Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2020
How might the history of Ireland's revolution be reassessed if viewed within a transnational, comparative or global framework? Drawing attention to recent writing on the subject, this introduction considers the conceptual and historiographical issues at stake in reframing the history of the Irish Revolution, as well as considering potential limitations to these approaches. We assess what topics in particular lend themselves to a fresh perspective focusing on Irish nationalism, while also indicating areas where there is considerable scope for new lines of inquiry. In this era of intensive commemoration of the events that unfolded between 1912 and 1923, this special issue serves to remind us that the history of the revolution should not be confined to the island of Ireland. We argue that thinking transnationally and comparatively can promote a more inclusive and diverse global history of Irish Revolution.
1 Fitzpatrick, David, ‘We are all transnationalists now’ in I.H.S., xli, no. 159 (May 2017), p. 123Google Scholar.
2 Hoppen, K. Theodore, rev. of Nagle, Shane, Histories of nationalism in Ireland and Germany: a comparative study from 1800 to 1932 (London, 2017)Google Scholar in I.H.S., xlii, no. 161 (May 2018), p. 194.
3 For a more detailed elaboration of some of these points, see McGarry, Fearghal, ‘Reframing Ireland's revolution’ in Delaney, Enda and McGarry, Fearghal (eds), The Irish Revolution, 1919: a global history (Dublin, 2019), pp 8–12Google Scholar; idem, ‘“A land beyond the wave”: transnational perspectives on Easter 1916’ in Niall Whelehan (ed.), Transnational perspectives on modern Irish history (New York, 2015), pp 165–88.
4 Delaney, Enda, ‘Directions in historiography: our island story? Towards a transnational history of late modern Ireland’ in I.H.S., xxxvii, no. 148 (Nov. 2011), pp 599–621Google Scholar.
5 Garvin, Tom, Nationalist revolutionaries in Ireland, 1858–1928 (new ed., Dublin, 2005), p. 54Google Scholar.
6 Boyce, D. G., Nationalism in Ireland (2nd ed., London, 1991)Google Scholar.
7 Brundage, David, Irish nationalists in America: the politics of exile, 1798–1998 (Oxford, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8 Bayly, C. A., Beckert, Sven, Connelly, Matthew, Hofmeyr, Isabel, Kozol, Wendy and Seed, Patricia, ‘AHR Conversation: on transnational history’ in American Historical Review, cxi, no. 5 (Dec. 2006), pp 1441–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Fitzpatrick, ‘We are all transnationalists now’, p. 124.
10 Foster, R. F., Modern Ireland, 1600–1972 (London, 1988), p. 471Google Scholar.
11 Jeffery, Keith, 1916: a global history (London, 2015), pp 103–04Google Scholar.
12 Fearghal McGarry, ‘“The Ireland of the Far East”? The Wilsonian moment in Ireland and Korea’ (forthcoming).
13 Manela, Erez, ‘The Wilsonian moment in east Asia: the March First movement in global perspective’ in Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, ix, no. 1 (Apr. 2009), p. 12Google Scholar.
14 Bessel, Richard, ‘Revolution’ in Winter, Jay (ed.), The Cambridge history of the First World War, ii: the state (Cambridge, 2014), p. 139Google Scholar. Lago, Enrico Del, Healy, Róisín and Barry, Gearóid, ‘Globalising the Easter Rising: 1916 and the challenge to empires’ in eidem (eds), 1916 in global context: an anti-imperial moment (London, 2018), p. 4Google Scholar.
15 Weinhauer, Klaus, McElligott, Anthony and Heinsohn, Kirsten, ‘Introduction’ in eidem (eds), Germany 1916–23: a revolution in context (Bielefeld, 2015), p. 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 Del Lago, Healy & Barry, ‘Globalising the Easter Rising’, p. 3.
17 Ibid., p. 4.
18 Walsh, Maurice, Bitter freedom: Ireland in a revolutionary world, 1918–1923 (London, 2015)Google Scholar. Richard Grayson's military study, Dublin's great wars: the First World War, the Easter Rising and the Irish Revolution (Cambridge, 2018), also demonstrates the potential for reintegrating Irish experiences of war and revolution.
