Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:50:06.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EARLY BABYLONIAN TABLETS IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM'S KUYUNJIK COLLECTION 2: A NEW MANUSCRIPT OF THE COMPOSITION “LETTER FROM SÎN-ŠAMUḪ TO THE GOD ENKI”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2022

Zsombor J. Földi  and
Gábor Zólyomi
Zsombor J. Földi
Affiliation:
Historisches Seminar, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, [email protected]
Gábor Zólyomi
Affiliation:
Dept. of Assyriology and Hebrew Studies, L. Eötvös University Budapest, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This short paper publishes a new manuscript of the literary composition “Letter from Sîn-šamuḫ to the god Enki” (ETCSL 3.3.19). K.8755 is one of the tablets which proved to be Old Babylonian in spite of their assignment to the British Museum's Kuyunjik Collection. It preserves parts of ll. 8–15 of the composition and probably belonged to a multiple columns tablet. The present paper offers a score transliteration of the lines concerned, based both on the recently published copies and the online photos of the other mss. It provides a number of new readings and interpretations on individual lines.

الملخص

الملخص

تنشر هذه الورقة القصيرة مخطوطة جديدة للتأليف الأدبي "رسالة من سين شامو Sîn-šamuḫ إلى الإله إنكي" (ETCSL 3.3.19). K.8755 وهو أحد الرقم التي ثبت أنها بابلية قديمة على الرغم من تخصيصها لمجموعة كيونجيك Kuyunjik بالمتحف البريطاني. وهي تحافظ على أجزاء من ll - 8-15 من التأليف وربما ينتمي إلى رقم به أعمدة متعددة. تقدم الورقة الحالية ترجمة نطقية بالأحرف اللاتينية تظهر تحت النصوص المسمارية المعنية ، تستند بذلك الى كل من النسخ المنشورة مؤخرًا والصورعبرالإنترنت الخاصة بـالمخطوطات الأخرى. فهي بذلك توفر عددًا من القراءات والتفسيرات الجديدة على الأسطر الفردية.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 84 , December 2022 , pp. 95 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attinger, P. 1993. Eléments de linguistique sumérienne. La construction de du11/e/di ‘dire’. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis Sonderband. Fribourg, Suisse – Göttingen: Editions Universitaires – Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Attinger, P. 2005. “A propos de ak ‘faire’ (II)”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 95: 208–275.Google Scholar
Attinger, P. 2019. “[Review of Hallo 2018]”. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 71: 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezold, C. 1893. Catalogue of the Cuneiform Tablets in the Kouyunjik Collection of the British Museum, Vol. III. London: [British Museum].Google Scholar
Black, J. and Zólyomi, G. 2007. “Introduction to the study of Sumerian” in Ebeling, J. and Cunningham, G., eds., Analyzing Literary Sumerian. Corpus based Approaches. London – Oakwill: Equinox Publishing, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Böck, B. 1996. “‘Wenn du zu Nintinuga gesprochen hast, …’ Untersuchungen zu Aufbau, Inhalt, Sitz-im-Leben und Funktion sumerischer Gottesbriefe”. Altorientalische Forschungen 23: 3–23.Google Scholar
Böck, B. 2013. “Briefgebet von Sin-šamuḫ an Enki” in Janowski, B. and Schwemer, D., eds., Hymnen, Klagelieder und Gebete. Texte aus der Umwelt des Alten Testament, Neue Folge 7. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, pp. 40–42.Google Scholar
Brisch, N. M. 2007. Tradition and the Poetics of Innovation. Sumerian Court Literature of the Larsa Dynasty (c. 2003–1763 BCE). Alter Orient und Altes Testament 339. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cavigneaux, A. 1999. “A Scholar's Library in Meturan? With an edition of the tablet H 72 (Textes de Tell Haddad VII)” in Abusch, T. and van der Toorn, K., eds., Mesopotamian Magic. Textual, Historical, and Interpretative Perspectives. Ancient Magic and Divination 1. Groningen: STYX, pp. 251–273.Google Scholar
Charpin, D. 2020. “Les découvertes épigraphiques de Taylor à Ur en 1854 : Nouvelle approche” in Charpin, D., Béranger, M., Fiette, B. and Jacquet, A., Nouvelles recherches sur les archives d'Ur d’époque paléo-babylonienne. Archibab 4 = Mémoires de N.A.B.U. 22. Paris: SÉPOA, pp. 13–42.Google Scholar
Dyckhoff, C. B. 1999. Das Haushaltsbuch des Balamunamhe. Band 1: Darstellung. Band 2: Belegmaterial. München: W. Reh.Google Scholar
