Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:16:42.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Mesopotamian Daggers and Their Relatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Extract

The first of the two daggers I propose to discuss I bought from Mr. John Whitaker of Cambridge, who acquired it from Messrs. Sotheby's sale on December 10th, 1932. The type, the patina, and the date when it came into the market suggest the possibility that it may have been associated with the two similar daggers recently acquired by the British Museum and said to have been discovered in a cave near Kirmanshah in the Luristan province of Persia, and with another now in the Louvre in Paris.

The dagger in my possession belongs to a series of Late Bronze Age daggers and swords best characterized by their inlaid hilt. The inlay of wood, ivory, or some other material has usually vanished and the remaining part of the hilt consists of a flanged tang, frequently with one or more rivet-holes and with a tang or a flange to hold the pommel.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , November 1934 , pp. 163 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 163 note 1 Fig. I, No. 1.

page 163 note 2 For the Late Bronze Age swords, see Peake, The Bronze Age and the Celtic World, and Parker Brewis, The Bronze Sword in Great Britain (Archaeologia, LXXIII).

page 164 note 1 Gadd, C. J. in B.M. Quarterly, VII, No. 2, p. 44 and pl. XVIII (123060 is the upper and 123061 the lower dagger)Google Scholar.

page 164 note 2 With which they are contemporary.

page 164 note 3 1931 excavations No. 315; cf. Dussaud in Syria, 1929, fig. 7 and fig. 8 (two examples from Nihavand).

page 164 note 4 M. Contenau informs me that according to the report given by the dealer this weapon was found in Luristan; two daggers recently acquired by the Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology in Cambridge are said to have come from the same province.

page 134 note 5 Syria, 1933, 1 and pl. 1 ffGoogle ScholarPubMed.

page 164 note 6 Fig. 1, No. 2.

page 165 note 1 Carter, , IllustratedLondon News, 10 12th, 1929 Google ScholarPubMed.

page 165 note 2 Bonnet, Die Waffen der Völker des alten Orients, fig. 36.

page 165 note 3 Rowe, , Illustrated London News, 11 12th, 1927 Google Scholar.

page 165 note 4 Puchstein, Boghaz Koi, pl. XVIII; WASMUTH, Hethitische Kunst, pl. VI.

page 165 note 5 Wasmuth, loc. cit., pl. XXXII.

page 165 note 6 Daremberg and Saglio, 148, and Quintus Curtius, VIII. 48.

page 165 note 7 Quintus Curtius, VIII. 48, Xenophon, Cyropaedeia II. 1. 9 Google Scholar and VI. 2. 10, and, in the sense of ‘kitchen chopper’, Aristophanes, Fragment 184.

page 165 note 8 Macalister, Gezer, fig. 473.

page 165 note 9 Xanthoudides, , Eph. Arch. 1904, 29 and fig. 7Google Scholar

page 165 note 10 Benton, , B.S.A. XXIX. 113, fig. 2Google Scholar.

page 165 note 11 Macalister, , Gezer, iii, pl. 75, No. 16 Google Scholar.

page 166 note 1 Cros, Du, Tello, 128 and pl. VIIIGoogle Scholar.

page 166 note 2 Syria, III, pl. 65.

page 166 note 3 Bonnet, , Waffen …, 6570 Google Scholar.

page 166 note 4 Morgan, De, Mission scientifique en Perse 1896, IV, 61 ff.Google Scholar

page 166 note 5 Dated by Tallgren between 1300 and 900 B.C.

page 166 note 6 Childe, , The Aryans, 122 Google Scholar.

page 166 note 7 Childe, loc. cit., 122 and fig. 25, No. 7.

page 167 note 1 L'Anthropologie, 1910, 425 Google Scholar.

page 167 note 2 St. Germain, No. 4234.

page 167 note 3 Mallia, I, pl. I and p. 60.

page 167 note 4 Cf. Evans, Shaft Graves, fig. 22.

page 167 note 5 Macalister, , Gezer, III, pl. 75, No. 6Google Scholar.

page 167 note 6 Cf. Petrie, Arms and Weapons, pl. XXIII, No. 34.

page 168 note 1 Morgan, De, Mission scientifique en Perse 1896, IV, chap. 2Google Scholar. Such swords resemble Late Halstatt types; cf. Hoernes, , Kultur der Urzeit, III, fig. 9, Nos. 6 and 7Google Scholar.

page 167 note 2 Woolley, , Ant. Journ. 10 1928, 427 Google Scholar, and Illustrated London News, 12 17th, 1927, 1091 Google Scholar.

page 167 note 3 Syria, 1931, pl. III; the preliminary account does not make it clear whether the sherd comes from Ras Shamra or Minat-ul-Beida.

page 167 noet 4 Karo, Schachtgraber von Mykenae, e.g. No. 725, from Grave 5 on pls. LXXXI, LXXXII; see also pp. 202 ff.

page 167 note 5 Evans, Prehistoric Tombs, fig. 59 and fig. 109, No. 36; on the other cruciform swords the guard is missing but was probably similar.

page 167 note 6 Wace, , Archaeologia, LXXXII. 105 and 220, and pl. LIGoogle Scholar.

page 167 note 7 Persson, , Royal Tombs, pl. XXXIII. 4 and p. 97, and pl. XXXII. 5, p. 103Google Scholar.

page 169 note 1 Andrae, , Anu-Adad Tempel, 53 Google Scholar.

page 169 note 2 Tsountas, , Εϕημερὶς Αρχαιολογική, 1891, pl. III, No. 6Google Scholar.

page 169 note 3 Layard, Mon. of Nineveh, pls. 7a, 17, 19, &c.

page 169 note 4 Layard, loc. cit., pl. 96, No. 10.

page 169 note 5 Evans, Shaft Graves, fig. 23.

page 169 note 6 Cf. Wace, , Archaeologia, LXXXII, pl. VII, No. 49, from Tomb 518 at MycenaeGoogle Scholar.

page 169 note 7 Xanthoudides, , Εϕημερὶς Αρχαιολογική, 1906 Google Scholar.

page 169 note 8 Halbherr, , Monumenti Antichi dell' Accademia dei Lincei, XIX Google Scholar, and Evans, , Palace of Minos, I. 195 and fig. 142 c Google Scholar.

page 169 note 5 Daressy, , Annales du Service, VII, pl. VIIGoogle Scholar, and Archaeologia, LIII, pl. IV, No. 2.