No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Connacht in the eighteenth century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2016
Extract
Connacht in the eighteenth century was regarded as the most remote and the most catholic part of Ireland. These two qualities gave the region a very individual character, and the few travellers who ventured to cross the Shannon had the sensation of entering another world. This did not apply to two of the five counties—Leitrim and Sligo, which had been allotted tothe soldiers of the parliamentary army in the Cromwellian settlement and for this reason were not typical of the province. The essential Connacht lay beyond the Shannon in the counties of Galway, Mayo and Roscommon, the greater part of which had been reserved for catholic landowners in the Cromwellian settlement. The result of this arrangement was to leave the catholic gentry in a much stronger position in Connacht than in the rest of Ireland. This position remained largely unshaken by the Jacobite war, as the treaty of Limerick, the terms of the surrender of Galway, and their own solidarity protected most of the Connacht landholders from confiscation at the end of the war.
When the eighteenth century began, several hundred catholic landholders were in occupation of a substantial part of Galway and Mayo and, to a lesser degree, of Roscommon. This situation was a constant source of anxiety to the authorities, who from time to time were alarmed about the prospect of a French landing in the west supported by catholic landlords and catholic peasants. It was said that catholics in Connacht outnumbered protestants by fifty to one and that in some counties there were so few protestant freeholders to serve on juries that the region could scarcely be held to acknowledge the authority of the government.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1958
References
1 This paper was originally delivered in Trinity College, Dublin, on 27 Feb. 1958, as a lecture in the O’Donnell series.
1a Report of the commrs of enquiry into Irish forfeitures, 1699.
2 Synge to Wake, 15 Apr. 1725 (Gilbert coll.).
3 [Tocnaye, La], Rambles through Ireland (Cork, 1798), ii. 16 Google Scholar.
4 Autobiography (ed. O’Brien, R.B.), i. 136 Google Scholar.
5 Wakefield, E.. Account of Ireland, ii. 754 Google Scholar.
6 J. McParlan, Statistical survey of county Mayo, introd., p. vi.
7 R. O’Flaherty, West Connacht (ed. J. Hardiman), p. 414.
8 Synge to Wake, 15 Jan. 1717 (Gilbert coll.).
9 Journal, iv. 378.
10 Memoirs, p. 175.
11 E.g. the ratio between Beaufort’s estimates (1792) and the 1841 census is 1: 2’8 for Connacht and 1: 19 for Munster.
12 Ir. Arch. Soc. Misc., i. 171.
13 Irish tour, pp. 84-9.
14 J. McParlan, Statistical survey of county Mayo, pp. 164-5.
15 H. Dutton, Statistical survey of county Galway, p. 375.
16 Delany, M., Autobiography, i. 350 Google Scholar.
17 Tour in Connemara, pp. 41-4.
18 Memoirs, i. 278.
19 In P.R.O.I.
20 N.L.I., MS 5619 (O’Malley papers), p. 349.
21 O’Conor to Walker, 21 Oct. 1786 (Gilbert coll.).
22 Sinclair, J., Statistical account of Scotland, xxxi. 371-8Google Scholar.
23 C. Otway, Sketches in Erris and Tyrawley, pp. 347-9.
24 Commons’ jn. Ire. (ed. 1798), vi. xcv.
25 Journal, iv. 268.
26 Lords’ jn. Ire., iii. 115.
27 Commons’ jn. Ire., vii. 314.
28 Connaught Journal, 1793, 1795.
29 Briain, Liam Ó, ‘Theobald Wolfe Tone in Galway’, in Irish Sword, ii. 228-9Google Scholar.
30 Tuathail, É. Ó, ‘On Hugh O’Donnell in Larkfield’, in Éigse, iii. 21-4Google Scholar.
31 Commons’ jn. Ire., xi. 444. For Connacht O’Donnells see A.F.M., vi, app. For Newport O’Donnells see N.L.I., O’Donnell papers.
32 N.L.I., MS 5619, p. 203.
33 R. Hayes, Last invanon of Ireland, pp. 305-6.
34 O’Flaherty, West Connaught, p. 416.
35 O. J. Burke, Annals of the Connaught circuit, pp. 84-6, 98-101.
36 M. Edgeworth. Tour in Connemara, pp. 102-3.
37 Statistical survey of county Galway, p. 332.
38 N.L.I., Bellew papers.
39 Narrative of what passed at Killalla, p. 22.