Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:04:05.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tuwati and Wasusarma: Imitating the behaviour of Assyria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Mark Weeden*
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, Thornhaugh Street, London WC1H 0XG, [email protected]

Abstract

This essay reviews the evidence concerning the Tabalian king Wasusarma and his father Tuwati, who appear in Neo-Assyrian and Urartian annals. The context for the removal of Wasusarma (Uassurme) from power by the Assyrian king is assumed to have lain in the events depicted in the large inscription of TOPADA. The historical and geographical import of this inscription is explored through a close reading of its historical portion, concluding that its background is set in a local struggle for power over north-western Cappadocia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akdoğan, R. and Hawkins, J. D. 2009: Kirşehir-Yassihöyük'ten ele geçen luvi hiyeroglif yazılı kurşun levha, Anadolu Mediniyetleri Müzesi'nin Yıllığı 2008–2009, Ankara, 714.Google Scholar
Aro, S. 1998: Tabal. Zur Geschichte und materiellen Kultur des zentralanatolischen Hochplateaus von 1200 bis 600 v. Chr., PhD Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Arutiunian, N. V. 2002: Korpus urartskikh klinoobraznykh nadpisei, Erevan.Google Scholar
Barjamovic, G. 2010: Travelling in Turkey. Sites, routes and historical geography in Central Anatolia, in Singer, I. (ed.), ipamati kistamati pari tumatimis. Luwian and Hittite Studies Presented to J. David Hawkins on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday. Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M. 1967. Havuzköy in Ostkappadokien, Archäologischer Anzeiger 82: 132–41.Google Scholar
Dinçol, A. and Dinçol, B. 2008: Die Prinzen-und Beamtenseiegel aus der Oberstadt von Boğazköy-Ḫattuša vom 16. Jahrhundert bis zum Ende der Grossreichszeit, Boğazköy-Ḫattuša, Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen 22, Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar
Draycott, C. M. and Summers, G. D. 2008: Sculpture and Inscriptions from the Monumental Entrance to the Palatial Complex at Kerkenes Dağ, Turkey, Kerkenes Special Studies 1, OIP Publications 135, Chicago.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. 1997: Einleitung in die Sanherib-Inschriften, AfO Beiheft 26, Vienna.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. 1993: Die Inschriften Sargons II. aus Khorsabad, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Genz, H. 2004: Büyükkaya I. Die Keramik der Eisenzeit, Boğazköy-Hattuša 21, Mainz.Google Scholar
Genz, H. 2009: Thoughts on the use of seals in Iron Age Central Anatolia, in Sağlamtiur, H. et al. (eds.), Studies in Honour of Altan Çilingiroğlu. A Life Dedicated to Urartu. On the Shores of the Upper Sea, Istanbul, 309–17.Google Scholar
Giusfredi, F. 2009: The problem of the Luwian title tarwanis , Altorientalische Forschungen 36/1, 140–5.Google Scholar
Goedegebuure, P. 2007: The Hieroglyphic Luwian demonstrative ablative-instrumentals zin and apin , in Acts of the VIth International Congress of Hittitology, SMEA 49, Rome.Google Scholar
Gonnet, H. 1984: Nouvelles données archéologiques relatives aux inscriptions hiéroglyphiques de Hartapusa à Kızıldağ, in Studia Naster, Louvain-la-Neuve, 119–25.Google Scholar
Grayson, A. K. 1996: Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC, 2 (858–745 BC), Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Assyrian Periods 3, Toronto.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 19721975: Ḫatti, in Reallexikon der Assyriologie 4: 152–9.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 1979: Some historical problems of the Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions, Anatolian Studies 29, 153–67.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 1992: The Inscriptions of the Kızıldağ and the Karadağ in the light of the Yalburt Inscription, in Otten, H., Akurgal, E. and Ertem, E. (eds.), Hittite and Other Anatolian and Near Eastern Studies in Honour of Sedat Alp, Ankara, 259–75.