Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:09:49.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of service use among people with learning disabilities discharged from long-stay hospital care in Northern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Sinéad McGilloway  and
Michael Donnelly
Michael Donnelly
Affiliation:
Health and Social Care Research Unit, Queen's University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Institute of Clinical Science, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Continuing deinstitutionalisation has led to growing concern about the availability and accessibility of services for people with learning disabilities transferring to community living. This study was undertaken in order to assess the configuration of services in terms of availability and uptake for people with learning disabilities who have left long-stay hospital care and to identify gaps or barriers to service provision within the unique integrated health and social services structure in Northern Ireland.

Method: The ‘keyworkers’ of 195 people – most of whom were aged 40-59 years with a diagnosis of moderate intellectual impairment – were interviewed by a researcher one year after discharge using the Service Interview.

Results: While a wide range of generic and specialist services was available, ‘packages’ of care consisted largely of public sector services (eg. GPs, chiropodists and social workers) and relied, to some extent, on the type of community accommodation. Although services appeared well co-ordinated in terms of care reviews and keyworker arrangements, 40% of people required more one-to-one support particularly in areas related to integration. However, services were perceived by care staff to be satisfactory

Conclusions: The development of community care has been slower in Northern Ireland than elsewhere and a large proportion of resources remain tied up in hospital care. However, existing community-based services appear to be addressing individual needs. Some former patients, though, may have been subject to transinstitutionalisation in the sense that their choice of accommodation was restricted mainly to large private sector homes and work and daytime opportunities were insufficient to facilitate integration. Service planners and providers need to give further consideration to the likely effects of different forms of rehabilitation, reprovision and resettlement and to be aware that the pattern of service provision is likely to be different for the more dependent cohorts of people who leave hospital in the future.

Keywords

Learning disabilityCommunity careLongstay hospital
Type
Audits
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 109 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Emerson, E, Hatton, C. Moving out: relocation from hospital to community. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
2.Booth, T, Simons, K, Booth, W. Outward Bound. Relocation and community care for people with learning difficulties. Milton Keynes: Open University Press 1990.Google Scholar
3.Salovuta, T. Immediate psychological effects of deinstitutionalisation. In: Mansell, J, Ericsson, K (eds.) Deinstitutionalisation and community living. London: Chapman and Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
4.Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS (Northern Ireland)). A Regional Strategy for the Northern Ireland Health and Personal Social Services, 1987-1992. Belfast: DHSS (Northern Ireland), 1986.Google Scholar
5.Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS(Northern Ireland)). A Regional Strategy for the Northern Ireland Health and Personal Social Services, 1992-1997. Belfast: DHSS (Northern Ireland), 1991.Google Scholar
6.Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS(Northern Ireland)). A Regional Strategy for the Northern Ireland Health and Personal Social Services, 1997-2002. Belfast: DHSS (Northern Ireland), 1995.Google Scholar
7.Donnelly, M, McGilloway, S, Mays, Net al.Opening New Doors. An evaluation of community care for people discharged from psychiatric and mental handicap hospitals. Belfast: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
8.Beecham, J, Knapp, MRI. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft, G, Brewin, C, Knapp, MRJ (eds). Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskill, 1992.Google Scholar
9.Beecham, J, Knapp, M, McGilloway, Set al.The cost-effectiveness of community care for adults with learning disabilities. J Intellect Disability Res 1997; 41: 30–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.The Welsh Office. All Wales Strategy for the development of services for mentally impaired people. Wales: The Welsh Office, 1983.Google Scholar
11.Korman, N, Glennerster, H. Closing a hospital: a political and economic study. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
12.Bond, S, Smith, M, Pitcairn, K. Community resettlement from hospital of people with a mental handicap. Centre for Health Services Research, Report No.53. Newcastle: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 1992.Google Scholar
13.Cambridge, P, Hayes, L, Knapp, MRJ, Fenyo, A, Gould, E. Care in the community five years on. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1994.Google Scholar
14.Knapp, MRJ, Cambridge, P, Thomason, C, Beecham, J, Allen, C, Darton, R. Care in the community: challenge and demonstration. Aldershot: Ashgate/PSSRU, 1992.Google Scholar
15.Goffman, E. Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday, 1961.Google Scholar
16. Registration and Inspection Unit Sixth Annual Report Belfast: Eastern Health and Social Services Board, 1997.Google Scholar
17.Mansell, J. Staffing and staff performance in services for people with severe or profound learning disability and serious challenging behaviour. J Intellect Disability Res 1995; 39: 3–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.House of Commons Select Committee on Social Services. Community care, HPC13-I, Session 1984-1985. London: HMSO, 1985.Google Scholar
19.Felce, D. Quality of support for ordinary living. In: Mansell, J, Ericsson, K (eds). Deinstitutionalisation and community living. London: Chapman and Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
20.Emerson, E, Hatton, C. Residential provision for people with learning disabilities: An analysis of the 1991 census. University of Manchester: Hester Adrian Research Centre, 1996.Google Scholar
21.Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS (Northern Ireland)). Review of policy for people with a learning disability. Belfast: DHSS (Northern Ireland), 1994.Google Scholar