Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:49:31.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irish unionism and the Russellite threat, 1894-1906

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Alvin Jackson
Alvin Jackson*
Affiliation:
Department of Modern History, Queen’s University of Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Whether as a unionist, or as an independent, T W Russell was never taken lightly by the parliamentary representatives of late Victorian unionism: directly, and obliquely, his contribution to the evolution of their movement was immense. As a popular unionist missionary in Britain between the first two home-rule bills, and as a protégé of Joseph Chamberlain, Russell was a valuable medium of communication between the British and Irish unionist parties. Moreover, he was both a champion of unionist farmer demands and a loyalist member of parliament; so Russell also created a vital bond between Irish unionism and rural opinion. As a member of the parliamentary Ulster party, Russell worked unstintingly for its success, provoking flexibility among both the more obtuse landed elements in the commons and among radical farmers in the counties. Yet, when he left unionism, his influence (now indirect) remained. Confronted by the spectre of presbyterian farmer militancy led by Russell, Irish unionist members of parliament meekly tailored their public pledges; and when, between 1900 and 1902, his agitation peaked, these members went further, revising the structure of their party in order to deflate his criticism and restore old loyalties. As one of the most significant forces in moulding twentieth-century unionism from nineteenth-century toryism, Russell merits special attention: his relationship with the unionist leadership in the strategically crucial years between 1894 and 1906 is examined here at length.

Type
Articles
Information
Irish Historical Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 100 , November 1987 , pp. 376 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Stead, W T Coming men on coming questions (London, 1905), p. 235 Google Scholar; Hickey, D.J. and Doherty, J.E., A dictionary of Irish history since 1800 (Dublin, 1980), pp 515–16.Google Scholar

2 Peter O’Brien to Balfour, 24 Apr 1889 (B.L., Arthur Balfour papers, Add. MS 49814, f.252).

3 Hartington to Chamberlain, 6 Sept. 1886 (Birmingham University Library, Joseph Chamberlain papers, JC.5/22/17).

4 Jesse Collings to Russell, 27 May 1887 (P.R.O.N.I., Irish Unionist Alliance corresp., D.989).

5 Lucy, Henry, Diary of the unionist parliament, 1895–1900 (Bristol and London, 1901), p. 13.Google Scholar

6 Lucy, Henry W, Peeps at parliament taken from behind the speaker’s chair (London, 1903), p. 127 Google Scholar

7 Belfast News Letter (hereafter B.N.L.), 4 Feb. 1902.

8 Craig-Sellar to Montgomery, 13 Mar 1888 (P.R.O.N.I., Hugh De Fellenberg Montgomery papers, D.627/428/36); Richard Bagwell to Montgomery, 31 Aug. 1888 (ibid., no. 52); Deramore to Akers-Douglas, 2 Nov 1889 (Kent County Record Office, Aretas Akers-Douglas papers, U.564/C 167/4).

9 Balfour to Leonard Courtney, 13 Feb. 1892 (B.L., Arthur Balfour papers, Add. MS 49830, f.530); Balfour to Russell, 3 Nov 1891 (ibid., f. 343); Balfour to Montgomery, 14 Sept. 1889 (ibid., Add. MS 49828, f. 277).

10 W.H. Smith to Akers-Douglas, 20 Sept. 1889 (Kent C.R.O., Akers-Douglas papers, U564/C25/89); Pease, Alfred E., Elections and recollections (London, 1932), p. 185.Google Scholar

11 Russell, T W, Ireland and the empire: a review (Dublin and New York, 1901), p. 275.Google Scholar

12 Hansard 4, viii, 1480.

13 Barker, Michael, Gladstone and radicalism: the reconstruction of liberal policy in Britain, 1885–1894 (Hassocks, 1976), pp 18–19.Google Scholar

14 Solow, Barbara L., The land question and the Irish economy, 1870-1903 (Cambridge, Mass., 1971), p. 184ff.Google Scholar

15 Contrast Solow, Land question, with Bonn, Moritz J., Modern Ireland and her agrarian problem (Dublin, 1906), pp 105–21,Google Scholar and Bew, Paul, Conflict and conciliation in Ireland, 1890–1910: Parnellite and radical agrarianism (Oxford, 1987), p. 88.Google Scholar

l6 Report from the select committee on land acts (Ireland) together with the proceedings of the committee, pp vii–viii, H.C. 1894 (310), xiii, 7–8.

17 Russell to Salisbury, 16 Aug. 1893 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers).

18 J.S. Mairs to Balfour, 3 Mar 1894 (Whittingehame, Arthur Balfour papers, TD.83/133/32/50).

19 Balfour to C. [Londonderry?], 15 Mar 1894 (ibid., no. 49).

20 Bonn, Modern Ireland, p. 121 Google Scholar

21 Lea to Montgomery, 4 Nov 1889 (P.R.O.N.I., Montgomery papers, D.627/428/114).

22 Russell, Ireland & the empire, p. 275.Google Scholar

23 Frederick Wrench to Balfour, 10 Mar. 1894 (Whittingehame, Arthur Balfour papers, TD.83/133/32/50).

24 B.N.L., 25 Jan. 1894, 15 Apr. 1894, 19 Jan. 1894.

25 Atkinson to Balfour, 23 Oct. 1893 (Bodl., J.S. Sandars papers, c.725, ff 83–91); B.N.L., 5, 7 Apr. 1895.

26 Hansard 4, xxiii, 305 (12 Apr. 1894, Harland), col. 308 (Russell), cols 397ff (13 Apr., Smith-Barry, Russell, Johnston).

27 Brodrick to Balfour, 25 Dec. 1894 (B.L., Arthur Balfour papers, Add. MS 49720, f.9).

28 Report from the select committee on the land acts (Ireland) together with the proceedings of the committee ., pp xxix–lviii, H.C. 1894 (310), xiii, 29–58.

29 Ibid.

30 Macartney to Montgomery, 7 Aug. 1894 (P.R.O.N.I., Montgomery papers, D.627/428/248).

31 Hansard 4, xxvii, 425 (19 July 1894).

32 Ibid.

33 Ibid., col. 674 (23 July 1894, Chamberlain), col. 708 (Macartney) and col. 718 (Russell).

34 Lansdowne to Devonshire, 7 Nov. 1894 (Chatsworth House, Devonshire papers, 340/2576); Brodrick to Balfour, 25 Dec. 1894 (B.L., Arthur Balfour papers, Add. MS 49270, f.9).

35 B.N.L., 28 Apr 1894.

36 Ibid.

37 T W Russell to Chamberlain, 28 Apr 1894 (Birmingham U.L., Joseph Chamberlain papers, JC.5/75/16).

38 Chamberlain to Balfour, 25 Apr. 1894 (B.L., Arthur Balfour papers, Add. MS 49773, f.63). Cf. William Johnston’s diary, 24 Apr. 1894 (P.R.O.N.I., Johnston papers, D.880/2).

39 B.N.L., 5 May 1894.

40 Ibid.

4l B.N.L., 29 May 1894.

42 Chamberlain to Montgomery, 9 Oct. 1894 (P.R.O.N.I., Montgomery papers, Τ 1089/261).

43 N.W , 13 Oct. 1894.

44 Ibid.

45 N.W. , 18 Oct. 1894.

46 B.N.L., 8 Nov 1894.

47 B.N.L., 6, 21 Nov 1894.

48 B.N.L., 8 Nov. 1894, N.W., 9 Nov 1894. Cf. William Johnston’s diary, 6, 16, 17, 23, Nov 1894 (P.R.O.N.I., Johnston papers, D.880/2).

49 Brodrick to Salisbury, 18 Oct. 1894 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers).

50 Balfour to Brodrick, 14 Oct. 1894 (ibid.).

51 Brodrick to Balfour, 25 Dec. 1894 (B.L., Arthur Balfour papers, Add. MS 49720, f.9). Cf. ’Memorandum by Joseph Chamberlain on the proposed compromise over Morley’s evicted tenants bill’ (Birmingham U.L., Joseph Chamberlain papers, JC.8/5/1/18).

52 Salisbury to Balfour, 29 Dec. 1894 (B.L., Arthur Balfour papers, Add. MS 49690, f.97).

53 Hansard 4, xxxi, 335 (4 Mar 1895, Rentoul), xxxii, 810 (2 Apr., Barton), col. 1044 (5 Apr., Dane).

54 Ibid., xxxii, 1054 (5 Apr., Sexton).

55 Ibid., col. 1067 (Balfour).

56 Horace Plunkett’s diary, 2 May 1895 (Plunkett Foundation, Horace Plunkett papers). This is partly quoted by Gailey, Andrew in ‘Unionist rhetoric and local government reform, 1895–9’ in I.H.S., 24, no. 93 (May 1984), p. 55.Google Scholar Dr Gailey slightly modifies his argument concerning unionist commitment to reform in 1895: Ireland and the death of kindness: the experience of constructive unionism, 1890–1905 (Cork, 1987), p. 143.

51 B.N.L., 17 July 1895.

58 Ibid.

59 B.N.L., 22 July 1895.

60 Salisbury to Balfour, 28 June 1895 (Whittingehame, Arthur Balfour papers, TD.83/133/71); Balfour to Salisbury, 29 June 1895 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers, E/Balfour/495).

61 B.N.L., 17 July 1895.

62 Ibid.; Russell to Salisbury, 2 July 1895 (Hatfield, Salisbury Papers).

63 Russell to Salisbury, 4 July 1895 (ibid.).

64 B.N.L., 17 July 1895.

65 For Russell’s period at the Local Government Board, see Stead, W T, Coming men on coming questions, pp 235–6Google Scholar; for Russell and financial relations, see Gailey, , Death of kindness, p. 104.Google Scholar

66 There is no evidence of Russell’s presence at Ulster party meetings after 1894 in the papers of other members.

67 Edward Saunderson to Salisbury, 19 Mar. 1895 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers); Hansard 4, xxxi, 997 (13 Mar. 1895).

68 Balfour to Salisbury, 20 June 1895 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers).

69 Chamberlain to Ashbourne, 19 July 1895 (House of Lords Record Office, Ashbourne papers, B30/2), quoted in Cooke, A.B. and Malcomson, A.P W (eds), The Ashbourne papers (Belfast, 1974), p. 101.Google Scholar

70 Chamberlain to Montgomery, 3 Aug. 1895 (P.R.O.N.I., Montgomery papers, Τ 1089/270).

71 For the strain Chamberlain felt in keeping radical colleagues to order, see Chamberlain to Devonshire, 19 Apr. 1895 (Chatsworth, Devonshire papers, 340/2608), quoted in Garvin, , Life of Joseph Chamberlain, 2, 630–31,Google Scholar and Holland, Bernard, Life of Spencer Compton, eighth duke of Devonshire (2 vols, London, 1911), 2, 267–8.Google Scholar

72 Saunderson to Salisbury, 23 Sept. 1900 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers); B.N.L., 21 Sept. 1900. The speech is printed in Russell, T W, Compulsory purchase in Ireland: five speeches made by Mr T W Russell (Dublin, 1901),Google Scholar a collection compiled by Russell’s opponents in order to demonstrate his inconsistency

73 Salisbury to Russell, 5 Nov 1900 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers). The italics are mine.

74 Cadogan was moved to label the prime minister ‘the champion of the Ulster landlord interest’ Cadogan to Salisbury, 22 Apr 1900 (ibid.).

75 Saunderson to Salisbury, 23 Sept. 1900, Abercorn to Salisbury, 9, 18, 25, 31 Oct. 1900 (ibid.). See also Murphy, Desmond, Derry, Donegal and modern Ulster, 1790–1921 (Londonderry, 1981), p. 203.Google Scholar

76 Chamberlain to Balfour, 21 Oct. 1900 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers).

77 Russell, , Ireland & the empire, p. 131.Google Scholar

78 See, e.g., McMinn, J.R.B. ‘Liberalism in north Antrim, 1900–14’ in I.H.S., 23, no. 89 (May 1982), p. 19 Google Scholar (‘Russell had failed to be appointed and was bent on revenge’), and Murphy, , Derry, Donegal & modern Ulster, p. 205.Google Scholar

79 Bonn, , Modern Ireland, p. 121 Google Scholar; Bew, , Conflict & conciliation, pp 86–95.Google Scholar

80 McMinn, , ‘Liberalism in north Antrim’, pp 19–20 Google Scholar; N.W, 19 Jan. 1901.

81 N.W, 17 Jan. 1901.

82 Hansard 4, lxxxix, 728 (21 Feb. 1901)

83 N.W, 17 Jan. 1901.

84 Ibid., 9 Feb. 1901

85 Ibid., 9 Jan. 1901

86 Russell, , Ireland & the empire, p. 275 Google Scholar

87 N.W, 8 Jan. 1901.

88 Hansard 4, lxxxix, 746 (21 Feb. 1901, my italics). Cf. Russell’s Cookstown speech in Irish News, 3 Dec. 1900. For evidence of Russell’s growing support among nationalists, see ibid., 3 Dec. 1900; Coleraine Chronicle, 6 Apr 1901, N.W, 10 Apr. 1901

89 N.W., 29 Nov 1900.

90 Ibid., 8 and 19 Jan. 1901

91 Coleraine Chronicle, 6 Apr 1901.

92 B.N.L., 21 Dec. 1900.

93 Russell to Salisbury, n.d. [Dec. 1900], 1 Jan. 1901 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers).

94 N.W., 8 Feb. 1901.

95 Montgomery to Lecky, 21 Nov 1900 (T.C.D., W.E.H. Lecky papers, MS 1832/1997).

96 William Johnston’s diary, 19 Feb. 1901 (P.R.O.N.I., Johnston papers, D.880/2).

97 Cadogan to Salisbury, 15 Jan. 1901 (Hatfield, Salisbury papers).

98 McMinn, , ‘Liberalism in north Antrim’, p. 20 Google Scholar; idem, ‘The Rev. James Brown Armour and liberal politics in North Antrim, 1869–1914’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Queen’s University of Belfast, 1979), pp 341–2.

99 Russell, , Ireland & the empire, pp 277–8.Google Scholar

100 Horace Plunkett’s diary, 14 Mar. 1902 (Plunkett Foundation, Plunkett papers).

101 Horace Plunkett’s diary, 8 Oct. 1901 (ibid.). Plunkett momentarily considered standing on the Russellite ticket in East Down, but declined to provide the necessary pledge on compulsion.

102 Horace Plunkett’s diary, 14 Mar. 1902 (ibid.).

103 Gailey, , Death of kindness, p. 171,Google Scholar McMinn, , ‘J.B. Armour’, p. 344.Google Scholar

104 The report (with the names of the signatories) is printed in Dunraven’s, Lord, Past times and pastimes (2 vols, London, [1922] ), ii, 179.Google Scholar For the development of Russell’s views, see Russell, T W ‘The Irish land question: what remains to be done’ in Stead, W T (ed.), Coming men on coming questions, pp 238–44.Google Scholar Cf. an earlier view, Russell, T W ‘The Irish land system’ in Dowsett, C.F (ed.), Land: its attractions and riches (London, 1892), p. 808.Google Scholar

