No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Full circle: the Manning–Gladstone correspondence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 August 2015
Extract
In his famous portrayal of the eminent Victorian Henry Manning, Lytton Strachey commented thus: ‘It was as if the Fates had laid a wager that they would daunt him; and in the end they lost their bet.’ As one of the high-profile British converts to Roman Catholicism (1851), archbishop of Westminster (1865), cardinal (1875) and candidate for the papacy (1878), Manning was one of the most formidable and influential churchmen of his day. Throughout his adult life, he shared an intellectual, respectful and fractious friendship with William Gladstone who, as Liberal party leader and four-time British prime minister (1868–74, 1880–5, 1886, 1892–4), was the most successful and prolific politician of his generation. The relationship between Manning and Gladstone is significant because in his political career the latter paid great attention to the former. Throughout, Gladstone was fascinated by religious polemics, while his views on constitutional government were shaped very much by his own religious convictions.
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 2014
References
* The correspondence of Henry Edward Manning and William Ewart Gladstone: the complete correspondence, 1833–1891. Edited by Peter C. Erb. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013. Vol. I, 1833–1844, cxx, 485 pp. Vol. II, 1844–1853, xii, 557 pp. Vol. III, 1861–1875, xii, 442 pp. Vol. IV, 1882–1891, xii, 550 pp. £320, four vols.
1 Strachey, Lytton, Cornerstone: portraits of four eminent Victorians (Tucson, AZ, 2009 [original version 1918]), p. 2.Google Scholar
2 See Ramm, Agatha, ‘Gladstone’s religion’, in Historical Journal, xxviii, no. 2 (June, 1985), pp 327–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 McCarthy, John-Paul, ‘The religious dimension in Gladstone’s Home Rule analysis’ in Daly, Mary E. and Hoppen, K. Theodore (eds), Gladstone: Ireland and beyond, (Dublin, 2011), pp 157–68.Google Scholar
4 Gladstone, William Ewart, Two letters to the earl of Aberdeen on the state prosecutions of the Neapolitan government (London 1851)Google Scholar.
5 McIntire, C. T., England against the papacy 1858–1861: Tories, Liberals, and the overthrow of papal temporal power during the Italian Risorgimento (Cambridge, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Raponi, Danilo, ‘An ‘‘Anti-Catholicism of free trade?’’ Religion and the Anglo–Italian negotiations of 1863’ in European History Quarterly, xxxix, no. 4 (Oct. 2009), pp 633–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Barr, Colin, Finelli, Michelle and O’Connor, Anne, Nation/Nazione: Irish nationalism and the Italian Risorgimento (Dublin, 2014)Google Scholar.
8 Russell to Palmerston, 15 May 1865 (University of Southampton, Broadlands papers, PP/GC/RU/886-911).
9 Romani, R., ‘British Views on Irish national character, 1800–1846: an intellectual history’ in History of European Ideas, xxiii (1997), pp 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Evans, E. J., The forging of the modern state: early industrial Britain 1783–1870 (London & New York, 1983), pp 300–7.Google Scholar
11 Gilley, Sheridan, ‘The Garibaldi riots of 1862’in Historical Journal, xvi, no. 4 (Dec., 1973), pp 697–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Norman, E. R., ‘Cardinal Manning and the temporal power’ in Beales, Derek and Best, Geoffrey (eds), History, society and the churches: essays in honour of Owen Chadwick (Cambridge, 1985), p. 255.Google Scholar
13 Wright, Owain, ‘British foreign policy and the Italian occupation of Rome, 1870’ in International History Review, xxxiv, no. 1 (Mar., 2012), pp 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Boyce, D. George, ‘Gladstone and Ireland’, in Jagger, Peter J. (ed.) Gladstone, (London, 1998), pp 105–22Google Scholar at pp 106–7.
15 See McClelland, V. A., ‘Gladstone and Manning: a question of authority’ in Jagger, Peter J., (ed.) Gladstone, politics and religion, (London, 1985), pp 148–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Parry, Jonathan, The rise and fall of liberal government in Victorian Britain (New Haven & London, 1993), pp 295–6.Google Scholar