No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 August 2015
In the advertisement prefacing Charles O’Conor’s Dissertations on the antient history of Ireland (1753), the editor challenged an unnamed gentleman who had, apparently, smeared the good name of the author. The editor, Michael Reily (who went under the cognomen ‘Civicus’) was intricately involved in this dispute from its early stages and did not spare any criticism for the individual he deemed responsible, Dr John Fergus, the erstwhile friend and associate of both Reily and O’Conor. ‘A Gentleman of great Reputation’ alleged Reily, had branded O’Conor with ‘the meanest Species of Immorality’. The dispute did not centre on some esoteric point of Irish mythology or any disagreement over issues of interpretation. It was not even, at least not in any direct way, a rift over political issues regarding the penal laws and the status of papists in the Irish polity, a tendency quite prevalent among the fissiparous Catholic organisations and pugilistic personalities of this period. Rather, it was wholly concerned with those most pertinent aspects of existence for an eighteenth century gentlemen – credit and honour. The disagreement was about Newton’s Chronology and its application to the Irish annalistic corpus as a means of validating the latter – not about the principle of its applicability, nor regarding the minutiae of dates or similar arcana, but to who should gain the credit for appropriating Newton’s prestige to such a particularly Irish topic.
1 [O’Conor, Charles,] Dissertations on the antient history of Ireland (Dublin, 1753)Google Scholar, ‘Advertisement’.
2 Sir Isaac Newton to John Covel, 28 Feb. 1688/9 in Turnbull, H. W. (ed.), The correspondence of Isaac Newton: 1688–1694 (7 vols, Cambridge, 1959–1977), iii, 14.Google Scholar
3 Isaac Newton, ‘The case of the Parliament of Ireland’ (T.N.A., Mint 19/III.456–7); I am thankful to Patrick Kelly for this reference.
4 Rupert Hall, A., Isaac Newton: adventurer in thought (Cambridge, 1992), pp 391–3Google Scholar; Hall, A. Rupert, Isaac Newton: eighteenth-century perspectives (Oxford, 1999), p. 5.Google Scholar
5 Swift, Jonathan, The Hibernian patriot: being a collection of the Drapier’s letters to the people of Ireland, concerning Mr. Wood’s brass half-pence … (Dublin, 1730), p. 37Google Scholar; Isaac Newton, ‘Detailed report on the trial at London of Wood’s copper coinage for Ireland, which was found satisfactory, with an account of the amount of Wood’s coinage up to 28 March 1724’ (T.N.A., Mint 19/II.467).
6 Molyneux, William to Locke, John, 2 Mar. 1693 in Familiar letters between Mr. John Locke, and several of his friends (London, 1708), pp 32–8Google Scholar; Berman, David, Berkeley and the Irish philosophy (London, 2005), p. 87Google Scholar; Berman, David, George Berkeley: idealism and the man (Oxford, 1994), p. 10.Google Scholar
7 Pierris, Graciela de, ‘Newton, Locke and Hume’ in Janiak, Andrew and Schliesser, Eric (eds), Interpreting Newton: critical essays (Cambridge, 2012), p. 257.Google Scholar
8 Berman, Berkeley and the Irish philosophy, pp 80–1.
9 De Beer, E. S. (ed.), The correspondence of John Locke (8 vols, Oxford, 1976–1989), iv, 602Google Scholar; Berman, , George Berkeley, p. 7Google Scholar; McBride, Ian, Eighteenth-century Ireland: isle of slaves (Dublin, 2009), p. 67.Google Scholar
10 Berkeley, George, Philosophical commentaries generally called the Commonplace book, ed. Luce, A. A. (London, 1944), pp 392–4Google Scholar, 398; Turbayne, Colin M., ‘Berkeley and Molyneux on retinal images’ in Journal of the history of ideas, xxvi, no. 3, (June 1955), pp 339–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Berkeley, George, The principles of human knowledge (Dublin, 1710), pp 110–16Google Scholar; Kearney, Richard, Postnationalist Ireland: politics, culture, philosophy (London, 1997), pp 145–8Google Scholar, 169–72.