Espak, P. 2007. “Su'en-šamuh'i kiri jumal Enkile: Monoteistlikke algeid sumeri religioonis”. Eesti Akadeemilise Orientaalseltsi aastaraamat 2: 66–75.Google Scholar
Flückiger-Hawker, E. 1999. Urnamma of Ur in Sumerian Literary Tradition. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 166. Fribourg, Suisse – Göttingen: University Press – Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Földi, Zs. J. 2020. “Early Babylonian tablets in the British Museum's Kuyunjik Collection 1: A fragment of an administrative document from Ur III Girsu?”. Hungarian Assyriological Review 1: 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, B. R. 2013. “Albert T. Clay and His Babylonian Collection” in Collins, B. J. and Michalowski, P., eds., Beyond Hatti. A Tribute to Gary Beckman. Atlanta: Longwood Press, pp. 121–135.Google Scholar
Gadotti, A. 2014. ‘Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld’ and the Sumerian Gilgamesh Cycle. Untersuchungen zur Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 10. Boston – Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallo, W. W. 1968. “Individual Prayer in Sumerian: The Continuity of a Tradition”. Journal of the American Oriental Society 88: 71–89 [reprinted in Hallo 2010: 255–285].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallo, W. W. 1995. “Lamentations and Prayers in Sumer and Akkad” in Sasson, J. M., ed., Civilizations of the Ancient Near East, Vol. III. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, pp. 1871–1881 [reprinted in Hallo 2010: 299–317].Google Scholar
Hallo, W. W. 2010. The World's Oldest Literature. Studies in Sumerian Belles-Lettres. Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 35. Leiden – Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallo, W. W. 2018 †. Sumerian Literary and Historical Inscriptions (with the assistance of H. T. Vedeler). Yale Oriental Series, Babylonian Texts 22. New Haven – London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinerman, A. 2011. Education in Early 2nd Millennium BC Babylonia. The Sumerian Epistolary Miscellany. Cuneiform Monographs 42. Leiden – Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, S. N. and Maier, J. 1989. Myths of Enki, the Crafty God. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krecher, J. 1986. “The Present Possibilities and Limitations of Our Understanding and Translating Sumerian Texts”. Sumer 42: 44–47.Google Scholar
Lämmerhirt, K. 2010. Wahrheit und Trug. Untersuchungen zur altorientalischen Begriffsgeschichte. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 348. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Leichty, E. V., Finkel, I. L. and Walker, Ch. B. F.. 2019. Catalogue of the Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum, Volumes IV–V. Dubsar 10. Münster: Zaphon.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. 2011. The Correspondence of the Kings of Ur. An Epistolary History of an Ancient Mesopotamian Kingdom. Mesopotamian Civilizations 15. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. 2013. “From the Collections of an Old Babylonian Literary Connoisseur”. Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale 107: 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinger Foster, K. 2020. A Mesopotamian Miscellany [translations by B. R. Foster]. Gorgias Studies in the Ancient Near East 15. Piscataway: Gorgias Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, J. E. 2005. “The Ishtar Temple at Nineveh”. Iraq 67: 347–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutz, M. T. 2013. Bodies of Knowledge in Ancient Mesopotamia. The Diviners of Late Bronze Age Emar and Their Tablet Collection. Ancient Magic and Divination 9. Leiden – Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takai, K. 2009 Old Babylonian Letters of Petition and Later Individual Lament Prayers. Unpublished PhD dissertation (Yale University).Google Scholar
Zólyomi, G. 2000. “Structural Interference from Akkadian in Old Babylonian Sumerian”. Acta Sumerologica 22: 335–360.Google Scholar
Zólyomi, G. 2014. “The Competition Between the Enclitics –/ʾa/ and –/e/ in Sumerian” in Neumann, H., Dittmann, R., Paulus, S., Neumann, G. and Schuster-Brandis, A., eds., Krieg und Frieden im Alten Vorderasien. 52e Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale / International Congress of Assyriology and Near Eastern Archaeology, Münster, 17.–21. Juli 2006. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 401, pp. 909–919.Google Scholar