Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:30:15.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concordance of clinical estimation of suicidal intent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Helen S Keeley
Affiliation:
National Suicide Research Foundation, 1 Perrott Avenue, College Road, Cork, Ireland
Carmel McAuliffe
Affiliation:
National Suicide Research Foundation, 1 Perrott Avenue, College Road, Cork, Ireland
Paul Corcoran
Affiliation:
National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, Ireland and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College, Cork, Ireland
Ivan J Perry
Affiliation:
National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, Ireland and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College, Cork, Ireland

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to assess the level of agreement between clinical estimates of suicidal intent based entirely on information recorded in the Accident and Emergency acute assessment and Beck's Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) scores.

Method: As part of the WHO/EURO Multicentre Study of Parasuicide, cases of deliberate self-harm (DSH) in Cork city hospitals were monitored. Over the period 1995-1997, the information recorded in the Accident and Emergency acute assessment was examined by a psychiatrist and, if possible on the available evidence, clinical estimates were made at three levels of suicidal intent: minimal, moderate and definite. Seventy-nine of these cases had fully completed Beck's SIS. Statistical comparison was made between the results of the SIS and the clinical estimate of suicide intent.

Results: The agreement (Kappa = 0.146, p = 0.046) and concordance (Lin's concordance coefficient = 0.330, p = 0.001) between the two ratings are statistically significant but both are low. The overlap between those identified as high or low intent is low.

Conclusions: These findings indicate low agreement between a clinician's rating of suicide intent based on clinical records and Beck's SIS. This is especially relevant given the increasing reliance on psychometric instruments in assessment in psychiatry. However, further investigation is necessary to clarify which is the more valid method.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Platt, S, Bille-Brahe, U, Kerkhof, AJFM, Schmidtke, A, Bjerke, T, Crepet, P, De Leo, D, Haring, C, Lonnqvist, J, Michel, K, Philippe, A, Pommereau, X, Querejeta, I, Salander-Renberg, E, Temesvary, B, Wasserman, D, Sampaio-Faria, J. Parasuicide in Europe: the WHO/EURO Multicentre Study of Parasuicide. I. Introduction and preliminary analysis for 1989. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992; 85: 97104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Hjelmeland, H. Repetition of parasuicide: a predictive study. Suicide Life Threat Behav 1996;26:395404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Motto, JA. An integrated approach to estimating suicide risk. Suicide Life Threat Behav 1991; 21: 7489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Dennis, M, Beach, M, Evans, PA, Winston, A, Friedman, T. An examination of the accident and emergency management of deliberate self harm. J Accid Emerg Med 1997; 14: 311315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Beck, AT, Schuyler, D, Herman, I. Development of suicidal intent scales. In: Beck, AT, Resnik, HLP, Lettieri, DJ, eds. The prediction of suicide. Bowdie, MD: Charles Press, 1974: 4556.Google Scholar
6.Bancroft, J, Hawton, K, Simkni, S, Kingston, B, Cumming, C, Whitwell, D. The reasons people give for taking overdoses: A further enquiry. Brit J Med Psychol 1979; 52: 353365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Strosahl, K, Chiles, J, Linehan, M. Prediction of suicide intent in hospitalised parasuicides: reasons for living, hopelessness and depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry 1992; 33: 366373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed