Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:12:40.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Painted Pottery of the Second Millennium from Southern Turkey and Northern Syria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

M. V. Seton Williams
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

So many different types of painted pottery have been found in the Near East and left unrelated that it seems important to recognise the constituent members of a single family where possible. Here an attempt will be made to identify a distinctive group of pottery which was made more or less contemporaneously in various parts of Turkey and North Syria between c. 1900 and c. 1550 B.C. This fabric is sufficiently similar in form, design and colour to enable us to say that it was technically interrelated, and that it was the manifestation of a fashion and mode of pottery comparatively restricted both in time and space. The makers therefore must have been in the grip of a dominant fashion; their wares were familiar, easily marketable, and doubtless often manufactured at the centres at which they have been found. But their common characteristics must lead to the conclusion, in keeping with the historical evidence, that the pot designers of Cilicia, the ‘Amq and North Syria were in fairly close touch with one another. There is no doubt that the pottery with which we are dealing has close connections with the Ḫabur ware, particuarly the large vessels, but in Cilicia, and to a lesser extent in the ‘Amq, there was a greater variety of forms and finer workmanship than the Ḫabur ware usually portrays.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , Spring 1953 , pp. 56 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 57 note 1 A.A.A., XXIV, 136 et seqGoogle Scholar.

page 57 note 2 In the Mersin Museum; A.J.A., XLIV, 63, Fig. 4Google Scholar; ibid., XLII, Figs. 5, 8 and 9.

page 57 note 3 Rev. Arch. Series VI; III; 17, 5.

page 57 note 4 A.J.A., XLIX, 5 ff., 23Google Scholar.

page 58 note 1 Kürkçülar, Boz, Alapunar, Yenice and Sirkeli are marked on the accompanying map, the sites of Misis, Kabarsa, Domuz Tepe, Hacilar, Dikili, and Zeytinli are situated in the same area but could not be shown owing to lack of space. I am indebted to Mr. Stewart, for drawing this map, and for redrawing much of the pottery to a uniform scale, and to Mr. Michael Ricketts for the rest of the drawings.

page 58 note 2 A.A.A, XXVI, Pl. LXXI, 152.

page 58 note 3 I am indebted to Professor Garstang for permission to reproduce the material from Mersin, and to Miss Goldman for permission to examine and use the material from her sondages in the Cilician plain.

page 58 note 4 A.A.A., XXVI, Pls. LXVI–LXVIII and LXXXI.

page 58 note 6 A.J.A., XLII, Fig. 9: Speiser, E. A., The Chalice Ware of Northern Mesopotamia and its historical significance, B.A.S.O.R. 48, 5, Fig. 1Google Scholar.

page 59 note 1 A.A.A., XXV, Pls. XI: 8, 13, 14, 16, 17, 25–27; XIII.

page 59 note 2 Özgüç, T. and Özgüç, N., Karahöyük Hafriyati Raporu, 1947, Türk. Tarih Yayinlarindan V seri, No. 7, 1949Google Scholar.

page 59 note 3 J.N.E.S., I, 282–285, 305Google Scholar.

page 59 note 4 According to Dr. Özgüç, level II is c. 1800 and level III c. 1850. Anatolian Studies, I, 59Google Scholar; I.L.N., 10 6, 1951, 544Google Scholar.

page 59 note 5 Ibid., 547, ending between 1778 and 1808 according to the excavator.

page 59 note 6 The difficulty of cc relating the different levels at Kültepe is increased by the fact that the areas dug are widely spaced and that there are no sections.

page 59 note 7 I.L.N., Jan. 14, 1950, Fig. 19; ibid., Oct. 6, 1951, 546: 1, 3, and 4.

page 60 note 1 I.L.N., Dec. 18, 948, Fig. 12.

page 60 note 2 Dr.Özgüç, Tahsin, Tarafindan, T. T. K., Yapilan Kültepe Kaziri Raporu 1948, lev. LXXVII: 589 and lev. XXXVIII; 599Google Scholar.

page 60 note 3 Ibid., lev. LXXIX: 412–17, and material in the Ankara and Kayseri Museums.

page 60 note 4 Kültepe Raporu, 198–99.

page 60 note 5 Von der Osten, H. H., The Alishar Hüyük, Seasons 1930–1932, Pt. I, O.I.P., XXVIII, 208Google Scholar.

page 60 note 6 Von der Osten, H. H., Buntkeramit im Anatolien, Orientalia Suecana 1, fasc 1–2, 15—30Google Scholar.

page 60 note 7 T. Burton Brown, Excavations in Azerbaijan, Period D, 86; and from sherds in the Ashmolean Museum, Dr. Özgüç, examined this material and considered it to be similar to that from Kültepe.

page 60 note 8 SirWoolley, Leonard, Excavations at Atchana-Alalakh, A.J., XVIII, Pl. XVII: 3, 29–30Google Scholar.

page 60 note 9 I.L.N. 10 25, 1947, 470, Figs. 10, 12 and 14Google Scholar.

page 61 note 1 In the Antakaya Museum, Nos. 7874, and 9861. Woolley considers them in situ in V.

page 61 note 2 Ibid. bowls 9808, 9860 and 9790, and goblet 9890.

page 61 note 3 Braidwood, R. J., Mounds in the Plain of Antioch, 6Google Scholar.

page 61 note 4 du Buisson, Le Comte de Mesnil, Compte Rendu de la Quatrieme Campagne de Fouilles à Mishrife-Qatna, Syria, 11, Pl. XXIGoogle Scholar.

page 61 note 5 Iraq, IX, pt. 1, 25, note 1.

page 61 note 6 Ibid, 23.

page 61 note 7 Iraq, IV, pt. 2, Fig. 23: 1.

page 64 note 1 Starr, F., Nuzi, Vol. I, 389–90Google Scholar; Vol. II, Pl. 70: B, dated to the transitional period before the Nuzi pottery came in.

page 64 note 2 Speiser, E. A., The pottery of Tell Billa, Mus. Jour., XXIII: 3, Pl. LXX, 270, 284Google Scholar.

page 64 note 3 T. T. K. Belleten, XV, 58, Fig. 1: 18Google Scholar.

page 64 note 4 Cl. Schaeffer, Ugarit II, Figs. 100: 30; 108: 22.

page 64 note 5 P.E.Q., 1942, 27Google Scholar.

page 64 note 6 Journal of Hellenic Studies, LXX, 10, 15Google Scholar.

page 64 note 7 Sir Aurel Stein, Old Routes of Western Iran, Pl. XXV: 33.

page 64 note 8 Iraq, IV, pt. 2, 102–4.

page 64 note 9 G. Contenau and R. Ghirshman, Fouilles de Tepe Giyan, Pl. XI: 3.

page 65 note 1 Iraq, IX, pt. 1, 25, and n.1. for a discussion of examples prior to 2000 B.C.

page 65 note 2 Ibid., 78.

page 65 note 3 Ibid., 25, note 1.

page 65 note 4 From information kindly supplied by Sir Leonard Woolley.

page 65 note 5 The dating on which this paper is based is that of Professor Sidney Smith.