Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:13:21.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Digest of Recent Israeli Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2016

Paul Sharon
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 18 , Issue 3-4 , Summer–Autumn 1983 , pp. 475 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land Annex to the Hague Convention of October 18, 1907 (Convention No. IV of 1907), sec. III, art. 43: “The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.”

2 Op. cit., art. 48: “If, in the territory occupied, the occupant collects the taxes, dues and tolls imposed for the benefit of the State, he shall do so, as far as is possible, in accordance with the rules of assessment and incidence in force, and shall in consequence be bound to defray the expenses of the administration of the occupied territory to the same extent as the legitimate Government was so bound.”

3 Fourth Geneva Convention 1949, art. 64: “The penal laws of the occupied territory shall remain in force, with the exception that they may be repealed or suspended by the Occupying Power in cases where they constitute a threat to its security or an obstacle to the application of the present Convention. Subject to the latter consideration and to the necessity for ensuring the effective administration of justice, the tribunals of the occupied territory shall continue to function in respect of all offences covered by the said laws.

The Occupying Power may, however, subject the population of the occupied territory to provisions which are essential to enable the Occupying Power to fulfill its obligations under the present Convention, to maintain the orderly government of the territory, and to ensure the security of the Occupying Power, of the members and property of the occupying forces or administration, and likewise, of the establishments and lines of communications used by them.”

4 Feilchenfeld, E. H., The International Economic Law of Belligerent Occupation (New York, 1971) 49.Google Scholar

5 11 L.S.I. 157.

6 At p. 235, quoting from Shamgar, M., “Legal Concepts and Problems of Israeli Military Government” in Military Government in the Territories Administered by Israel 1967–1980 (Jerusalem, 1982) 47–48.Google Scholar

7 von Glahn, G., Law Among Nations (New York, 1981) 686.Google Scholar

8 “Ligabue v. Finanze” (1952) 19 Int'l L.R. 616, 617–618.

9 Alijamaya Almasihia v. Minister of Defence et al. (1972) 26(i) P.D. 574, 582.