Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:11:16.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The patient and the community: priorities for protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Pamela J Taylor
Pamela J Taylor*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Man functions both as an individual and as part of his group, the two roles sometimes leading to conflicting needs. If mental disorder contributes to such conflict then a psychiatrist may be expected to take a leading role in arbitrating between the needs and rights of the individual patient before him and the needs and rights of society. This is not an easy task. This paper seeks to clarify the range of roles the psychiatrist may have to adopt when attempting such a task: his role as an individual, as a member of the general public, as an agent of the patient, as an agent of the patient's representative or even as an agent of state authority or society. Some of the dilemmas that arise in each of these roles are discussed.

Keywords

Psychiatrist rolesLimits to KnowledgeLimits of “truth”ConfidentialityPatient autonomyConsentResponsibilities to patientsResponsibilities to othersSplit allegiancesDangerousnessProtecting the professionals
Type
Original Articles
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , September 1989 , pp. 128 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Third Edition - Revised. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.Google Scholar
2.Robertson, G. The 1959 Mental Health Act of England and Wales: Changes in the use of its Criminal Provisions. In: Gunn, J, Farrington, DP, eds. Abnormal Offenders, Delinquency, and the Criminal Justice System. John Wiley and Sons, 1982.Google Scholar
3.Mann, S A and Cree ‘New’ long-stay psychiatric patients: a national sample survey of 15 mental hospitals in England and Wales 1972-3. Psychological Medicine 1976. 6; 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.McCreadie, R G, Robinson, A D and Wilson, A O A. The Scottish Survey of Chronic Day-Patients. Br. J. Psychiatry 1984; 145; 626–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Pomeroy, J C and Ricketts, B. Long-Term Attendence in the Psychiatric Out-Patient Department for Non Psychotic Illness. Br. J. Psychiatry 1985: 147: 508–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Dell, S, Robertson, G and Parker, E. (1987) Detention in Broadmoor: Factors in length of study Br. J. Psychiatry 1987: 150: 824–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lewis, D O, Pincus, J H, Bard, B, Richardson, E, Prichep, L S, Feldman, M and Yeager, C. Neuropsychiatric, Psychoeducational and family characteristics of 14 Juveniles condemned to death in the United States. Am. J. Psychiatry 1988: 145: 584–589.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Bloch, S, Larkin, T. Ethics in psychotherapy. In: Duntan, GR, Shinebourne, E, eds. doctors decide: ethical conflicts in medical practice. Oxford University Press, 1989: 155–166.Google Scholar
9.Roth, L H, Lidz, C W, Meisel, A, Soloff, P HKaufman, K, Spiker, D G and Foster, G G. Competency to decide about Treatment and Research – An Overview of some Empirical Data. Int. J. Law and Psychiatry 1982: 5: 29–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Tarasoff, V. Regents of the University of California Superior Court Almeda Co. 1974, S 29: P.2d; 553 Appeal in Supreme Court of California 1976. 551: P.2d. 334. (5.c. cal).Google Scholar
11.Zusman, J and Simon, J. Differences in repeated psychiatric examinations of litigants to a lawsuit. Am. J. Psychiatry 1983: 140: 1300–1304.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Chiswick, D. Insanity in Bar of Trial in Scotland: A State Hospital Study Br J Psychiatry 1978: 132: 598–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Dell, S. Murder into Manslaughter, Oxford University Press: Oxford. 1984.Google Scholar
14.Thomas, D A. Principles of Sentencing. London: Heinemann. 1979.Google Scholar
15.Home office department of health and social security Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders London: HMSO Cmnd 6244. 1975.Google Scholar
16.Monahan, J. The prediction of violent behaviour: toward a second generation of theory and policy Am. J. Psychiatry 1984: 141: 10–15.Google Scholar
17.Montadon, C & Harding, T. The Reliability of Dangerousness Assessments. A decision making exercies. Br J Psychiatry 1984: 144: 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Menzies, R J, Wedster, C D & Sepejak, D S. Hitting the forensic sound barrier: predictions of dangerousness in a pretrial psychiatric clinic. In: Webster, CD, Ben-Avon, MH, Hucker, SJ, eds. Dangerousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985: 115–143.Google Scholar
19. Acres, D I. The After-care of special hospital patients. Reports of the Committee of Mentally abnormal Offenders. London. HMSO Cmnd 6244. 1975: 292–302.Google Scholar
20.Bowden, P. Medical Practice: Defendents and Prisoners. Medical Ethics 1976: 2: 163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar