, in L. Alteri and L. Raffini (eds), La nuova politica. Movimenti, mobilitazioni e conflitti in Italia, Napoli: EdiSES, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Piven, F. (2006), Challenging Authority. How Ordinary People Change America, New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Piven, F. and Cloward, R. (1979), Poor People’s Movements, New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Regini, M. (2014), La Riforma Universitaria nel Quadro dei Sistemi di Governance Europei, Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Santoro, W. and McGuire, G. (1997), ‘Social movement insiders: the impact of institutional activists on affirmative action and comparable worth policies’, Social Problems 44(4): 503–519.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1997), Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Silver, B. (2003), Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1998), Power in Movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vennesson, P. (2008), ‘Case studies and process tracing: theories and practices’, in M. Keating and D. della Porta (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, E., Martin, A. and McCarthy, J. (2008), ‘Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: the influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires’, American Journal of Sociology 114(1): 397–417.Google Scholar
Weber, K., Rao, H. and Thomas, L.G. (2009), ‘From streets to suites: how the anti-biotech movement penetrated German pharmaceutical firms’, American Sociological Review 74: 106–127.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cini supplementary material

Appendix

Download Cini supplementary material(File)
File 12.6 KB