Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:36:00.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Therapy for stuttering: experimenting with experimenting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Margaret M Leahy
Affiliation:
School of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College, Dublin
Geraldine Collins
Affiliation:
School of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College, Dublin

Abstract

An account is given of an approach to group therapy for stuttering using Kelly's personal construct theory as a basis for exploring the understanding of stuttering and the process of change. All five clients who participated showed considerable improvement in fluency on the Riley Stuttering Severity Instrument. Although the improvement may be due to concurrent individual fluency therapy, feedback on the group sessions suggested that group therapy had a positive effect on personal behaviour and facilitated transfer and maintenance of speech fluency.

Type
Clinical and Brief Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Abbs, J. Speech movement disorders. In: Adelman, G, ed. Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Boston: Birkhauser, 1987.Google Scholar
2.Glauber, IP. The psychoanalysis of stuttering. In: Eisenson, J, ed. Stuttering: a symposium. New York: Harper, 1958.Google Scholar
3.Johnson, W. The onset of stuttering. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1955.Google Scholar
4.Horsley, I. Childhood stuttering. In: Leahy, MM, ed. Disorders of communication: the science of intervention. London: Taylor & Francis, 1989.Google Scholar
5.Starkweather, W. Fluency & stuttering. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1987.Google Scholar
6.Krause, R. A social psychological approach to the study of stuttering. In: Fraser, C, Sherer, KR, eds. Advances in the social psychology of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
7.Andrews, G, Craig, A, Feyer, AM. Hoddinott, S, Howie, P, Neilson, M. Stuttering: a review of research findings and theories c. 1982. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1983; 48: 226–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gregory, H. Handling relapse [Paper presented at Clinical Management of Stuttering Conference]. Washington DC, 1987.Google Scholar
9.Woods, CL, Williams, DE. Traits attributed to stuttering and normally fluent males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1976; 19: 267–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Horsely, I, Fitzgibbon, CT. Stuttering children, investigation of a stereotype. British Journal of Communication Disorders 1987; 22: 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sheehan, J. Current issues on stuttering and recovery. In: Gregory, HH, ed. Controversies about stuttering therapy. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1979.Google Scholar
12.Guitar, B, Peters, TJ. 1982. Stuttering: an integration of contemporary therapies. Memphis: Speech Foundation of America, 1982. (Speech Foundation of America Series, no 16.)Google Scholar
13.Gregory, HH. Controversies about stuttering therapy. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1979.Google Scholar
14.Leahy, M, O'Sullivan, B. Psychological change and fluency therapy – a pilot study. British Journal of Communication Disorders 1987; 22: 245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kelly, G. Personal construct psychology. New York: Norton, 1955.Google Scholar
16.Fransella, F. Personal change and reconstruction. London: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
17.Hayhow, R, Levy, C. Working with stuttering. Bichester, Oxon: Winslow Press, 1989.Google Scholar
18.Riley, G. The stuttering severity instrument. Tigard, Oregon: CC Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
19.Van Riper, C. The treatment of stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.Google Scholar