Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:25:04.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-stay forensic psychiatric inpatients in the Republic of Ireland: aggregated needs assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Conor O'Neill ,
Patrick Heffernan ,
Ray Goggins ,
Ciaran Corcoran ,
Sally Linehan ,
Dearbhla Duffy ,
Helen O'Neill ,
Charles Smith  and
Harry G Kennedy
Conor O'Neill
Affiliation:
St Brendan's Hospital, Rathdown Rd, Dublin, Ireland
Patrick Heffernan
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Ray Goggins
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Ciaran Corcoran
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Sally Linehan
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Dearbhla Duffy
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Helen O'Neill
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Charles Smith
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Harry G Kennedy
Affiliation:
Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin 14, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: To profile the current cohort of forensic psychiatric inpatients in the Republic of Ireland, comparing psychiatric healthcare and placement needs of long-stay patients with those more recently admitted.

Method: All forensic psychiatric inpatients in the Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum on a census date were included in the study. Patients and key worker were interviewed using a standardised schedule and validated research instruments. Static and dynamic risk factors for violence including demographic, diagnostic and legal characteristics were supplemented by detailed chart review. Standardised anonymised case vignettes were presented to panels of forensic and community psychiatric multidisciplinary teams who assessed current and future treatment and placement requirements for the cohort.

Results: There were 88 forensic psychiatric inpatients on the census date. Forty-three had lengths of stay over two years (17 over 20 years). Both patient groups were predominantly males with severe mental illness and histories of violent offending. The majority of the long-stay group were receiving regular parole and this group had lower levels of positive symptoms and comorbid substance misuse disorders. Significant gaps in existing rehabilitation inputs were identified. Almost half the long-stay patients were inappropriately placed. Thirty per cent of long-stay patients could be safely transferred to lower levels of security within six months and 63% within three years.

Conclusions: Holding patients in conditions of excessive security impedes rehabilitation and has considerable human rights implications. Almost half of long-stay forensic psychiatric patients in Ireland are inappropriately placed. Barriers to discharge include legislative inadequacies, lack of local low-secure facilities and under-resourcing of community psychiatric services. Such barriers lead to inappropriate utilisation of limited resources and limit access to secure facilities for higher-risk mentally disordered offenders. These findings are of particular relevance in the context of proposed new insanity legislation.

Keywords

Forensic psychiatryNeeds assessmentLength of stayPlacementRiskDiversion schemesCriminal Law (Insanity) Bill
Type
Original Papers
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 119 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cohen, A, Eastman, N. Assessing Forensic Mental Health Need: Policy, Theory and Research. London: Gaskell Press, 2000.Google Scholar
2.Warheit, G, Bell, R, Schwab, J. Needs Assessment Approaches – Concepts and Methods. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Mental Health, 1977.Google Scholar
3.Hayward, P, Peck, E, Smith, H. Qualitative and quantitative approaches to needs assessment in mental health: creating a common currency. J Mental Health 1993; 2: 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Holzer, C, Goldsmith, H, Jackson, , al e. Indirect indicators for mental health services: comments and an independent formulation. In: Goldsmith, H, ed. Needs Assessment: Its Future. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1988: 33–46.Google Scholar
5.Reed, J. Report on the working group on high security and related psychiatric provision. London: HMSO, 1994.Google Scholar
6.Taylor, P, Butwell, M, Dacey, R, Kaye, C. Within maximum security hospitals: a survey of need. London: Special Hospitals Services Authority, 1991.Google Scholar
7.Murray, K. The use of beds in NHS medium secure units in England. J Forensic Psychiatry 1996; 7: 504–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Maden, A, Curie, C, Meaux, C, Burrow, S, Gunn, J. Treatment and security needs of special hospital patients. London: Whurr publications, 1995.Google Scholar
9.Pierzchniak, P, Farnham, F, DeTaranto, Net al.Assessing the needs of patients in secure settings: a multidisciplinary approach. J Forensic Psychiatry 1999; 10(2): 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Courtney, P, O'Grady, J, Cunnane, J. The provision of secure psychiatric services in Leeds. Paper II: A survey of unmet need. Health Trends 1992; 24(2): 51–53.Google Scholar
11.Keogh, F, Roche, A, Walsh, D. “We have no beds…” An enquiry into the availability and use of acute psychiatric beds in the Eastern Health Board region. Dublin: Health Research Board, 1999.Google Scholar
12.Lelliot, P, Wing, J. A national audit of new long-stay psychiatric patients. II: Impact on services. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 165: 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Lelliot, P, Wing, J, Clifford, P. A national audit of new long-stay psychiatric patients. I: Method and description of the cohort. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 165: 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.O'Neill, C, Sinclair, H, Kelly, A, Kennedy, H. Interaction of forensic and general psychiatric services in Ireland: Learning the lessons or repeating the mistakes? Ir J Psychol Med 2002; 19(2): 48–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.O'Driscoll, C, Leff, J. The TAPS project 8: Design of the research study on the long-stay patients. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 162(Suppl 19): 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Wykes, T, Sturt, E. The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: an assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS schedule. Br J Psychiatry 1986; 148: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Andreasen, N. Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Iowa: University of Iowa, 1984.Google Scholar
18.Andreasen, N. Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Br J Psychiatry 1989; 155(Supplement 7): 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Overall, J, Gorham, D. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Reports 1962; 10: 799–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.David, AS, Buchanan, A, Reed, A. The assessment of insight in psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 1992; 161: 599–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.National High security psychiatric services; Changes in funding and organisation. London: NHSE, 1995.Google Scholar
22.WHO. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1992.Google Scholar
23.Andrews, DA, Zinger, I, Hoge, RD, Bonta, J, Gendreau, P, Cullen, FT. Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology 1990; 28: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Test, MA. Training in community living. In: Liberman, R, ed. Handbook of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. New York: Macmillan, 1992: 153–170.Google Scholar
25.Snowden, P, McKenna, J, Jasper, A. Management of conditionally discharged patients and others who present similar risks in the community: integrated or parallel? J Forensic Psychiatry 1999; 10: 583–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Coid, J, Kahtan, N, Cook, A, Gault, S, Jarman, B. Predicting admission rates to secure forensic psychiatry services. Psychol Med 2001; 31: 531–539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Swanson, JW, Swartz, MS, Borum, R, Hiday, VA, Wagner, R, Burns, BJ. Involuntary outpatient commitment and reduction of violent behaviour in persons with severe mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 176: 324–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Bigelow, DA, Bloom, JD, Williams, MH. Costs of managing insanity acquitees under a psychiatric security review board system. Hosp Comm Psychiatry 1988; 41: 613–14.Google Scholar
29.Dvoskin, JA, Steadman, HJ. Using intensive case management to reduce violence by mentally ill persons in the community. Hosp Comm Psychiatry 1994; 45: 679–84.Google ScholarPubMed
30.Muller-Isberner, JR. Forensic psychiatric aftercare following Hospital Order treatment. Int J Law and Psychiatry 1996; 19: 81–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Heilbrun, K, Griffin, P. Community based forensic treatment. In: Wettstein, RA, ed. Treatment of offenders with mental disorders. New York: Guilford Press, 1998:168–210.Google Scholar
32.Holloway, J, Shaw, J. Providing a forensic psychiatry service to a magistrate's court: A follow-up study. J Forensic Psychiatry 1993; 4: 575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Joseph, P, Potter, M. Diversion from custody, II: Effect on hospital and prison resources. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 162: 330–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Joseph, P. Psychiatric assessment at the magistrates' court. Br J Psychiatry 1994; 164: 722–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Johnson, S. Dual diagnosis of severe mental illness and substance misuse: A case for specialist services? Br J Psychiatry 1997; 171: 205–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Criminal Law (Insanity) Bill. Dublin: Government Publications, 2002.Google Scholar