Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:58:08.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): use in an Irish psychiatric outpatient population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Stephen Browne ,
Michael Doran  and
Sheila McGauran
Stephen Browne
Affiliation:
University Department of Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, West Didsbury, Manchester M20 8LR, England
Sheila McGauran
Affiliation:
North Kildare Mental Health Service, Auburn House, Courtown Road, Kilcock, Co Kildare, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility and validity of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) in an Irish catchment area psychiatric service.

Method: One hundred consecutive outpatients were assessed using the HoNO S and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scales.

Results: It was feasible to administer HoNOS in day-to-day clinical practice. There was a statistically significant correlation between the HoNO S and GAF scores. Attenders at the outpatient department had significantly lower HoNOS scores compared to individuals assessed on domiciliary visits or at the day hospital. Individuals with schizophrenia had significantly higher HoNO S scores compared to affective disordered patients. However, this difference was confined to the Social subscale of HoNOS.

Conclusions: Although these findings indicate that HoNOS has significant convergent and criterion validity as a measure of psychiatric morbidity, its widespread use in day-to-day clinical practice may be premature.

Keywords

MorbidityClinical utilityValiditySchizophreniaAffective disorder
Type
Original Papers
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 17 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Department of Health. The Health of the Nation: A Strategy of Health for England. London; HMSO, 1992.Google Scholar
2.Wing, JK, Curtis, RH, Beevor, AS. HoNOS: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Report on Research and Development. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists' Research Unit, 1996.Google Scholar
3.Trailer, T, Callaly, T, Hantz, P, Little, J, Shields, R, Smith, J. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Results of the Victorian field trial. Br J Psych 1999; 174: 380–8.Google Scholar
4.Amin, S, Singh, SP, Croudace, T, Jones, P, Medley, I, Harrison, C. Evaluating the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Reliability and validity in a three-year follow-up of first-onset psychosis. Br J Psych 1999; 174: 399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chaplin, R, Perkins, R. HoNOS: a cautionary tale of their use in a rehabilitation service. Psych Bull 1999; 23: 20–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sharma, VK. Wilkinson, O, Fear, S. Health of the Nation Outcome scales: a case study in general psychiatry. Br J Psych 1999; 174: 395–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bebbington, P, Brugha, T, Hill, T, Marsden, L, Window, S. Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Br J Psych 1999; 174: 389–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.James, M, Kehoe, R. Using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in clinical practice. Psych Bull 1999; 23: 536–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed), (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: APA, 1994.Google Scholar
10.Norusis, JM. SPSS/ PC+ statistics. Chicago, IL: SPSS, 1986.Google Scholar
11.NHS Executive. Planning and Priorities Guidance for the NHS 1997/8. Leeds: Department of Health, 1996.Google Scholar
12.Report of Working Group on Outcome Indicators for Severe Mental Illness. London: HMSO, 1999Google Scholar
13.Stein, OS. Usefulness of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Br J Psych 1999: 174: 375–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed