Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:09:39.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FRAGMENTS OF THE THIRD MILLENNIUM BC FROM NIGIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2021

Davide Nadali  and
Lorenzo Verderame
Davide Nadali
Affiliation:
Sapienza Università di Roma Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Antichità Ex Vetrerie Sciarra Studio 121 Via dei Volsci, 122 [email protected]
Lorenzo Verderame
Affiliation:
Sapienza Università di Roma Istituto Italiano di Studi Orientali Circonvallazione Tiburtina, 4 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ancient city of Nigin in the State of Lagash is largely attested in the epigraphic sources of the rulers of the First Dynasty of Lagash. Conversely, the archaeological evidence of the Early Dynastic Period is so far very scanty and limited. This paper presents a small group of documents to be dated to the Early Dynastic Period IIIb that were found out of context, but that nevertheless point to a phase of occupation of Nigin in the third millennium BC and are coherent with the information we already know about history of the city and the State of Lagash.

تشهد المصادر الكتابية لحكام السلالة الأولى لولاية لكش على وجود مدينة نيجين القديمة في الولاية . بعكس من ذلك، نجد الأدلة الأثرية لعصر السلالات المبكرة هزيلة ومحدودة للغاية حتى الآن . تقدم هذه الدراسة مجموعة صغيرة من الوثائق التي يرجع تاريخها إلى فترة السلالات المبكرة IIIb والتي تم العثور عليها خارج سياقها، ولكنها على أية حال تشير الى مرحلة من استيطان نيجين في الألف الثالث قبل الميلاد وتتناسق هذه مع المعلومات التي لدينا عن تاريخ المدينة وولاية لجش .

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 83 , December 2021 , pp. 105 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Davide Nadali is author of the introduction and the section on the visual evidence; Lorenzo Verderame is author of the section on the analysis of written documents; both jointly wrote the conclusion.