19 Walsh, Bitter freedom, p. 11. This may be changing. A recent Irish Times supplement (‘Century 1919: war and peace’, Irish Times, 21 Jan. 2019) featured articles on the global ambitions of the Dáil, the global context of the revolution, the Amritsar Massacre, the Paris peace conference and Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy. However, this supplement coincided with the centenary of the most internationalised period of the War of Independence, when Irish republicans looked to the Paris peace conference as providing a route to independence.
20 On this see, in particular, Jones, Heather, ‘Romantic Ireland's dead and gone? How centenary publications are reshaping Ireland's divided understanding of its decade of war and revolution, 1912–1923’ in First World War Studies, ix, no. 3 (2018), pp 344–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Bourke, Richard, ‘Introduction’ in idem and McBride, Ian (eds), The Princeton history of modern Ireland (Princeton, 2016), p. 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 For the Expert Advisory Group's guidance, see https://www.decadeofcentenaries.com/publication-of-decade-of-centenaries-second-phase-guidance-2018-2023-by-expert-advisory-group/ (2 Jan. 2020).
23 ‘Row over bid to extend centenary events to cover Ireland and India’ (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/apr/01/british-row-over-call-extend-centenary-events-cover-ireland-india) (23 Dec. 2019).
24 Hart, Peter, The I.R.A. and its enemies: violence and community in Cork, 1916–23 (Oxford, 1998)Google Scholar; McBride, Ian, ‘The Peter Hart affair in perspective: history, ideology and the Irish Revolution’ in Hist. Jn., lxi, no. 1 (Mar. 2018), pp 249–71Google Scholar; Kalyvas, Stathis, The logic of violence in civil war (Cambridge, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 Fitzpatrick, David, ‘The geography of the War of Independence’ in Crowley, John, Drisceoil, Donal Ó, Murphy, Mike and Borgonovo, John (eds), Atlas of the Irish Revolution (Cork, 2017), p. 534Google Scholar.
26 For further details, see https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FP00914X%2F1 (23 Dec. 2019).
27 See Whelehan (ed.), Transnational perspectives, and also the recent special issue, ‘Ireland and Finland, 1860–1930: comparative and transnational histories’, I.H.S., xli, no. 160 (Nov. 2017).
28 The first publication to emerge from this project was Enda Delaney and Fearghal McGarry (eds), The Irish Revolution, 1919–21: a global history (Dublin, 2019). Research by project staff and other contributors can also be accessed via the ‘Global Irish Revolution’ major theme on R.T.É. and Boston College's ‘Century Ireland’ website: https://www.rte.ie/centuryireland/index.php/global-irish-revolution/.
29 Gerwarth, Robert and Horne, John (eds), War in peace: paramilitary violence in Europe after the Great War (Oxford, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilson, T. K., Frontiers of violence: conflict and identity in Ulster and Upper Silesia, 1918–1922 (Oxford, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
30 Malcolm, Elizabeth and Hall, Dianne, A new history of the Irish in Australia (Sydney, 2018)Google Scholar.
31 Keown, Gerard, First of the small nations: the beginnings of Irish foreign policy in the inter-war years, 1919–1932 (Oxford, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
32 See, for instance, Grogan, Geraldine, The noblest agitator: Daniel O'Connell and the German Catholic movement, 1830–50 (Dublin, 1991)Google Scholar; and for a recent comparative account, see Nagle, Histories of nationalism in Ireland and Germany.
33 A notable exception is D. G. Boyce, Englishmen and Irish troubles: British public opinion and the making of Irish policy, 1918–22 (London, 1972).
34 Foster, R. F., Vivid faces: the revolutionary generation in Ireland, 1890–1923 (London, 2014)Google Scholar.
35 Brundage, Irish nationalists, pp 153–4.
36 The pioneering work was Jeffery, Keith (ed.), ‘An Irish empire’? Aspects of Ireland and the British Empire (Manchester, 1996)Google Scholar. Other collections that contain rich studies include Kenny, Kevin (ed.), Ireland and the British Empire (Oxford, 2004)Google Scholar and McMahon, Timothy G., de Nie, Michael and Townend, Paul (eds), Ireland in an imperial world: citizenship, opportunism, and subversion (London, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
37 The editors would like to thank Professor Robert Gerwarth (U.C.D.) and Dr Patrick Mannion (Edinburgh) for acting as expert commentators at the workshop held in Edinburgh in June 2019, and the editors of Irish Historical Studies and the anonymous peer reviewer for very helpful and constructive comments.