Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:10:44.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perspective: psychiatric diagnosis is too important for its own good

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2013

A. Frances*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: A. Frances, PO Box 3950, Department of Psychiatry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. (Email [email protected])

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Perspective
Copyright
Copyright © College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn. APA: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Andreasen, NC (2007). DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: an example of unintended consequences. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33, 108112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angell, M (2011). The Illusions of Psychiatry. New York Rev Books, July 14 (http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jul/14/illusions-of-psychiatry). Accessed 23 April 2013.Google Scholar
Applebaum, PS (2013). Law & psychiatry: imposed insanity defenses and political crimes. Psychiatric Services 64, 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batstra, L, Thoutenhoofd, ED (2012). The risk that DSM-5 will further inflate the diagnostic bubble. Current Psychiatry Reviews 8, 260263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayle Jones, K (2012). The risk that DSM 5 will reduce the credibility of psychiatric diagnosis. Current Psychiatry Reviews 8, 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feighner, JP, Robins, E, Guze, SB, Woodruff, RA, Winokur, G, Munoz, R (1972). Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry 26, 5763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frances, A. (2012). Diagnosing the DSM. New York Times, May 11.Google Scholar
Frances, A. (2013). Where have all the normals gone? Huffington Post, March 30 (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/allen-frances/jon-ronson-ted-talk_b_2978686.html). Accessed 24 April 2013.Google Scholar
Frances, A, First, M, Pincus, H (1995). DSM-IV Guidebook. American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC, p. 418.Google Scholar
Frances, AJ, Egger, HL (1999). Whither psychiatric diagnosis? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 33, 161165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gili, M, Roca, M, Basu, S, McKee, M, Stuckler, D (2013). The mental health risks of economic crisis in Spain: evidence from primary care centres, 2006 and 2010. European Journal of Public Health 23, 103108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillihan, SJ, Parens, E (2011). Should we expect ‘neural signatures’ for DSM diagnoses? Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 72, 13831389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyman, SE (2010). The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 6, 155179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendell, RE, Cooper, JE, Gourlay, AJ, Copeland, JR, Sharpe, L, Gurland, BJ (1971). Diagnostic criteria of American and British psychiatrists. Archives of General Psychiatry 25, 123130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, RC, Chiu, WT, Demler, O, Merikangas, KR, Walters, EE (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62, 617627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kessler, RC, McGonagle, KA, Zhao, S, Nelson, CB, Hughes, M, Eshleman, S, Wittchen, HU, Kendler, KS (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry 51, 819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kupfer, D, First, M, Regier, D (editors) (2002). A Research Agenda for DSM-V. American Psychiatric Publishing: Washington.Google Scholar
Liu, KY, King, M, Bearman, PS (2010). Social influence and the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology 115, 13871434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayes, R, Horwitz, AV (2005). DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 41, 249267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) (2011). NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RdoC). Draft 3.1 (http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research-funding/rdoc/nimh-research-domain-criteria-rdoc.shtml). Accessed 24 April 2013.Google Scholar
Rosenhan, DL (1973). On being sane in insane places. Science 179, 250258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovenko, R (2011). The DSM in litigation and legislation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry Law 39, 611.Google ScholarPubMed
Sowers, W (2005). Reducing reductionism: reclaiming psychiatry. Psychiatric Services 56, 637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, D (2012). The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality. British Medical Journal 344, e3135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, RL (1975). On pseudoscience in science, logic in remission, and psychiatric diagnosis: a critique of Rosenhan's “On being sane in insane places”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 84, 442452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Endicott, J, Robins, E (1978). Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry 35, 773782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M (1993). DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: a history. American Journal of Psychiatry 150, 399410.Google ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M, Galione, JN, Ruggero, CJ, Chelminski, I, Dalrymple, K, Young, D (2010). Overdiagnosis of bipolar disorder and disability payments. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 198, 452454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zisook, S, Corruble, E, Duan, N, Iglewicz, A, Karam, EG, Lanouette, N, Lebowitz, B, Pies, R, Reynolds, C, Seay, K, Katherine Shear, M, Simon, N, Young, IT (2012). The bereavement exclusion and DSM-5. Depress Anxiety 29, 425443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed