Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T12:31:21.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Setting-Off of Losses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Arye Lapidoth
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Cases
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , Summer 1993 , pp. 487 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 1 L.S.I.[N.V.] 145.

2 Income Tax Ordinance, 1947, P.G. 1947, No. 1568, Supplement 1, p. 93.

3 See the reasons given for the system of deduction in respect of trade losses recommended in the Model Ordinance, on which sec. 14 of 1941 Ordinance is based. Cmd. 1788, p. 8, secs. 21 and 22.

4 A.B. v. Assessing Officer, (1952) 7 P.M. 79, at 84.

5 Supra n. 1, at 160.

6 See supra n. 4.

7 Goldberg v. Assessing Officer, 3 P.D.E. 180.

8 Ibid.

9 See Gliksberg, D., “The Offsetting of Ordinary Losses and the Legislative Purpose”, (1992) 21 Mishpatim 531Google Scholar. See also Neiger, D., “Following the Decision in Goldstein Ltd.”, (1990) vol. 4, no. 6Missim, p. A–11Google Scholar. See also D. Levy and M. Gurfein, “Adventure in the Nature of Trade and Set off of Losses - the Goldstein Case”, ibid., at A-17.