12 Breuninger, Scott, Recovering Bishop Berkeley: virtue and society in the Anglo–Irish context (New York, 2010), p. 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McBride, , Eighteenth-century Ireland, pp 74–5Google Scholar.
13 Walton, Jacob, A vindication of Sir Isaac Newton’s principle of fluxions against the objections of the Analyst (Dublin, 1735).Google Scholar
14 [Arbuckle, James,] ‘A dream representing the world to be better’ in The Tribune, part 2, no. 21, (London, 1729), pp 149–55Google Scholar in Berman, David (ed.), George Berkeley: eighteenth-century responses (London & New York, 1989), pp 127–33Google Scholar.
15 Jacob, Margaret Candee, ‘John Toland and the Newtonian ideology’ in Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, xxxii (1969), pp 307–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Berman, David and O’Riordan, Patricia (eds), The Irish Enlightenment and Counter-Enlightenment (2 vols, Bristol, 2002), ii, x–xxiGoogle Scholar; Berman, , Berkeley and the Irish philosophy, pp 118–19Google Scholar; Janiak, Andrew, Newton as philosopher (Cambridge, 2008), p. 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Rundle, Thomas, A sermon preach’d in Christ Church, Dublin, on Thursday the 23rd of October 1735 (Dublin, 1735), pp 5–6.Google Scholar
17 Lecky, W. E. H, A history of Ireland in the eighteenth century (5 vols, London, 1913), i, 422Google Scholar; Ross, Ian Campbell, ‘Was Berkeley a Jacobite? Passive obedience revisited’ in Eighteenth-Century Ireland, xx (2005), p. 30Google Scholar; Berman, George Berkeley, pp 27, 81–97.
18 Berman, George Berkeley, pp 63–9; Janiak, Newton as philosopher, pp 89–90.
19 Berkeley, George, The Querist, (Dublin, 1735–1737)Google Scholar; Lecky, , History of Ireland, i, 301Google Scholar; Kelly, Patrick, ‘Berkeley’s economic writings’ in Winkler, Kenneth (ed.), Cambridge companion to Berkeley (Cambridge, 2005), pp 339–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Newton, Isaac, The present state of Ireland: being Sir Isaac Newton’s representation about gold and silver coins to the right honourable the lords commissioners of his majesty’s treasury (Dublin, 1729).Google Scholar
21 Sean D. Moore, ‘Introduction: Ireland and Enlightenment’ and Berman, David, ‘The birth of Scottish philosophy from the golden age of Irish philosophy’ in Eighteenth century studies, xlv, no. 3, (spring 2012), pp 347Google Scholar, 381.
22 Banville, John, The Newton letter (London, 1999), p. 6Google Scholar; Manuel, Frank E., Isaac Newton, historian (Cambridge, 1963), p. 6.Google Scholar
23 Ussher’s schema and Newton’s ‘flagrantly contradicted each other’: Manuel, Isaac Newton, p. 29.
24 Cunningham, Bernadette, The world of Geoffrey Keating: history, myth and religion in seventeenth-century Ireland (Dublin, 2004); pp 39, 77Google Scholar; Leerssen, Joep, ‘Archbishop Ussher and Gaelic culture’ in Studia Hibernica, xxi/xxiii, (1982–1983), pp 50–8.Google Scholar
25 McCormick, Ted, William Petty and the ambitions of political arithmetic (Oxford, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘Alchemy in the political arithmetic of William Petty’ in Studies in history and philosophy of science, part A, xxxvii, no. 2, (June 2006), pp 290–307; Wennerlind, Carl, ‘Credit-money as the philosopher’s stone: alchemy and the coinage problem in seventeenth-century England’ in History of Political Economy, xxxv (2003), pp 234–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Sweet, Rosemary, Antiquaries: the discovery of the past in eighteenth-century Britain (London, 2004), pp 3–5.Google Scholar
27 Kidd, Colin, British identities before nationalism: ethnicity and nationhood in the Atlantic world, 1600–1800 (Cambridge, 1999), p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Hall, Isaac Newton, p. 9.
29 Manuel, Isaac Newton, historian, p. 2.
30 O’Conor, S.J. Charles, ‘Charles O’Conor of Belanagare: an Irish scholar’s education, part II: a visit to Dublin 1727–1728’ in Studies, xxiii, no. 91, (Sept. 1934), pp 456–7.Google Scholar
31 Thomas Sheridan only had two copies of the Opticks, in English and French; Swift the Chronology; Thomas Lloyd owned copies of Opticks and Pemberton’s account of Newton, and Burgh of Pemberton, the Chronology and the Observations on Daniel; Bishop Pocock possessed Pemberton and the Opticks; only for the lawyer Samuel Card is there evidence of ownership of the Arithmetica Universalis, along with Voltaire’s and Pemberton’s accounts of Newton. See A catalogue of books the library of the Rev. Dr. Thomas Sheridan, deceased; to be sold by auction on Monday the 12th of this instant November, at the Parliament-House, (Dublin, 1739); A catalogue of books, the library of the late Rev. Dr. Swift, Dean of St. Patrick’s, Dublin. To be sold by auction, (Dublin, 1745); Catalogue of books: being, the library of Samuel Card, Esq; counsellor at law, deceased, (Dublin, 1755); A catalogue of books. Being the library of doctor Thomas Lloyd, deceased, (Dublin, 1758); A catalogue of books. Being the libraries of the Rev Mr. Burgh, and an eminent physician deceased, (Dublin, 1769); A catalogue of the library of the late Right Revd. Dr. Richard Pocoke, lord bishop of Meath deceased, (Dublin, 1766).
32 A catalogue of the libraries of John Fergus, M. D. and son, both deceased. (Dublin, 1766), pp 3–58.
33 Newton, Isaac, The chronology of the antient kingdoms amended (Dublin, 1728)Google Scholar, ‘List of subscribers’.
34 Catháin, Diarmuid Ó, ‘John Fergus M.D.: eighteenth-century doctor, book collector and Irish scholar’ in R.S.A.I.Jn., cxviii, (1988), p. 139.Google Scholar
35 Love, Walter D., ‘Charles O’Conor of Belanagare and Thomas Leland’s “philosophical” history of Ireland’ in I.H.S., xiii, no. 49 (Mar. 1962), pp 1–25.Google Scholar
36 Fergus to O’Conor, 1730 (R.I.A, O’Conor papers, MS 1159, B.i.1, f. 79).
37 O’Rahilly, T. F., ‘Irish scholars in Dublin in the early eighteenth century’ in Gadelica, i (1912–1913), p. 161.Google Scholar
38 Ó Catháin, ‘John Fergus’, pp 140–4; Catalogue of the libraries of John Fergus, p. 53.
39 Mary Pollard, Dublin’s trade in books, 1550–1800 (Oxford, 1990).
40 Rev. O’Conor, Charles, Memoirs of Charles O’Conor of Belanagare (Dublin, 1796), pp 186–97.Google Scholar
41 Robert Digby to O’Conor, 24 Jan. 1743; Rev. Thomas Contarine to O’Conor, 13 May and 17 June 1743; Digby to O’Conor, 18 June 1743 (R.I.A. MS B.1.i, ff 27–36).
42 Reily to O’Conor, ‘1749’ (ibid., f. 147).
43 O’Conor to Reily, 10 Nov. 1749, (ibid., f. 153).
44 Fergus to O’Conor, 21 Sept. 1750 (ibid., f. 163).
45 O’Conor to Denis O’Conor [17 Nov. 1751], in The letters of Charles O’Conor of Belanagare eds Ward, Catherine Coogan and Ward, Robert E. (2 vols, Ann Arbor, MI, 1980), i, 6Google Scholar [hereafter Letters]; Reily to O’Conor, 10 Nov. 1752, (R.I.A. MS B.1.i, f. 62).
46 Reily to O’Conor, 27 July 1753, (ibid., f. 203); Reily to O’Conor, 20 Dec. 1751 (ibid., f. 180).
47 Reily to O’Conor, 27 July 1753, (ibid., f. 203); Reily to O’Conor, 12 June 1753 (ibid., f. 201).
48 Reily to O’Conor, 10 Nov. 1752 (ibid., f. 178).
49 O’Conor to Curry, 16 July, 1756 in Letters, i, 16.
50 Reily to O’Conor, 5 May 1753 (R.I.A., O’Conor papers, B.i.1, f. 197).
51 O’Halloran, Clare, Golden ages and barbarous nations: antiquarian debate and cultural politics in Ireland, 1750–1800 (Cork, 2004), pp 25–6.Google Scholar
52 O’Conor, Dissertations, p. 16.
53 Ibid., p. 20.
54 Newton, Chronology, p. 176.
55 O’Conor, Dissertations, p. 213; Reily to O’Conor, 30 Mar. 1752 (R.I.A., MS B.i.1, f. 183).
56 [Beaumont Brennan/Edmund Burke?,] The Reformer, 21 Apr. 1748 in McLoughlin, T. O. and Bolton, James T. (eds), The writings and speeches of Edmund Burke, i: the early writings (Oxford, 1997), p. 126.Google Scholar
57 Nary, Cornelius, A new history of the world, containing an historical and chronological account of the times and transactions, from the creation to the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ, according to the computation of the Septuagint; which the author manifestly shews to be that of the ancient Hebrew copy of the Bible (Dublin, 1720), p. iiGoogle Scholar; Newton to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb. 1676, in Maury, Jean-Pierre, Newton: understanding the cosmos (London, 1992)Google Scholar.
58 Nary, A new history of the world, p. 4.
59 Jacob, , ‘John Toland, and the Newtonian ideology’, p. 318.Google Scholar
60 Hutchinson, Francis [bishop of Down and Connor], A defence of the antient historians: with a particular application of it to the history of Ireland and Great-Britain, and other northern nations in a dialogue between a Protestant and a Papist, an Englishman and an Irishman (Dublin, 1734), p. 115.Google Scholar
61 [Clayton, Robert,] A letter to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of *****, concerning his defence of the ancient historians, &c. (Dublin, 1735), pp 6–7.Google Scholar
62 [Clayton, Robert,] A replication to the rejoinder: being a state of the case, together with the history of Popery; containing an account of its rise, progress and decay (Dublin, 1743), pp 6Google Scholar, 56–8.
63 Clayton, Robert, The chronology of the Hebrew bible vindicated: the facts compared with other ancient histories, and the difficulties explained, from the Flood to the death of Moses. Together with some conjectures in relation to Egypt, during that period of time. Also two maps, in which are attempted to be settled the journeyings of the children of Israel (Dublin, 1747)Google Scholar; Clayton, Robert, A dissertation on prophecy, wherein the coherence and connexion in both the Old and New Testament are fully considered (Dublin, 1749)Google Scholar.
64 Delany, Patrick, An historical account of the life and reign of David King of Israel: interspersed with various conjectures, digressions, and disquisitions. In which (among other things) Mr. Bayle’s criticisms upon the conduct and character of that prince, are fully considered (Dublin, 1740), pp 239–53Google Scholar; Berman, George Berkeley, p. 9. King’s, WilliamDe origine mali (Dublin, 1702)Google Scholar was a response to Bayle’s scepticism: McBride, Eighteenth-century Ireland, p. 67.
65 O’Conor to John Curry, 3 Oct. 1760 in Letters, i, 99.
66 Minute book of the Dublin Society of Antiquarians committee: ‘A catalogue of the Irish books in the library of John Fergus, M.D., deceased c.1772’ (R.I.A. MS 24.e.7): O’Conor bought ‘A novel in the Irish character’, ‘Irish poems’, ‘Lives of saints’ and ‘Irish genealogy’.
67 Clayton, Robert, Journal from Grand Cairo to Mount Sinai and back again (London, 1753)Google Scholar; Schliesser, Eric, ‘The Newtonian refutation of Spinoza: Newton’s challenge and the Socratic problem’ in Janiak, and Schliesser, (eds), Interpreting Newton, p. 306Google Scholar; Feingold, Mordecai, The Newtonian moment: Isaac Newton and the making of modern culture (New York & London, 2004), pp 169–91Google Scholar.
68 Berman, George Berkeley, pp 102, 108; Clayton to Cox, 3 Apr. 1738 (B.L. Add MS 21138, ff 77–83); Clayton to Perceval, 9 Feb. 1737, (B.L. Add. MS 47013, f. 60).
69 One of O’Conor’s first publications was during the Lucas affair, when his Counter-Appeal was published to criticize the Appeal of William Henry; however, it is probable that the real target was Cox – certainly, O’Conor’s biographers and intimates seemed to think so. The Wards state that the Counter-Appeal was written ‘because Cox distorted the ancient history of the Irish’ (Letters, i, 5); it was, in fact, Henry who did so. O’Conor was virulently opposed to Cox’s grandfather’s treatment of the Irish past in his Hibernia Anglicana (London, 1689–90).
70 Clayton, Robert, Vindication of the ... Old and New Testaments (Dublin, 1752)Google Scholar.
71 [Clayton, Robert,] An essay on spirit, wherein the doctrine of the Trinity is considered in the light of nature and reason; as well as in the light in which it was held by the ancient Hebrews (Dublin, 1751)Google Scholar; Berman, David, ‘Berkeley, Clayton and an essay on spirit’ in Journal of the History of Ideas, xxxii, no. 3 (July–Sept. 1971), pp 367–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
72 Leighton, C. D. A., ‘The enlightened religion of Robert Clayton’ in Studia Hibernica, xxix (1995–1997), p. 169.Google Scholar
73 Llanover, Lady (ed.), The autobiography and correspondence of Mary Glanville, Mrs. Delany, (3 vols, London, 1861) iii, 85Google Scholar; Clayton to Thomas Herring, archbishop of Canterbury, (B.L. Add. MS 4301, f. 258).
74 Warburton, William, The divine legation of Moses, on the principles of a religious deist, from the omission of the doctrine of a future state of reward and punishment in the Jewish dispensation (2 vols, London, 1738), ii, 206–7.Google Scholar
75 Clayton, , Grand journey, pp 77–9Google Scholar, 105.
76 Manuel, Isaac Newton, p. 181; Thomas Birch, review of A journey from Grand Cairo to Mount Sinai (B.L. Add MSS 4254, f.69); Clayton, Robert, Dagverhaal van eene reize van Groot Cairo na den Berg Sinai (Amsterdam, 1754)Google Scholar (N.L.I., LO 6075).
77 [Burke, Edmund,] A vindication of natural society: or, a view of the miseries and evils arising to mankind from every species of artificial society. In a letter to Lord **** by a late noble writer (London, 1756)Google Scholar; Berman, David, ‘The culmination and causation of Irish philosophy’ in Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie lxiv (1982), p. 273Google Scholar; [Burke, Edmund,] A philosophical enquiry into our ideas of the sublime and beautiful, (London, 1757), pp 118–19Google Scholar.
78 Leland, John, Reflections on the late Lord Bolingbroke’s letters on the study and use of history; especially so far as they relate to Christianity, and the Holy Scriptures (2nd edn., Dublin, 1753), pp viiiGoogle Scholar, 18.
79 John, Henry St, Bolingbroke, Viscount, Letters on the study and use of history, in Bolingbroke, , The works of the late Right Honorable Henry St. John, Lord Viscount Bolingbroke (5 vols, London, 1754), ii, 303Google Scholar, 313.
80 John, Henry St., Bolingbroke, Viscount, Letters on the study and use of history (2 vols, London, 1752), i, 78Google Scholar, 84, 101.
81 Clayton, Robert, An answer to the objections of the late Lord Bolingbroke against the histories of the Old and New Testament (Dublin, 1752)Google Scholar.
82 Ibid.; Leland, Reflections on the late Lord Bolingbroke’s letters, pp 43–7.
83 O’Conor to Curry, 22 Aug. 1758 in Letters, i, 61.
84 Ibid.; [O’Conor, Charles,] Seasonable thoughts relating to our civil and ecclesiastical constitution (Dublin, 1753), p. 46.Google Scholar
85 O’Conor to Faulkner, 4 May 1757; O’Conor to Daniel O’Conor, 7 Feb. 1756 in Letters, i, 10, 31.
86 [O’Conor, Charles,] The case of the Roman-Catholics of Ireland, (Dublin, 1755)Google Scholar; [O’Conor, Charles,] A vindication of a pamphlet lately published intituled, The case of the Roman-Catholics of Ireland (Dublin, 1755)Google Scholar; O’Conor to Denis O’Conor, 7 Feb., 1756 in Letters, i, 11.
87 [Clayton, Robert,] A few plain matters of fact humbly recommended to the consideration of the Roman-Catholicks of Ireland (Dublin, 1756), pp 5Google Scholar, 15, 78.
88 [O’Conor, Charles,] The principles of the Roman-Catholics of Ireland, exhibited in some useful observations on a pamphlet intituled Plain matters of fact (Dublin, 1756), p. 8.Google Scholar
89 Ibid., p. 21.
90 [O’Conor,] Case, pp 17, 28, 39, 40, 64–5; [O’Conor,] Principles, p. 21; McBride, Ian, ‘Catholic politics in the penal era: Father Sylvester Lloyd and the Delvin address of 1727’ in Eighteenth Century Ireland, xxvi (2011), pp 115–48Google Scholar; [Clayton,] Matters of fact, p. 75.
91 [Protestant, A,] Remarks upon a late pamphlet entitled the Case of the Roman Catholicks of Ireland (Dublin, 1755)Google Scholar; Reily to O’Conor, 20 Sept. 1755 (R.I.A. MS B.i.1, f. 77); O’Conor to Denis O’Conor, 13 Mar. 1756 in Letters, i, 12; O’Conor to Curry, 2 June 1756 in Letters, i, 14.
92 Fagan, Patrick, Divided loyalties: the questions of the oath for Catholics in the eighteenth century (Dublin, 1997)Google Scholar.
93 O’Conor to Curry, 22 Sept. 1756, 13 Jan. 1757 in Letters, i, 23–6.
94 O’Conor to Curry, 22 Sept. 1756 in Letters, i, 24; [O’Conor,] Principles, pp 11, 73, 79.
95 [Clayton,] Matter of fact, p. 96.
96 [Clayton, Robert,] The Bishop of C——-r’s speech, made in the House of Lords, in Ireland, for omitting the Nicene and Athanasian out of the liturgy (London, 1757)Google Scholar.
97 Berman, Berkeley and the Irish philosophy, p. 110.
98 Reily to O’Conor, 26 June 1756 (R.I.A. MS B.i.1, f. 279).
99 Johnston-Liik, Edith Mary, History of the Irish Parliament: Commons, constituencies and statutes, (6 vols, Belfast, 2002), iv, 342–3Google Scholar; O’Conor to Dr John Curry, Good Friday, 1758 in Letters i, 55; [O’Conor,] Principles of the Roman-Catholics, p. 81.
100 O’Conor to Chevalier O’Gorman, 21 Jan. 1786 in Letters, ii, 234. I am grateful to Patrick Kelly for indicating material relating to Newton and Ireland. I am also thankful to Ian McBride for commenting on the first draft and advising on subsequent drafts. I also wish to acknowledge the assistance of the Eighteenth-Century Ireland Society, at whose conference an early version of this article was presented. Lastly, I wish to thank Mordecai Feingold and Elizabethanne Boran for allowing me to speak on this topic to the ‘Reception of Newton’ conference in Marsh’s Library, Dublin.