Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:54:18.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doubts about the two-lobed burial and the survival of Early Dynastic to Akkadian transitional building levels in Area WF at Nippur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.”

J. K. Galbraith

“The complex sequence of burials, labelled Burial 14, involved inhumation of more than seven individuals. Initially, during excavation, the entire sequence was thought to comprise a single, multichambered tomb. But reconsideration of the stratigraphy and grave contents made it apparent that there were three separate burial phases.” With this honest admission McGuire Gibson and Augusta McMahon started their description of this strange burial complex. Their interpretation of the excavation led them to propose that one of the burial phases consisted of a two-lobed chamber containing the remains of three individuals (called Skeletons 2, 3, and 4). In this article I will suggest that this burial phase should be subdivided into at least two phases, an “Early Dynastic (ED)” burial containing Skeleton 3 and a “Late Akkadian” burial containing Skeleton 2. The dating of Skeleton 4 is uncertain but most probably it should also date to the Akkadian period.

There are three reasons for suggesting this: first, the finds associated with Skeleton 2 appear to be considerably later than those associated with Skeleton 3; second, the two-lobed shape of the burial can be more easily explained as the result of several graves dug into each other than as the result of a single burial; and third, burials of three individuals in one grave at the same time are very uncommon in southern Mesopotamia in the second half of the third millennium BC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahrani, Zainab. 1989. The Administrative Building at Tell al Hiba, Lagash (University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor)Google Scholar
Delougaz, Pinhaz. 1952. The Pottery of the Diyala Region (Oriental Institute Publication 63, Chicago)Google Scholar
Delougaz, P., Hill, Harold D., and Lloyd, Seton. 1967. Private Houses and Graves in the Diyala Region (Oriental Institute Publication 88, Chicago)Google Scholar
Gibson, McGuire and McMahon, Augusta. 1995. “Investigation of the Early Dynastic-Akkadian transition: Report of the 18th and 19th seasons of excavation in Area WF, Nippur”, Iraq 57 (1995): 139; abbreviated as Transition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, McGuire and McMahon, Augusta. 1997. “The Early Dynastic-Akkadian transition Part II: The authors' response”, Iraq 59: 914Google Scholar
Green, A. (ed.). 1993. Abu Salabikh Excavations 4. The 6G Ash-Tip and its Contents: Cultic and Administrative Discard from the Temple? (British School of Archaeology in Iraq, London)Google Scholar
Gut, Renata. 1995. Das prähistorische Ninive: zur relativen Chronologie der frühen Perioden Nordmesopotamiens (Baghdader Forschungen 19, Mainz am Rhein)Google Scholar
Hrouda, B., and Karstens, K. 1965. “Zur inneren Chronologie des Friedhofes ‘A’ in Ingharra/Chursagkalamma bei Kiš”, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 58: 256–67Google Scholar
Luby, E. J. 1987. “Part II. Grave 185”, in Matthews, R. J. and Postgate, J. N., “Excavations at Abu Salabikh, 1985–86”, Iraq 49: 104–5Google Scholar
Martin, H. P. 1982. “The Early Dynastic cemetery at al-‘Ubaid, a re-evaluation”, Iraq 44: 145–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, H., Moon, J., and Postgate, J. N. 1985. Abu Salabikh Excavations 2. Graves 1–99 (British School of Archaeology in Iraq, London)Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald. 1997. “The Early Dynastic-Akkadian transition Part I: When did the Akkadian period begin?”, Iraq 59: 17Google Scholar
Moon, Jane. 1981. “Some new Early Dynastic pottery from Abu Salabikh”, Iraq 43: 4775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Jane. 1982. “The distribution of upright-handled jars and stemmed dishes in the Early Dynastic period”, Iraq 44: 3969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Jane. 1985. “The pottery”, in Martin, , Moon, , and Postgate, 1985: 610Google Scholar
Moon, Jane. 1987. Abu Salabikh Excavations 3. Catalogue of Early Dynastic Pottery (British School of Archaeology in Iraq, London)Google Scholar
Moon, Jane. 1993. “Pottery”, in Green, (ed.) 1993: 145–57Google Scholar
Pollock, Susan. 1985. “Chronology of the Royal Cemetery of Ur”, Iraq 47: 129–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postgate, Carolyn, Oates, David, and Oates, Joan. 1997. The Excavations at Tell al Rimah: The Pottery (British School of Archaeology in Iraq)Google Scholar
Roaf, Michael, and Killick, Robert. 1987. “A mysterious affair of styles: The Ninevite 5 pottery of northern Mesopotamia”, Iraq 49: 199230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, E. 1978. “Dating the A cemetery at Kish, a reconsideration”, Journal of Field Archaeology 5: 7996Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L. 1934. Ur Excavations 2. The Royal Cemetery (London and Philadelphia)Google Scholar