Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:26:57.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telephone consultancy in adolescent psychiatry: an audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Declan Finnian Sheerin
Declan Finnian Sheerin*
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Family Psychiatry, Yorkhill NHS Trust, Glasgow, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: An audit was carried out to evaluate the performance of a telephone consultancy service in adolescent psychiatry. Its objective was to answer the following questions: What does a telephone consultancy service actually do? Is it worth having? If so, how can we improve it? Method: Proforma data sheets on 69 consecutive calls to the Telephone Consultancy Service over a 16-month period were analysed. Results: Seventy-seven percent of enquirers used the service to request a referral or to ask about the appropriateness of referral but only 46% of enquiries were responded to in this way. Twenty-two percent of enquiries were given counselling or advice on how to proceed with the cases themselves. Almost 50% of calls came from the social work department and they enquired principally about conduct problems (27% of their calls) and sexual abuse victims (18% of their calls). General practitioners infrequently used the service (7 calls over a 16-month period). Conclusions: These findings appear to indicate that a telephone consultancy service can provide a counselling service and highlight community resources that may be overlooked by other agencies. However, infrequent use of the service by general practitioners suggests that there has been poor dissemination of information about the service – therefore it is important to bolster awareness of the service itself on a periodic basis amongst potential users.

Keywords

AuditAdolescentsTelephoneConsultancy.
Type
Original Papers
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 15 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.General Medical Council. Annual report of the general medical council. Bristol: General Medical Council, 1991.Google Scholar
2.Heather, N, Kissoon-Singh, J, Fenton, GW. Assisted natural recovery from alcohol problems: effects of a self-help manual with and without supplementary telephone contact. Br J Addict 1990; 85: 1177–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Hagopian, GA, Rubenstein, JH. Effects of telephone call interventions on patients' well-being in a radiation therapy department. Cancer Nurs 1990; 13(6): 339–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Squires, RW, Miller, TD, Harn, T, Michecls, TA, Palma, TA. Transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring of cardiac rehabilitation exercise sessions in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 962–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Hallam, L. Organisation of telephone services and patients' access to doctors by telephone in general practice. BMJ 1991; 302: 629–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Gidda, S. Telephone services and general practice (letter). BMJ 1991; 302: 1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hallam, L. You've got a lot to answer for, Mr Bell. A review of the use of the telephone in primary care. Fam Prac 1989; 6: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.McLaren, PM, Watson, JP, Summerfield, AB, Lipsedge, M. Interactive television in psychiatry. Psychiatric Bull 1992; 16: 288–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.McLaren, PM, Ball, CJ. A pilot study on the use of the telephone in an acute psychiatric service. Psychiatric Bull 1992; 16: 531–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Difford, F. Defining essential data for audit in general practice. In: Audit in action. London: BMJ, 1992.Google Scholar
11.Wrate, RM, Rothery, DJ, McCabe, RJ, Aspin, J, Bryce, G. A prospective multicentre study of admissions to adolescent inpatient units. (Submitted for publication 1992).Google Scholar
12.Fergusson, DM, Horwood, LJ, Lynskey, MT. Family change, parental discord and early offending. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1992; 33(6): 1059–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Singh, G, Barton, D, Bodiwala, GG. Accident and emergency department's response to patients' inquiries by telephone. J R Soc Med 1991; 84(6): 345–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Killila, BA. Undocumented phone calls: a liability issue. Indiana Medicine 1990; 83(10): 768–9.Google Scholar
15.Shaw, C. Looking forward to audit. In: Audit in action. London: BMJ, 1992.Google Scholar