Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:33:00.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Irish parliament of 1560: the anglican reforms authorised

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Henry A. Jefferies
Henry A. Jefferies*
Affiliation:
Haberdashers’ Aske’s School, Elstree, Herts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Few Irish parliaments were more important than that of 1560. It recognised Elizabeth Tudor’s title to the crown of Ireland and authorised the reform of the Irish church. Yet the sparse documentary record of its proceedings has lent itself to wildly differing interpretations. Controversy has centred upon the manner in which the ecclesiastical legislation reached the statute books, and the disposition of the bishops towards it. Even today, long after the interdenominational debate has ended, there is no consensus among historians on this very difficult subject.

In the most comprehensive treatment to date of the 1560 parliament Robert Dudley Edwards concluded that fraud and deception were employed to force the queen’s ecclesiastical legislation through a recalcitrant House of Commons. However, the opposition of the bishops in the upper house was insurmountable and the parliament was quickly prorogued without its legislative programme being sanctioned.

Type
Research Article
Information
Irish Historical Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 102 , November 1988 , pp. 128 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The last denominational studies were those of Ronan, Myles V., The Reformation in Ireland under Elizabeth (London, 1930), pp 17–40 Google Scholar, and Jourdan, G.V., ‘The transitional stage of reform, 1558–75’ in Phillips, W.A. (ed.), History of the Church of Ireland (3 vols, London, 1933-4), ii, 292–311 Google Scholar.

2 Edwards, R. Dudley, Church and state in Tudor Ireland: a history of penal laws against Irish catholics, 1534–1603 (Dublin, 1935), pp 170-91Google Scholar.

3 Bradshaw, Brendan, ‘The beginnings of modern Ireland’ in Farrell, Brian (ed.), The Irish parliamentary tradition (Dublin, 1973), pp 80–81, 266Google Scholar.

4 Ellis, Steven G., Tudor Ireland: crown, community and the conflict of cultures, 1470–1603 (London, 1985), pp 210-14Google Scholar.

5 Carte papers (B.L., Lansd. MS 159, p. 164).

6 ‘The device for alteration of religion’, written in 1558 by an anonymous court official, predicted that a return to reformation would lead to turmoil in Ireland ‘by reason of the clergy there is so addicted to Rome’, quoted in Gee, Henry, The Elizabethan prayer book and ornaments (London, 1902), p. 196 Google Scholar.

7 Calendar of the MSS of the marquis of Salisbury (23 vols, H.M.C., London, 1883–1973), iii, no. 968.

8 Fiants Ire. Eliz., no. 27.

9 Ibid., no. 35.

10 Rymer, Thomas (ed.), Foedera, conventiones, litterae et cujuscunque generis acta publica, xv (London, 1713), pp 533-6Google Scholar.

11 Cal. Carew MSS, miscell., pp 200–2.

12 Cal. Carew MSS, 1515–74, no. 233.

13 Ibid., no. 218.

14 Shirley, E.P. (ed.), Original letters and papers in illustration of … the church in Ireland during the reigns of Edward VI, Mary and Elizabeth (London, 1851), no. 32 Google Scholar.

15 ‘The register of the mayors of Dublin’ (B.L., Add. MS 4791, p. 11).

16 Cal. S. P. Spain, 1558–67, no. 56.

17 W. Shaw Mason, ‘Collation of the Irish statutes’ (T.C.D., MS 1739, p. 288).

18 Calendar of the patent rolls, 1558–60 (London, 1939), pp 28–9.

19 Cal. S. P. Ire., 1509–73, no. 1.

20 This was first suggested by Edwards, Church & state, p. 177; see also Ellis, Tudor Ire., p. 210.

21 These files are referred to in Cal. pat. rolls Ire., Hen. VIII—Eliz., p. 123.

22 Hardiman, James (ed.), A statute of the fortieth year of King Edward III enacted in … Kilkenny, A.D. 1367 (I.A.S., ii, Dublin, 1843), pp 135-8Google Scholar.

