No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Use of a Company's Name
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2016
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bef7/8bef7f1cde132c9bdebb58539a876377b24a7ed9" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Cases
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1969
References
1 (1968) (II) 22 P.D. 400.
2 Elman, Peter, “The Use of a Company's Name” (1969) 4 Is.L.R. 156.Google Scholar
3 (1889) 61 L.T. 23, 58 L.J.Q.B. 377.
4 (1894) 70 L.T. 376.
5 (1889) 61 L.T. 26.
6 Pashkus v. “Hamadiah” Kvutzat Poalim Ltd. (1965) 19 P.D. 690.
7 (1858) E.B. & E. 499, 120 E.R. 595.
8 120 E.R. 597.
9 (1905) 21 T.L.R. 510
10 (1912) 106 L.T. 544.
11 See Gower, L.C.B., Modern Company Law (2nd. ed., 1959) 187, note 26.Google Scholar
12 [1968] 2 All E.R. 987.
13 [1968] 2 All E.R. 988.
14 [1968] 2 All E.R. 990.
15 Elman, cit. 156.
16 See L.C.B. Gower, op. cit. 46 ff.
17 Procaccia, G., “Problems of Legislation in Company Law” (1966) 16 Scripta Hierosolymitana 155, 156–157.Google Scholar
18 Kohavi v. Baker (1957) 11 P.D. 225; American Cyanamide v. Abie (1962) 16 P.D. 788; State of Israel v. Giter (1963) 17 P.D. 2073.
19 See the famous Practice Direction of the House of Lords of July 26, 1966.
20 [1968] 2 W.L.R. 643.
21 (1968) 84 L.Q.R. 299.
22 (1878) E.B. & B. 499; 120 E.R. 595.
23 (1905) 21 T.L.R. 510.
24 (1912) 106 L.T. 544.