Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:02:35.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Telepsychiatry in a Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

David Browne
Affiliation:
St Davnet's Hospital, Monaghan, Ireland
Michael Reilly
Affiliation:
St Davnet's Hospital, Monaghan, Ireland
Oonagh Bradley
Affiliation:
Department of Child Psychiatry, Mayo General Hospital, Castlebar, Co Mayo, Ireland

Abstract

Objectives: To carry out a survey on the use of video conferencing equipment by a rural child psychiatric multidisciplinary team and to determine what impact the introduction of this equipment had on service provision.

Method: Several aspects were studied including user satisfaction and estimations of cost saving, on the basis of avoidance of travel to and from the regional base in Galway. A questionnaire was also developed to determine whether alternative contact would have been made if if this new technology were not in place.

Results: The results of the initial six months following commencement were investigated. Use of the equipment was attempted 17 times during this period. Most members of the child psychiatry team participated in its use. Visual problems accounted for 66.7% of reported technical difficulty and 88.9% of users rated their level of satisfaction with the equipment as ‘Satisfied’ or ‘Very Satisfied’.

Conclusions: Apart from the start-up cost implications of installing this equipment, it satisfied its aim of increasing contact between the rural service and St Anne's Children Centre in Galway. The equipment was easy to use and for the most part reliable.

Type
Audit
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.McLaren, P, Ball, CJ. Telemedcine: lessons remain unheeded. BMJ 1995; 310:1390–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gelber, H. The experience of the Royal Children's Hospital mental health service video conferencing project. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1998; 4: 71–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gammon, D, Bergvik, S, Bergmo, T, S Pedersen. video conferencing in psychiatry: a survey of use in Northern Norway. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1996; 2: 192–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mannion, L, Fahy, TJ, Duffy, C, Broderick, M, Gethins, E. Telepsychiatry': keeping a link with an island. Psychiatric Bulletin 1998; 22: 47–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hart, R. Survival in Isolation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 1986; 3: 125–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Gelber, H., Alexander, M. An evaluation of an Australian video conferencing project for child and adolescent telepsychiatry. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1999; 5: (suppl. 1), s1:21-s1: 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hilty, DM, Marks, SL, Urness, D, Yellowlees, P, Nesbitt, TS. Clinical and Educational Telepsychiatry Application: A Review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 2004; 49: 1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.McLaren, P. Telepsychiatry in Europe. International Psychiatry 2004; 3: 810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yellowlees, P. Broadband telecommunications: the bricks and mortar of future eMental health systems. International Psychiatry 2004; 3: 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar