Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:29:07.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE SYMBOLIC ROLE OF ANIMALS IN BABYLON: A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE LION, THE BULL AND THE MUŠḪUŠŠU*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Chikako E. Watanabe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the meaning of three animals—the lion, the bull, and the mušḫuššu-dragon—as depicted on the walls of the Ishtar Gate and Processional Way at Babylon. These animals embody multiple layers of meaning but are associated with specific deities and all possess apotropaic qualities. The animals served traditionally as guardian figures placed at the entrances to Mesopotamian temples and palaces. This study focuses on their apotropaic roles which are evoked by the specific architectural context in which the animals are placed. It is suggested that the images of these animals underscored the importance of both the Ishtar Gate and the Processional Way as a crucial route into the symbolic heart of the city.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 77 , December 2015 , pp. 215 - 224
Copyright
© The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 23310190 and 26283012 and JSPS Bilateral Joint Research Project (OP).

*

Dr Collon's scholarly achievement has contributed tremendously to our knowledge of Ancient Near Eastern seals. Without her painstaking work on seals in the British Museum, we would not have been able to access this abundant source of information. It is a great honour for me to dedicate this article to her in celebration of her academic career.

References

Amiet, P. 1966. Elam. Paris. Google Scholar
Andrae, W. 1913. Die Festungswerke von Assur. Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft in Assur, A. Baudenkmäler aus assyrischer Zeit; 2. Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichung 23. Leipzig.Google Scholar
André-Salvini, B. (ed.) 2008. Babylone. Catalogue de l'exposition « Babylone » Paris, musée du Louvre, 14 Mars–2 Juin 2008. Paris.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. 1996. The interpretation of figurines: the emergence of illusion and new ways of seeing. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6/2: 291–95.Google Scholar
Barnett, R.D. 1976. Sculptures from the North Palace of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh (668–627 b.c.). London. Google Scholar
Braun-Holzinger, E.A. 1991. Mesopotamische Weihgaben der frühdynastischen bis altbabylonischen Zeit. Heidelberger Orient Verlag. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Da Riva, R. 2012. The twin inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar at Brisa (Wadi esh-Sharbin, Lebanon). A historical and philological study. Archiv für Orientforschung Beiheft 32. Wien.Google Scholar
Edzard, D.O. 1997. Gudea and his dynasty. The royal inscriptions of Mesopotamia: Early Periods, vol. 3/1. Toronto.Google Scholar
Engel, B.J. 1987. Darstellungen von Dämonen und Tieren in assyrischen Palästen und Tempeln nach den schriftlichen Quellen. Mönchengladbach. Google Scholar
Finkel, I.L. and Seymour, M.J. (eds). 2008. Babylon: myth and reality. London.Google Scholar
Frankena, R. 1961. New materials for the Tākultu ritual: additions and corrections, Bibliotheca Orientalis 18: 199–207.Google Scholar
Frayne, D.R. 1990. Old Babylonian period (2003–1595 b.c.). The royal inscriptions of Mesopotamia: Early Periods, vol. 4. Toronto.Google Scholar
George, A.R. 1992. Babylonian topographical texts. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 40. Leuven Google Scholar
Hall, H.R. and Woolley, C.L. 1927. Ur excavations: Vol. 1, Al-'Ubaid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading in the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Koldewey, R. 1914. The excavations at Babylon, translated by Johns, A.S.. London.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1985. The history of muš-ḫuš in ancient Mesopotamia. Pp. 87–94 in Borgeaud, P. (ed.), L'animal, l'homme, le dieu dans le Proche-Orient ancient. Les cahiers du CEPOA 2. Leuven.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. 1996. The importance of context in interpreting figurines, in Can we interpret figurines? Cambridge Archaeological Journal 6/2: 285–91.Google Scholar
Marzahn, J. and Schauerte, G. (eds). 2008. Babylon: Wahrheit. Katalogband: Wahrheit. München.Google Scholar
Oates, J. 1979. Babylon. revised edition. London.Google Scholar
Ornan, T. 2005. The triumph of the symbol: pictorial representation of deities in Mesopotamia and the Biblical image ban. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 213. Fribourg & Göttingen.Google Scholar
Parrot, A. 1948. Tello: vingt campagnes de fouilles (1877–1933). Paris. Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 1994 Text and figure in ancient Mesopotamia: match and mismatch. Pp. 176–84 in Renfrew, C. and Zubrow, E.B.W. (eds), The ancient mind. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Safar, F., Mustafa, M.A. and Lloyd, S. 1981. Eridu. Baghdad. Google Scholar
Seidl, U. 1989. Die babylonischen kudurru-Reliefs: Symbole mesopotamischer Gottheiten. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 87. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Simmons, S. D. 1959. Early Old Babylonian tablets from Ḥarmal and elsewhere. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 13: 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg, Å.W. and Bergmann, E. 1969. The Collection of the Sumerian Temple Hymns by Åke W. Sjöberg and E. Bergmann; and the Keš temple hymn, by Gene B. Gragg, Texts from Cuneiform Sources vol. 3. Locust Valley, New York.Google Scholar
Streck, M. 1916. Assurbanipal und die letzten assyrischen Könige bis zum Untergange Nineveh's. VAB 7. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.C. 1927–28. The prisms of Esarhaddon and of Ashurbanipal found at Nineveh. London.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F., Barrois, A., Dossin, G., and Dunand, M. 1931. Arslan-Tash. Paris. Google Scholar
Unger, E. 1931. Babylon: die heilige Stadt nach der Beschreibung der Babylonier. Berlin. Google Scholar
Watanabe, C.E. 2002. Animal symbolism in Mesopotamia: a contextual approach. Wiener Offene Orientalistik Bd 1. Vienna.Google Scholar
Wiggermann, F.A.M. 1989. Tišpak, his seal and the dragon mušḫuššu. Pp. 117–33 in Haex, O.M.C., Curvers, H.H. and Akkermans, P.M.M.G. (eds), To the Euphrates and beyond: archaeological studies in honour of Maurits N. van Loon. Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Wiggermann, F.A.M. 1992. Mesopotamian protective spirits: the ritual texts. Cuneiform Monographs 1. Groningen.Google Scholar
Wiseman, D.J. 1985. Nebuchadrezzar and Babylon. Oxford. Google Scholar