No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Federal Systems of Government*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 February 2016
Extract
It is perhaps paradoxical that the spread of nationalism in modern times has been accompanied by a counter-movement for the establishment of broader units of government, not only internationally, where plans and projects for some form of world government go back to at least the 17th century, but regionally as well. This study is concerned with the local or regional expression of integration, called federalism or federation.
Clearly inspired, if not directly and immediately affected, by the example of the United States, the federal movement made headway in the 19th century, but it is largely since the end of the Second World War and the demise of colonialism, that its dimensions have grown. Although its success generally is rather doubtful—there appears to be a kind of empiric rule that the first fifteen are crucial—the retreat, so to speak, from particularism and attempts to advance to geographically broader units of government have persisted.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1976
References
1 See, e.g., Nussbaum, A., A Concise History of the Law of Nations (1950) 92–94.Google Scholar
2 Cf. Jenks, C. W., “World Organization and European Integration” 1 European Yearbook, 173.Google Scholar
3 Elazar, D., “Federations” in International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences (1968) vol. 5, p. 365.Google Scholar
4 Bouvier's, Law Dictionary (1914) vol. I, p. 1192.Google Scholar
5 See e.g., the proposals of the Royal Commission on the Constitution, Cmnd. 5460 (1973) (Kilbrandon Report) with regard to the devolution of legislative powers over a defined area of subject-matter in the case of Scotland and Wales which already have a well-developed sense of national identity and experience of administrative devolution.
6 Cf. MacMahon, A. W., “The Problems of Federalism: A Survey” in Federalism, Nature and Emergence (1955) 4–5.Google Scholar
7 See Bernier, I., International Legal Aspects of Federalism (1973)Google Scholar, who isolates three elements; a division of powers, a measure of independence and interdependence between centre and regions and direct action on population both central and regional. See also Schwarzenberger, G., “Federalism and Supranationalism in the European Communities” (1963) 16 Current Legal Problems 17, 19, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 J. E. Aubert, “Etat” in Encyclopedie Dalloz; Pilotti, M., “Les Unions d'Etats” (1928) 24 Hague Recueil des Cours 497, 500–1.Google Scholar
9 Cf. Oppenheim-Lauterpacht, , International Law, vol. I, p. 164Google Scholar; Pilotti, op. cit., at p. 498.
10 O'Connell, , International Law (2nd ed.) vol. 1, p. 295.Google Scholar
11 Cf. Lasok, D. and Bridge, J. W., Introduction to the Law … of the European Communities (1973) 21 ffGoogle Scholar; Kozyris, P. J., “National and Supranational Law in the E.E.C.” 37 Law and Contemporary Problems 287 ff.Google Scholar See Appendix II.
12 Cf. Francks, T. M., Why Federations Fail (1968) 169.Google Scholar
13 Wheare, K. C., Federal Government (1953) ch. I. passim.Google Scholar
14 The influence of the judiciary may sometimes weaken the central government: Proceedings of the 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law (1974) 193.
15 Ibid., at pp. 190, 194, 198; Cole, R. T., “West German Federation Revisited” (1975) 23 A.J.I.L. 325.Google Scholar
16 Livingston, W. S., “Canada, Australia and the U.S.” in Federalism (1968) 120.Google Scholar
17 See The Influence of Federal Structures on the Legislative Sources of Law, Proceedings of the Colloquium of the International Association of Legal Science, Belgrade, July 1973 (hereafter referred to as Legal Science Association Report), which deals with the federations in Africa, Brazil, Germany, India, Mexico, Switzerland, Yugoslavia and the U.S.A.
18 Ibid., at pp. viii–ix. The situation adumbrated in the text is well illustrated by the demands of Wales and Scotland—although in an entirely different context—for greater independence and the solutions which have been proposed to meet these demands, as portrayed in the Kilbrandon Report, 1973, Cmnd. 5460.
19 E. W. Fuss, ibid., at pp. 11–12. In the case of Germany it has, however, been observed that a judicial tendency exists to construe federal competence strictly in favour of the Länder: K. H. Friauf in Proceedings of Fifth International Symposium on Comparative Law (Canadian and Foreign Law Research Centre, 1968) 16–17. The passage from a static to a dynamic federation in Brazil occurred with a generation after the federal constitution of 1891 and centralization has since proceeded apace: H. Valladao, ibid., at pp. 37 ff.
20 Cf. generally Wheare, op. cit., at ch. III; Carnell, F. G., “Political Implications of Federalism in New States” in Federalism and Economic Growth (1961) 20 ff.Google Scholar; Livingston, op. cit., passim; Franck, op. cit., at pp. 170–182; Friedrich, , Constitutional Government and Democracy (1964) 191 ff.Google Scholar; Finer, H., Theory and Practice of Modern Government (1949) 181.Google Scholar
21 Wallace, E., “The West Indies Federation Decline and Fall” (1962) 17 Int. Jour. 284Google Scholar; Sherlock, , “Prospects in the Caribbean” (1963) 41 For. Aff. 744Google Scholar; Washington, S. N., “Crisis in the British West Indies” (1960) 38 For. Aff. 646.Google Scholar
22 Smith, S.A. de, The New Commonwealth and Its Constitutions (1964) 216–262.Google Scholar
23 Hinden, R., “Dilemma in Central Africa” (1959) 30 Pol.Qu. 262Google Scholar; Chai, , “The Kenya Community and the African Affairs Board of the Central African Federation” (1963) 12 I. Comp. L.Q. 1089.Google Scholar On federalism as a solution to the problem of the existence of a permanent minority, see Finer, S. E., Comparative Government (1970) 47–48.Google Scholar
24 Hughes, , East Africa: The Search for Unity (1963) 21–34Google Scholar; Banfield, J., “Federation in East Africa” (1963) 18 Int. Jour. 181–193Google Scholar; Proctor, , “The Effort to Federate East Africa: A Post Mortem” (1966) 37 Pol. Qu. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Hughes, op. cit., at p. 215.
26 Legal Science Association Report, at p. vi and passim.
27 Ibid.
28 D. Thiam, ibid., at pp. 124–25.
29 (1971–72) Middle East and North Africa 762.
30 (1971–72) Middle East and North Africa 760–62; Little, , South Arabia: Arena of Conflict (1968) 143.Google Scholar
31 Palmer, M., “The United Arab Republic” (1966) 20 Mid. East Jour. 51Google Scholar; Parker, J.S.F., “The United Arab Republic” (1962) 38 Int. Aff. 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Washington, op. cit., at p. 650.
33 See Daraene, P., “Indépendence et Regroupements Politiques en Afrique du Sud du Sahara” (1960) 10 Rev. Franc. de Sc. Pol. 850, 856, 857Google Scholar; Nkrumah, K., Africa Must Unite (1963) 143.Google Scholar
34 The fact that the former were supported by the Russians and the latter by the West also had its effect: Shwadran, B., “Union of Jordan with Iraq and Recoil” (1958) 9 Mid. East Affairs 370, 379Google Scholar; Longrigg, , “New Groupings Among the Arab States” (1958) 34 Int. Aff. 312, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Wallace, op. cit., at p. 274; Ramphal, S., “British Constitution-Making in the British West Indies” (1953) 2 I. Comp. L. Q. 192, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Sherlock, P. “Prospects in the Caribbean” (1963) 41 For. Aff. 744, 746.Google Scholar
37 Ibid. See also Campbell, J., “The West Indies” (1963) 39 Int. Aff. 335, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 Little, op. cit., at pp. 104, 120; Brinton, J. Y., Aden and the Federation of South Arabia (1964) 16.Google Scholar
39 See Anthony, J. D., “The Union of Arab Emirates” (1972) 26 Mid. East Jour. 271.Google Scholar
40 Parker, op. cit., at pp. 15, 16.
41 Barbour, N., “Impressions of the United Arab Republic” (1960) 36 Int. Aff. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 See generally Garnick, D., “On the Economic Feasibility of a Middle Eastern Common Market” (1960) 14 Mid. East Jour. 265Google Scholar; Kanovsky, E., “Arab Economic Unity” (1967) 21 Mid. East Jour. 213, 232–233Google Scholar; M. Palmer, op. cit., at pp. 50, 62.
43 Palmer, op. cit., at p. 63; Kanovsky, op. cit., at p. 215.
44 Palmer, op. cit., at p. 66; Barbour, op. cit., at p. 28; Kanovsky, op. cit., at p. 215.
45 What is equitable in any instance is a highly moot point.
46 See art. 8 of the Rome Treaty, which incidentally gives a total period of 15 years for the three stages of transition. See supra text to n. 3.
47 Somerville, J.J. B., “The Central African Federation” (1963) 39 Int. Aff. 386CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ranger, T., “The Politics of the Irrational in Central Africa” (1963) 34 Pol. Qu. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48 The direct influence of international “allegiance” on federation is relatively small.
49 Cf. Karat, K. L., Legal Science Association Report, at p. 55.Google Scholar
50 (1958) 9 Mid. East Aff. 110.
51 See Longrigg, op. cit., at p. 311; Barbour, op. cit., at p. 31; Parker, op. cit., at p. 278.
52 “Iraq-Jordan Federation Agreement, 14 Feb. 1958” (1958) 9 Mid. East Aff. 111.
53 Vatiokiotis, P. J., “Dilemmas of Political Leadership in the Arab Middle East” (1961) 37 Int. Aff. 189, 191–92, 707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54 Proctor, op. cit., at p. 56; Thiam, op. cit., passim.
55 Hughes, op. cit., at p. 20; Proctor, op. cit., at pp. 64–65.
56 Somerville, op. cit., at pp. 389–90.
57 Ghai, op. cit., at p. 1113.
58 Hinden, op. cit., at p. 26.
59 Sheridan, L. A., “Constitutional Problems of Malaysia” (1964) 13 I. Comp. L. Q. 1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60 Ibid., at p. 1366.
61 Nanda, V. P., “Self-Determination in International Law” (1972) 66 A.J.I.L. 321, 328–30.Google Scholar
62 Proctor, op. cit., at p. 61.
63 Washington, op. cit., at p. 649.
64 Foltz, , From French West Africa to the Mali Federation (1965) 167Google Scholar; Anthony, op.cit., at p. 250.
65 Campbell, op. cit., at p. 541.
66 Palmer, op. cit., at p. 162.
67 See Brinton, op. cit.
68 Franck, op. cit., at p. 171; Deutsch, K., Political Community in the North Atlantic Area (1957) 123 ff.Google Scholar
69 Franck, op. cit., at p. 152.
70 Cf. Carnell, op. cit., at p. 19.
71 Elazar, op. cit., at p. 356.
72 Watts, op. cit., at pp. 4–5; cf. Carnell, op. cit., at p. 47.
73 Ramphal, op. cit., at p. 192.
74 Elazar, op. cit., at p. 356 ff.
75 Cf. Thomson, P., “Size and Effectiveness in the Federal System” in Essays in Federalism (1960) 169.Google Scholar
76 Codding, G. A., The Federal Government of Switzerland (1961) 33.Google Scholar
77 See Minon, M.H. de, “Bicameralism” (1975) 23 A.J.I.L. 236.Google Scholar
78 Thiam, op. cit., at p. 128 ff.
79 Watts, R. L., New Federations (1960) 342.Google Scholar
80 An important example is set by the International Court of Justice.
81 Watts, op. cit., at p. 10 ff.
82 Cf. Friedrich, op. cit., at p. 204 ff.; Ramphal, op. cit., at p. 199; Blanc-Jaevain, X., Legal Science Association Report at p. 141.Google Scholar
