Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:32:12.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Distribution of Upright-Handled Jars and Stemmed Dishes in the Early Dynastic Period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Jane Moon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a previous article we discussed the recently excavated upright-handled jars and stemmed dishes from Abu Salabikh (Moon 1981). In the following pages we attempt to follow the wide distribution of these two pottery types by presenting similar material from other Early Dynastic sites. Occurrence of both in association clusters about Northern Babylonia, so a good starting point is provided by Kish, where upright-handled jars and stemmed dishes were first commented upon.

As with so many sites dug in the earlier part of the century, available records leave much to be desired. “Ingharra was badly excavated, the excavations were badly recorded, and the records were correspondingly badly published” (Lloyd 1969, 48). However, the attention to detail afforded by Mackay's description of the upright-handled jars and stemmed dishes is admirable (Mackay 1925, 23–37; 1929, 130–156). And while the caution that is the privilege of hindsight must now be applied to some of the deductions, there is no need to reiterate pure description.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , Spring 1982 , pp. 39 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet, P., 1961. La Glyptique mésopotamienne archaïque, Paris.Google Scholar
Banks, E. J., 1912. Bismaya, or The Lost City of Adab, New York.Google Scholar
Biggs, R. D., 1967a. Inscriptions from Tell Abu Salabikh, Chicago.Google Scholar
Biggs, R. D., 1967b. Semitic names in the Fara period. Orientalia 36, 55–66.Google Scholar
Burrows, E. R., 1935. Ur Excavations Texts II, London/Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Delougaz, P., 1952. Pottery from the Diyala Region, Chicago.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A., 1936. Archaische Texte aus Uruk, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J., 1977. Thoughts about Ibla: a preliminary evaluation, March 1977. Syro-Mesopotamian Studies Vol I, issue 1.Google Scholar
Genouillac, H. de, 1934. Fouilles de Telloh Vol. I, Paris.Google Scholar
Gibson, M., 1972. The City and Area of Kish, Miami.Google Scholar
Hall, H. R., and Woolley, C. L., 1927. Ur Excavations I: al-‘Ubaid, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hansen, D. P., 1963. New votive plaques from Nippur. JNES 22, 145–166.Google Scholar
al-Hasani, S., 1955. (Note on Museyib Project) Sumer 11, 47.Google Scholar
Heinrich, E., 1931. Fara. Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft in Fara und Abu Hatab 1902/03.Google Scholar
Hrouda, B., 1973. Zusammenfassender Vorbericht über die Ergebnisse der 1. Kampagne in Ishan Bahriyat/Isin. Sumer 29, 37–46.Google Scholar
Hrouda, B., 1975. Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ergebnisse der 2. Ausgrabungs-Kampagne in Ischan Bahriyat-Isin. Sumer 31, 25–32.Google Scholar
Hrouda, B., and Karstens, K., 1967. Zur inneren Chronologie des Friedhofes “A” in Ingharra/Chursagkalamma bei Kish. ZA N.F. 24, 256–267.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T., 1957. Early political development in Mesopotamia. ZA 52, 91–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, M., 1953. Textes commerciaux de Lagash. RA 48, 57–69.Google Scholar
Langdon, S., 1924. Excavations at Kish I, 1923–4. Paris.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S., 1969. Back to Ingharra. Iraq 31, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, S., and Safar, F., 1943. Tell ‘Uqair: excavations by the Iraq Government Directorate of Antiquities in 1940–41. JNES 2, 131–158.Google Scholar
Mackay, E., 1925 and 1929, Report on the Excavation of the “A” Cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia, Chicago.Google Scholar
Madhlum, T., 1960. Tell al-Wilayah. Sumer 16, 62–92.Google Scholar
McCown, D., et al., 1978. Nippur II: The North Temple and Sounding E, Chicago.Google Scholar
Mecquenem, R. de, 1905. Fouilles de Suse (MDP VIII).Google Scholar
Mecquenem, R. de, 1931. Excavations at Susa (Persia), 1930–31. Antiquity 15, 330–343.Google Scholar
Mecquenem, R. de, 1934. Fouilles de Suse (MDP XXV).Google Scholar
Moon, J. A., 1981. Upright-handled jars and stemmed dishes: some new Early Dynastic pottery. Iraq 43, 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S., 1966. A re-consideration of the excavations on Tell Ingharra (East Kish) 1923–33. Iraq 28, 18–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S., 1970. Cemetery “A” at Kish, grave groups and chronology. Iraq 32, 86–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S., 1979. Kish Excavations 1923–33, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nissen, H. J., 1966. Zur Datierung des Königsfriedhqfes von Ur, Berlin.Google Scholar
Parrot, A., 1935. Les Fouilles de Mari, ière Campagne. Syria 16, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrot, A., 1956. Le Temple d'Ishtar (Mission de Mari I), Paris.Google Scholar
Parrot, A., 1967. Les Temples d'Ishtarat et de Ninni-Zaza (Mission de Mari III), Paris.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N., 1976. Inscriptions from Tell al-Wilayah. Sumer 32, 77–100.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N., and Watson, P. (ed)., 1979. Excavations in Iraq 1977–1978. Iraq 41, 141–181.Google Scholar
Rashid, S. A., 1963. Die Ausgrabungen von Tell al-Wilayah und die Bedeutung ihrer Rollsiegel. Sumer 19, 82–106.Google Scholar
Watelin, L. C., 1930. Excavations at Kish III, Paris.Google Scholar
Watelin, L. C., 1934. Excavations at Kish IV, Paris.Google Scholar
Whelan, E., 1978. Dating the A cemetery at Kish, a Reconsideration. JFA 5, 79–96.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L., 1934. Ur Excavations II, the Royal Cemetery, London/Philadelphia.Google Scholar