Article contents
Mobilising for land, nation and class interests: agrarian agitation in Finland and Ireland, 1879–1918
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 November 2017
Abstract
This article explores the comparative history of land agitation and how it evolved and intersected with nationalism and socialism in Finland and Ireland between the Irish Land War and the Finnish Civil War of 1918. Drawing on current scholarship as well as contemporary newspapers and official records, the article shows that an organised land movement developed later and was markedly less violent in Finland than in Ireland. Moreover, while in Ireland the association of landlordism with British rule helped to fuse the land movement with nationalist mobilisation during the Land War, in Finland the tie between the land movement and nationalism remained weak. This was a consequence of Finnish nationalists’ strong affiliation with landowning farmers, which hindered their success in mobilising tenant farmers and agricultural workers. Consequently, the Finnish countryside witnessed a remarkable rise in the socialist movement in the early 1900s. The socialist leanings of the Finnish land movement were greatly influenced by the Russian revolutions, whereas in Ireland militant Fenianism, often emanating from Irish America, affected land agitation more than socialism. As to transnational exchanges, the article also indicates the influence of Irish rural unrest and the related land acts on Finnish public debates and legislation.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Irish Historical Studies , Volume 41 , Issue 160: Ireland and Finland, 1860–1930: Comparative and Transnational Histories , November 2017 , pp. 200 - 220
- Copyright
- © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd
References
1 See Lane, Fintan, ‘Rural labourers, social change and politics in late nineteenth-century Ireland’ in Fintan Lane and Donal Ó Drisceoil (eds), Politics and the Irish working class, 1830–1945 (Houndmills, 2005), pp 124–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lane, Pádraig C., ‘Agricultural labourers and the land question’ in Carla King (ed.), Famine, land and culture in Ireland (Dublin, 2000), pp 104–113 Google Scholar; Boyle, John W., ‘A marginal figure: the Irish rural labourer’ in Samuel W. Clark and James S. Donnelly, Jr. (eds), Irish peasants: violence and political unrest, 1780–1914 (Dublin, 1983), pp 327–334 Google Scholar; Horn, Pamela R., ‘The National Agricultural Labourers’ Union in Ireland, 1873–9’ in I.H.S., xvii, no. 67 (Mar. 1971), pp 350–351 Google Scholar.
2 See Kirby, David, ‘The labour movement’ in Max Engman and David Kirby (eds), Finland: people, nation, state (London, 1989), pp 196–197 Google Scholar, 201–4; Alapuro, Risto, State and revolution in Finland (Berkeley, 1988), pp 117–120 Google Scholar; Soikkanen, Hannu, ‘Revisionism, reformism and the Finnish labour movement before the First World War’ in Scandinavian Journal of History, iii (1987), pp 353–355 Google Scholar.
3 See Velde, Henk te, ‘Political transfer: an introduction’ in European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire, xii, no. 2 (July 2005), pp 205–221 Google Scholar.
4 Davitt, Michael, The fall of feudalism in Ireland, or, the story of the Land League revolution (London, 1904)Google Scholar. For recent research see Casey, Brian (ed.), Defying the law of the land: agrarian radicals in Irish history (Dublin, 2013)Google Scholar; Campbell, Fergus and Varley, Tony (eds), Land questions in modern Ireland (Manchester, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 The period following the Land War has been covered, e.g., by Fitzpatrick, David, Politics and Irish life 1913–1921: provincial experience of war and revolution (Dublin, 1977)Google Scholar; Campbell, Fergus, Land and revolution: nationalist politics in the west of Ireland, 1891–1921 (Oxford, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Donnelly, James S. Jr., The land and the people of nineteenth-century Cork (London, 1975)Google Scholar; Jordan, Donald E. Jr., Land and popular politics in Ireland: County Mayo from the plantation to the Land War (Cambridge, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Vaughan, W. E., Landlords and tenants in mid-Victorian Ireland (Oxford, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Two seminal studies are Clark, Samuel, Social origins of the Land War (Princeton, 1979)Google Scholar and Bew, Paul, Land and the national question in Ireland, 1858–82 (Dublin, 1979)Google Scholar, which take different positions on the development of the Land War. Clark argues that social and class antagonisms softened in post-Famine Ireland, creating an atmosphere where a united peasantry could be mobilised against landlordism, whereas Bew argues that discord rather than unity marked the land movement that was based on volatile ‘class alliance’ between large and small farmers.
8 Clark, Samuel, ‘Strange bedfellows? The Land League alliances’ in Campbell & Varley (eds), Land questions, pp 87–116 Google Scholar; Casey, Brian, ‘Matt Harris and the Irish land question, 1876–1882’ in Rural History, xxv, no. 2 (2014), pp 183–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Lane, ‘Rural labourers’, pp 113–17.
10 Forsman, Jaakko, Mistä syystä sosialismi levisi Suomen maalaisväestön keskuuteen? (Helsinki, 1912)Google Scholar.
11 Linna, Väinö, Täällä Pohjantähden alla (3 vols, Porvoo, 1959–62)Google Scholar, translated into English by Richard Impola as Under the North Star (3 vols, Beaverton, 2001–3).
12 Rasila, Viljo, Suomen torpparikysymys vuoteen 1909 (Helsinki, 1961)Google Scholar; Soikkanen, Hannu, Sosialismin tulo Suomeen (Porvoo, 1961)Google Scholar; Rasila, Viljo, Kansalaissodan sosiaalinen tausta (Helsinki, 1968)Google Scholar; Haatanen, Pekka, Suomen maalaisköyhälistö tutkimusten ja kaunokirjallisuuden valossa (Porvoo, 1968)Google Scholar; Rasila, Viljo, Torpparikysymyksen ratkaisuvaihe: Suomen torpparikysymys vuosina 1909–1918 (Helsinki, 1970)Google Scholar; Santonen, Arvo, Pienviljelijäin järjestäytymiskysymys ja pienviljelijäjärjestöjen vakiintuminen Suomessa: tutkimus maatalouden pienviljelyspoliittisesta murrosvaiheesta 1930-luvun alkuun mennessä (Helsinki, 1971)Google Scholar.
13 Annuaire Statistique de Finlande (Helsinki, 1909), p. 7; Population by industry: population by industry and commune in 1880–1975 (Helsinki, 1979), p. 333.
14 Ó Gráda, Cormac, Ireland: a new economic history, 1780–1939 (Oxford, 1994), pp 213–214 Google Scholar.
15 Boyle, ‘Irish rural labourer’, p. 312.
16 Östman, Ann-Catrin, ‘Mekanisoinnin ensimmäinen aalto’ in Matti Peltonen (ed.), Suomen maatalouden historia II (Helsinki, 2004), p. 55 Google Scholar; Haapala, Pertti, Kun yhteiskunta hajosi: Suomi, 1914–1920 (Helsinki, 1995), pp 77–79 Google Scholar, 102–3; Alapuro, State, p. 47.
17 The Diet consisted of four chambers: nobility, clergy, bourgeoisie and peasantry. The peasant chamber was elected in an indirect election, in which the vote was restricted to landowners, who formed only 4.5 per cent of the rural population at the beginning of the twentieth century (Jouko Vahtola, Suomen historia (Helsinki, 2003), pp 259–61).
18 Cf. Alapuro, State, pp 90, 96, 111; Kissane, Bill, ‘Nineteenth-century nationalism in Finland and Ireland: a comparative analysis’ in Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, vi (2000), pp 30–34 Google Scholar.
19 For debates on the Irish relationship to empire, see Howe, Stephen, ‘Colonized and colonizers: Ireland in the British Empire’ in Alvin Jackson (ed.), The Oxford handbook of modern Irish history (Oxford, 2014), pp 65–82 Google Scholar.
20 On Fenianism see, e.g., Steward, Patrick and McGovern, Bryan, The Fenians: Irish rebellion in the North Atlantic world, 1858–1876 (Knoxville, 2013)Google Scholar.
21 Bew, Paul and Maume, Patrick, ‘Michael Davitt and the personality of the Irish agrarian revolution’ in Fintan Lane and Andrew G. Newby (eds), Michael Davitt: new perspectives (Dublin, 2009), pp 66–68 Google Scholar.
22 Winstanley, Michael J., Ireland and the land question, 1800–1922 (London, 1984), pp 11–12 Google Scholar; Perry Curtis, L. Jr., ‘Demonising the Irish landlords since the Famine’ in Casey (ed.), Defying the law of the land, pp 24–27 Google Scholar.
23 Davitt, Fall of feudalism in Ireland, p. xvii.
24 See Vuorinen, Marja, Kuviteltu aatelismies: aateluus viholliskuvana ja itseymmärryksenä 1800-luvun Suomessa (Helsinki, 2010), pp 379–380 Google Scholar, 394–7.
25 Alapuro, State, pp 90–1, 95; Snellman, Alex, ʻSuurtilat ja Suomen aateli 1800–1900-luvuilla’ in Ennen ja nyt, ii (2012)Google Scholar (http://www.ennenjanyt.net/?p=605) (28 May 2014).
26 ‘Superficie des champs, répartie en exploitations de grandeur différente, de propriétaires et de fermiers, en 1910’ in Annuaire Statistique de Finlande (Helsinki, 1915), pp 120–1. The figures include both freeholdings and tenant farms.
27 Alapuro, State, pp 36, 42–3, 94–5.
28 Satakunta, 5 Aug. 1882; Ilmarinen, 22 Aug. 1882; Satakunta, 26 Aug. 1882.
29 Tenants of Matku to the governor general, 24 Feb. 1882 (National Archives of Finland (N.A.F.), Chancellery of the Governor General (KKK) 1882, Fb:1482, d. 29); Hämäläinen, 18 Mar. 1882; Hämeen Sanomat, 21 Mar. 1882.
30 Rasila, Suomen torpparikysymys, pp 98–9.
31 For Zemlya i Volya and Cherny Peredel see, e.g., Venturi, Franco, Roots of revolution: a history of the populist and socialist movements in 19th century Russia (London, 2001), pp 558–708 Google Scholar.
32 Hämäläinen, 18 Mar. 1882; Ilmarinen, 22 Aug. 1882.
33 On rural unrest in Italy in the mid-1880s see Davis, John A., Conflict and control: law and order in nineteenth-century Italy (Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1988), pp 205–209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; on Spain during the 1870s, see Bookchin, Murray, The Spanish anarchists: the heroic years 1868–1936 (New York, 1977), pp 91–108 Google Scholar; on the Crofters’ War in Scotland, see Newby, Andrew, ‘Land and the “crofter question” in nineteenth-century Scotland’ in International Review of Scottish Studies, xxxv (2010), pp 7–36 Google Scholar.
34 On the arrests of Land League leaders, see Bew, Land and the national question, pp 154, 170, 194–6.
35 Lane, ‘Rural labourers’, pp 129–36.
36 See Rasila, Suomen torpparikysymys, pp 91–3, 128–35.
37 For the Great Address, see Tommila, Päiviö, Suuri adressi (Porvoo, 1999)Google Scholar.
38 Leonard Lundin, C., ‘Finland’ in Edvard C. Thaden (ed.), Russification in the Baltic provinces and Finland, 1855–1914 (Princeton, 1981), pp 425 Google Scholar, 429; Peltonen, Matti, Talolliset ja torpparit (Helsinki, 1992), pp 258–259 Google Scholar.
39 Matilda Grönqvist’s account ‘Viime vuoden tapahtumia’, 1900 (Finnish Literature Society, Matilda Grönqvist papers, vol. 2, p. 2).
40 Ståhlberg, K. J., Berättelse om verkstäld undersökning angående utspridande af falska rykten i landet (Helsingfors, 1899), pp 3–6 Google Scholar; Suodenjoki, Sami, Kuriton suutari ja kiistämisen rajat: työväenliikkeen läpimurto hämäläisessä maalaisyhteisössä, 1899–1909, (Helsinki, 2010), pp 96–97 Google Scholar.
41 For an example of the anti-rumour propaganda, see a song leaflet composed under the pseudonym Totinen, Tuomas, Laulu maanjakohommista eli kuinka Jukolan Jussin kävi (Pori, 1899)Google Scholar. See also Peltonen, Talolliset, pp 262–3.
42 Suodenjoki, Sami, ‘Ilmianto valvonnan ilmapiirin lietsojana routavuosien Suomessa’ in Historiallinen Aikakauskirja, cxii (2014), pp 145–149 Google Scholar; idem, , ‘Whistleblowing from below: Finnish rural inhabitants’ letters to the imperial power at the turn of the twentieth century’ in Ann-Catrine Edlund, Lars-Erik Edlund and Susanne Haugen (eds), Vernacular literacies – past, present and future (Umeå, 2014), pp 278–280 Google Scholar.
43 Polvinen, Tuomo, Imperial borderland: Bobrikov and the attempted Russification of Finland 1898–1904 (London, 1995), pp 229–231 Google Scholar. On the impact of the land act of 1902, see Rasila, Suomen torpparikysymys, pp 226–30.
44 Polvinen, Imperial borderland, p. 232; Peltonen, Matti, ‘Epävarmuus ja viha: Torpparikysymyksen moraalitalous’ in Raimo Parikka (ed.), Työ ja työttömyys (Tampere, 1994), pp 319–321 Google Scholar.
45 Rasila, Suomen torpparikysymys, pp 258–63, 271–9.
46 Häkkinen, Antti, ‘Nälkä punikkina? Huonot ajat ja poliittinen aktiivisuus’ in Matti Peltonen (ed.), Arki ja murros: tutkielmia keisariajan lopun Suomesta (Helsinki, 1990), pp 429–433 Google Scholar.
47 On the general strike, see Tikka, Marko, Kun kansa leikki kuningasta: Suomen suuri lakko 1905 (Helsinki, 2009)Google Scholar.
48 Suodenjoki, Sami, ‘Suurlakon riitaisa yksimielisyys’ in Pertti Haapala, Olli Löytty, Kukku Melkas and Marko Tikka (eds), Kansa kaikkivaltias: suurlakko Suomessa 1905 (Helsinki, 2008), pp 111–114 Google Scholar.
49 Aamulehti, 30 Nov. 1905.
50 Peltonen, Matti, ‘Vuojoen kartanon lakko vuonna 1905: Suurlakon aikaista radikalismia Lounais-Suomessa’ in Peltonen (ed.), Arki ja murros, pp 253–278 Google Scholar.
51 Työtilastollinen Aikakauslehti (1907), p. 97; Soikkanen, Sosialismin tulo, pp 316–17; Rasila, Suomen torpparikysymys, p. 334.
52 Työtilastollinen Aikakauslehti (1908), pp 226–7; ibid. (1909), pp 327–8; ibid. (1910), pp 313–14; ibid. (1911), pp 141–2.
53 Rasila, Torpparikysymyksen ratkaisuvaihe, pp 272–80.
54 Peltonen, ‘Epävarmuus’, pp 319–24; Ball, Stephen, ‘Crowd activity during the Irish Land War, 1879–90’ in Peter Jupp and Eoin Magennis (eds), Crowds in Ireland, c.1720–1920 (Houndmills, 2000), p. 219 Google Scholar.
55 Länsi-Suomi, 29 Nov. 1879; Suomalainen Wirallinen Lehti, 17 Nov. 1881; Päivälehti, 19 Feb. 1903. See also Newby, Andrew, ‘“The cold northern land of Suomi”: Michael Davitt and Finnish nationalism’ in Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies, vi, no. 1 (Autumn 2012), pp 79–80 Google Scholar.
56 Tampereen Sanomat, 15, 17 May 1907.
57 Reuter, J. N., Den nyare Agrarlagstiftningen i Storbritannien och Irland (Åbo, 1907), pp 227–228 Google Scholar. Julio Reuter was a linguistics expert, professor of Sanskrit at the University of Helsinki, and prominent Finnish nationalist. He was particularly active in promoting Finland’s image as a distinctive nation abroad. See also Newby’s article in this issue.
58 Rasila, Suomen torpparikysymys, pp 156, 206–8.
59 Jutikkala, Eino, ‘Peasant movements and agrarian problems in Finland from the end of the XIXth century to the second world-war’ in Cahiers internationaux d’histoire économique et sociale, vii (1976), pp 84–85 Google Scholar.
60 Winstanley, Ireland, pp 40–1. See also, Bull, Philip, ‘The significance of the nationalist response to the Irish land act of 1903’ in I.H.S., xxviii, no. 111 (May 1993), pp 283–305 Google Scholar.
61 Lane, P. G., ‘Agricultural labourers’, pp 80–84 Google Scholar; Boyle, ‘Irish rural labourer’, pp 329–31.
62 Jones, David S., ‘The cleavage between graziers and peasants in the land struggle, 1890–1910’ in Clark & Donnelly (eds), Irish peasants, pp 381–384 Google Scholar; Cosgrove, Patrick, The ranch war in Riverstown, Co. Sligo, 1908 (Dublin, 2012)Google Scholar.
63 Dooley, Terence, ‘Landlords and the land question, 1879–1909’ in Carla King (ed.), Land, famine and culture in Ireland (Dublin, 2000), p. 135 Google Scholar; Campbell, Land and revolution, p. 280. See also, O’Connor, Emmet, A labour history of Ireland 1824–1960 (Dublin, 1992), pp 99–100 Google Scholar, 112–13.
64 See Clark & Donnelly (eds), Irish peasants, pp 25–35.
65 Ball, ‘Crowd activity’, pp 213, 229–38, 241.
66 On boycotting as a transnational political practice, see te Velde, ‘Political transfer’, pp 212–15. In Finland, Swedish-language newspapers used the term ‘boycott’ in their coverage of Irish events as early as 1880 (Morgonbladet, 18 Dec. 1880). See also Newby, in this issue, on its earlier political associations with Ireland.
67 Ball, ‘Crowd activity’, p. 214. For moonlighting, see also Lucey, Donnacha Seán, Land, popular politics and agrarian violence in Ireland: the case of County Kerry, 1872–86 (Dublin, 2011)Google Scholar.
68 Daryl, Philippe [a pseudonym for Paschal Grousset], Ireland’s disease: notes and impressions (London, 1888), pp 126–128 Google Scholar.
69 Mulholland, Marc, ‘Political violence’ in Richard Bourke and Ian McBride (eds), The Princeton history of modern Ireland (Princeton, 2016), p. 388 Google Scholar.
70 Legg, Marie-Louise, Newspapers and nationalism: the Irish provincial press 1850–1892 (Dublin, 1999), pp 119–122 Google Scholar, 138–47; Moran, Oisín, ‘Thomas Stanislaus Cleary (1851–98): Land League leader and campaigning newspaper editor’ in Casey (ed.), Defying the law of the land, pp 100–113 Google Scholar.
71 Suodenjoki, Sami, ‘Kansalaisyhteiskunnan ja Suomen ideat, liikkeet ja julkisuudet’ in Kari Paakkunainen (ed.), Suomalaisen politiikan murroksia ja muutoksia (Helsinki, 2012), pp 68–69 Google Scholar.
72 Rasila, Suomen torpparikysymys, pp 379–83.
73 Soikkanen, Hannu, Kohti kansan valtaa 1: 1899–1937 (Helsinki, 1975), p. 87 Google Scholar; Alapuro, Risto, ‘The construction of the voter in Finland, c.1860–1907’ in Redescriptions: Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History, no. 10 (2006), pp 52–53 Google Scholar, 58–60; Kaihovirta, Matias, Oroliga inför framtiden: en studie av folklig politisk agerande bland bruksarbetarna i Billnäs ca 1900–1920 (Helsinki, 2015), pp 229–241 Google Scholar.
74 Manninen, Turo, ‘Järjestysvalta järkkyy’ in Ohto Manninen (ed.), Itsenäistymisen vuodet, 1917–1920 (3 vols, Helsinki, 1992), i, 282–285 Google Scholar, 328–43. For an overview in English, see Kirby, David, The Baltic world, 1772–1993: Europe’s northern periphery in an age of change (London, 1995), pp 250–254 Google Scholar.
75 Suodenjoki, Kuriton suutari, pp 225–7, 230, 254–5.
76 For the danger of going too far with the concept of ‘everyday resistance’, see Navickas, Katrina, ‘What happened to class? New histories of labour and collective action in Britain’ in Social History, xxxvi (2011), p. 203 Google Scholar.
77 The acts of sabotage committed in Finland in 1917–18 have received little scholarly attention, unlike the acts of political violence. Nevertheless, the historiography mentions several instances of arson of manors, farmhouses and churches, not to mention innumerable minor infractions, committed by the Reds during the Civil War. See, e.g., Paavolainen, Jaakko, Poliittiset väkivaltaisuudet Suomessa I: ‘punainen terrori’ (Helsinki, 1966)Google Scholar.
78 O’Mahony, Patrick and Delanty, Gerard, Rethinking Irish history: nationalism, identity and ideology (Houndmills, 1998), p. 88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
79 Lane, Pádraig G., ‘The Land and Labour Association, 1894–1914’ in Journal of the Cork Historical and Archaeological Society, xcviii (1993), p. 90 Google Scholar.
80 Lucey, Donnacha Seán, ‘Power, politics and poor relief during the Irish Land War, 1879–82’ in I.H.S., xxxvii, no. 148 (Nov. 2011), pp 584–598 Google Scholar; Feingold, William L.: ‘Land League power: the Tralee Poor-Law election of 1881’ in Clark & Donnelly (eds), Irish Peasants, pp 285–310 Google Scholar.
81 Jaakkola, Jouko, Pulma, Panu, Satka, Mirja and Urponen, Kyösti, Armeliaisuus, yhteisöapu, sosiaaliturva: suomalaisen sosiaalisen turvan historia (Helsinki, 1994), pp 121–133 Google Scholar.
82 Liikanen, Ilkka, Fennomania ja kansa: joukkojärjestäytymisen läpimurto ja Suomalaisen puolueen synty (Helsinki, 1995), pp 237–228 Google Scholar.
83 Soikkanen, Sosialismin tulo, pp 124–30; Suodenjoki, Kuriton suutari, 140–4.
84 See Callesen, Gerd, ‘Denmark’ in Marcel van der Linden and Jürgen Rojahn (eds), The formation of labour movements 1870–1914: I (Leiden, 1990), pp 147–148 Google Scholar; Thörnquist, Annette, Lönearbete eller egen jord? Den svenska lantarbetarrörelsen och jordfrågan 1908–1936 (Uppsala, 1989), pp 59–60 Google Scholar; Sejersted, Francis, The age of social democracy: Norway and Sweden in the twentieth century (Princeton, 2011), pp 132–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
85 Suodenjoki, Kuriton suutari, pp 163–8; Soikkanen, Sosialismin tulo, pp 195–207.
86 See Larkin, Emmet, ‘Catholicism and socialism in Ireland’ in Church History, xxxiii (1964), pp 462–483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
87 Soikkanen, Sosialismin tulo, pp 338, 343.
88 Suomen virallinen tilasto XXIX, Vaalitilasto 1, Eduskunta-vaalit vuosina 1907 ja 1908 (Helsinki, 1909), table II.
89 On the demand for forced cultivation, see Jussila, Petri, Tilastomies torpparien asialla: Edvard Gyllingin maatalouspoliittinen toiminta ja ajattelu suurlakon ja sisällissodan välissä (Helsinki, 2015), pp 104–111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
90 The Agrarian League had Finnish-nationalist origins and it sought to lessen class antagonism in the countryside, for example, through the emancipation of tenant farmers. See: Soikkanen, Sosialismin tulo, pp 285–6, 386–9.
91 Soikkanen, Kohti kansan valtaa 1, pp 260–1.
92 Lane, Fintan, ‘Michael Davitt and the Irish working class’ in Lane & Newby (eds), Michael Davitt, pp 75–98 Google Scholar.
93 O’Mahony & Delanty, Rethinking, p. 89; Fitzpatrick, Politics, pp 237–40.
94 O’Mahony & Delanty, Rethinking, pp 89–90.
95 Haapala, Pertti, ‘The expected and non-expected roots of chaos: preconditions of the Finnish Civil War’ in Tepora, Tuomas and Roselius, Aapo (eds), The Finnish Civil War 1918: history, memory, legacy (Leiden, 2014)Google Scholar, p. 30.
- 3
- Cited by