Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:27:42.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minority Rights for Immigrants? Multiculturalism versus Antidiscrimination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2012

Christian Joppke
Get access

Abstract

Contemporary immigration has reinforced calls for minority rights in liberal states, which accrue to immigrants (but also to citizens) qua member of an ethnic minorify group. It is often overlooked that such minority rights may be of two kinds: multicultural rights that protect cultural differences or antidiscrimination rights that attack discrimination on these grounds. I argue that the importance of multicultural rights has been greatly exaggerated, and that much of the work attributed to them has in fact been accomplished by group-indifferent individual rights. By contrast, antidiscrimination rights are growing stronger; even in Europe. However, to the degree that it tackles indirect discrimination, antidiscrimination cannot but be factually group-making, even in states that reject multiculturalism.

Type
Articles
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , 2010 , pp. 49 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wirth, Louis, The Problem of Minority Groups, in The Science of Man in the World Crisis 347, 347 (Linton, Ralph ed., 1940)Google Scholar.

2 Id.

3 Waters, Mary, Ethnic Options: choosing identities in America 156 (1990)Google Scholar.

4 Id. at 157. Mary Waters's distinction between ethnic and racial groups, the former being positively self- and the latter negatively other-defined, echoes Max Weber's famous discussion on “ethnic relations” (ethnische Gemeinschaftsbeziehungen) in his Wirtschaft und Gesellshaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie 234–244 (1976)Google Scholar.

5 Wirth, supra note 1.

6 Kastoryano, Riva, Negotiating Identities: States and Immigrants in France and Germany 140 (Harshav, Barbara trans., Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

7 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art. 27, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.

8 Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious or Linguistic Minorities, G.A. Res. 47/135, art. 1, annex, 47 U.N. GAOR Supp. No. 49 at 210, U.N. Doc. A/47/49 (Dec. 18, 1992) states: “States shall protect the existence and the national or ethnic, cultural, religious and linguistic identity of minorities within their respective territories and shall encourage conditions for the promotion of that identity.”

9 See the critique by Kymlicka, Will, Multicultural Odysseys (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Taylor, Charles, Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition” (1992)Google Scholar.

11 Id. at 26.

12 Id. at 35.

13 Id. at 39.

14 Id. at 44.

15 Id. at 63.

16 Id. at 68.

17 For another influential radical variant, which is inspired not by anticolonialism but by feminism, see Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference (1990)Google Scholar.

18 Kymlicka, Will, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (1995)Google Scholar; see also Joppke, Christian, Multicultural Citizenship: A Critique, 42 Eur. J. Soc. 431 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Kymlicka, supra note 18, at 108-15.

20 Kukathas, Chandran, Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom 249 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Id. at 250.

22 Id. at 251.

23 Kymlicka, supra note 18, at 86-87.

24 Id. at 31.

25 One of the few rights with a cultural inflection, which are available to immigrant minorities but not to members of the majority group, is the so-called “cultural defense” in criminal law, which reduces the culpability of offenders who are deemed conditioned by their origin cultures (see Renteln, Alison Dundes, The Cultural Defense (2005)Google Scholar.

26 See Joppke, Christian, Successes and Failures of Muslim Integration in France and Germany, in Bringing Outsiders In: Transatlantic Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation 115, 120–125 (Hochschild, Jennifer L. & Mollenkopf, John H. eds., 2009)Google Scholar.

27 See, e.g., in this issue, Stopler, Gila, Rights in Immigration: The Veil as a Test Case, 43 Isr. L. Rev. 183 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 See Joppke, Christian, Veil: Mirror of Identity (2009)Google Scholar.

29 I borrow the useful distinction between “expressive” and “access” racism from Bleich, Erik, Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policymaking since the 1960s 12–13 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Civil Rights Act of 1964 title VII, sec. 701(b), July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241, which targets “unlawful employment practices.”

31 Still best on the distinction between equality of opportunity and equality of results is Bell, Daniel, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society 408–455 (1973)Google Scholar.

32 Graham, Hugh Davis, The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy, 1960-1972, 456 (1990)Google Scholar. See also Skrentny, John David, The Ironies of Affirmative Action (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, who similarly grounds the rise of affirmative action in “administrative pragmatism.”

33 Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 431 (1971).

34 Id. at 430.

35 The words “indirect discrimination” do not appear in Griggs v. Duke Power Co., id.

36 Sabbagh, Daniel, Equality and Transparency: A Strategic Perspective on Affirmative Action in American Law 123 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Id.

38 Skrentny, John David, The Minority Rights Revolution (2002)Google Scholar.

39 Id. at 9-12.

40 Id. at 141.

41 Id. at 264.

42 See Graham, Hugh Davis, Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America (2002)Google Scholar.

43 Sabbagh, supra note 36, at 39.

44 Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).