23 Foedera, xv, 535–6.

24 Cal. Carew MSS, 1515–74, no. 96; Hardiman, Statute of Edward III, p. 137.

25 The English-born councillors in the House of Commons were Sir William Fitz-William, Sir George Stanley, Sir Henry Radcliffe, John Parker, Sir John Allen, James Wingfield, Francis Agard and Humphrey Warren. Sir Thomas Cusack, M.P. for Athenry, was the only Irish-born councillor elected to the lower house. The other English officials who sat in the Commons were Nicholas Heron, Francis Cosby, Henry Draycott and Henry Cowley.

26 Cal. S. P. Ire., 1509–73, p. 157.

27 Cal. S. P. Spain, 1558–67, no. 89.

28 Ibid., nos 56, 65.

29 While 77 peers were summoned to the English House of Lords for the parliament of 1559, attendance never exceeded 45, and generally averaged 36 ( Jones, Norman, Faith by statute: parliament and the settlement of religion 1559 (London & New Jersey, 1982), pp 73-4Google Scholar).

30 Salisbury MSS, iii, no. 968.

31 Elizabeth’s letter has not survived, but the text of Mary’s missal to her Irish parliamentarians has been preserved in Cal. pat. rolls Ire., Hen. VIII-Eliz., pp 360–61.

32 The original list was in a state of decay when Hardiman printed it, and illegible in parts. Hence it appears that the bishop of Emly’s name has been obliterated by time.

33 ‘The register of the mayors of Dublin’ (B.L., Add. MS 4791, p. 11); Cal. S. P. Ire., 1509–77, no. 1.

34 Bradshaw, ‘Modern Ireland’, pp 80–81, 266.

35 Ibid., p. 266.

36 Rec. comm. Ire. rep. (3 vols, 1815–25), ii, rep. 8, suppl., p. 357.

37 Cal. S. P. Spain, 1558–67, nos 87, 88, 89.

38 The statutes at large passed in the parliaments held in Ireland (20 vols, Dublin, 1786–1801), i, 275–310; Cal. Carew MSS, 1515–74, no. 234.

39 Leland, Thomas, The history of Ireland from the invasion of Henry II (new ed., Dublin, 3 vols, Dublin, 1814), ii, 225, nGoogle Scholar.

40 Cal. S. P. Ire., 1509–73, no. 1.

41 Haugaard, William, Elizabeth and the English reformation (Cambridge, 1970), pp 112-13Google Scholar.

42 Articles of religion, no. 24.

43 Cal. S. P. Ire., 1509–73, p. 108.

44 Ibid., p. 356.

45 Haugaard, Elizabeth & the reformation, p. 126.

46 St Leger reported in January 1551 that an experimental Latin version of the first Book of Common Prayer was very well received in Limerick city (Cal. S. P. Ire., 1509–73, p. 110). The 1560 Liber precum publicarum is significantly closer to the 1549 prayer-book than is the Elizabethan prayer-book (Haugaard, Elizabeth & the reformation, pp 112–19).

47 Stat. Ire., i, 284–90; The prayer-book of Queen Elizabeth, 1559 (London, 1890), p. 41.

48 Haugaard, Elizabeth & the reformation, pp 183–232.

49 Fiants Ire. Eliz., nos 223, 224.

50 Stat. Ire., i, 284–90.

51 Ellis, Tudor Ire., p. 239; Silke, J.J., Ireland and Europe, 1559–1607 (Dundalk, 1966), p. 5 Google Scholar.

52 Cal. S. P. Spain, 1558–67, nos 88, 89.

53 Treadwell, Victor, ‘The Irish parliament of 1569–71’ in R.I.A. Proc., lxv (1966-7), sect. C, pp 67-8Google Scholar.

54 Foedera, xv, 565.

55 ‘Annals of Ireland of the reign of Queen Elizabeth’ in SirWare, James, The antiquities and history of Ireland, ed. Ware, Robert (Dublin, 1705), pp 2–3 Google Scholar. R. Dudley Edwards pointed out that the Loftus annals are based on Ware’s ‘Annals’ for much of Elizabeth’s reign and thus have no independent value (Edwards, Church & state, p. 175, n. 1).

56 Salisbury MSS, iii, no. 968.

57 Rothe, David, Analecta et de processu martyriali, ed. Moran, P.F. (London, 1884), p. 236 Google Scholar. I am indebted to Dr John Barry, Department of Classics, University College, Cork, who generously translated for me several pages of this work.