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 1995a: The political geography of north Syria and south-east Anatolia in the Neo-Assyrian period, in Liverani, M. (ed.), Neo-Assyrian Geography, Rome, 87101.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 1995b: “Great Kings” and “Country Lords” at Malatya and Karkamiš, in van den Hout, T. (ed.), Studio Historiae Ardens. Ancient Near Eastern Studies Presented to Philo H. J. Houwink ten Cate on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, PIHANS 74, 7386.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 1995c: The Hieroglyphic Inscription of the Sacred Pool Complex at Hattusa (SÜDBURG), with an Archaeological Introduction by Peter Neve, StBoT Beiheft 3, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 2000: Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions I.13, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 2003: Scripts and texts, in Melchert, H. C., The Luwians, HdO 1/68, 128–69.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 2005: Commentary on the readings; Commentary on the sign-list, in Herbordt, S., Die Prinzen- und Beamtensiegel der hethitischen Grossreichszeit auf Tonbullen aus dem Nişantepe-Archiv in Hattusa, mit Kommentaren zu den Siegelinschriften und Hieroglyphen von J. David Hawkins, Boğazköy-Ḫattuša 19, Mainz, 248–313, 426–36.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 2006: Tudhaliya the hunter, in van den Hout, T. (ed.), The Life and Times of Ḫattusili III and Tudhaliya IV — Proceedings of a Symposium Held in Honour of J. De Roos, 12–13 December 2003, Leiden, 4976.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. and Morpurgo-Davies, A. 1979: The Hieroglyphic inscription of Bohça, in Carruba, O. (ed.), Studia Mediterranea Piero Meriggi Dicata, Pavia, 388405.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. and Postgate, J. N. 1988: Tribute from Tabal, State Archives of Assyria Bulletin 2/1, 3140.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. and Weeden, M. in press: The hieroglyphic rock inscription of Malkaya: A new look, Anatolian Archaeological Studies: Kaman-Kalehöyük 17.Google Scholar
Hutter-Braunsar, S. 2009: Begegnungen am oberen Euphrat: Urartäer und Luwier in Ostanatolien, in Tatishvili, I., Hvedelidze, M. and Gordeziani, L. (eds.), Caucasian and Near Eastern Studies 14, Giorgi Melikishvili Memorial Volume, Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Ikeda, J. 1984: Hittites and Aramaeans in the land of Bit-Adini, in Monarchies and Socio-Religious Traditions in the Ancient Near East, BMECCJ 1, 2735.Google Scholar
Jasink, A.-M. 1995: Gli stati neo-ittiti: analisi delle fonte scritte e sintesi storica, Pavia.Google Scholar
Jasink, A.-M. 1998: Tarwani-: A title for Neo-Hittite rulers, in Alp, S. and Süel, A. (eds.), III. Uluslararasi Hititoloji Kongresi Bildirileri, Çorum 16–22 Eylül 1996, Ankara, 341–57.Google Scholar
König, F. W. 1957: Handbuch der chaldischen Inschriften II, AfO Beiheft 8, Graz Google Scholar
Kloekhorst, A. 2008: Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon, Leiden.Google Scholar
Laessoe, J. 1959: A statue of Shalmaneser III from Nimrud, Iraq 21, 150–5.Google Scholar
Melchert, H. C. 2004: A Luwian dedication, in Penney, J. H. W. (ed.), Indo-European Perspectives. Studies in Honour of A. Morpurgo-Davies, Oxford, 370–9.Google Scholar
Müller-Karpe, A. 1998: Untersuchungen in Kuşaklı 1997, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 130, 93174.Google Scholar
Nakamura, M. 2002: Das hethitische nuntarriyašha-Fest, PIHANS 94, Leiden.Google Scholar
Omura, M. 2009: 2007 Yılı Yassıhöyük Yüzey Araştirmalan, in 26. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 26–30 Mayıs 2008 Ankara, Ankara 2737.Google Scholar
Omura, S. 1998: Preliminary report on the general survey in central Anatolia 1997 (Japanese language), Anatolian Archaeological Studies: Kaman-Kalehöyük 7, 85128.Google Scholar
Omura, S. 2001: Preliminary report on the general survey in central Anatolia (2000), Anatolian Archaeological Studies: Kaman-Kalehöyük 10, 3787.Google Scholar
Parpola, S. 1987: The Correspondence of Sargon II, State Archives of Assyria I, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Rieken, E. and Yakubovitch, I. 2010: The new values of the Luwian signs L. 319 and L. 172, in Singer, I. (ed.), ipamati kistamati pari tumatimis. Luwian and Hittite Studies Presented to J. David Hawkins on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday. Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
Saggs, H. W. F. 1958: The Nimrud letters, 1952 — Part IV, Iraq 20, 182212.Google Scholar
Salvini, M. 1972: Le testimonianze storiche urartee sulle regioni del medio Eufrate Melitene, Kommagene, Sophene, Tomisa, La Parola del Passato, Rivista di studi antichi CXLIICXLIV.Google Scholar
Salvini, M. 1979: Problemi di morfologia nominale in Urarteo, Annali dell'Istituto Orientale di Napoli 1, 97115.Google Scholar
Salvini, M. 2008/I: Corpus dei Testi Urartei I, Rome.Google Scholar
Salvini, M. 2008/III: Corpus dei Testi Urartei III, Rome.Google Scholar
Salvini, M. and André-Salvini, B. 1992: Gli annali di Argišti I, note e collazioni, Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 30, 923.Google Scholar
Şenyurt, Y. 1999: Nevşehir Ili 1997 Yılı Yüzey Araştırması, in XVI. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 25–29 Mayıs 1998 Tarsus I. Cilt, Ankara, 451–7.Google Scholar
Şenyurt, Y. forthcoming: Ovaören-Göstesin geç hitit/luwi hiyeroglif yaziti, to appear in a Festschrift for V. Donbaz.Google Scholar
Schirmer, W. 1998: Göllüdağ 1995–96, in 26. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 25–29 Mayıs 1998 Tarsus, 3. Cilt, 26–30 Mayıs Ankara, Ankara, 5163.Google Scholar
Starke, F. 1990: Untersuchungen zur Stammbildung des keilschriftluwischen Nomens, StBoT 31, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Summers, G. 1994: Grey Ware and the eastern limits of Phrygia, in Çilingiroğlu, A. and French, D. H. (eds.), Anatolian Iron Ages 3, BIAA Monograph 16, London, 241–52.Google Scholar
Tadmor, H. 1994: The Inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III, King of Assyria, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Wäfler, M. 1983: Zu Status und Lage von Tabal, Orientalia 52, 181–93.Google Scholar
Weeden, M. forthcoming: Studies in the Hittite School Tradition, StBoT, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Weippert, M. 1973: Menahem von Israel und seine Zeitgenossen in einer Stelinschrift des assyrischen Königs Tiglathpileser III. aus dem Iran, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Palästina-Vereins 89, 2653.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, G. 1976: Zur urartäischen Nominalflexion, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 66/1, 105–19.Google Scholar
Wiseman, D. J. 1956: A fragmentary inscription of Tiglath-Pileser III from Nimrud, Iraq 18, 117–29.Google Scholar
Wittke, A.-M. 2004: Mušker und Phryger: ein Beitrag zur Geschichte Anatoliens vom 12. bis zum 7. Jh. v. Chr., TAVO Beihefte 99, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Woudhuizen, F. C. 2007: Great King Wasusarma's victory memorial at Topada, Ancient West and East 6, 2341.Google Scholar
Yakubovich, I. 2005: Carian monument, in Kazanskii, N. N. (ed.), Hrda Manasa: Studies Presented to Leonard G. Herzenberg on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, St Petersburg, 240–51.Google Scholar
Yakubovich, I. 2008: Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language, PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Yakubovich, I. 2009: Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language, Brill's Studies in Indo-European Languages and Linguistics 2, Leiden.Google Scholar
Yiğit, T. 2000: Tabal (in Turkish), Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 40/3–4, 177–89.Google Scholar