Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:28:34.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bodies Corporate in Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Henry E. Baker
Get access

Extract

Societies consisting of persons who have associated for a common interest and for objects other than that of deriving profits, which are generally known in this country as “Ottoman societies” are regulated by the Ottoman Law of Societies of August 3, 1909, which is based on a French law of July 1, 1901. Such a society is formed by agreement of the founders and does not owe its existence to any registration, but its founders must notify the competent official of the formation of the society immediately after its formation and supply him with the prescribed particulars. No such society may be established contrary to the provisions of the law, public morality or with the intention of disturbing the peace of the country or aiming at disintegration of the State, or changing the form of the ruling Government, or causing dissension among different communities, and it is prohibited to establish political societies under the title of races and nationalities.

Among Ottoman societies are the Histadrut, WIZO, Hebrew University and professional associations such as the Bar Association.

Type
Articles
Information
Israel Law Review , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1974 , pp. 518 - 547
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (1954) H.H. no. 219, p. 16.

2 Drayton, , Laws of Palestine (hereinafter referred to as Drayton) I, chap. 22, p. 161.Google Scholar

3 (1961) (II) 15 P.D. 1151 and F.H. (1962) (II) 16 P.D. 1209.

4 19 L.S.I. 231.

5 15 L.S.I. 79.

6 22 L.S.I. 266.

7 S.H. no. 694, p. 118. [For an English translation and comment on the Law see Shalev, , “General Comments on Contracts (General Part) Law, 1973” (1974) 9 Is.L.R. 274Google Scholar (Ed.)].

8 8 L.S.I. 163.

9 5 L.S.I. 142.

10 5 L.S.I. 45.

11 (1973) S.H. no. 696, p. 150.

12 (1973) S.H. no. 712, p. 262.

13 (1971) H.H. no. 976, p. 129.

14 Drayton, II chap. 103, p. 1041.

15 Ibid., vol. I, chap. 10, p. 56.

16 (1936) P.G. Extraordinary, no. 566 (Supp. no. 1) p. 21.

17 Drayton, I, chap. 24, p. 360.

18 (1971) H.H. no. 964, p. 3.

19 22 L.S.I. 210.

20 1 L.S.I. 7.

21 22 L.S.I. 282.

22 (1972) S.H. no. 651, p. 51.

23 (1973) H.H. no. 1067, p. 317.

24 (1941) P.G. no. 1134 (Supp. no. 1) p. 85.

25 1 L.S.I. (N.V.) 5 [For a detailed study of sec. 42 of the Interpretation Ordinance, see Potchebutzky, J., “Is the State Subject to the Rule of Law?” (1974) 9 Is.L.R. 360Google Scholar (Ed.)].

26 (1936) P.G. Extraordinary, no. 652 (Supp. no. 1) p. 285.

27 24 L.S.I. 112.

28 (1944) P.G. no. 1380 (Supp. no. 1) p. 129; 2 L.S.I. (N.V.) 5.

29 6 L.S.I. 147.

30 3 L.S.I. 110.

31 4 L.S.I. 115.

32 Drayton, I, chap. 38, p. 502.

33 1 L.S.I. 23.

34 12 L.S.I. 52.

35 12 L.S.I. 138.

36 (1936) P.G. Extraordinary, no. 589 (Supp. no. 11) p. 157.

37 19 L.S.I. 330.

38 (1947) P.G. Extraordinary, no. 1637 (Supp. no. 1) p. 307.

39 23 L.S.I. 18.

40 (1944) P.G. no. 1380 (Supp. no. 1) p. 151.

41 Drayton, I, chap. 14, p. 112.

42 Drayton, I, chap. 15, p. 128.

43 Drayton, II, chap. 135, p. 1378.

44 19 L.S.I. 58.

45 6 L.S.I. 27.

46 (1956) 17 P.M.S. 31.

47 (1926) 4 Rotenberg 1451.

48 7 L.S.I. 3.

49 8 L.S.I. 35.

50 10 L.S.I. 24.

51 (1943) P.G. no. 1305 (Supp. no. 1) p. 44.

52 11 L.S.I. 89.

53 18 L.S.I. 83.

54 (1973) S.H. no. 677, p. 36.

55 17 L.S.I. 153.

56 1 L.S.I. (N.V.) 247.

57 1 L.S.I. (N.V.) 315.

58 9 L.S.I. 54.