83 Hyneman, C. S. and Carey, G. W., eds., The Second Federalist (1967) 95–97.Google Scholar
84 Fuss, op. cit., at p. 1 ff.
85 Valladao, op. cit., at p. 36.
86 Watts, op. cit., at p. 170 ff.
87 Carpizo, J., Legal Science Association Report at p. 52.Google Scholar
88 Ramphal, op. cit., at p. 202.
89 Fuss, op. cit., at p. 2.
90 Ibid., at p. 4.
91 See the examples in Appendix II.
92 Carpizo, J. and Aubert, J. F., Legal Science Association Report at pp. 82, 84, 98.Google Scholar
93 Deutsch, op. cit.
94 Franck, op. cit., at p. 171 ff.
95 Royal Commission on the Constitution, Cmnd. 5460 (1973) para. 539.
96 Livingston, op. cit., at p. 139.
97 Franck, op. cit., at p. 168.
98 Cf. Thiam, op. cit., at p. 124 ff.
99 Cf. Mogi, op. cit., at pp. 1059, 1066, 1073.
100 Cf. Friedrich, op. cit., at p. 190.
101 Ibid., at p. 163; cf. Watts, op. cit., at p. 350 ff.
102 Franck, op. cit., at p. 177 ff.; Thiam, op. cit., at p. 118.
103 Becker, C. L., Freedom & Responsibility in the American Way of Life (1955) 83.Google Scholar
104 The sources of information are generally the relevant sections of Blaustein and the Stateman's Yearbook.
105 Lotian, , “Some Legal Aspects of the Formation of the United Arab Republic and the United Arab States” (1959) 8 I. Comp. L. Q. 346.Google Scholar
106 Rubin, , Constitution and Government of Ghana (1961) 21.Google Scholar
107 See Harvey, W. B., Law and Social Change in Ghana (1966) 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nkrumah, K., Africa Must Unite (1963) 142.Google Scholar
108 Foltz, , From French West Africa to the Mali Federation (1965) 103, 182.Google Scholar
109 Somerville, J. J. B., “The Central African Federation” (1963) 39 Int. Aff. 356, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
110 Banfield, J., “Federation in East-Africa” (1963) 18 Int. Jour. 181–193.Google Scholar
111 Wallace, op. cit., at p. 270.
112 Ramphal, op. cit., at p. 149.
113 Campbell, J.F., “Rumblings Along the Red Sea: The Eritrean Question” (1970) 48 For. Aff. 537, 541–542.Google Scholar
114 Robertson, , European Institutions (1966) 1.Google Scholar
115 Behr, , “The European Coal and Steel Community—A Political and Legal Innovation” (1953) 63 Yale L.J. 1, 3–4, 6.Google Scholar
116 Convention on Certain Institutions Common to the European Communities, 1957.
117 Vernon, R., “The Schumann Plan—Sovereign Powers of the European Coal and Steel Community” (1953) 47 A.J.I.L. 183, 195.Google Scholar In certain cases the Authority is required to request the non-binding opinion of consumers and dealers, in order to ensure that the views of all interested parties are represented.
118 Robertson, op. cit., at pp. 152–157.
119 Before the recent addition of new members voting was by majority but France and Germany together had a veto, and if both voted on the same side of a three-three division that was decisive.
120 Robertson, op. cit., at p. 196. The argument is that the Council has been ready to initiate action in areas where the Commission has hesitated, but in fact were it not for its existence which acts as a continual restraint, the Commission might very well have acted earlier in the same areas.
121 A failure by the High Authority to take action can also be brought before the Court as a negative act.
122 Stein, E., “The European Coal and Steel Community: The Beginning of its Judicial Process” (1955) 55 Colum. L.R. 985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
123 The Rome Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community and the Treaty Establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.
124 Coombes, D., Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community (1970) 100.Google Scholar
125 “Second Report on European Political Cooperation of Foreign Policy” (1974) Common Market L.R. 114.
126 Coombes, op. cit., at pp. 50–53.
127 Kozyris, op. cit., at p. 286.
128 Rosenstiel, F., “Reflections on the Notion of Supranationality” (1964) 2 Jour. Com. Mark. Stud. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
129 Krosigk, F., “A Reconsideration of Federalism in the Scope of the Present Discussion on European Integration” (1971) 9 Jour. Com. Mark. Stud. 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
130 Palmer, , European Unity (1968) 24.Google Scholar
131 Ibid., at pp. 175–176.
132 Camps, M., European Unification in the Sixties, 81–82.Google Scholar
133 Ibid., at p. 35.
134 Palmer, op. cit., at pp. 475–476; Camps, op. cit., at p. 212.
135 Deutsch, K. W., “Supranational Organizations in the 1960's” (1963) 1 Jour. Corn. Mark. Stud. 212, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
136 Kitzinger, U., The European Common Market and Community (1967) 211.Google Scholar
137 See Rosenstiel, op. cit.
138 Palmer, op. cit., at p. 475. See also Schwarzenberger, op. cit., at pp. 19–22; Lasok and Bridges, op. cit., at pp. 22–27.
139 Camps, op. cit., at pp. 213, 219.
140 Kitzinger, op. cit., at p. 216; Cf. Friedrich, op. cit., at p. 17; Lasok and Bridges; op. cit., at p. 27.