Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T17:25:33.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chronology of the Royal Cemetery of Ur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Susan Pollock
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study of chronology is little but a dry exercise when undertaken for its own sake alone. Yet, there can be little doubt that it remains a necessary prelude to virtually all of the more interesting analyses of social, political, economic, and other issues which archaeologists may seek to address. It is in this spirit that I would like to present a reevaluation of the internal chronology of the Royal Cemetery of Ur which has formed the basis of my ongoing research into various sociological aspects of the cemetery.

The Royal Cemetery constitutes a vast body of data, largely without parallel in Mesopotamia. Well excavated and reported for its time (Woolley, 1934, 1955), it contained more than 2,000 burials, many of them with lavish sets of material accompaniments. The so-called Royal Tombs, from which the cemetery derives its name, contain, in addition to vast quantities of material wealth, the bodies of anywhere from a few to more than 70 individuals accompanying the principal occupant of each tomb. Although the most spectacular graves all appear to date to the earliest portion of the cemetery's use, burials continued to be made in the cemetery, apparently without interruption, for some 500 years.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 47 , 1985 , pp. 129 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet, P., 1980. La glyptique mésopotamienne archaïque. Paris.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M., 1965. Die Entwicklung der Glyptik während der Akkad-Zeit. Berlin.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M., 1969. Zur Glyptik zwischen Mesilim- und Akkad-Zeit (Early Dynastie III). ZA 59, 261–92.Google Scholar
Boese, J., 1978. Mesanepada und der Schatz von Mari. ZA 68, 6–33.Google Scholar
Bottéro, J., 1967. The First Semitic Empire. In Bottéro, J., Cassin, E., and Vercoutter, J. (eds.), The Near East: The Early Civilizations. New York.Google Scholar
Buchanan, B., 1954. The Date of the So-Called Second Dynasty Graves of the Royal Cemetery of Ur. JAOS 74, 147–53.Google Scholar
Buchanan, B., 1966. Review of Die Entwicklung der Glyptik während der Akkad-Zeit. AJA 70, 288–90.Google Scholar
Collon, D., 1982. Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum, Cylinder Seals II: Akkadian—Post-Akkadian—Ur III Periods. London.Google Scholar
Cooper, J., 1980. Studies in Mesopotamian Lapidary Inscriptions II. RA 74, 101–10.Google Scholar
Cowgill, G., 1972. Models, methods and techniques for seriation. In Clarke, D. (ed.), Models in Archaeology. London.Google Scholar
Crawford, H., 1977. The Architecture of Iraq in the Third Millennium B.C. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Delougaz, P., 1952. Pottery from the Diyala Region. OIP LXIII. Chicago.Google Scholar
Drennan, R., 1976. Fabrica San José and Middle Formative Society in the Valley of Oaxaca. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, no. 8. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Forest, J.-D., 1983. Les pratiques funéraires en Mésopotamie du 5e millénaire au début du 3e, étude de cas. Paris.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG., 1972. Umm el-Jir, a Town in Akkad. JNES 31, 237–94.Google Scholar
Guttman, L., 1968. A General Nonmetric Technique for Finding the Smallest Space for a Configuration of Points. Psychometrika 33 (4), 469–506.Google Scholar
Hall, H. R. H., and Woolley, C. L., 1927. Ur Excavations vol. I: Al-‘Ubaid. London.Google Scholar
Hansen, D., 1965. The Relative Chronology of Mesopotamia Part II. The Pottery Sequence at Nippur from the Middle Uruk to the End of the Old Babylonian Period (3400–1600 B.C.). In Ehrich, R. (ed.), Chronologies in Old World Archaeology. Chicago.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T., 1939. The Sumerian King List. Chicago.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G., 1971. Seriation from Abundance Matrices. In Hodson, F. R., Kendall, D. G., and Tautu, P. (eds.), Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J., 1964a. Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis. Psychometrika 29 (1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J., 1964b. Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: a Numerical Method. Psychometrika 29 (2), 115–29.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J., 1971. Multidimensional Scaling in Archaeology: Time is Not the Only Dimension. In Hodson, F. R., Kendall, D. G., and Tautu, P. (eds.), Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Lingoes, J., 1973. The Guttman-Lingoes Nonmetric Program Series. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Mackay, E., 1925. Report on the Excavation of the “A” Cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia, Part I. (Field Museum of Natural History, Anthropology Memoirs I). Chicago.Google Scholar
Martin, H., 1982. The Early Dynastic Cemetery at Al-‘Ubaid, A Re-evaluation. Iraq 44, 145–85.Google Scholar
Moon, J., 1980. Some New Early Dynastic Pottery From Abu Salabikh. Iraq 42, 47–75.Google Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S., 1970. Cemetery A at Kish: Grave Groups and Chronology. Iraq 32, 86–128.Google Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S., 1977. What do we know about the people buried in the Royal Cemetery? Expedition 20, 24–40.Google Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S., 1978. Kish Excavations 1923–1933. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nissen, H., 1966. Zur Datierung des Königsfriedhofes von Ur. Bonn.Google Scholar
Pollock, S., 1983. The Symbolism of Prestige: An Archaeological Example from the Royal Cemetery of Ur. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Porada, E., 1965. The Relative Chronology of Mesopotamia, Part I. Seals and Trade (6000–1600 B.C.). In Ehrich, R. (ed.), Chronologies in Old World Archaeology. Chicago.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N., 1977. Excavations at Abu Salabikh, 1976. Iraq 39, 269–99.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N., and Moorey, P. R. S., 1976. Excavations at Abu Salabikh, 1975. Iraq 38, 133–69.Google Scholar
Shepard, R., 1972. Introduction. In Shepard, R., Romney, A. K., and Nerlove, S. (eds.), Multidimensional Scaling Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences vol. 1. New York.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E., and Kupper, J.-R., 1971. Inscriptions royales sumériennes et akkadiennes. Paris.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, V., 1983. Ceramics, Chronology, and Community Patterns: An Archaeological Study at Moundville. New York.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L., 1929. Excavations at Ur, 1928–9. AJ 9, 305–43.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L., 1934. Ur Excavations vol. II: The Royal Cemetery. London.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L., 1955. Ur Excavations vol. IV: The Early Periods. London.Google Scholar
Wright, H. T., 1969. The Administration of Rural Production in an Early Mesopotamian Town. Anthropological Papers of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, no. 38. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar