Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:12:13.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Henry Grattan, the Regency Crisis and the emergence of a Whig party in Ireland, 1788–9

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Extract

The Regency Crisis that proceeded from the apparent insanity of George III in October 1788 has a twofold importance in Irish political history. In an Anglo-Irish context, it can be argued that this episode crucially accelerated the hardening of British opinion in support of a political union with Ireland, and therefore marked a stage in the long ‘prelude to union’. But the Regency Crisis was also significant in purely domestic terms. Its consequences for the development of Irish parliamentary politics form the central concern of this article, the primary object of which is to analyse the course of events in Ireland and especially the evolving motives of the key individuals and factions in opposition between November 1788 and March 1789. The process not only made for intrinsically thrilling political drama; the ‘opposition’ response to the machinations of government on this issue paved the way for the advent of an Irish Whig party that was to transform the balance of power in the Irish parliament during the course of its final decade.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This phrase is taken from Kelly, James, Prelude to union: Anglo-Irish politics in the 1780s (Cork, 1992)Google Scholar. The focus of this book is on the political consequences of Pitt’s commercial propositions in 1785. For a broader discussion see idem, The origins of the Act of Union: an examination of unionist opinion in Britain and Ireland, 1650-1800’ in I.H.S., xxv, no. 99 (May 1987), pp 236-63Google Scholar.

2 For a detailed analysis of this important development see Herman, Neil, ‘“Radicalism not dangerous”: an analysis of moderate reform politics in Ireland, 1782-1791’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales, Swansea, 1999), ch. 7.Google Scholar

3 Forbes has not received the same biographical exposure as some of his contemporaries, notwithstanding his prominence in the patriot movement. For a short summary of his life see Kiernan, T. J. (ed.), ‘The Forbes letters’ in Anal. Hib., no. 8 (1938), pp 313-71.Google Scholar

4 Malcomson, A. P. W., Isaac Corry: an adventurer in the field of politics, 1755-1813 (Belfast, 1974), p. 7.Google Scholar

5 Buckingham to W. W. Grenville, 18 Apr. 1788 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 323).

6 [Rev.Scott, John], Review of the principal characters in the Irish House of Commons (Dublin, 1789), p. 22Google Scholar; Johnston, E. M. (ed.), ‘Members of the Irish parliament, 1784-7’ in R.I.A. Proc., lix (1971), sect. C, p. 176.Google Scholar

7 Fitzherbert to [Nepean?], 31 Dec. 1788 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, f. 3).

8 Ehrman, John, The younger Pitt: the years of acclaim (London, 1969), p. 645.Google Scholar

9 See Grenville to Buckingham, 13 Sept. 1788 (Duke, of Buckingham, and Chandos, (ed.), Memoirs of the court and cabinets of George III … (4 vols, London 1853-5), i, 448-54).Google Scholar

10 See Derry, John, The Regency Crisis and the Whigs (Cambridge, 1963), p. 67.Google Scholar

11 Schweitzer, D. R., ‘The Whig political connexion between Britain and Ireland’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1982), pp 100-1.Google Scholar

12 Derry, Regency Crisis & the Whigs, p. 119.

13 Ibid., p. 97.

14 Ibid., p. 141.

15 Ibid., p. 68.

16 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 53.

17 Buckingham to Sydney, 3 Jan. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, f. 6).

18 See below, pp 486-7.

19 Derry, Regency Crisis & the Whigs, p. 197.

20 O’Brien, Gerard makes this charge in his Anglo-Irish politics in the age of Grattan and Pitt (Dublin, 1987), pp 119-20.Google Scholar

21 See Gwynn, Stephen, Henry Grattan and his times (London, 1939), p. 222.Google Scholar

22 Malcomson, A.P.W., John Foster: the politics of the Anglo-Irish ascendancy (Oxford, 1978), p. 401.Google Scholar

23 See Charlemont to Forbes, 18 Dec. 1788 (H.M.C., Charlemont, ii, 84).

24 Grattan to Forbes, 28 Nov. 1788 (P.R.O.N.I., Forbes papers,T/3391/61).

25 Grattan to Forbes, Nov. 1788 (ibid., T/3391/62).

26 Belfast Newsletter, 19-23 Dec. 1788.

27 Portland to Forbes, 9 Jan. 1789 (P.R.O.N.I., T/3391/69).

28 Belfast Newsletter, 13-17 Feb. 1789.

29 Buckingham to Grenville, 1 Dec. 1788 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 377).

30 Fitzherbert to Nepean, 18 Jan. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, ff 37-8).

31 Buckingham to Grenville, 3 Jan. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 396).

32 Buckingham to Grenville, 23 Nov. 1788 (ibid., p. 375).

33 Gwynn, Grattan & his times, p. 223.

34 Ibid. See also Buckingham to the duke of Leinster, 18 Apr. 1788 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 323).

35 Scrope Bernard to Grenville, 27 Dec. 1787 (ibid., p. 294).

36 See Buckingham to Grenville, 3 Jan. 1789 (ibid., p. 395).

37 Buckingham to Grenville, 8 Dec. 1788 (ibid., p. 383); Sheridan to Forbes, 9 Dec. 1788 (P.R.O.N.I., T/3391/65).

38 See Connolly, S. J. (ed.), The Oxford companion to Irish history (Oxford, 1998), p. 601.Google Scholar

39 See below, pp 489-90.

40 Yelverton to Forbes, 6 Dec. 1788 (P.R.O.N.I., T/3391/64).

41 Grattan to Forbes, 9 Jan. 1789 (ibid., T/3391/70).

42 Grattan to Forbes, Jan./Feb. 1789 (ibid., T/3391/75).

43 Hardy to Forbes, 22 Jan. 1789 (ibid., T/3391/72).

44 O’Brien, Anglo-Irish politics, p. 120.

45 The history and proceedings of the Lords and Commons of Great Britain in parliament with regard to the regency … and the speeches of the Lords and Commons of Ireland (London, 1789), p. 66; Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 126; Meenan, P. N., ‘The Regency Crisis in Ireland’ (unpublished M. A. thesis, University College Dublin, 1981), p. 84.Google Scholar

46 See Schweitzer, ‘Whig political connexion’, p. 133.

47 Grenville to Buckingham, 10 Dec. 1788 (Buckingham, & Chandos, (ed.), Court & cabinets of George III, ii, 46).Google Scholar

48 Grenville to Buckingham, 18 Dec. 1788 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 387); O’Brien, Anglo-Irish politics, p. 143.

49 Buckingham to Sydney, 13 Jan. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, f. 199).

50 Sydney to Buckingham, 21 Jan. 1789 (ibid., ff 48-50).

51 Buckingham to Grenville, 10 Jan. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 397-8).

52 Buckingham to Grenville, 27 Jan. 1789 (ibid., pp 404-5). For the background to Lord Shannon’s decision see Hewitt, Esther (ed.), Lord Shannon’s letters to his son, 1790-1802 (Belfast, 1982), pp xliiixliv.Google Scholar

53 Buckingham to Grenville, 5 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 407).

54 Buckingham to Grenville, 27 Jan. 1789 (ibid., pp 403-5).

55 The combined number of votes commanded by Shannon and Leinster was thirty-five; Ponsonby had access to nine (O’Brien, Anglo-Irish politics, p. 124).

56 Buckingham to Grenville, 5 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 408).

56 Buckingham to Grenville, 5 Feb. 1789 (ibid., p. 406).

57 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 2.

59 Ibid., p. 7.

60 Ibid., p. ll7.

61 Buckingham to Grenville, 7 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 410).

62 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 22.

63 Ibid., p. 26. For the complete division list see Dublin Evening Post, 17 Feb. 1789.

64 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 40.

65 Ibid., p. 39.

66 Ibid., p. 53.

67 Ibid., p. 63.

68 Lord Sydney sent the official report of the king’s convalescence to Buckingham on 17 Feb. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, f. 102). See also Lord Lucan to Pery, 17 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Emly, ii, 196).

69 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 85.

70 Buckingham to Grenville, 18 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 413).

71 This quotation contains extracts from two letters from Buckingham to Sydney dated 14 and 19 Feb. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, ff 106-8,127-9). Original emphasis.

72 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 119.

73 Buckingham to Grenville, 20 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 414).

74 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 119.

75 Ibid., p. 126.

76 Hist. & proc. of Lords & Commons of Great Britain … with regard to the regency, pp 91-2.

77 Ibid., p. 71.

78 Ibid., p. 78.

79 Ibid., p. 76.

80 Dundas to Dundas, n.d. (N.L.I., Melville papers, MS 54/30).

81 See Grattan to Forbes, [late Jan. / early Feb. 1789] (P.R.O.N.I., T/3391/75).

82 D.N.B. entry.

83 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 36.

84 Ibid., p. 120.

85 Scrope Bernard to Grenville, 21 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 417).

86 See Buckingham to Grenville, 7 Feb. 1789 (ibid., p. 410).

87 Grattan to Forbes, Nov. 1788 (P.R.O.N.I., T/3391/62).

88 Gwynn, Grattan & his times, pp 232-3; O’Connor, Theresa M., ‘The conflict between Flood and Grattan, 1782-3’ in Cronne, H. A., Moody, T. W. and Quinn, D. B. (eds), Essays in British and Irish history in honour of James Eadie Todd (London 1949), pp 169-84.Google Scholar

83 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 134.

