Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:03:28.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of the people in the characterization of populism. Evidence from the press coverage of the 2014 European Parliament election campaign in Italy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2016

Marino De Luca  and
Antonio Ciaglia
Marino De Luca*
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Science, University of Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
Antonio Ciaglia
Affiliation:
School of Literature, Language, and Media, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
*
**E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Populism is being increasingly studied by political and social scientists. This article pays particular attention to the way in which ‘people’ can be approached and appealed to by their leaders. In particular, by undertaking a content analysis of the two most read daily newspapers in Italy, and by relying on the technique of correspondence analysis, this article shows that to fully understand the phenomenon of populism, the way in which ‘the people’ are approached by their leaders cannot be left aside. In doing so, this article empirically analyses and discusses three dimension of populism and contributes to a more granular understanding of this phenomenon in established democracies.

Keywords

populismelectionsmedia coveragecorrespondence analysisEuropean electionpolitical communication
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 63 - 85
Copyright
© Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Conference ‘New Populisms’ Political Communication’ (26–27 June 2015) organised by the Institute for Communication Sciences (CNRS/Paris-Sorbonne/UPMC) and the Center for Comparative Studies in Political and Public Communication (Ceccopop).

References

Albertazzi, D. and McDonnell, D. (eds) (2007), Twenty-First Century Populism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Althaus, S.L., Swigger, N., Chernykh, S., Hendry, D.J., Wals, S.C. and Tiwald, C. (2014), ‘Uplifting manhood to wonderful heights? News coverage of the human costs of military conflict from World War I to Gulf War Two’, Political Communication 31(2): 193–217.Google Scholar
Badiou, A., Bourdieu, P., Butler, J., Didi-Huberman, G., Khiari, S. and Rancière, J. (2013), Qu’est-ce qu’un peuple?, Paris: La Fabrique.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobba, G. and McDonnel, D. (2015), ‘Italy a strong and enduring market for populism’, in H. Kriesi and T.S. Pappas (eds), European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, Colchester: ECPR press, pp. 163–180.Google Scholar
Bruhn, K. (2012), ‘To hell with your corrupt institutions!: AMLO and populism in Mexico’, in C. Mudde and C.R. Kaltwasser (eds), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–112.Google Scholar
Campus, D. (2010), ‘Mediatization and personalization of politics in Italy and France: the cases of Berlusconi and Sarkozy’, The International Journal of Press/Politics 15(2): 219–235.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1981), Populism, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1999), ‘Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy’, Political Studies 47(1): 2–16.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (2002), ‘Taking politics to the people: populism as the ideology of democracy’, in Y. Mény and Y. Surel (eds), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vreese, C.H. (2005), ‘News framing: theory and typology’, Information Design Journal + Document Design 13(1): 51–62.Google Scholar
Garzia, D. (2011), ‘The personalization of politics in Western democracies: causes and consequences on leader-follower relationships’, The Leadership Quarterly 22(4): 697–709.Google Scholar
Greenacre, M.J. (1984), Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenacre, M.J. (1993), Correspondence Analysis in Practice, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jagers, J. and Walgrave, S. (2007), ‘Populism as political communication style: an empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium’, European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 319–345.Google Scholar
Knight, A. (1998), ‘Populism and neo-populism in Latin America, especially Mexico’, Journal of Latin American Studies 30(2): 223–248.Google Scholar
Krämer, B. (2014), ‘Media populism: a conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects’, Communication Theory 24(1): 42–60.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (2012), ‘Personalization of national election campaigns’, Party Politics 18(6): 825–844.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (2014), ‘The populist challenge’, West European Politics 37(2): 361–378.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (2015), ‘Populism. Concepts and conditions for its rise in Europe’, Comunicazione Politica 2: 175–193.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. and Pappas, T.S. (2015), European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, Colchester: ECPR press.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (1977), Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism-Fascism-Populism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (2005), On Populist Reason, London: Verso.Google Scholar
March, L. (2012), ‘Towards an understanding of contemporary left-wing populism’. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association (PSA), Annual International Conference, April 3–5, Belfast.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, G. (2014), ‘Mediatization and political populism’, in F. Esser and J. Strömbäck (eds), Mediatization of Politics. Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 42–56.Google Scholar
Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (2002), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004), ‘The populist zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition 39(4): 542–563.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Y. (2010), ‘Accountability and multi-level governance: more accountability, less democracy?’, West European Politics 33(5): 1030–1049.Google Scholar
Pauwels, T. (2011), ‘Measuring populism: a quantitative text analysis of party literature in Belgium’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 21(1): 97–119.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (2007), The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rahat, G. and Sheafer, T. (2007), ‘The personalization(s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003’, Political Communication 24(1): 65–80.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. (1995), ‘Neoliberalism and the transformation of populism in Latin America: the Peruvian case’, World Politics 48(1): 82–116.Google Scholar
Rooduijn, M. (2014), ‘The mesmerising message: the diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European Media’, Political Studies 62(4): 726–744.Google Scholar
Rooduijn, M. and Pauwels, T. (2011), ‘Measuring populism: comparing two methods of content analysis’, West European Politics 34(6): 1272–1283.Google Scholar
Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S.L. and Van Der Brug, W. (2014), ‘A populist zeitgeist? programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe’, Party Politics 20(4): 563–575.Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J. (2008), ‘Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics’, The International Journal of Press/Politics 13(3): 228–246.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. (2004a), ‘Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe’, Journal of Political Ideologies 9(3): 269–288.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. (2004b), Populism, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2014), Democracy Disfigured. Opinion, Truth, and the People, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Den Hoven, A. (2006), ‘Assuming leadership in multilateral economic institutions: the EU’s “development round” discourse and strategy’, West European Politics 27(2): 256–283.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2001), ‘Clarifying a contested concept. Populism in the study of Latin American politics’, Comparative Politics 34(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Wiles, P. (1969), ‘A syndrome, not a doctrine’, in G. Ionescu and E. Gellner (eds), Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, pp. 166–179.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

De Luca and Ciaglia Dataset

Dataset

http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/B6YLAV
Link