References

Amiet, P. 1980. La glyptique mésopotamienne archaïque. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Asher-Greve, J. 2006. “‘Golden of Age’ of Women? Status and Gender in Third Millennium Sumerian and Akkadian Art.” In Schroer, S., ed., Images and Gender. Contributions to the Hermeneutics of Reading Ancient Art. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 220. Fribourg and Göttingen: Academic Press and Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Pp. 42–81.Google Scholar
Bauer, J. 1972. Altsumerische Wirtschaftstexte aus Lagasch. Studia Pohl 9. Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, R. D. 1976. “Enannatum I of Lagash and Ur-Lumma of Umma – A New Text.” In Eichler, B. L., Heimerdinger, J. W. and Sjöberg, Å. W., eds., Kramer Anniversary Volume. Cuneiform Studies in Honor of Samuel Noah Kramer. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 25. Kevelaer/Neukirchen-Vluyn: Butzon & Bercker/Neukirchener Verlag. Pp. 33–40.Google Scholar
Boese, J. 1971. Altmesopotamische Weihplatten. Eine sumerische Denkmalsgattung des 3. Jahrtausends v. Chr. Untersuchungen zur Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 6. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun-Holzinger, E. 2007. Das Herrscherbild in Mesopotamien und Elam. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 342. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. S. 1986. Sumerian and Akkadian Royal Inscriptions, I: Pre-Sargonic Inscriptions. New Haven (CT): American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Edzard, D. O. 2000. “NINA.” Reallexikon der Assyriologie 9: 322–324.Google Scholar
Evans, J. M. 2012. The Lives of Sumerian Sculpture. An Archaeology of the Early Dynastic Temple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, A. 1966. Die Inschriften Gudeas von Lagaš, I. Einleitung. Analecta Orientalia 30/I. Roma: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
Fiandra, E. et al. 2000. “Elementi per la chiusura delle porte nel Vicino Oriente Antico e in Egitto.” In Graziani, S., ed., Studi sul Vicino Oriente Antico dedicati alla memoria di Luigi Cagni, Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale. Pp. 283–307.Google Scholar
Frayne, D. R. 2008. Presargonic Period (2700–2350 BC). Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Early Periods 1. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, D. P. 1963. “New Votive Plaques from Nippur.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 23/3: 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, D. P. 1975. “Frühsumerische und frühdynastische Flachbildkunst.” In Orthmann, W., ed., Der Alte Orient. Propyläen Kunstgeschichte 14. Berlin: Propyläen Verlag. Pp. 179–193.Google Scholar
Heimpel, R. 1998. “Nanše. A. Philologisch.” Reallexikon der Assyriologie 9: 152–160.Google Scholar
Huber Vuillet, F. 2009–11. “Sirara. II.” Reallexikon der Assyriologie 12: 552–553.Google Scholar
Huh, S. K. 2008. Studien zur Region Lagaš. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 345. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Iselin, C. 2006. “Les plaques perforées au Proche-Orient: fonction et datation.” Orient-Express 2: 44–50.Google Scholar
Khwshnaw, A., and Zólyomi, G.. 2020. “An abbreviated version of En-metena 1 from the Sulaymaniyah Museum.” Hungarian Assyriological Review 1: 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koldewey, R. 1887. “Die altbabylonischen Gräber in Surghul und El Hibba.” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 2: 403–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1995. “Review of R. A. Di Vito, Robert A., Studies in Third Millennium Sumerian and Akkadian Personal Names: The Designation and Conception of the Personal God.” Orientalia 64: 131–136.Google Scholar
Marchesi, G., and Marchetti, N.. 2011. Royal Statuary of Early Dynastic Mesopotamia. Mesopotamian Civilizations 14. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Moortgat, A. 1940. Vorderasiatische Rollsiegel. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Steinschneidekunst. Berlin: Verlag Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Nadali, D. and Polcaro, A. (eds.) 2020. The Italian Archaeological Excavations at Tell Zurghul, Ancient Nigin, Iraq. Final Report of the Seasons 2015–2017. Quaderni di Vicino Oriente XVI. Roma: Sapienza Università di Roma.Google Scholar
Nadali, D. and Polcaro, A. 2020. “Italian Archaeological Expedition to Nigin, Southern Iraq: New Results from Recent Excavations.” In Otto, A. et al. , eds., Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East 03–07 April 2018, Munich. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Pp. 277–292.Google Scholar
Pizzimenti, S. 2020. “From the 3rd to the 2nd Millennium BC: An Assessment on Area A Pottery Assemblage from Trench 1.” In Nadali, D. and Polcaro, A., eds., The Italian Archaeological Excavations at Tell Zurghul, Ancient Nigin, Iraq. Final Report of the Seasons 2015–2017. Quaderni di Vicino Oriente XVI. Roma: Sapienza Università di Roma. Pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Polcaro, A. 2020. “The Excavations in Area A: The Discovery of a Multifunctional Building of the 4th-3rd Millennium BC.” In Nadali, D. and Polcaro, A., eds., The Italian Archaeological Excavations at Tell Zurghul, Ancient Nigin, Iraq. Final Report of the Seasons 2015–2017. Quaderni di Vicino Oriente XVI. Roma: Sapienza Università di Roma. Pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
Pollock, S. 2003. “Feasts, Funerals, and Fast Food in Early Mesopotamian States.” In Bray, T. L., ed., The Archaeology and Politics of Food and Feasting in Early States and Empires. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. Pp. 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renette, S. 2014. “Feasts on Many Occasions: Diversity in Mesopotamian Banquet Scenes during the Early Dynastic Period.” In Altmann, P. and Fu, J., eds., Feasting in the Archaeology and Texts of the Bible and the Ancient Near East. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. Pp. 61–86.Google Scholar
Romano, L. 2015. “Holding the Cup: Evolution of Symposium and Banquet Scenes in the Early Dynastic Period.” In Dittmann, R. and Selz, G. J., eds., It's a Long Way to a Historiography of the Early Dynastic Period(s). Altertumskunde des Vorderen Orients 15. Münster” Ugarit-Verlag. Pp. 289–302.Google Scholar
Sallaberger, W. and Schrakamp, I. 2015. “The Presargonic Period.” In Sallaberger, W. and Schrakamp, I., eds., History & Philology. ARCANE III. Turnhout: Brepols. Pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
Selz, G. 1983. Die Bankettszene. Entwicklung eines „überzeitlichen“ Bildmotivs in Mesopotamien von der frühdynastischen bis zur Akkad-Zeit. Freiburger Altorientalische Studien 11. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Selz, G. 1995. Untersuchungen zur Götterwelt des altsumerischen Stadstaates von Lagaš. Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund XV. Philadelphia: The Samuel Noah Kramer Fund.Google Scholar
Steible, H. 1982a. Die altsumerischen Bau- und Weihinschriften, I. Freiburger Altorientalische Studien 5/1. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Steible, H. 1982b. Die altsumerischen Bau- und Weihinschriften, II. Freiburger Altorientalische Studien 5/2. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Suter, C. E. 2008. “Who are the Women in Mesopotamian Art from ca. 2334-1763 BCE?” Kaskal 5: 1–55.Google Scholar
Suter, C. E. 2018. “Feasting and Elite Women in Early Mesopotamia: A Contribution from the Visual Record.” Kaskal 15: 139–154.Google Scholar
Szarzyńska, K. 1992. “Names of Temples in the Archaic Texts from Uruk.” Acta Sumerologica 14: 269–285.Google Scholar
Verderame, L. 2020. “Inscribed objects from Zurghul, ancient Nina/Niĝin.” In Nadali, D. and Polcaro, A., eds., The Italian Archaeological Excavations at Tell Zurghul, Ancient Nigin, Iraq. Final Report of the Seasons 2015–2017. Quaderni di Vicino Oriente XVI. Roma: Sapienza Università di Roma. Pp. 219–236.Google Scholar
Wiseman, D. J. 1962. Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum. Cylinder Seals I: Uruk – Early Dynastic Periods. London: The Trustees of the British Museum.Google Scholar