105 B.N.L., 15 Jan. 1903.

106 Ibid., 22 Jan. 1902.

107 Ibid., 4 Feb. 1902.

108 Ibid., 19 Mar 1903.

109 Ibid., 16 Jan. 1903, quoting The Times.

110 Boyle, John W ‘A marginal figure: the Irish rural labourer’ in Clark, Samuel and JrDonnelly, James S., (eds), Irish peasants: violence and political unrest, 1780–1914 (Manchester, 1983), p. 331 Google Scholar See also Fitzpatrick, David, ‘The disappearance of the Irish agricultural labourer, 1841–1912’ in Irish Economic and Social History, 7 (1980), pp 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

111 See, e.g., B.N.L., 23 Jan. 1902; McMinn, , ‘J.B. Armour’, p. 339.Google Scholar

112 B.N.L., 19 Jan. 1903.

113 Ibid., 17 Jan. 1903, 25 Jan. 1902.

114 McMinn, , ‘J.B. Armour’, p. 353.Google Scholar For details of the devolution affair, see Gailey, , Death of kindness, pp 235–91,Google Scholar Jackson, T.A. ‘The Irish unionist parliamentary party, 1885–1906’ (unpublished D.Phil, thesis, Oxford, 1986), pp 408–53.Google Scholar

115 Calculations based upon figures provided in Walker, Brian M. Parliamentary election results in Ireland, 1801–1922 (Dublin, 1978).Google Scholar

116 As early as 1904 Russell was accepting financial aid from Herbert Gladstone ( Bew, , Conflict & conciliation, p. 91).Google Scholar

117 Carson to William Moore, 28 Jan. 1906 (Moore papers in the possession of Sir William Moore, Bt).

118 B.N.L., 7 Feb. 1902, p. 5; Ervine, , Craigavon, pp 125–6.Google Scholar

119 Peel to Lonsdale, 10 Feb. 1902 (P.R.O.N.I., Joshua Peel papers, D.889/4C/2, p. 742).

120 B.N.L., 23 Mar 1903.

121 Joseph Wilson to Moore, 9 Feb. 1903 (Moore papers).

l22 B.N.L., 22 Jan. 1903.

123 Campbell, T.J. Fifty years of Ulster, 1890–1940 (Belfast, 1941), p. 263.Google Scholar

124 T W Russell to white, 30 Jan. 1906 (National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, Arnold White papers, WH1/80). I am grateful to Dr R.H. Williams, St Peter’s College, Oxford, for this reference.

125 Campbell, , Fifty years, p. 264.Google Scholar

126 Cf. Lyons, F.S.L. The Irish unionist party and the devolution crisis of 1904–5’ in I.H.S., 6, no. 21 (Mar 1948), p. 22.Google Scholar

127 Bew, Paul and Wright, Frank ‘The agrarian opposition in Ulster politics, 1848–1887’ in Clark, & Donnelly, (eds), Irish peasants, p. 226.Google Scholar

128 Bew, & Wright, ‘Agrarian opposition’, pp 213–19.Google Scholar

129 Ibid., p. 192.

130 Bew, Conflict & conciliation, p. 89.Google Scholar

131 Bew, & Wright, ‘Agrarian opposition’, pp 219 ff.Google Scholar

132 Brett, Maurice V and Oliver, , Esher, Viscount (eds), The journals and letters of Reginald, Viscount Esher (4 vols, London, 1934–8), ii, 76.Google Scholar

133 Ervine, Craigavon, p. 101.Google Scholar The biographical information here is taken from Who was who, 1916–1929 (London, 1929), p. 918.

134 Russell had been predicting a breakdown in British government in Ireland since November 1917 ‘in three months you’ll have to decide to govern or clear out’ (Sir A. Frederick Whyte’s diary, 19 Nov 1917, India Office Library, Whyte papers, Ms Eur. D761/1). I am grateful to Mr Christopher Collins, Nuffield College, Oxford, for this reference.

135 Marjoribanks, Edward and Colvin, Ian, The life of Lord Carson (3 vols, London, 1932–6), i, 161.Google Scholar Marjoribanks oddly describes Russell as ‘an English member who took up the Irish question’