90 Fox to Richard Fitzpatrick, 17 Feb. 1789 (Russell, Lord John (ed.), Memorials and correspondence of Charles James Fox (4 vols, London, 1853-7), ii, 301.Google Scholar

91 See Buckingham to Grenville, 21 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 417).

92 Buckingham to Sydney, 21 Feb. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, ff 142-4).

93 Robinson, Nicholas, ‘Caricature and the Regency Crisis: an Irish perspective’ in Eighteenth-Century Ireland, i (1986), p. 166.Google Scholar

94 H.M.C., Various collections, viii, 417.

95 Dublin Evening Post, 14 Mar. 1789.

96 Charlemont to Burke, 24 Mar. 1789 (H.M.C., Charlemont, ii, 89).

97 Buckingham to Grenville, 25 Feb. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 420).

98 Buckingham to Sydney, 25 Feb. / 1 Mar. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, ff 162-78).

99 Buckingham to Grenville, 22 Mar. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 435).

100 Buckingham to Grenville, 22 Mar. 1789 (ibid., p. 436).

101 Burke to Charlemont, 27 May 1789 (H.M.C., Charlemont, ii, 99).

102 Dublin Evening Post, 26 Mar. 1789.

103 Buckingham to Grenville, 28 Mar. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 441).

104 Dublin Evening Post, 28 Mar. 1789.

105 Westmorland to Pitt, 4 Apr. 1792 (P.R.O.N.I., Pitt/Pretyman papers, T/3319/13).

106 Buckingham to Grenville, 31 Mar. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 441).

107 Buckingham to Hobart, [9?] Mar. 1790 (Franciscan Library, Killiney, Co. Dublin, misc. corr. of the duke of Buckingham, MS Collection J/8). I should like to thank Father Ignatius Fennessy for the kindness and generosity that was extended to me upon my visit to the Franciscan Library.

108 Buckingham to Grenville, 31 Mar. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 441).

109 Buckingham to Grenville, 22 Mar. 1789 (ibid., p. 435).

110 Parl. reg. Ire., ix, 252.

111 Ibid., p. 268.

112 Buckingham to Sydney, 4 Mar. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, ff 185-6).

113 Buckingham to Grenville, 2 Mar. 1789 (H.M.C., Fortescue, i, 425).

114 Buckingham to Grenville, 25 Feb. 1789 (ibid., p. 421).

115 Buckingham to Grenville, 2 Mar. 1789 (ibid., p. 435).

116 Grenville to Buckingham, 5 Oct. 1789 (ibid., p. 528).

117 Lucan to Pery, 12 Feb., 2 Mar. 1789 (H.M.C., Emly, ii, 196-7).

118 Dundas to [Pitt?], n.d. (N.L.I., MS 54/30).

119 William Preston to [Dundas?],27 Feb. 1789 (P.R.O.N.I., T/3319/1).

120 Dublin Evening Post, 27 June 1789.

121 Buckingham to Grenville, 30 Sept. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/27, ff 267-8).

122 See Dublin Evening Post, 12 Dec. 1789.

123 Buckingham to Sydney, 28 Mar. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, ff 325-6).

124 See Schweitzer, ‘Whig political connexion’, p. 132.

125 Burke to Charlemont, 9 Aug. 1789 (The correspondence of Edmund Burke, ed. Copeland, T. W.et al. (10 vols, Cambridge, 1958-78), vi, 910).Google Scholar

126 Kennedy, Denis, ‘The Irish opposition, parliamentary reform and public opinion, 1793-1794’ in Eighteenth-Century Ireland, vii (1992), p. 95.Google Scholar

127 Parl.reg. Ire., x, 216.

128 For a detailed discussion of the development, aims and personnel of the Whig clubs in Dublin and Belfast see Herman, Neil, ‘The Whig clubs and popular politics in Ireland in the 1790s’ in Gillespie, Raymond (ed.), The remaking of modern Ireland, 1750-1950: Beckett Prize Essays in Irish History, 1999-2000 (forthcoming).Google Scholar

129 Dublin Evening Post, 11 July 1789; McDowell, R. B., Irish public opinion, 1750-1800 (London, 1944), p. 134.Google Scholar

130 Dublin Evening Post, 25 June 1791; Kelly, James, ‘“The glorious and immortal memory”: commemoration and Protestant identity in Ireland, 1660-1800’ in R.I.A. Proc. xciv (1994), sect. C, pp 38, 52.Google Scholar

131 Johnston, E. M. (ed.), ‘The state of the Irish House of Commons in 1791’ in R.I.A. Proc. lix (1957), sect. C, p. 51.Google Scholar

132 Ponsonby to Fitzherbert, 27 Mar. 1789 (P.R.O., HO 100/26, f. 323).

133 See, for example, Charlemont to Haliday, 10 Jan. 1795 (H.M.C., Charlemont, ii, 257).

134 For one interpretation see Kennedy, Denis, ‘The Irish Whigs, 1789-93’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, 1971), pp 292-7.Google Scholar

135 Malcomson, Foster, pp 401-4.

136 Haliday to Charlemont, 28 Jan. 1797 (H.M.C., Charlemont, ii, 293).

137 Leinster, Charlemont, Thomas Conolly and William Ponsonby to prince of Wales, [probably June] 1797 (ibid., pp 302-3).

138 Ibid., p. 303.