45 Id. at 295.

46 Id. at 292.

47 Id. at 311 and 313, respectively.

48 Id. at 297.

49 Sabbagh, supra note 36, at 38.

50 Id. at 43.

51 Id. at 163.

52 Id. at 156.

53 See Waters, Mary & Vang, Zoua M., The Challenges of Immigration to Race-Based Diversity Policies in the United States, in 3 Belonging? Diversity, Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada 433 (Banting, Keith, Courchene, Thomas J. & Seidle, F. Leslie eds., 2007)Google Scholar, who cite evidence that by means of affirmative action minorities have made “remarkable strides in education, particularly post-secondary education.”

54 Sabbagh, supra note 36, at 162.

55 Teles, Steven M., Why is There No Affirmative Action in Britain? 41 Am. Behav. Sci. 1004 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Gehring, Jacqueline S., Hidden Connections: Citizenship and Anti-Discrimination Policy in Europe, in Citizenship Policies in the Age of Diversity: Europe at the Crossroads (Zapata-Barrero, Ricard ed., 2009)Google Scholar.

57 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, The German Proposal for an ‘Anti-Discrimination’-law: Anticonstitutional and Anti-Common Sense. A Response to Nicola Vennemann, 3 Ger. L.J. 1 (2002)Google Scholar.

58 Especially France, which earlier used the penal law to combat “expressive” racism (see Bleich, supra note 29, at chs. 5 & 6). Why France would strongly support a measure foreign to its legal tradition is persuasively explained by Guiraudon, Virginie, Construire une Politique Européenne de Lutte contre les Discriminations: L'Histoire de la Directive Race, 53 Sociétés Contemporaines 11 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Council Directive 2000/43/EC of June 29, 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (2000 O.J. 22-26).

60 Id at art. 13.

61 Id. at art. 2.2(b).

62 Id. at art. 5.

63 Id. at preamble, “whereas.”

64 See Joppke, Christian, Transformation of Immigrant Integration: Civic Integration and Antidiscrimination in the Netherlands, France, and Germany, 59 World Pol. 243, 262 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 European Commission, Promoting Diversity. DG4 Employment and Social Affairs 2002.

66 Veil, Simone, Comité de Réflexion sur le Preambule de la Constitution : Rapport au Président de la République, Dec., 2008, at 57Google Scholar.

67 Gabizon, Cécilia, La France dit non au fichage ethnique, Le Figaro, Dec. 9, 2008, at 2Google Scholar.

68 Nicolas Sarkozy, quoted in id.

69 These developments are discussed in Joppke, Multicultural Citizenship, supra note 18; Joppke, Christian, The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy, 55 Brit. J. Soc. 237 (2004)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Joppke, Transformation, supra note 64; and Joppke, Christian, Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe, 30 W. Eur. Pol. 1 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Starr, Paul, Social Categories and Claims in the Liberal State, in How Classification Works 156 (Douglas, Mary & Hull, David eds., 1992)Google Scholar.

71 De Zwart, Frank, The Dilemma of Recognition: Administrative Categories and Cultural Diversity. 34 Theory & Soc. 137, 142–144 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 Id. at 137.

73 Id.

74 See De Zwart, Frank & Poppelaars, Caelesta, Redistribution and Ethnic Diversity in the Netherlands: Accommodation, Denial and Replacement, 50 Acta Sociologica 387 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Quoted in De Zwart, The Dilemma of Recognition, supra note 71, at 155.

76 See also Poppelaars, Caelesta & Scholten, Peter, Two Worlds Apart: The Divergence of National and Local Immigrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands, 40 Admin. & Soc. 335 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Taylor, Multiculturalism, supra note 10.

78 Torpey, John, Making Whole What Has Been Smashed: On Reparations Politics (2005)Google Scholar.

79 With customary lucidity, Steven Lukes has laid out this argument in a 1993 unpublished paper, “The Politics of Equal Dignity and the Politics of Recognition” (on file with the author).

80 This is the claim made by Steven Vertovec & Susanne Wessendorf, Assessing the Backlash against Multiculturalism in Europe, MMG Working Paper 09-04, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity (2009).

81 Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, supra note 44, at 316.

82 For the U.S., see Kelly, Erin & Dobbin, Frank, How Affirmative Action became Diversity Management, 41 Am. Behav. Sci. 960 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for France, see Bereni, Laure, ‘Faire de la Diversité une Richesse pour l'Entreprise’: La Transformation d'une Contrainte Juridique en Catégorie Managériale, 35 Raisons politiques 87 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 Veil, supra note 66.

84 Poppelaars & Scholten, supra note 76, at 348-50.

85 Soysal, Yasemin, Limits of Citizenship (1994)Google Scholar; Jacobson, David, Rights Across Borders (1996)Google Scholar.

86 For rights expansion, see Soysal, supra note 85, and Jacobson, supra note 85; see also Joppke, Christian, The Legal-Domestic Sources of Immigrant Rights: The United States, Germany, and the European Union, 34 Comp. Pol. Stud. 339 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For rights contraction, especially after 2001, see Joppke, Christian, Citizenship and Immigration 91–95 (2010)Google Scholar.