58 Rothe, Analecta, pp 234–6.

59 Falkiner, C.L., ‘The parliament of Ireland under the Tudors’ in R.I.A. Proc., xxv (1904-5), sect. C, pp 553-66Google Scholar; Fiants Ire. Eliz., no. 185.

60 Lennon, Colm, Richard Stanihurst, the Dubliner, 1547–1618 (Dublin, 1981), p. 22 Google Scholar.

61 Cal. pat. rolls Ire., Eliz., Roll 36 Elizabeth dorso, no. 1.

62 Lynch, John, Cambrensis eversus (1662; ed. Kelly, Matthew, 3 vols, Dublin, 1848-52), iii, 19 Google Scholar.

63 Rothe, Analecta, p. 235.

64 Wadding papers, 1614–38, ed. Jennings, Brendan (I.M.C., Dublin, 1953), p. 319 Google Scholar. My translation from the Spanish.

65 Harris, Walter (ed.), The whole works of James Ware (2 vols, Dublin, 1764), i, 537 Google Scholar.

66 Archivio Segreto Vaticano, Nunziatura di Portogallo, ii, f. 408v, quoted in Bolster, Evelyn, A history of the diocese of Cork (Cork, 1982), p. 77 Google Scholar.

67 Cal. S. P. Ire., 1509–73, p. 154.

68 Cal. Carew MSS, 1515–74, no. 225.

69 Cal. S. P. Spain, 1558–67, no. 89.

70 Fiants Ire. Eliz., nos 198, 199.

71 Rothe, Analecta, pp 447–55.

72 ‘Annals of Ireland, Elizabeth’, n.d. (1560), in Sir James Ware, Antiquities, pp 3–5.

73 Wilson, Philip, ‘The writings of Sir James Ware and the forgeries of Robert Ware’ in Transactions of the Bibliographical Society, xv (1917), pp 83–94 Google Scholar.

74 Bruce, John and Perowne, T. (eds.), Correspondence of Mathew Parker (Cambridge, 1853), Letter lxxxi, p. 117 Google Scholar.

75 Shirley, Original letters, Letter lxxvii, pp 214–21. The wording of Ware’s annal for 1560 is strikingly similar to that of Loftus’s letter.

76 Salisbury MSS, iii, no. 968.

77 Haugaard, Elizabeth & the reformation, pp 36–42.

78 Cal. S. P. Rome, 1558–71, no. 108.

79 Hogan, Edmund (ed.), Ibernia Ignatiana, 1540–1607 (Dublin, 1880), p. 13 Google Scholar. Wolfe commissioned Dónal Mac Comgayll to deliver the letter of 12 October 1561, and also to give a detailed verbal report on the Irish bishops to Rome.

80 Cal. Carew MSS, 1515–74, no. 237.

81 Bolster, Diocese of Cork, pp 59–60.

82 Fiants Ire. Eliz., nos 221, 666, 667, 668.

83 Bradshaw, Brendan, Simms, J.G. and Woods, C.J., ‘Bishops of the Church of Ireland from 1534’ in A new history of Ireland, ix (Oxford, 1984), pp 400, 411, 417, 425Google Scholar.

84 Bradshaw, Brendan, ‘Fr Wolfe’s description of Limerick city, 1574’ in N. Munster Antiq. Jn., xvii (1975), p. 51 Google Scholar.

85 Bradshaw, ‘Modern Ireland’, pp 80–81, 266. See also Bradshaw, Brendan, The Irish constitutional revolution of the sixteenth century (Cambridge, 1979), p. 274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

86 Bradshaw, ‘Wolfe’s description of Limerick’, p. 51.

87 Canny, Nicholas, ‘Why the Reformation failed in Ireland; une question mal posée?’ in Journal of Ecclesiastical History, xxx (1979), pp 423-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 Ibid., pp 432–4.

89 Haugaard, Elizabeth & the reformation, pp 112–19.

90 Ibid., passim.

91 Jones, Faith by statute, pp 130–31.

92 Rothe, Analecta, pp 447–55. Interestingly, Viscount Baltinglass justified his rebellion in 1580 on the grounds that ‘a woman uncapax of all holy orders’ could not be governor of the church, as well as by reference to the increasingly unjust character of Elizabeth’s rule in Ireland.